ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(901) SUMAN SHARMA & OTHERS Vs. M/S. AYUSHMAN HOSPITAL & OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023
The present Complaint has been filed under Section 21(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, the Act 1986) by the Complainant - Suman Sharma & 3 Ors. against the Opposite Parties - M/s. Ayushman Hospital & its 2 doctors for the alleged medical negligence and wrong treatment which resulted into untimely death of the kin of the Complainants.
India Law Library Docid # 1882144

(902) BAJAJ CAPITAL LIMITED Vs. SUNITA TAK & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023
This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Opposite Party No. 2 against Respondents /Complainants and Opposite Parties Nos. 1 & 3 challenging the impugned Order dated 09.01.2017 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur, Rajasthan, in First Appeal bearing No. 890 of 2016. Vide such order, the State Commission dismissed the Appeal at the stage of admission while upholding the Order dated 30.03.2016 passed by the District Consumer Protection Forum, Ajmer, in Compla
India Law Library Docid # 1882147

(903) SMT. PARAMJEET KAUR Vs. DR. S.K. BANSAL & OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023
This complaint has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Mrs. Paramjeet Kaur, the widow of late Rajinder Singh, (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) against the Maharaja Agarsain Hospital (OP-2), Dr. S.K. Bansal (OP-1), Dr. Kailash Nath Singla (OP-3) & Sunder Lal Jain Hospital (OP-4), for the alleged medical negligence caused by OPs, resulting in the death of the Complainants husband.
India Law Library Docid # 1882167

(904) RAJENDRA SADANAND JUJARE & 2 OTHERS Vs. DR. LATA M. PATIL & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023
The present Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Naveen Chillai, the GPA holder for the Complainants (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) against the Mitanshu Polyclinic & Hospital (OP-2), Dr. Lata M. Patil Gynecologist and Obstetrician (OP-1) & Dr. Mali-Anaesthetist (OP-3) for the alleged medical negligence.
India Law Library Docid # 1882169

(905) SURESH KUMAR PROPRIETOR JAI DURGA POLYMERS Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023
This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant against Respondent / Opposite Party challenging the impugned Order dated 09.04.2018 passed by the State Commission, Delhi, in First Appeal bearing No. 229 of 2015. Vide such Order, the State Commission allowed the Appeal while setting aside the Order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-VI, I.P. Estate, New Delhi in Case No. CC/689/10.
India Law Library Docid # 1882185

(906) M/S. GAGAN RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHER [CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023
This complaint, under section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been filed by the complainant alleging unfair trade practice and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties in not paying the amount of its insurance claim and seeking directions to them for payment of loss suffered due to spontaneous combustion in the sponge iron stock of Rs.29,70,000/-(Twenty Nine Lacs Seventy Thousand) along with interest @ 18% p.a. from the
India Law Library Docid # 1882204

(907) THE AUTHORISED SIGNATORY CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS Vs. THE PRINCIPAL MEMS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL AND OTHERS [KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023
This is an appeal filed under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 against the order in C.C. No. 232/2022 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Malappuram (District Commission for short). As per the order dated 10.03.2023, the District Commission allowed the complaint and the opposite parties were directed as under:
India Law Library Docid # 1881915

(908) MADHULEKHA SAWHNEY Vs. M/S. SHIPRA ESTATE LTD. & JAI KRISHAN ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023
Madhulekha Sawhney has filed CC/89/2017 for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover possession of the flat allotted to her, complete in all respect within reasonable period and execute Flat Buyers Agreement and Maintenance Agreement, in her favour; (ii) pay delay compensation in the form of interest @21% per annum on his deposit from March, 2009 till actual handing over possession; (iii) restrain the opposite parties from charging interest on the balance amount for delayed or deferred per
India Law Library Docid # 1882138

(909) ROSHNI KHANNA & ANOTHER Vs. M/S. SHIPRA ESTATE LTD. & JAI KRISHAN ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023
Smt. Roshni Khanna and Rajesh Khanna have filed CC/844/2016, for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover possession of the flat allotted to them, complete in all respect within reasonable period and execute Flat Buyers Agreement and Maintenance Agreement, in their favour; (ii) pay delay compensation in the form of interest @21% per annum on their deposit from January, 2009 till actual handing over possession; (iii) restrain the opposite parties from charging interest on the balance amount
India Law Library Docid # 1882152

(910) M/S. RAMDEV SUGAR PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023
The OP in their written statement/reply stated that the complainant obtained standard fire special perils policy bearing No. 19130331118P101192468. The policy was valid from 23.04.2018 to 22.04.2019. On 06.08.2018 during the evening hours, they noticed smoke coming out of the molasses tank No. 15 located at the open yard within the factory premises. The OP further stated that within the next few days it was noticed that the level of molasses rising in the tank due to increase in volume and event
India Law Library Docid # 1882170

(911) SATYAPRAKASH JAIN S/O. R.L. JAIN Vs. M/S. IVR PRIME URBAN DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023
Satya Prakash Jain has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) deliver possession of built-up area of his share as per Development Agreement dated 20.04.2007; (ii) pay Rs.5000000/- as compensation for deficiency in service; (iii) pay Rs.100000/- as the costs of litigation; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 1882175

(912) SUNIL KUMAR S/O SHRI GOPAL SINGH Vs. M/S. ADANI M2K PROJECTS LLP AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023
Sunil Kumar has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.18593465/- with interest @18% per annum, from the date of deposit till the date of refund; (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) pay Rs.one lac, as costs of the litigation; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 1882184

(913) TEJINDER SINGH Vs. M/S. SHIPRA ESTATE LTD. AND JAI KRISHAN ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023
Tejinder Singh has filed CC/600/2016 for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover possession of the flat allotted to him, complete in all respect within reasonable period and execute Flat Buyers Agreement and Maintenance Agreement, in his favour; (ii) pay delay compensation in the form of interest @21% per annum on his deposit from March, 2009 till actual handing over possession; (iii) restrain the opposite parties from charging interest on the balance amount for delayed or deferred period
India Law Library Docid # 1882227

(914) SATPAL SINGH Vs. M/S EMERGING VALLEY PRIVATE LIMITED [CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023
This complaint has been filed by the complainant, seeking possession of the plots alongwith adequate interest on the amount paid till the time possession is handed over or in alternative, refund the total amount(s) paid i.e. Rs.74,40,000/- alongwith adequate interest; compensation of Rs.5 Lakhs on account of mental agony and harassment and Rs.1 Lakh towards litigation, as he is aggrieved of deficiency in providing service, negligence and adoption of unfair trade practice on the part of the oppos
India Law Library Docid # 1882263

(915) SUNDAR SINGH Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-05-2023
We have heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant (the complainant) and the learned counsel for the respondent (the insurance co.). We have also perused the record, including inter alia the State Commissions impugned Order dated 26.02.2019 and the memorandum of appeal.
India Law Library Docid # 1882145

(916) KAMLESH W/O. SH. RAM KARAN DALAL Vs. M/S. BPTP LIMITED & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-05-2023
This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant against Respondents / Opposite Parties challenging the impugned Order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula, Haryana, in First Appeal bearing No. 770 of 2016. Vide such Order, the State Commission dismissed the Appeal while upholding the Order dated 26.07.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad in Consumer Complaint No. 251/2011.
India Law Library Docid # 1882172

(917) SUNIL KUMAR S/O BIHARI PERJAPATI AND OTHERS Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-05-2023
These two (02 nos.) Revision Petitions under Section 21(b) of the Act 1986 are in challenge to the Order dated 05.02.2013 of the State Commission in Appeals No. 04 and No. 05 of 2013 arising out of the Order dated 28.08.2012 of the District Commission in Complaints No. 86 and No. 87 of 2011. The Revision Petitions were dismissed, with reasoned judgment to follow. This Order gives the reasons.
India Law Library Docid # 1882179

(918) BERKELEY HYUNDAI (BERK AUTO LLP) Vs. SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA AND OTHERS [CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-05-2023
Arguments on these applications were heard. For the reasons stated in the respective applications, delay of 153 days (M.A. No. 08 of 2023) in FA No.03 of 2023 (Berkley Hyundai (Berk Auto LLP)); and delay of 83 days (M.A. No. 883 of 2022) in FA No.167 of 2022 (Hyundai Motor India Ltd. and anr.) is condoned and the said applications are disposed of accordingly.
India Law Library Docid # 1881917

(919) AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PRIVATE LTD Vs. ANEES A K AND OTHERS [KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-05-2023
This is an appeal filed by the first opposite party in C.C. No. 446/2015 before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Malappuram (District Commission for short). As per the order dated 17.02.2016 the District Commission allowed the complaint and directed the opposite parties to pay jointly and severally, an amount of Rs. 3,380/- being the value of the article along with a compensation of Rs. 10,000/- and costs of Rs. 3,000/- to the complainant, failing which opposite party shall be liable
India Law Library Docid # 1881925

(920) THE BRANCH MANAGER SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SYED HAYATHPEER HUSSENI [KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-05-2023
This Appeal filed by OP under Section 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, aggrieved by an order dated 12.01.2017, passed in CC/62/2016 by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Koppal (herein after referred as District Forum/Commission and the parties arrayed as in the consumer complaint). Commission examined grounds of appeal, impugned order, appeal papers and heard learned counsels. Complainant raised Consumer Complaint before the Forum below alleging deficiency in service on the part of
India Law Library Docid # 1882275