(861) PANKAJ MAHESHWARI Vs. S.B.I. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-06-2023 The Office has reported that the appeal has been filed with delay of 42 days. The impugned order has been passed on 18.08.2020 and the appeal was filed on 06.11.2020. During this period, Supreme Court has waived limitation in Suo Motu Writ Petition No.3 of 2020. Therefore, there is no question for delay. The appellant has filed IA/11/2021 for condoning the delay. IA/11/2021 is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The complainant has filed above appeal against the order of State Consu India Law Library Docid # 1882295
(862) LALIT KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. E-HOMES INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-06-2023 The present Consumer Complaint is filed under Section 58(1)(a)(i)(ii) accompanied with Application under Section 35(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in a representative capacity by the Complainants belonging to the Dasnac-Jewel of Noida Project/ Phase 1 (hereinafter referred to as Project) of the Opposite Party No. 1, the Builder, NOIDA Authority and office of Deputy Registrar, Firms, Societies and Chits. Brief facts of the case as per the Complaint India Law Library Docid # 1882229
(863) DR. SHAILENDER DHAWAN Vs. DIGVIJAY ADVOCATE AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-06-2023 Above revision petition has been filed against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, dated 18.01.2018, passed in First Appeal No.784 of 2016 (arising out of the order of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad, dated 15.06.2016 passed in CC No.48 of 2013), whereby District Forum has partly allowed the complaint and directed the petitioner (opposite party-1) to pay Rs.500000/- as the compensation and State Commission has dismissed the appeal. Mr. Digvij India Law Library Docid # 1882238
(864) GTFS MULTI SERVICES LTD. Vs. SMT. PRAVATI BEHERA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-06-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — The case involves a dispute over an insurance claim following the accidental death, who had a Janata Personal Accident Insurance Policy — The claim was not settled by the insurance company, leading to legal proceedings —The main issue is whether there was a deficiency in service by the insurance company and its agent in settling the claim — The petitioner contends that they acted only as a facilitator and forwarded all necessary documents to the in India Law Library Docid # 2415661
(865) CDR. RAJESH RAJGOPALAN AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. VATIKA LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-06-2023 This order will dispose a complaint filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice by the opposite party, a builder, in delay in handing over possession of the flats booked by the complainants and related issues. A separate application under section 12(1)(c) read with section 22 of the Act was filed by the complainants seeking permission to file the complaint by consumers having same interest which was allo India Law Library Docid # 1882234
(866) M/S. SOUTH BENGAL AGRO PRODUCTS Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-06-2023 The present Consumer Complaint has been filed by Complainant under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Complainant is a Partnership firm carrying on business of paddy, rice, broken rice, husk and bran. The Complainant had taken Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy No.031603/11/13/11/00000058 valid from 21.05.2013 to 20.05.2014 covering his business as well as plant & machinery for sum of Rs.5,09,50,000/-. Case of the Complainant is that on 08.11.2013, about 6:50 am, fire brok India Law Library Docid # 1882239
(867) PALANADU COLD STORAGE Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-06-2023 The Complainant is a cold storage and acts as a custodian for the agricultural produce stored by the farmers. The Complainant obtained a Standard Fire & Special Perils Policy No.566018111310000062 for a sum of Rs.14 crores (Rs.4 crores for building, plant & machinery and Rs.10 crores for stock) valid from 30.03.2014 to 29.03.2015 from National Insurance Company Limited. On 09.09.2014, vide endorsement No.566018111382100004, the sum insured was enhanced from Rs.14 crores to Rs.19.5 crores (Rs.5,5 India Law Library Docid # 1882294
(868) PUSHPA VERMA & 2 OTHERS Vs. BHARDWAJ NURSING AND MATERNITY HOME PRIVATE LIMITED & 9 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Mrs. Pushpa Verma, Mrs. Shubhra Verma Bhatnagar and Dr. (Mrs.) Rashmi Mathur have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to pay exemplary damage & compensation of Rs.100000000/-; and any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, alleging medical negligence in treatment of Justice J.S. Verma (Retd. Chief Justice Of India), resulting in his death. To pursue the principles of Justice J.S. Verma lived for, the complainants approached t India Law Library Docid # 1882054
(869) JATIN JAIN Vs. ADANI M2K PROJECTS LLP & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Jatin Jain has filed above complaint for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.20797199/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till its realization; (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) pay Rs.100000/- as litigation costs; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. India Law Library Docid # 1882182
(870) AMBILY MENON & ANOTHER Vs. M/S. BPTP LTD. & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Ambily Menon and Mohan Veluthedathu Balan have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.3468000/- with interest @18% per annum, from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund; (ii) pay Pre-EMI to HDFC Bank on the loan of the complainant as per subvention scheme; (iii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iv) pay Rs.100000/-, as litigation costs; and (v) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and ci India Law Library Docid # 1882187
(871) SHEEL DEV YADAV Vs. M/S. BPTP LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Heard Mr. Aditya Parolia, Advocate, for the complainant and Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Advocate, for the opposite parties. Sheel Dev Yadav has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.6252803/- with interest @18% per annum, from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund; (ii) pay Rs.1000000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) pay Rs.150000/-, as litigation costs; and (v) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the fa India Law Library Docid # 1882201
(872) UMIYA HABITAT CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED Vs. M/S. UMIYA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Heard Mr. Suresh Raikar, Advocate for the complainant and Mr. R.S. Banerjee, Advocate for the opposite party. Umiya Habitat Co-operative Hosing Society Ltd. has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) cure the defects pointed out by M/s. Casta Engineers Pvt. Ltd., Vasco da Gama; (ii) adopt the suggestions and recommendations made by Goa State Pollution Control Board; (iii) honour the joint inspection report; (iv) set up a sewage treatment plant with sufficient capacity for India Law Library Docid # 1882242
(873) ANIL MILKHIRAM GOYEL AND ANOTHER Vs. HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION LIMITED (HSBC) [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2023 Consumer Law - Banking Service - Deficiency of Service - Dishonour of cheques despite sufficient funds in account - There is nothing on record that the bank has actually classified the complainants as high risk customers or complainants could have been classified so, requesting them to update their KYC every 2 years as per RBI guidelines - Bank's action of freezing the joint SB A/c of complainants on the grounds of KYC of any of the complainant having not been renewed and/or non-deposit of any o India Law Library Docid # 1603341
(874) LIBERTY VIDEOCON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. UMA BAI DHANKAR AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-06-2023 Consumer Law — Group Personal Accident Policy — The case involves a dispute over an insurance claim following the accidental death, who was insured under a Group Personal Accident Policy — The primary issue is whether the deceased’s actions violated the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, thereby justifying the repudiation of the claim —The insurance company argued that the deceased’s actions of connecting an electric wire to a pole were unauthorized and violated the policy terms, void India Law Library Docid # 2415669
(875) AAKUP KHAN S/O SHRI AJMAT KHAN Vs. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Complainant against order dated 27.05.2015 passed by Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No.925 of 2014, whereby the Appeal filed by Respondent/Opposite Party No. 1 was partly allowed. India Law Library Docid # 1882180
(876) ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION Vs. CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, HUDA & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The present Complaint is filed by Army Welfare Housing Organization (AWHO) hereinafter referred to as the Complainant. The Complainant is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 having its registered office at Rajaji Marg, New Delhi. The Complainant provides dwelling units to serving and retired Army personnel and their widows on No Profit No Loss basis. India Law Library Docid # 1882188
(877) VISHWANATH GANGADHAR PATANKAR Vs. AVADHOOT GAS AGENCY AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Complainant under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against order dated 26.05.2009 passed by Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (for short State Commission) in First Appeal No.1256 and 1257 of 2008, whereby Appeal No.1256 filed by him was dismissed and Appeal No.1257 of 2008 filed by Respondent No.1/Opposite Party No. 1 was allowed. Case of the Petitioner/Complainant is that he tried to India Law Library Docid # 1882212
(878) M/S. BHAGAT FORD Vs. GURDARSHAN SINGH DHILLON [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Opposite Party against order dated 16.05.2016 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UT Chandigarh (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No. 83 of 2016, whereby the Appeal was dismissed. The Case of the Complainant is that on 08.08.2015, at 10:15 am the Complainant booked two vehicles, Ford Ikon CH03A5625 and Ford Eco Sport CH01AX 8884 for service. The Opposite Party assured the Complainant that the servic India Law Library Docid # 1882369
(879) CONSUMER EDUCATION & RESEARCH SOCIETY SURAKSHA SANKOOL Vs. DR. RAJESH GANDHI [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-06-2023 The Complaint is a voluntary Consumer Association, providing legal help to the needy. In the instant case, the patient Mr. Jinendra Shah (since deceased, hereinafter referred as, the patient), a young 31-year boy, working as a Managing Director in Neerja Jewellery in Dubai. He, while on India visit, suffered a fracture of left humerus due to vehicle accident. He was operated on 01.12.2003 in Ahmedabad. However, the fracture could not heal properly and resulted into non-union. The patient consult India Law Library Docid # 1882371
(880) AJITH THOMAS ABRAHAM AJITH THOMAS ABRAHAM, 65, MONTIETH ROAD, EGAMORE Vs. CHERUKAT VIJAYAKUMAR AND OTHERRS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ] 07-06-2023 This order shall dispose of the Execution Petition No. 58 of 2022 and RA No. 336 of 2022. Vide the Appeal Execution, the Appellant has challenged the order dated 21.03.2022 in Execution Petition No. 49 of 2017 whereby the State Commission pursuant to the directions of the High Court of Kerala dated 04.01.2022 in OP ( C) 1381 of 2021 heard the parties on the issue to consider the question of law raised, in view of Section 14 (1) (a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and thereafter reje India Law Library Docid # 1882362