(921) SANOJ KUMAR ALIAS SHAILESH KUMAR DEALER Vs. RAJU SAO ALIAS RAJU KUMAR AND OTHERS [BIHAR STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-05-2023 Present appeal has been filed on behalf of Maa Bindhya Vashini H.P. Gas agency, Arwal through its dealer Sanoj Kumar for setting the order dated 29.07.2017 passed in Complaint Case no. 35 of 2015 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Forum, Arwal whereby and whereunder the Ld. District Consumer Forum has allowed the complaint case and directed all opposite parties no. 1,2 & 3 to pay jointly and severally Rs. 3,50,000/- as compensation for death of son of complainant and Rs. 50,000/- for loss of ho India Law Library Docid # 1881905
(922) CYGNUS MAHARAJA AGGARSAIN HOSPITAL AND OTHERS Vs. SHARWAN KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) S/O SH.KRISHAN LAL THROUGH HIS L.RS AND OTHERS [HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-05-2023 Vide this common order above mentioned two appeals bearing No.144 of 2017and F.A. No.310 of 2017will be disposed of as both the appeals have been preferred against the common order dated 29.11.2016 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panipat (in short District Commission). India Law Library Docid # 1882090
(923) GEETABEN JAYESHBHAI SHAH Vs. MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHETH PUKHRAJ RAICHAND GENERAL HOSPITAL & 5 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-05-2023 This Revision Petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Petitioner Geetaben Jayeshbhai Shah, (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant or Appellants) against the Impugned Order dated 21.09.2016 passed by State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Gujarat, (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No. 509/20011, wherein the Appeal was dismissed and the Order passed by District Forum, Gandhinagar was confirmed. India Law Library Docid # 1882135
(924) CHITTARMAL SAINI Vs. S.K. SONI HOSPITAL & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The Appellant has filed the instant Appeal under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the Act), against the Order dated 09.02.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 28 of 2007, wherein the State Commission, dismissed the Complaint filed by the Complainant (Appellant herein). India Law Library Docid # 1882133
(925) INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITALS AND OTHERS Vs. PAWAN KUMAR & 8 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The Complainants are legal heirs of deceased Smt. Asha Rani Gurdhar. The Opposite Parties are OP-1-Kakkar Maternity and Nursing Home (OP-1), Dr. Rajesh Kakkar (OP-2), Dr. Abhishek Kakkar (OP-3) and Dr. Sunil Bajaj-The Medical officer of Kakkar Hospital (OP-4). Dr. Anant Ram Janta Hospital Barwala (OP-5) and Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi (OP-6), both were impleaded as a proforma party. India Law Library Docid # 1882136
(926) DR. MANPREET KAUR AND OTHERS Vs. MRS. SUMAN & 5 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The State Commission passed Order against the Opposite Parties. The State Commission held the Opposite Parties negligent jointly and severally, and awarded compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- alongwith the cost of litigation Rs.50,000/-. The OP No. 1 was also directed to bear all the expenses, which may be incurred on the future treatment of Complainant No. 1 in any Government hospital/ health center/dispensary etc. India Law Library Docid # 1882140
(927) DR. NARENDRABABU H V Vs. KARITHIMMEGOWDA & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by Dr. Narendrababu H V, Opposite Party No.1 before the District Forum, against the order dated 26.08.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karnataka (for short the State Commission) in Appeal No.321 of 2015 filed by the Petitioner herein against the order dated 24.02.2015 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mandya (for short the District Forum) in Complaint No.215/2013. Complainant Sri Karithimmegowda had also filed India Law Library Docid # 1882142
(928) MS. REENA MITTAL Vs. SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL & OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The present Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Smt. Reena Bansal through her husband Ankur Goel (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) against the Sir Ganga Ram Hospital (OP-2) & Dr. S. S. Saha-Sr. Consultant (Dept. of Plastic Surgery) - (OP-2) for the alleged medical negligence caused to the Complainant which rendered her permanently disabled, bed ridden and in a vegetative state. India Law Library Docid # 1882150
(929) RENU SHARMA Vs. U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 This revision petition under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (in short, State Commission) in Appeal No. 2821 of 1999 dated 21.01.2014 arising out of order dated 26.04.1999 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ballia (in short, District Forum) in Consumer Complaint No. 140 of 1998. India Law Library Docid # 1882151
(930) PARIKSHIT DALAL & OTHERS Vs. SANTOSH HOSPITAL & 11 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 Deaths due to anaphylactic shock are uncommon and it is a diagnosis based on findings which may not always be present and as such poses challenges for the forensic pathologist or an expert in reaching certainty with regard to the cause of death. A holistic view that all findings need to be considered in the approach to reach a definitive cause of death. India Law Library Docid # 1882154
(931) SMT. SABITARI AGARWAL Vs. TATA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The present Appeal is directed against the order dated 26.06.2012 passed by Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, the State Commission) at Mumbai in Complaint Case No. CC/09/54, whereby the State Commission dismissed the complaint filed by the Appellant. India Law Library Docid # 1882163
(932) RAMNARAYAN PANDEY S/O. BRAHMESHWAR PANDEY Vs. SUPERITENDENT, RED CROSS SPECIALITIES POLYCLINIC & 5 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The Appellant/Complainant has filed the instant Appeal under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the Act), against the Order dated 23.02.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar (for short the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 30 of 2014, wherein the State Commission, dismissed the Complaint. India Law Library Docid # 1882171
(933) SUBHASH S Vs. DR. PRADEEP GK AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 24.03.2021 of the Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram (in short, the State Commission) in RP no. 06 of 2021 arising from the order dated 28.01.2021 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Vazhuthacaud, Thiruvananthapuram (in short, the District Forum) in IA no. 25 of 2020 in CC no. 323 of 2017. India Law Library Docid # 1882178
(934) UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF POST & 3 OTHERS Vs. J.P SINGH [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-05-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed against the Order dated 07.06.2022 of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at Lucknow (for short the State Commission) in Appeal No. 1603 of 2008, whereby the Appeal was dismissed and the Order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Azamgarh (for short the District Forum) dated 18.07.2008 in Consumer Complaint No. 144 of 2006 was confirmed. India Law Library Docid # 1882166
(935) DEVENDRA KUMAR GOEL Vs. THE CHIEF MANAGER, MR. MOHIT BURMAN (CHAIRMAN) [CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-05-2023 This appeal has been filed by the decree holder/complainant Sh. Devendra Kumar Goel (appellant herein) against order dated 13.12.2022 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh (in short District Commission), whereby, Execution Application No.151 of 2018 filed by him has been dismissed by the District Commission. The issue before the District Commission for consideration was that whether the decree holder/complainant had been able to prove beyond reasonable dou India Law Library Docid # 1882233
(936) CHITRALEKHAMISRA Vs. SUBHADRA BATH PLAZA AND OTHER [ODISHA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-05-2023 Captioned appeal is filed u/s 15 of the erstwhile Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter called the Act). Parties to this appeal shall be referred to with reference to their respective status before the District Forum. The factual matrix leading to the case of the complainant is that on 23.11.2011, the complainant had purchased one V-Guard solar water heater system at the cost of Rs. 19,500/- vide Annexure-1 from O.P.No.1 who is the authorised dealer of the O.P.No.2 Company. The system has t India Law Library Docid # 1882251
(937) The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Sub-Regional Office Vs. Mr Md. Abdul Nayeem Major and others [KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 These Appeals are filed under Section 15 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 by the OP, aggrieved by the Orders dated 17.12.2013 and 10.12.2013 in Consumer Complaint Nos.268/2013, 270/2013 and 185/2013 respectively on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bellary (for short, the District Forum). Since the facts and law involved in all these cases are one and the same, they have been taken up together for consideration. India Law Library Docid # 1882086
(938) ANUBHAB CONSTRUCTION Vs. CITY STAR GANGULY PROJECTS LLP [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 Anubhab Construction (a Partnership Firm, registered Indian Partnership Act, 1932) has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) handover possession of the flats and car parking spaces as allocated to its share under Development Agreement dated 16.01.2013 and Supplementary Agreement dated 13.01.2015, forthwith; (ii) allow the complainant to enter the site of the project; (iii) obtain completion certificate of the project from competent authority; (iv) pay Rs.50000/-, per mon India Law Library Docid # 1882106
(939) BUILD INDIA & ANOTHER Vs. SHOBHA SHRIVASTAVA & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 This revision petition under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Circuit Bench at Nagpur (in short, State Commission) in First Appeal No. A/02/768 dated 19.12.2012 arising out of order dated 22.03.2002 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Nagpur (in short, District Forum) in Complaint No. 360 of 1995. India Law Library Docid # 1882148
(940) BRANCH MANAGER, BELLAD ENGINEERING CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. S. HANUMANTHAPPA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-05-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners against the order dated 28.02.2023 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karanataka (for short the State Commission) in Appeal No.1472 of 2014 filed by the Petitioner against the order dated 15.07.2014 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chitradurga (for short the District Forum) in Complaint No.02/2014 filed by the Complainant (Respondent No.1 herein). The Appeal was dismissed on the ground that the Pe India Law Library Docid # 1882156