ive
THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(901) M/S GVR COLD STORAGE Vs. M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-01-2023
Based on the intimation received, the opposite party appointed M/s Rank Surveyors Pvt. Ltd., who visited the site on 09.07.2011 and 10.07.2011. The surveyor inspected the premises and the complainant furnished various documents sought by them on 13.09.2011. The complainant filed two claim forms for damaged stocks. Rs.1,33,91,310/- was claimed for the stock and Rs.4,40,06,339/- for building, machinery and other equipments.
India Law Library Docid # 1867612

(902) TASTE'L FINE FOODS PVT. LTD. Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-01-2023
The Complainant deals in manufacturing, processing packaging and storage of frozen Indian breads, frozen snacks, ready to cook/bake food, ambient staple ready to eat meals, ready to cook sauces, pastes and condiments. Almost all products manufactured by the Complainant are exported. The Complainant has two units (i) for production of ready to eat products (hereinafter referred to as Unit-1) and (ii) for manufacturing and stocking of frozen food products (hereinafter referred to as Unit-2).
India Law Library Docid # 1881911

(903) M/S.GOODYEAR INDIA LTD. Vs. SHRI BABAN GANPAT SHINDE AND OTHERS [MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-01-2023
Appellant M/s. Goodyear India Ltd., has preferred the present appeal feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 15/03/2002 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Satara in Complaint No.7 of 2001, whereby the learned District Consumer Commission allowed the complaint filed by the respondent/original complainant - Shri Baban Ganpat Shinde and directed the appellant/original opponent no.3 along with other opponents to replace the tyres of tractor and also to pay compe
India Law Library Docid # 1882193

(904) M/S. ARYAN LIFESTYLES PVT. LTD Vs. SAMEER NAYYAR AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-01-2023
The appeal is listed for final hearing. No one appears for the respondents despite service. We do not see any good reason to delay the hearing any further and deem it appropriate to decide the matter on its merits. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and have perused the record.
India Law Library Docid # 1867606

(905) AKSHAY GUPTA AND ANOTHER Vs. ICICI BANK LIMITED AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 02-01-2023
The complainants stated that ICICI Bank Limited (opposite party-1) (the bank) was a banking company, incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in the business of providing loans against property, home loans, financial assistance etc. to the general public. Rajesh Lifespaces Private Limited and Rajsanket Realty Limited (opposite parties-2 and 3) (the builders) were the companies,
India Law Library Docid # 1867572

(906) SHYAM FERRO ALLOYS LTD Vs. NEW INDIAASSURNACE CO. LTD AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-12-2022
Shyam Ferro Alloys Limited (the Insured) has filed above complaint, for directing The New India Assurance Company Limited (the Insurer) to pay (i) Rs.16979277/- with interest @21% per annum from 18.11.2004 till the date of payment, towards insurance claim, (ii) Rs.15/- lakhs, as compensation for business loss and mental agony, (iii) Cost of litigation; and (iv) Any other relief, which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 1867598

(907) M/S M.R.F. LTD. Vs. THE BRANCH MANAGER M/S LALJI MULJI TRANSPORT CO. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-12-2022
This complaint was earlier dismissed vide order dated 11.05.2012. And said order was challenged before the Hon'ble National Commission by the complainant by filing First Appeal no. 465 of 2012. The Appeal before the Hon'ble National Commission has been decided vide order dated 02.07.2022. The matter was remanded back with the following observations.
India Law Library Docid # 1873274

(908) AKBAR SHAIKH AND ANOTHER Vs. INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-12-2022
In March, 2007, loan in the sum of Rs.49,00,000/- was disbursed to the complainants to be repaid in 144 equated monthly instalments (EMI) of Rs.71,974/- per month. Accordingly, the EMIs started in April 2007, and first EMI was paid on 05.04.2007. However, the pre-EMIs were also paid in January, February and March,2007. In June, 2007, the OP increased the EMI amount to Rs.75,197/- from Rs.71974/-.
India Law Library Docid # 1867575

(909) GOLD PLUS GLASS INDUSTRY LTD Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-12-2022
In brief, the facts of the case as stated by the complainant are that the complainant under a contract with China Quinhuangdao Yaohua Glass Machine company (in short, Yaohua) is the manufacturer of float glass in Roorkee, Uttarakhand. The complainant took an Industrial All Risk Policy for the float glass line factory from 2006 till 2013. Policy no. 112000/11/12/06/00001558 was issued on 01.02.2013 for a sum of Rs 812 crores
India Law Library Docid # 1867583

(910) MANGLORE CITY CORPORATION LALBAGH Vs. F.C. FERNANDES AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-12-2022
This revision petition filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula (in short, State Commission) in First Appeal No. 150 of 2011 dated 25.07.2012 arising out of order dated 21.09.2012 in complaint no. 379 of 2007 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sonepat (in short, District Forum).
India Law Library Docid # 1867589

(911) MANMEET KUNWAR AND TRAPTA CHAUHAN AND OTHERS. Vs. M/S. VAHE PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-12-2022
IA/16863/2018 seeking permission to proceed in representative capacity for the benefit of entire class of persons having same interest under 12 (1) (c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, was allowed and public notice in terms of Section 13(6) of the Act, read with Order 1 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure was also ordered to be published in the newspapers. Notice was issued to the opposite party on 22.04.2019 giving them 30 days time to file their written statement.
India Law Library Docid # 1867590

(912) SANJEEV KUMAR TODI Vs. VATIKA LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-12-2022
The OP had started making demands from the very date of booking. The complainant was never intimated as to the development stage of the project or regarding the date of possession. All such requests made by the complainant were ignored by the OP. The Agreement entered into between the parties is a unilateral agreement. That in case of delayed payments the OP is entitled to impose 18% interest on the delayed payments.
India Law Library Docid # 1867597

(913) AKBAR SHAIKH AND ANOTHER Vs. INDIABULLS HOUSING FINANCE LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-12-2022
That the complainants are related to each other being son and mother. OP is a Non-Banking Financial Institution. The complainant No.1 approached the OP for availing the loan in the sum of Rs.49,00,000/- from the OP to be repaid within 12 years along with 14.50% interest per annum on reducing balance. Loan agreement was signed by the complainants on 24.01.2007.
India Law Library Docid # 1867875

(914) K. K. CHATURVEDI AND OTHERS Vs. INDORE TREASURE TOWN PVT.LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-12-2022
Brief facts of the case as stated by the complainants are that the Opposite party no.1 is a company and opposite party no.2 & 3 are subsidiary companies of opposite party no.1. The opposite parties no.1, 2 & 3 owned 130-140 acres of land collectively at Village-Bijalpur A. B. Road, Indore and launched residential township in the name and style "Indore Treasure Town" and started marketing with huge publicity in newspapers and other means at the site through opposite party no.4. The opposite party
India Law Library Docid # 1873211

(915) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Vs. RAKESH KUMAR SINGHAL [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-12-2022
The petitioners/opposite parties have filed this revision petition against the order dated 24.04.2019 passed in C.C.No.202/2016 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Morena (For short 'District Commission') whereby their application dated 07.12.2018 for taking affidavit and documents on record, was dismissed by the District Commission.
India Law Library Docid # 1873248

(916) S.MOHAN SUBRAMANI Vs. THE BEML EMPLOYEES CO.OP SOCIETY LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-12-2022
The brief facts of the complaint are: The Complainant was a member of OP society and retired employee of BEML. The OP society invites applications for additional sites for its employees. Accordingly the Complainant applied for allotment of site measuring 30x50 sft. in 9th stage, BEML layout, Bengaluru on 21.09.2002 and paid Rs.1,40,000/-. Since there was lot of miscommunication and confusion in acquiring proposed land, OP stopped to demand the further instalments. As such, the Complainant since
India Law Library Docid # 1873313

(917) THE BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK Vs. PUSHPALATHA [KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-12-2022
This is an appeal filed U/s.41 of CPA 2019 by OP/Appellant aggrieved by the order dtd.18.07.2022 passed in CC/444/2021 on the file of 2nd Addl., District Commission, Bengaluru. The Commission examined the grounds of appeal, impugned order, appeal papers and heard the learned counsels.
India Law Library Docid # 1867577

(918) AXIS BANK LTD. Vs. THOMAS NINAN AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-12-2022
The present Revision Petition, under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) has been filed by the Petitioner against the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Maharashtra, Mumbai (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No.755/2014 dated 07.08.2017.
India Law Library Docid # 1867578

(919) MRS. YELLA SUNANDA AND ANOTHER. Vs. M/S. SRI DHARANI CONSTRUCTIONS AND OTHERS. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-12-2022
Present Revision Petitions under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) have arisen out of the order of the A.P. State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No. 725/2008 dated 29.12.2010.
India Law Library Docid # 1867602

(920) BADRI NARAYAN Vs. M/S. YOUNG INDIA ENGINEERS AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-12-2022
This revision petition filed under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, circuit Bench at Aurangabad (in short, State Commission) in First Appeal No. 625 of 2011 dated 20.02.2015 arising out of order dated 30.06.2010 in complaint no. 263 of 2010 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Aurangabad (in short, District Forum).
India Law Library Docid # 1867579