ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(1) RAGHUVEER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. NARAYANA HRIDAYALAYA LTD. (NARAYANA MULTISPECIALTY HOSPITAL) AND 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 17-11-2023
This Order shall decide both the appeals arising out from the impugned Judgment /Order dated 30.07.2019 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Complaint No. 157/2017, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the complaint.
India Law Library Docid # 2400780

(2) M/S. SHAKAMBARI POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-11-2023
The complaint arises out of an insurance claim relating to the damage stated to have caused to the goods that was sustained due to a fall during transit. The claim has been repudiated by the insurance company. Hence this complaint.
India Law Library Docid # 2400777

(3) MAYA SHARMA AND 2 OTHERS Vs. RAJ HOSPITAL AND 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-11-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(b)
India Law Library Docid # 2400778

(4) NEW INDIAASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. M/S. N.R.H. CO. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-11-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Section 58(1)(b) — Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 64 UB
India Law Library Docid # 2400779

(5) KHANNA PAPER MILLS LTD. Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-11-2023
This complaint is by a Paper Mill about an insurance claim that has been repudiated by the opposite party, United India Insurance Company Limited on 01.12.2010. The present complaint was filed praying for damages suffered by the complainant due to breakdown of an Industrial Steam Turbine installed by the complainant for power generation.
India Law Library Docid # 2400776

(6) M/S EMPIRE HOME APPLIANCES LTD. Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-11-2023
This is an insurance claim which was filed in respect of a claim under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy the duration whereof was from 15.04.2011 to 14.04.2012. On 15.07.2011 a fire is alleged to have taken place in which the goods stored within the premises as mentioned in the policy are said to have been gutted and destroyed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400775

(7) J. NAGI REDDY MANAGING PARTNER, SRI MEENAKSHI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS Vs. RAVI SHANKAR AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
The present First Appeal, filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is brought forth by J Nagi Reddy, (henceforth referred to as the "Appellant" or "Opposite Party No.3"). This Appeal challenges the Order dated 08.12.2011 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore, Karnataka, (henceforth termed as "the State Commission"), in Consumer Complaint No. 145 of 2009, wherein the complaint filed by the Complainants (Respondents No. 1 & 2 herein) was allowed
India Law Library Docid # 2400572

(8) M/S. CLINIC NALLAM AND ANOTHER Vs. A. HELEN VICTORIA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
The Appellant filed the instant Appeal under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”), against the Order dated 20.04.2012 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Puducherry (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 2 of 2004, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the Complaint filed by the Complainant
India Law Library Docid # 2400574

(9) SAHARA HOSPITALITY LTD. Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
This complaint was heard on 16.10.2023 and again on 26.10.2023 when inal arguments proceeded and the judgment was reserved on 3.11.2023 when the Ld. Counsel for the parties finally concluded their arguments supported by their Written Submissions and the Judgments relied upon by them. However, in order to reduce the narration of facts in this judgment, the
India Law Library Docid # 2400573

(10) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. STERLITE POWER TRANSMISSION LIMITED [DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
The Appellant has preferred the present Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 to set aside the impugned order dated 02.06.2023 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-X, Udyog Sadan, C- 22 & 23 Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi in Complaint Case no. 190/2020 filed by Respondent/Complainant against the Appellant/Opposite Party. Vide impugned order dated 02.06.2023, the District Commission while deciding
India Law Library Docid # 2400577

(11) MR. KRISHAN CHANDER MALIK Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGIONAL MANGER AND OTHERS [DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
Complainant joined the service of the OP in the year of 1983 and retired from there on 31st March 2001 under the voluntary retirement scheme opened by the Bank. At the time of his retirement interalia he also received a sum of Rs. 56,042/- towards leave encashment of the total service rendered by him to the Bank. He deposited the said amount in his
India Law Library Docid # 2400578

(12) M/S. SWARNA MOTORS Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This Complaint under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) has been filed against the repudiation of the insurance claim under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy obtained by the Complainant who is a proprietorship firm operating as a premier distributor of genuine spare parts of commercial vehicles, on account of a fire
India Law Library Docid # 2400566

(13) MONIKA DHINGRA AND OTHERS Vs. PIONEER URBAN LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This complaint has been filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) alleging deficiency in services in respect of non-delivery of a flat booked by the Complainant with the Opposite party in the project ‘Araya’, promoted and developed by it
India Law Library Docid # 2400567

(14) M/S. REDDY VEERANNA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This complaint has been filed by a Private Limited Company through its Director that undertakes contracts for construction of public works, including roads, dams etc. The present complaint is filed with regard to the non-settlement of an insurance claim that had been registered with the insurance company, claiming a loss while carrying out the work of construction of a water storage tank under the lift irrigation scheme at Village Muchonipally in Gattu Mandal, Mehbubnagar, Andhra Pradesh. The pr
India Law Library Docid # 2400568

(15) ANUBHAV SINGHAL AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This consumer complaint under section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) alleges unfair trade practice and deficiency in service in delay in handing over possession of a flat booked by the complainants in a project promoted and executed by the opposite party within the promised time and seeking refund of the amount deposited with compensation and other costs.
India Law Library Docid # 2400569

(16) AVALON ROJECTS (A UNIT OF GRJ DISTRIBUTORS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.) Vs. NARENDER KUMAR GOYAL [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This order shall dispose of First Appeals No. 872 of 2021 and 873 of 2021 since they arise from the same impugned order which pertains to the same project and have the same conspectus of facts. For convenience, facts are being taken from First Appeal No. 872 of 2021
India Law Library Docid # 2400570

(17) VIPUL MOTORS PVT. LTD. Vs. PADMINI JOSHI AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This revision petition under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order dated 16.11.2016 in First Appeal No. 791 of 2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, Jaipur (in short, the ‘State Commission’) dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against order dated 29.04.2016of the District Consumer
India Law Library Docid # 2400571

(18) HDFC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. VIKRAMBHAI RANCHODDAS RANA [GUJARAT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
The appellants - original opponent has preferred the present appeal as per the provisions of Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act, 1986”) against the impugned order passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Surat (Addl.) (for short “learned District Commission”) in
India Law Library Docid # 2400579

(19) PITHAMBER R. POLSANI AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. PIONEER URBAN LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI] 08-11-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21 - Consumer Complaint - Possession of Flat - It is the case of the Complainants that they were coerced to take possession of an incomplete and unsafe Project; that the possession along with Occupation Certificate was not given within the committed period of 36 months; that the Opposite Party is not in a position to handover the possession of the plot in habitable condition as the construction was incomplete till the filing of the Complaint and the Opposi
India Law Library Docid # 2400494

(20) P.B. VISHNU ALIAS NAVNEETH VISHNU Vs. THE THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI] 08-11-2023
Consumer Complaint by minor child - Complainant was a minor child aged about 3½ years old when his father on 22.04.1996 and 23.04.1996 invested into 50 Fixed Deposits of Rs.50,000/- each in 25 branches of the respondent-Co-operative Bank - Due to some internal family arrangement that was presumably on account of some dispute between the husband and the wife, the mother of the complainant was made the guardian in relation to the said deposits - Deposits matured in the year 2012 that were to bear
India Law Library Docid # 2400495