ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(821) GURUMOORTHY, S/O. NAGASUBRAMANIAN, HINDU Vs. THE CANARA BANK AND OTHERS [PUDUCHERRY STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-07-2023
The present complaint has been filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 for the following reliefs: (a) Directing the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.98,58,000/- (Rupees ninety eight lakhs and fifty eight thousand only) to the complainant towards deficiency in service. (b) Directing the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees fifty lakhs only) to the complainant as compensation for hardship, harassment, humiliation etc. (c) Directing the opposite parties to do i
India Law Library Docid # 1882253

(822) BHAVESH TRIBHUVAN VORALIYA Vs. MANAGER, UNION BANK OF INDIA [GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-07-2023
This complaint was filed by Mr. Bhavesh Tribhovan Voraliya, a Non-Resident Indian and permanently residing in U. K. at the address given in the cause title. The complainant had been to India for short while and during his camping, he has filed this complaint and authorized his maternal uncle Mr. Naresh M. Sinroja as power of attorney holder and empowered him to do all necessary things on his behalf for his complaint. It is say of the complainant that the grandfather of the complainant late Mr. L
India Law Library Docid # 1882279

(823) ASHISH DHINGRA AND ANOTHER Vs. EMAAR MGF LAND LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-07-2023
Heard Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate, for the complainants and Mr. Aditya Narain, Advocate, for the opposite party. Ashish Dhingra and Rishi Pahuja have filed above complaint for directing the opposite party to (i) refund Rs.9052908/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of realization; (ii) pay Rs.1500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) pay Rs.200000/- as litigation costs; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper
India Law Library Docid # 1882310

(824) CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Vs. VISHAL GUPTA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-07-2023
The present Revision Petitions (RPs) have been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent(s) as detailed above, under section 58(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the orders dated 16.03.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in First Appeals (FAs) No. 176/2018, 180/2018 and 179/2018 in which orders dated 22.12.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Oraiya (hereinafter refe
India Law Library Docid # 1882311

(825) HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. RAJIV KUMAR AGARWAL AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-07-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents, as detailed above, under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 11.09.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 741 of 2013 in which order dated 03.04.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum VI New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as
India Law Library Docid # 1603469

(826) PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK GUWAHATI ZONAL OFFICE Vs. SRI KAMAL THENGAL C/O THANGAL AUTO SERVICE G.D. ROAD [ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-07-2023
Heard Mr. A. Parvez, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned counsel, for the respondent No. 1. Mr. N. Baruah, learned counsel, for the respondent No. 2 remained absent. However, as the matter is taken up for its disposal, the written argument submitted by the counsel for the respondent No. 2 along with the one of the counsel present today, are taken into consideration along with the oral argument of the counsel present today. This is an appeal under Sectio
India Law Library Docid # 1882245

(827) SANCHITA CHAUHAN DAUGHTER OF LATE SHAMSHER SINGH CHAUHAN Vs. M/S MANOHAR INFRASTRUCTURE & CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS [CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-07-2023
Initially in the year 2011, the mother of complainant, namely, Santosh Chauhan had booked the plot measuring 300 sq yards in the locality namely Palm Springs in the project The Palm being developed by the opposite parties in Mullanpur (New Chandigarh), District SAS Nagar, Mohali, the total sale consideration whereof was Rs.55,50,000/-, calculated @Rs.18,500/- per sq. yards. Apart from the said amount of Rs.55,50,000/-, only the EDC & PLC (if any) was to be paid extra. An application form was got
India Law Library Docid # 1882103

(828) MR. SHAMEEM UDDIN Vs. THE COUNTRY HEAD OF KUWAIT AIRWAYS AND OTHERS [DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-07-2023
The brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are that the Complainant is engaged in the business of handicraft export. The Complainant bought a round trip air ticket from Delhi-Kuwait-London from office of Kuwait Airways, New Delhi to attend the Spring Fair International in U.K. in which the Complainant had booked a booth, scheduled to be held in the first week of February 2019. On 01.02.2019, the Complainant embarked on flight no. KU 384 Delhi-Kuwait-London. However,
India Law Library Docid # 1882105

(829) HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA PVT. LTD. Vs. HARPAL SINGH AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-07-2023
This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Opposite Party No. 3 against Respondents/Complainant and Opposite Parties No. 1 and 2 challenging the common impugned Order dated 08.08.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, U.T. Chandigarh, in First Appeal bearing Nos. 27 of 2018 and 23 of 2018. Vide such Order, the State Commission had modified the Order dated 01.12.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T. Chandigarh, in Consumer C
India Law Library Docid # 1882318

(830) COMMODORE (R) VIJAY KUMAR GAUTAM NM Vs. STERLING HOLIDAY RESORTS AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-07-2023
This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant against Respondents/Opposite Parties challenging the impugned Order dated 30.07.2021 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UT Chandigarh, in Appeal bearing No. A/304/2019. Vide such Order, the State Commission had dismissed the Appeal while upholding the Order dated 18.11.2019 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, UT Chandigarh, in Consumer Complaint No. CC/522/2018. The brief facts o
India Law Library Docid # 1882314

(831) S.M. EINT (BRICK) UDYOG Vs. RAMKESH [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-07-2023
This revision petition has been filed under Section 58 (1)(b) of the Act 2019 in challenge to the Order dated 23.01.2023 of the State Commission in Appeal no. 22 of 2022 arising out of the Order dated 24.12.2021 of the District Commission in Complaint no. 10 of 2021. We have heard the learned counsel of the Petitioner and have perused the record including inter alia the Order dated 24.12.2021 of the District Commission, the impugned Order dated 23.01.2023 of the State Commission and the Petition
India Law Library Docid # 1882315

(832) ICICI BANK LTD. Vs. DIGAMBER VAMAN GURJAR AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 17-07-2023
The present Revision Petitions (RPs) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent(s) as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 29.11.2019 and 27.01.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Mumbai, (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in First Appeal (FA) No. in 939/2019, 940/2019, 941/2019, 942/2019, 943/2019; and in RP/180/2019, RP/220/2019 and RP/1/2020 in which order dated 17.07.2019 and 1
India Law Library Docid # 1882319

(833) PUNJAB URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RAJBIR SINGH GILL AND OTHERS [PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-07-2023
By this common order of ours, two Appeals i.e. First Appeal No.817 of 2022 and First Appeal No.818 of 2022 shall be disposed off as the same have been filed to challenge the common impugned orders dated 05.04.2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Faridkot (in short the District Commission) whereby the Consumer Complaint Nos.05 of 2020 and 292 of 2019 filed by respondents/complainants have been allowed by issuing directions to the appellant/OP- Punjab Urban Planning
India Law Library Docid # 1882102

(834) CHINMAY CHOWDHURY Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-07-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents, as detailed above, under section 58 ( 1) (b) of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the order dated 24.09.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in First Appeal (FA) No.RBR/A/43 of 2019 in which order dated 21.12.2016 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Siliguri (hereinafter referred to as District Commission)
India Law Library Docid # 1882313

(835) M/S. GAGAN GASTO CARE Vs. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-07-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under section 58(1)(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019, against the order dated 05.11.2020 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in First Appeal (FA) No. 225/2020 in which order dated 12.12.2019 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (C
India Law Library Docid # 1882316

(836) M/S. HOTEL LEELAVENURE LTD, MUMBAI Vs. NEW INDIAASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-07-2023
This consumer complaint under Section 21 (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) is filed alleging deficiency in service and seeking compensation with interest in respect of loss suffered on account of repudiation of a claim under two insurance policies issued by the opposite parties. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the Complainant, M/s Hotel Leelaventure Ltd., Mumbai (a Five-Star Deluxe Hotel), claimed an amount of Rs.5,98,42,267/- as compensation along with p
India Law Library Docid # 1882317

(837) SMT. DIMPY KHANNA AND OTHERS Vs. DR. A. S. SOIN AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-07-2023
Primary liver cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite careful selection for liver transplantation (LT) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), HCC may still recur after LT and is frequently associated with dismal outcome. The present Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act, 1986) by the Complainants against the Dr. A. S. Soin & Medanta Hospital for the alleged medical negligence causing d
India Law Library Docid # 1882222

(838) SURESH PRASAD GUPTA Vs. M.D TATA MOTORS AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-07-2023
This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant against the Respondents / Opposite Parties challenging the impugned Order dated 10.08.2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patna, Bihar, in Appeal bearing No. 220 of 2015. Vide such Order, the State Commission had allowed the Appeal while setting aside the Order dated 18.06.2015 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Rohtas (Sasaram), in Case No. 13/2013. The brief facts of the case are that the Comp
India Law Library Docid # 1882241

(839) CHANDA RAJESH AGARWAL Vs. KEYSTONE REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-07-2023
This Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking refund and other ancillary reliefs. The brief facts leading upto the present Complaint are that the Complainant had booked and been allotted a residential Flat bearing No. 604 on the Sixth Floor admeasuring 934 sq. ft. carpet area in the Project of the Opposite Party namely, Rustomjee Summit situated at Rajendra Nagar, Borivali (East), Mumbai-400066 for self-use vide Booking Agreement dated
India Law Library Docid # 1882312

(840) M/S. GLOBAL HOSPITAL Vs. P. MANJULA AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-07-2023
These two First Appeals (FAs) have been filed under section 19 of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 04.11.2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Telangana, Hyderabad, (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 18 of 2012. FA 1722 of 2016 has been filed by the Appellant, who was OP-1 before the State Commission in the said CC 18 of 2012, inter alia praying for setting aside the order dated 04.11.2016 of the State Commis
India Law Library Docid # 1882322