(841) PUSHPA VERMA & 2 OTHERS Vs. BHARDWAJ NURSING AND MATERNITY HOME PRIVATE LIMITED & 9 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Mrs. Pushpa Verma, Mrs. Shubhra Verma Bhatnagar and Dr. (Mrs.) Rashmi Mathur have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to pay exemplary damage & compensation of Rs.100000000/-; and any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, alleging medical negligence in treatment of Justice J.S. Verma (Retd. Chief Justice Of India), resulting in his death. To pursue the principles of Justice J.S. Verma lived for, the complainants approached t India Law Library Docid # 1882054
(842) JATIN JAIN Vs. ADANI M2K PROJECTS LLP & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Jatin Jain has filed above complaint for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.20797199/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till its realization; (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) pay Rs.100000/- as litigation costs; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. India Law Library Docid # 1882182
(843) AMBILY MENON & ANOTHER Vs. M/S. BPTP LTD. & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Ambily Menon and Mohan Veluthedathu Balan have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.3468000/- with interest @18% per annum, from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund; (ii) pay Pre-EMI to HDFC Bank on the loan of the complainant as per subvention scheme; (iii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iv) pay Rs.100000/-, as litigation costs; and (v) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and ci India Law Library Docid # 1882187
(844) SHEEL DEV YADAV Vs. M/S. BPTP LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Heard Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Advocate, for the opposite parties. Sheel Dev Yadav has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.6252803/- with interest @18% per annum, from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund; (ii) pay Rs.1000000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) pay Rs.150000/-, as litigation costs; and (v) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the fa India Law Library Docid # 1882201
(845) UMIYA HABITAT CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED Vs. M/S. UMIYA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Heard Mr. Suresh Raikar, Advocate for the complainant and Mr. R.S. Banerjee, Advocate for the opposite party. Umiya Habitat Co-operative Hosing Society Ltd. has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) cure the defects pointed out by M/s. Casta Engineers Pvt. Ltd., Vasco da Gama; (ii) adopt the suggestions and recommendations made by Goa State Pollution Control Board; (iii) honour the joint inspection report; (iv) set up a sewage treatment plant with sufficient capacity for India Law Library Docid # 1882242
(846) ANIL MILKHIRAM GOYEL AND ANOTHER Vs. HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED (HSBC) [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Consumer Law - Banking Service - Deficiency of Service - Dishonour of cheques despite sufficient funds in account - There is nothing on record that the bank has actually classified the complainants as high risk customers or complainants could have been classified so, requesting them to update their KYC every 2 years as per RBI guidelines - Bank's action of freezing the joint SB A/c of complainants on the grounds of KYC of any of the complainant having not been renewed and/or non-deposit of any o India Law Library Docid # 1603341
(847) LIBERTY VIDEOCON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. UMA BAI DHANKAR AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-06-2023 Consumer Law — Group Personal Accident Policy — The case involves a dispute over an insurance claim following the accidental death, who was insured under a Group Personal Accident Policy — The primary issue is whether the deceased’s actions violated the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, thereby justifying the repudiation of the claim —The insurance company argued that the deceased’s actions of connecting an electric wire to a pole were unauthorized and violated the policy terms, void India Law Library Docid # 2415669
(848) AAKUP KHAN S/O SHRI AJMAT KHAN Vs. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Complainant against order dated 27.05.2015 passed by Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No.925 of 2014, whereby the Appeal filed by Respondent/Opposite Party No. 1 was partly allowed. India Law Library Docid # 1882180
(849) ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION Vs. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, HUDA & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The present Complaint is filed by Army Welfare Housing Organization (AWHO) hereinafter referred to as the Complainant. The Complainant is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its registered office at Rajaji Marg, New Delhi. The Complainant provides dwelling units to serving and retired Army personnel and their widows on No Profit No Loss basis. India Law Library Docid # 1882188
(850) VISHWANATH GANGADHAR PATANKAR Vs. AVADHOOT GAS AGENCY AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Complainant under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against order dated 26.05.2009 passed by Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (for short State Commission) in First Appeal No.1256 and 1257 of 2008, whereby Appeal No.1256 filed by him was dismissed and Appeal No.1257 of 2008 filed by Respondent No.1/Opposite Party No. 1 was allowed. Case of the Petitioner/Complainant is that he tried to India Law Library Docid # 1882212
(851) M/S. BHAGAT FORD Vs. GURDARSHAN SINGH DHILLON [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Opposite Party against order dated 16.05.2016 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UT Chandigarh (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No. 83 of 2016, whereby the Appeal was dismissed. The Case of the Complainant is that on 08.08.2015, at 10:15 am the Complainant booked two vehicles, Ford Ikon CH03A5625 and Ford Eco Sport CH01AX 8884 for service. The Opposite Party assured the Complainant that the servic India Law Library Docid # 1882369
(852) CONSUMER EDUCATION & RESEARCH SOCIETY SURAKSHA SANKOOL Vs. DR. RAJESH GANDHI [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The Complaint is a voluntary Consumer Association, providing legal help to the needy. In the instant case, the patient Mr. Jinendra Shah (since deceased, hereinafter referred as, the patient), a young 31-year boy, working as a Managing Director in Neerja Jewellery in Dubai. He, while on India visit, suffered a fracture of left humerus due to vehicle accident. He was operated on 01.12.2003 in Ahmedabad. However, the fracture could not heal properly and resulted into non-union. The patient consult India Law Library Docid # 1882371
(853) AJITH THOMAS ABRAHAM AJITH THOMAS ABRAHAM, 65, MONTIETH ROAD, EGAMORE Vs. CHERUKAT VIJAYAKUMAR AND OTHERRS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ] 07-06-2023 This order shall dispose of the Execution Petition No. 58 of 2022 and RA No. 336 of 2022. Vide the Appeal Execution, the Appellant has challenged the order dated 21.03.2022 in Execution Petition No. 49 of 2017 whereby the State Commission pursuant to the directions of the High Court of Kerala dated 04.01.2022 in OP ( C) 1381 of 2021 heard the parties on the issue to consider the question of law raised, in view of Section 14 (1) (a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and thereafter reje India Law Library Docid # 1882362
(854) PHILIPS THOMAS & OTHERS Vs. DEEN HOSPITAL & OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-06-2023 This Order shall decide both the First Appeals arising from the impugned Order dated 04.02.2013 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kerala (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 2/2008, wherein the State Commission allowed the Complaint and held the Opposite Parties Nos. 1 to 3 negligent and awarded the total compensation sum of Rs.7,00,000/- out of which Rs.3,00,000/- should be deposited in the name of minor children of Complainant No India Law Library Docid # 1881909
(855) AASHUTOSH PRAMOD SRIVASTAVA & ANOTHER Vs. DR. RAHUL PATIL & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-06-2023 The present Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Aashutosh Pramod Srivastava & his brother Savivek Pramod Srivastava (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against the Opposite Parties Dr. Rahul Patil (OP-1) & Ruby Hall Clinic (OP-2), for the alleged medical negligence and wrong treatment which resulted into untimely death of their mother. India Law Library Docid # 1882181
(856) LIFELINE LABORATORY AND OTHERS Vs. ANJANAAGRAWAL AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-06-2023 The Appellant has filed the instant Appeal under section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in short the Act), against the Order dated 21.12.2021 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 114 of 2013, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the complainant and held OPs negligent. For the convenience, the parties are being referred to, in the instant Appeal, as position held in Consumer C India Law Library Docid # 1882207
(857) METRO HOSPITAL AND HEART INSTITUTE Vs. DR. OM PRAKASH AGARWAL AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-06-2023 This Order shall decide all the first appeals arising from the impugned Judgment /Order dated 18.03.2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 123/2010, wherein the State Commission allowed the complaint and held the Opposite Parties negligent and awarded lump sum Compensation sum of Rs.20,00,000/- along with 9% interest & Rs.20,000/- towards litigation costs. For the Convenie India Law Library Docid # 1882226
(858) MANAGER, SUMITRA D. S. MOTORS @ SUMITRA D.S. MOTORS PVT. LTD. Vs. RAJIV GUPTA @ RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-06-2023 This revision petition under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, 'the Act') assails the order in appeal no. 1831 of 2012 dated 12.01.2014 of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow (in short, 'the State Commission') (incorrectly mentioned as appeal no. 1701 of 2010 in the petition) arising out of order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal, Lakhimpur Kheri in CC no. 20 of 2011 dated 10.04.2011. India Law Library Docid # 1873470
(859) MANAGER, SUMITRA D. S. MOTORS @ SUMITRA D.S. MOTORS PVT. LTD. Vs. RAJIV GUPTA @ RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-06-2023 This revision petition under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order in appeal no. 1831 of 2012 dated 12.01.2014 of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow (in short, the State Commission) (incorrectly mentioned as appeal no. 1701 of 2010 in the petition) arising out of order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal, Lakhimpur Kheri in CC no. 20 of 2011 dated 10.04.2011. India Law Library Docid # 1877403
(860) DEPARTMENT OF POST AND OTHERS Vs. COLONEL NARENDRA NATH SURI (RETD.) [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-06-2023 The present Appeal has been filed against the order dated 06.12.2017 of the State Commission whereby the Consumer Complaint No. 358 of 2015 filed by the respondent ( hereinafter referred to as Complainant) was allowed and all the Appellants were held jointly and severally liable to refund sum of Rs.24,91,382/- and amount of Rs.8830/- to the complainant. Rs.1,00,000/- was awarded towards mental and physical harassment and Rs.10,000/- towards cost of litigation. The brief facts of the case are tha India Law Library Docid # 1882221