(881) MADHULEKHA SAWHNEY Vs. M/S. SHIPRA ESTATE LTD. & JAI KRISHAN ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023 Madhulekha Sawhney has filed CC/89/2017 for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover possession of the flat allotted to her, complete in all respect within reasonable period and execute Flat Buyers Agreement and Maintenance Agreement, in her favour; (ii) pay delay compensation in the form of interest @21% per annum on his deposit from March, 2009 till actual handing over possession; (iii) restrain the opposite parties from charging interest on the balance amount for delayed or deferred per India Law Library Docid # 1882138
(882) ROSHNI KHANNA & ANOTHER Vs. M/S. SHIPRA ESTATE LTD. & JAI KRISHAN ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., 3 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023 Smt. Roshni Khanna and Rajesh Khanna have filed CC/844/2016, for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover possession of the flat allotted to them, complete in all respect within reasonable period and execute Flat Buyers Agreement and Maintenance Agreement, in their favour; (ii) pay delay compensation in the form of interest @21% per annum on their deposit from January, 2009 till actual handing over possession; (iii) restrain the opposite parties from charging interest on the balance amount India Law Library Docid # 1882152
(883) M/S. RAMDEV SUGAR PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023 The OP in their written statement/reply stated that the complainant obtained standard fire special perils policy bearing No. 19130331118P101192468. The policy was valid from 23.04.2018 to 22.04.2019. On 06.08.2018 during the evening hours, they noticed smoke coming out of the molasses tank No. 15 located at the open yard within the factory premises. The OP further stated that within the next few days it was noticed that the level of molasses rising in the tank due to increase in volume and event India Law Library Docid # 1882170
(884) SATYAPRAKASH JAIN S/O. R.L. JAIN Vs. M/S. IVR PRIME URBAN DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023 Satya Prakash Jain has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) deliver possession of built-up area of his share as per Development Agreement dated 20.04.2007; (ii) pay Rs.5000000/- as compensation for deficiency in service; (iii) pay Rs.100000/- as the costs of litigation; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts of the case. India Law Library Docid # 1882175
(885) SUNIL KUMAR S/O SHRI GOPAL SINGH Vs. M/S. ADANI M2K PROJECTS LLP AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023 Sunil Kumar has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.18593465/- with interest @18% per annum, from the date of deposit till the date of refund; (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment; (iii) pay Rs.one lac, as costs of the litigation; and (iv) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. India Law Library Docid # 1882184
(886) TEJINDER SINGH Vs. M/S. SHIPRA ESTATE LTD. AND JAI KRISHAN ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023 Tejinder Singh has filed CC/600/2016 for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover possession of the flat allotted to him, complete in all respect within reasonable period and execute Flat Buyers Agreement and Maintenance Agreement, in his favour; (ii) pay delay compensation in the form of interest @21% per annum on his deposit from March, 2009 till actual handing over possession; (iii) restrain the opposite parties from charging interest on the balance amount for delayed or deferred period India Law Library Docid # 1882227
(887) SATPAL SINGH Vs. M/S EMERGING VALLEY PRIVATE LIMITED [CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-05-2023 This complaint has been filed by the complainant, seeking possession of the plots alongwith adequate interest on the amount paid till the time possession is handed over or in alternative, refund the total amount(s) paid i.e. Rs.74,40,000/- alongwith adequate interest; compensation of Rs.5 Lakhs on account of mental agony and harassment and Rs.1 Lakh towards litigation, as he is aggrieved of deficiency in providing service, negligence and adoption of unfair trade practice on the part of the oppos India Law Library Docid # 1882263
(888) SUNDAR SINGH Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-05-2023 We have heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant (the complainant) and the learned counsel for the respondent (the insurance co.). We have also perused the record, including inter alia the State Commissions impugned Order dated 26.02.2019 and the memorandum of appeal. India Law Library Docid # 1882145
(889) KAMLESH W/O. SH. RAM KARAN DALAL Vs. M/S. BPTP LIMITED & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-05-2023 This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/ Complainant against Respondents / Opposite Parties challenging the impugned Order dated 01.08.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Panchkula, Haryana, in First Appeal bearing No. 770 of 2016. Vide such Order, the State Commission dismissed the Appeal while upholding the Order dated 26.07.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad in Consumer Complaint No. 251/2011. India Law Library Docid # 1882172
(890) SUNIL KUMAR S/O BIHARI PERJAPATI AND OTHERS Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-05-2023 These two (02 nos.) Revision Petitions under Section 21(b) of the Act 1986 are in challenge to the Order dated 05.02.2013 of the State Commission in Appeals No. 04 and No. 05 of 2013 arising out of the Order dated 28.08.2012 of the District Commission in Complaints No. 86 and No. 87 of 2011. The Revision Petitions were dismissed, with reasoned judgment to follow. This Order gives the reasons. India Law Library Docid # 1882179
(891) BERKELEY HYUNDAI (BERK AUTO LLP) Vs. SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA AND OTHERS [CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-05-2023 Arguments on these applications were heard. For the reasons stated in the respective applications, delay of 153 days (M.A. No. 08 of 2023) in FA No.03 of 2023 (Berkley Hyundai (Berk Auto LLP)); and delay of 83 days (M.A. No. 883 of 2022) in FA No.167 of 2022 (Hyundai Motor India Ltd. and anr.) is condoned and the said applications are disposed of accordingly. India Law Library Docid # 1881917
(892) AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PRIVATE LTD Vs. ANEES A K AND OTHERS [KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-05-2023 This is an appeal filed by the first opposite party in C.C. No. 446/2015 before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Malappuram (District Commission for short). As per the order dated 17.02.2016 the District Commission allowed the complaint and directed the opposite parties to pay jointly and severally, an amount of Rs. 3,380/- being the value of the article along with a compensation of Rs. 10,000/- and costs of Rs. 3,000/- to the complainant, failing which opposite party shall be liable India Law Library Docid # 1881925
(893) THE BRANCH MANAGER SBI GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SYED HAYATHPEER HUSSENI [KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-05-2023 This Appeal filed by OP under Section 15 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986, aggrieved by an order dated 12.01.2017, passed in CC/62/2016 by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Koppal (herein after referred as District Forum/Commission and the parties arrayed as in the consumer complaint). Commission examined grounds of appeal, impugned order, appeal papers and heard learned counsels. Complainant raised Consumer Complaint before the Forum below alleging deficiency in service on the part of India Law Library Docid # 1882275
(894) SANOJ KUMAR ALIAS SHAILESH KUMAR DEALER Vs. RAJU SAO ALIAS RAJU KUMAR AND OTHERS [BIHAR STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-05-2023 Present appeal has been filed on behalf of Maa Bindhya Vashini H.P. Gas agency, Arwal through its dealer Sanoj Kumar for setting the order dated 29.07.2017 passed in Complaint Case no. 35 of 2015 passed by the Ld. District Consumer Forum, Arwal whereby and whereunder the Ld. District Consumer Forum has allowed the complaint case and directed all opposite parties no. 1,2 & 3 to pay jointly and severally Rs. 3,50,000/- as compensation for death of son of complainant and Rs. 50,000/- for loss of ho India Law Library Docid # 1881905
(895) CYGNUS MAHARAJA AGGARSAIN HOSPITAL AND OTHERS Vs. SHARWAN KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) S/O SH.KRISHAN LAL THROUGH HIS L.RS AND OTHERS [HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-05-2023 Vide this common order above mentioned two appeals bearing No.144 of 2017and F.A. No.310 of 2017will be disposed of as both the appeals have been preferred against the common order dated 29.11.2016 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panipat (in short District Commission). India Law Library Docid # 1882090
(896) GEETABEN JAYESHBHAI SHAH Vs. MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHETH PUKHRAJ RAICHAND GENERAL HOSPITAL & 5 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-05-2023 This Revision Petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Petitioner Geetaben Jayeshbhai Shah, (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant or Appellants) against the Impugned Order dated 21.09.2016 passed by State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Gujarat, (for short the State Commission) in First Appeal No. 509/20011, wherein the Appeal was dismissed and the Order passed by District Forum, Gandhinagar was confirmed. India Law Library Docid # 1882135
(897) CHITTARMAL SAINI Vs. S.K. SONI HOSPITAL & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The Appellant has filed the instant Appeal under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the Act), against the Order dated 09.02.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 28 of 2007, wherein the State Commission, dismissed the Complaint filed by the Complainant (Appellant herein). India Law Library Docid # 1882133
(898) INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITALS AND OTHERS Vs. PAWAN KUMAR & 8 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The Complainants are legal heirs of deceased Smt. Asha Rani Gurdhar. The Opposite Parties are OP-1-Kakkar Maternity and Nursing Home (OP-1), Dr. Rajesh Kakkar (OP-2), Dr. Abhishek Kakkar (OP-3) and Dr. Sunil Bajaj-The Medical officer of Kakkar Hospital (OP-4). Dr. Anant Ram Janta Hospital Barwala (OP-5) and Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi (OP-6), both were impleaded as a proforma party. India Law Library Docid # 1882136
(899) DR. MANPREET KAUR AND OTHERS Vs. MRS. SUMAN & 5 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The State Commission passed Order against the Opposite Parties. The State Commission held the Opposite Parties negligent jointly and severally, and awarded compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- alongwith the cost of litigation Rs.50,000/-. The OP No. 1 was also directed to bear all the expenses, which may be incurred on the future treatment of Complainant No. 1 in any Government hospital/ health center/dispensary etc. India Law Library Docid # 1882140
(900) DR. NARENDRABABU H V Vs. KARITHIMMEGOWDA & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-05-2023 The present Revision Petition has been filed by Dr. Narendrababu H V, Opposite Party No.1 before the District Forum, against the order dated 26.08.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karnataka (for short the State Commission) in Appeal No.321 of 2015 filed by the Petitioner herein against the order dated 24.02.2015 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mandya (for short the District Forum) in Complaint No.215/2013. Complainant Sri Karithimmegowda had also filed India Law Library Docid # 1882142