(1) AGRA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SMT. KANTA DEVI[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-07-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 51(2) — Appeal — Conversion from Revision Petition — Delay in filing — Condonation of delay requires plausible explanation, not mere shifting of blame to counsel. India Law Library Docid # 2447857
(2) ANIL KISAN SHELKE AND ANOTHER Vs. SHUBHANGI SANJEEV SHELKE AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 17-07-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in Service — Failure to deliver lawful possession of flats within the agreed period, coupled with delay in obtaining statutory Completion/Occupancy Certificate, constitutes a deficiency in service and an unfair trade practice. India Law Library Docid # 2447858
(3) TATA MOTORS LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. SADHU SINGH AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-07-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in service — Sale of defective vehicle — Complainant purchased a car from a dealer, which was manufactured by Tata Motors — The car had several defects soon after delivery, which the dealer failed to rectify — The District Commission found the dealer guilty of unfair trade practice and deficiency in service, ordering a refund and compensation — The State Commission held both the India Law Library Docid # 2447859
(4) CAPITAL GREENS FLAT BUYER ASSOCIATION Vs. DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-07-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Sections 71 and 72 — Execution Proceedings — Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Execution can be sought under the 2019 Act even if original complaints were filed under the 1986 Act, as the execution proceedings are governed by the law in force at the time of execution. India Law Library Docid # 2447860
(5) SHIV MANGAI SINGH Vs. RAJ KUMARI AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-07-2026 Medical Negligence — Consumer Protection — Appeal against State Commission's order finding appellant negligent in orthopedic surgery — The appellant argued that the State Commission failed to consider evidence, including affidavits and an OT register, which indicated that another doctor administered anesthesia, not the appellant. India Law Library Docid # 2447861
(6) HATSUN AGRO PRODUCT LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. RAJKUMAR VYTHIANATHAN AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-07-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in service — Complaint regarding quality of milk — No expert or laboratory evidence to prove milk was defective or spurious — Liability cannot be fixed on the manufacturer without such proof India Law Library Docid # 2447862
(7) TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. Vs. MS. KIRAN BALA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-07-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 40 — Review Application — District Forum's power to review its own order is to be exercised in its original jurisdiction, not as an executing court — A review application should be assigned a separate number and decided independently. India Law Library Docid # 2447863
(8) SMT. SANGEETA ARAWALIA AND OTHERS Vs. ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE & RESEARCH CENTRE LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-07-2026 Medical Negligence — Angioplasty and Stenting — Death of patient post-procedure — Allegations of incorrect treatment choice, doctor's inexperience, and hasty discharge — Court found no negligence as procedure was technically feasible, scientifically correct, and performed with informed consent after considering alternatives like CABG, India Law Library Docid # 2447864
(9) BRANCH MANAGER, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Vs. MORE ANITHA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-07-2026 Insurance Law — Repudiation of Life Insurance Claim — Non-disclosure of Pre-existing Ailment — Insurer repudiated claim based on undisclosed lung cancer — The insured had undergone treatment for lung cancer prior to policy inception, which was a material fact that should have been disclosed. India Law Library Docid # 2447935
(10) YASHODA HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. CHEKURI LAKSHMI NARAYANA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-07-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 34(2) — Jurisdiction for filing a consumer complaint — A complaint can be filed where the complainant resides, even if the cause of action arose elsewhere, provided the complainant has established residence there. India Law Library Docid # 2447936
(11) IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. Vs. SAKSHI ABRAHAM AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 51 — Appeal against State Commission order — Condonation of delay — Delay in filing appeal was condoned considering the matter had travelled to the Supreme Court and the appeal was filed shortly after the Supreme Court's order, and the delay was not opposed by the India Law Library Docid # 2447934
(12) MRS. DEVI RAMAKRISHNAN Vs. M/S VISHWAKARMA REAL ESTATE AND CONSTRUCTIONS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in Service — Delay in Possession — Builder failed to deliver flat by the agreed date, causing significant delay and hardship to the complainant. India Law Library Docid # 2447937
(13) VENEET VASUDEVA AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. OMAXE BUILDHOME PVT. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 12 — Deficiency in Service — Delayed Possession — Builder failed to deliver possession of apartment within the stipulated period as per the Apartment Buyer's Agreement. India Law Library Docid # 2447938
(14) MRS. SWATI HEMANT HADKE AND OTHERS Vs. TITAN COMPANY LTD. (THROUGH CEO) AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 36(2) — Dismissal of Complaint — Allegations of fraud and cheating — Consumer forums have limited jurisdiction and cannot adjudicate cases involving complex factual disputes or criminal acts like fraud, which require detailed evidence and cross-examination. India Law Library Docid # 2447939
(15) POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND REASEARCH CHANDIGARH, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Vs. AYUSH KALPASI[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Negligence in medical treatment — Burn injury sustained by patient post-surgery — Hospital's defence that no heater was present in April rejected — Principle of res ipsa loquitor applied due to lack of explanation from hospital for the injury. India Law Library Docid # 2447940
(16) M/S. ELECTRONICS AND GIFT Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Insurance claim — Burglary/house-breaking — State Commission set aside District Commission's order allowing claim — National Commission finds State Commission erred in restrictive interpretation of policy and facts. India Law Library Docid # 2447941
(17) AXIS BANK LTD. Vs. BALJIT KAUR AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revisional Jurisdiction — Limited scope — Interference only in cases of jurisdictional error, patent illegality, material irregularity, or manifest perversity — Not to act as an appellate authority over concurrent findings of fact. India Law Library Docid # 2447942
(18) BALWANT SHUKLA Vs. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-06-2026 Insurance Law — Standard Fire & Special Perils Policy — Burden of Proof — Insured must prove loss falls within policy coverage and was caused by an insured peril, not just that goods were damaged. India Law Library Docid # 2447924
(19) FIL INDUSTRIES Vs. JAHANGIR AHMED PARA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 38(3)(a) — Written Statement — Filing Period — The Act prescribes a period of thirty days for filing a written statement, extendable by a maximum of fifteen days, totaling forty-five days. India Law Library Docid # 2447925
(20) M/S ALIENS DEVELOPERS (P) LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. VUMMANNAGARI RAMACHANDRA REDDY[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 17-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 19 — Appeal against State Commission's order — Dismissal of application for rectification/clarification — Order directing refund of Rs — 43,50,000/- with interest and compensation upheld. India Law Library Docid # 2447926