(901) MS. REENA MITTAL Vs. SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL & OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The present Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Smt. Reena Bansal through her husband Ankur Goel (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) against the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (OP-2) & Dr. S. S. Saha-Sr. Consultant (Dept. of Plastic Surgery) - (OP-2) for the alleged medical negligence caused to the Complainant which rendered her permanently disabled, bed ridden and in a vegetative state. India Law Library Docid # 1882150
(902) RENU SHARMA Vs. U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 This revision petition under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (in short, State Commission) in Appeal No. 2821 of 1999 dated 21.01.2014 arising out of order dated 26.04.1999 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ballia (in short, District Forum) in Consumer Complaint No. 140 of 1998. India Law Library Docid # 1882151
(903) PARIKSHIT DALAL & OTHERS Vs. SANTOSH HOSPITAL & 11 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 Deaths due to anaphylactic shock are uncommon and it is a diagnosis based on findings which may not always be present and as such poses challenges for the forensic pathologist or an expert in reaching certainty with regard to the cause of death. A holistic view that all findings need to be considered in the approach to reach a definitive cause of death. India Law Library Docid # 1882154
(904) SMT. SABITARI AGARWAL Vs. TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The present Appeal is directed against the order dated 26.06.2012 passed by Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, the State Commission) at Mumbai in Complaint Case No. CC/09/54, whereby the State Commission dismissed the complaint filed by the Appellant. India Law Library Docid # 1882163
(905) RAMNARAYAN PANDEY S/O. BRAHMESHWAR PANDEY Vs. SUPERITENDENT, RED CROSS SPECIALITIES POLYCLINIC & 5 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The Appellant/Complainant has filed the instant Appeal under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the Act), against the Order dated 23.02.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar (for short the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 30 of 2014, wherein the State Commission, dismissed the Complaint. India Law Library Docid # 1882171
(906) SUBHASH S Vs. DR. PRADEEP GK AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 24.03.2021 of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram (in short, the State Commission) in RP no. 06 of 2021 arising from the order dated 28.01.2021 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Vazhuthacaud, Thiruvananthapuram (in short, the District Forum) in IA no. 25 of 2020 in CC no. 323 of 2017. India Law Library Docid # 1882178
(907) UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF POST & 3 OTHERS Vs. J.P SINGH [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-05-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed against the Order dated 07.06.2022 of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Lucknow (for short the State Commission) in Appeal No. 1603 of 2008, whereby the Appeal was dismissed and the Order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Azamgarh (for short the District Forum) dated 18.07.2008 in Consumer Complaint No. 144 of 2006 was confirmed. India Law Library Docid # 1882166
(908) DEVENDRA KUMAR GOEL Vs. THE CHIEF MANAGER, MR. MOHIT BURMAN (CHAIRMAN) [CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-05-2023 This appeal has been filed by the decree holder/complainant Sh. Devendra Kumar Goel (appellant herein) against order dated 13.12.2022 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh (in short District Commission), whereby, Execution Application No.151 of 2018 filed by him has been dismissed by the District Commission. The issue before the District Commission for consideration was that whether the decree holder/complainant had been able to prove beyond reasonable dou India Law Library Docid # 1882233
(909) CHITRALEKHAMISRA Vs. SUBHADRA BATH PLAZA AND OTHER [ODISHA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-05-2023 Captioned appeal is filed u/s 15 of the erstwhile Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter called the Act). Parties to this appeal shall be referred to with reference to their respective status before the District Forum. The factual matrix leading to the case of the complainant is that on 23.11.2011, the complainant had purchased one V-Guard solar water heater system at the cost of Rs. 19,500/- vide Annexure-1 from O.P.No.1 who is the authorised dealer of the O.P.No.2 Company. The system has t India Law Library Docid # 1882251
(910) The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Sub-Regional Office Vs. Mr Md. Abdul Nayeem Major and others [KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 These Appeals are filed under Section 15 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 by the OP, aggrieved by the Orders dated 17.12.2013 and 10.12.2013 in Consumer Complaint Nos.268/2013, 270/2013 and 185/2013 respectively on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bellary (for short, the District Forum). Since the facts and law involved in all these cases are one and the same, they have been taken up together for consideration. India Law Library Docid # 1882086
(911) ANUBHAB CONSTRUCTION Vs. CITY STAR GANGULY PROJECTS LLP [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 Anubhab Construction (a Partnership Firm, registered Indian Partnership Act, 1932) has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) handover possession of the flats and car parking spaces as allocated to its share under Development Agreement dated 16.01.2013 and Supplementary Agreement dated 13.01.2015, forthwith; (ii) allow the complainant to enter the site of the project; (iii) obtain completion certificate of the project from competent authority; (iv) pay Rs.50000/-, per mon India Law Library Docid # 1882106
(912) BUILD INDIA & ANOTHER Vs. SHOBHA SHRIVASTAVA & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 This revision petition under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Circuit Bench at Nagpur (in short, State Commission) in First Appeal No. A/02/768 dated 19.12.2012 arising out of order dated 22.03.2002 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur (in short, District Forum) in Complaint No. 360 of 1995. India Law Library Docid # 1882148
(913) BRANCH MANAGER, BELLAD ENGINEERING CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. S. HANUMANTHAPPA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners against the order dated 28.02.2023 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karanataka (for short the State Commission) in Appeal No.1472 of 2014 filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 15.07.2014 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chitradurga (for short the District Forum) in Complaint No.02/2014 filed by the Complainant (Respondent No.1 herein). The Appeal was dismissed on the ground that the Pe India Law Library Docid # 1882156
(914) DR.VENKAT M.VENKATESAN Vs. M/S.LAND MARVEL HOMES [TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 The complainant has filed this complaint against the OP inter alia stating that his family owned the property measuring 9630 sq. ft. situated in Block No.113 & T.S. No.7045, Plot No.18, New Door No.50/Old No.18, Raman Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-17; that the OP/Promoter approached them for development of the said property by constructing residential flats with due permission from the authorities concerned; that both sides agreed for the same and, in that regard, they entered into an agreement, date India Law Library Docid # 1882202
(915) MR. ASHOKKUMAR C. TAMANCHE Vs. AVIVA LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. [GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 The Complainant is a real brother of the original policy holder i.e. Dieseased Life Assured-DLA, named as Bhupatbhai Chhanalal Tamanche and complainant is residing at above mentioned address with his family. It is the case of Complainant that the DLA has taken one Life insurance policy from the opponent Aviva Life Insurance Co. Ltd. and that policy was issued by the opponent company with Policy numbered as 10142514. For getting that policy the L.A. has preferred a proposal form through the agent India Law Library Docid # 1882211
(916) TUSHAR KANTI THANDAR Vs. SOURENDRA NATH SHEE [WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 The facts of the case, in brief, are that an appeal has been filed by the appellant/complainant (hereinafter referred to as complainant) before the concerned Ld. District Commission against the respondent/OP (hereinafter referred to as OP) alleging deficiency in service. The complainant was an unemployed youth. From a reliable so he came to know that the OP was providing vocational tuition and running a placement agency for Government and Non-Government jobs. Being so heard, the complainant cont India Law Library Docid # 1882268
(917) DEVKINANDAN S/O BRIJMOHAN Vs. MANAGER, AGRICULTURE INSURANCE COMPANY OF INDIA LTD., AND OTHERS [MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2023 Alleging deficiency in service on the part of the respondents in not granting him compensation for the crop insured by him with the first respondent through the second respondent / Bank, the appellant / complainant had filed a complaint case No.29/2017 under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Guna (for short the District Commission). The District Commission vide impugned order dated 2.8.2017 dismissed the complaint. Feeling India Law Library Docid # 1881914
(918) HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE CO.LTD. Vs. SMT. SAVITRI VIJAY BHOSLE [MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2023 Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order passed in Consumer Complaint No.289 of 2015 dated 30/01/2017 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolhapur, the original opponent has preferred this appeal. India Law Library Docid # 1882107
(919) SARBANI CHATTERJEE Vs. BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & 4 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2023 This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant against the Respondents/Opposite Parties challenging the impugned Order dated 30.11.2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, in First Appeal No. A/1416/2014. Vide such Order, the State Commission allowed the Appeal while setting aside the Order dated 31.10.2014 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, North 24 Pgs, Barasat, in Consumer Complaint Case No. 665/2013. India Law Library Docid # 1882131
(920) ANINDYA CHATTERJEE AND ANOTHER Vs. LORD REALTY PVT. LTD. [WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2023 The complainants have filed the instant case under Section 17(1)(a)(i) of the CP Act, 1986, against the OPs alleging deficiency in service. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainants being husband and wife have wanted to purchase a residential plot for their residential accommodation. With such intention, the complainants approached the OP No. 1 who was developing and demarcating the residential plots in the name and style of Lord City Sonarpur wherein residential bungalows were India Law Library Docid # 1882249