(901) SHASHIDHAR KORRAPATI Vs. M/S. BINDU HOMES PVT. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 24-A — Limitation — Cause of action accrual — Deficiency in service — Complaint filed beyond two years from the date of possession and transfer deeds — Complaint held to be time-barred. India Law Library Docid # 2401431
(902) ASIT KUMAR MANDAL - PETITIONER(S) Vs. STATION MANAGER, WBSEDCL AND ANOTHER - RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 19 — Revisionary jurisdiction — Electricity dispute — Consumer challenged electricity bill — State Commission set aside District Forum order on grounds of non-approach to RGRO and lack of expert report — Petitioner argued State Commission erred in appreciation of evidence and jurisdictional grounds — Petitioner also contended failure to record meter readings regularly constitutes deficiency in service — Petitioner argued State Commission incorrectly relied India Law Library Docid # 2401424
(903) VIJAY LAKSHMI PUROHIT - PETITIONER(S) Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA - RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revisionary jurisdiction of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission — Concurrent findings of fact by lower fora — Limited scope of interference — Re-agitation of issues already decided by District Forum and State Commission without evidence of jurisdictional error or material irregularity on the part of the lower fora warrants dismissal of the revision petition. India Law Library Docid # 2401425
(904) DR. NARENDRA SINGH GILL - PETITIONER Vs. AMRI DEVI (DEAD) AND OTHERS THROUGH LRS - RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-12-2023 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 22 Rules 1, 3, 11 — Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Section 306 — Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Complaint for medical negligence and compensation — Abatement of proceedings upon death of complainant — Right to sue for personal injuries not causing death does not survive to legal representatives — Consumer complaint alleging medical negligence and seeking compensation survives on the death of the complainant during the pendency of proceedings — Legal heirs have India Law Library Docid # 2401426
(905) HARE RAM RAY AND OTHERS - COMPLAINANT(S) Vs. ADEL LANDMARKS LTD. - OPP.PARTY(S)[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12(1)(c) — Complaint filed on behalf of numerous individuals with a common cause of action — Permission granted. India Law Library Docid # 2401422
(906) KUSUM JAIN - PETITIONER(S) Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. -RESPONDENT(S)[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Appeal against State Commission's order Allows insurer's appeal, sets aside District Forum's award of damages and repairs for insured car after accident. India Law Library Docid # 2401423
(907) AMAR SINGH - PETITIONER Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS - RESPONDENT(S)[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Setting aside of State Commission's order — Reinstatement of District Forum's order — Petitioner filed revision against State Commission order which had set aside District Forum order allowing complaint — Court to examine whether Insurance Company was justified in repudiating claim due to fake driving license and whether there was willful negligence by complainant in employing the driver. India Law Library Docid # 2401417
(908) DR. ADIT DEY - PETITIONER Vs. SRI DURGA CHARAN SHEE AND OTHERS - RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Scope of revisional jurisdiction of National Commission is limited — Can only interfere if State Commission exercised jurisdiction not vested, failed to exercise vested jurisdiction, or acted illegally or with material irregularity — Concurrent findings on appreciation of evidence by lower fora cannot be interfered with. India Law Library Docid # 2401418
(909) RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. BALBIR KAUR[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revisionary Jurisdiction — Scope — Limited — Exerciseable only in case of jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or illegal or irregular exercise of jurisdiction — State Commission's order requiring interference only if prima facie jurisdictional error is apparent. India Law Library Docid # 2401232
(910) CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIA AIRLINES & 2 OTHERS Vs. C.V. JOSEPH, MANAGER (RETIRED) SYNDICATE BANK, & 3 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision against State Commission order — Delay in filing revision petition — Condonation of delay — Allowed in the interest of justice due to cross revision petitions being considered on merits and common issues. India Law Library Docid # 2401231
(911) CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIA AIRLINES AND OTHERS –PETITIONER Vs. C.V. JOSEPH, MANAGER (RETIRED) SYNDICATE BANK AND OTHERS – RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Sections 21(b), 2(r), 14(1)(c) & (d) — Revision Petitions against State Commission's order — Merger of Revision Petitions for common adjudication — Delay in filing Revision Petition condoned in the interest of justice due to cross Rps being taken up on merits and common issues — Order of District Forum allowing complaint modified by State Commission increasing compensation — OPs challenged State Commission's order for setting aside, Complainants sought enhancement India Law Library Docid # 2401416
(912) CHANDRASHEKHAR EXPORTS PVT. LTD. - PETITIONER Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. - RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 19 & 21 — Revision Petition — Jurisdiction — The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) has the power to entertain revision petitions against orders passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions. India Law Library Docid # 2401419
(913) SATNAM SINGH Vs. AEGON RELIGARE LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Scope — National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) not to interfere with the findings of facts of the lower fora unless perverse or based on no evidence. India Law Library Docid # 2401420
(914) CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR INDIA AIRLINES AND OTHER – PETITIONER Vs. C.V. JOSEPH, MANAGER (RETIRED) SYNDICATE BANK, AND OTHERS - RESPONDENT(S)[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Jurisdiction of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission — Powers of revision against State Commission's order — Scope limited to material irregularities or non-compliance with law — Not an appellate forum. India Law Library Docid # 2401421
(915) GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY - PETITIONER(S) Vs. HIMANSHU BOHRA - RESPONDENT(S)[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revisionary Jurisdiction — National Commission's power to interfere with concurrent findings of forums is limited — Interference is permissible only in cases of patent illegality, material irregularity, or jurisdictional error — Re-appreciation of evidence or challenging concurrent findings on already raised grounds does not warrant interference. India Law Library Docid # 2401412
(916) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA - PETITIONER Vs. HEMA AGARWAL AND ANOTHER - RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Delay — Condonation of delay justified due to office shifting and procedural steps, despite clerical errors in application — Delay of 580 days condoned with costs of Rs. 1.00 lakh. India Law Library Docid # 2401413
(917) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA - PETITIONER Vs. GUDIYA DEVI - RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2023 Limitation — Condonation of Delay — Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (or relevant earlier Act) — Revision Petition — Petitioner sought condonation of delay of 157 days in filing Revision Petition against State Commission's order — Grounds cited included processing delays, obtaining necessary documents (FIR, Charge-Sheet), and translation issues — Commission analyzed principles for condonation of delay based on Supreme Court judgments in Basawaraj, Esha Bhattacharjee, Office of the Chief Post Master India Law Library Docid # 2401414
(918) M/S. EICHER MOTORS LTD. – PETITIONER Vs. AVINASH SHETYE AND ANOTHER – RESPONDENT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Scope — Highlighting that the present Commission is not a appellate forum but a revisional forum, which means it can only interfere with the order of the lower forum if it is illegal, irregular, or improper, and not on the basis of factual disputes unless there is a perversity. India Law Library Docid # 2401415
(919) PRAGATI PAPERS INDUSTRIES KALAAMB DISTT.SIRMOUR H.P. THR M.D. AND OTHERS Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. THR BRANCH MANAGER NARAINGARH DISTT.AMBALA AND OTHERS[HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Complaint — Dismissal of — Insurance claim — Flood loss alleging — Court found no evidence of flood in the locality on the day of the alleged incident — Valuation report invalid due to lack of evidence — Insurance company's surveyor report stating no flood confirmed — District Consumer Commission's order directing payment set aside. India Law Library Docid # 2400974
(920) SMT. SONALI CHATTERJEE W/O SRI JAYANTA CHATTERJEE Vs. MRS. SUMITRA HALDER AND OTHERS[WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-12-2023 Consumer Protection Act, Section 17(1)(a)(i) — Deficiency in Service — Joint Venture Agreement — Landowner and Developer Agreement — Developer's Obligation to Construct and Hand Over Flat — Complaint for Refund of Earnest Money — Developer's Rights under Agreement — Buyer's Payment of Earnest Money as per Agreement — Delayed Construction — Death of Developer — Legal Heirs' Liability — Consumer Forum's Role in Redressal. India Law Library Docid # 2401004