(881) PHILIPS THOMAS & OTHERS Vs. DEEN HOSPITAL & OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-06-2023 This Order shall decide both the First Appeals arising from the impugned Order dated 04.02.2013 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kerala (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 2/2008, wherein the State Commission allowed the Complaint and held the Opposite Parties Nos. 1 to 3 negligent and awarded the total compensation sum of Rs.7,00,000/- out of which Rs.3,00,000/- should be deposited in the name of minor children of Complainant No India Law Library Docid # 1881909
(882) AASHUTOSH PRAMOD SRIVASTAVA & ANOTHER Vs. DR. RAHUL PATIL & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-06-2023 The present Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by Aashutosh Pramod Srivastava & his brother Savivek Pramod Srivastava (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against the Opposite Parties Dr. Rahul Patil (OP-1) & Ruby Hall Clinic (OP-2), for the alleged medical negligence and wrong treatment which resulted into untimely death of their mother. India Law Library Docid # 1882181
(883) LIFELINE LABORATORY AND OTHERS Vs. ANJANAAGRAWAL AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-06-2023 The Appellant has filed the instant Appeal under section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in short the Act), against the Order dated 21.12.2021 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 114 of 2013, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the complainant and held OPs negligent. For the convenience, the parties are being referred to, in the instant Appeal, as position held in Consumer C India Law Library Docid # 1882207
(884) METRO HOSPITAL AND HEART INSTITUTE Vs. DR. OM PRAKASH AGARWAL AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-06-2023 This Order shall decide all the first appeals arising from the impugned Judgment /Order dated 18.03.2016 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 123/2010, wherein the State Commission allowed the complaint and held the Opposite Parties negligent and awarded lump sum Compensation sum of Rs.20,00,000/- along with 9% interest & Rs.20,000/- towards litigation costs. For the Convenie India Law Library Docid # 1882226
(885) MANAGER, SUMITRA D. S. MOTORS @ SUMITRA D.S. MOTORS PVT. LTD. Vs. RAJIV GUPTA @ RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-06-2023 This revision petition under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, 'the Act') assails the order in appeal no. 1831 of 2012 dated 12.01.2014 of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow (in short, 'the State Commission') (incorrectly mentioned as appeal no. 1701 of 2010 in the petition) arising out of order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal, Lakhimpur Kheri in CC no. 20 of 2011 dated 10.04.2011. India Law Library Docid # 1873470
(886) MANAGER, SUMITRA D. S. MOTORS @ SUMITRA D.S. MOTORS PVT. LTD. Vs. RAJIV GUPTA @ RAJIV KUMAR GUPTA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-06-2023 This revision petition under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order in appeal no. 1831 of 2012 dated 12.01.2014 of the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Lucknow (in short, the State Commission) (incorrectly mentioned as appeal no. 1701 of 2010 in the petition) arising out of order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal, Lakhimpur Kheri in CC no. 20 of 2011 dated 10.04.2011. India Law Library Docid # 1877403
(887) DEPARTMENT OF POST AND OTHERS Vs. COLONEL NARENDRA NATH SURI (RETD.) [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-06-2023 The present Appeal has been filed against the order dated 06.12.2017 of the State Commission whereby the Consumer Complaint No. 358 of 2015 filed by the respondent ( hereinafter referred to as Complainant) was allowed and all the Appellants were held jointly and severally liable to refund sum of Rs.24,91,382/- and amount of Rs.8830/- to the complainant. Rs.1,00,000/- was awarded towards mental and physical harassment and Rs.10,000/- towards cost of litigation. The brief facts of the case are tha India Law Library Docid # 1882221
(888) DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, NORTHERN RAILWAY AND OTHERS Vs. BIRENDERA KUMAR PASWAN [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 02-06-2023 This revision under section 58(1)(b) of the Act 2019 is in challenge to the Order dated 09.06.2022 of the State Commission in appeal no. 58 of 2022 arising out of the Order dated 04.04.2022 of the District Commission in complaint no. 904 of 2019. We have heard the learned counsel for the revisionists (the railways) and the respondent in person (the complainant) and have perused the record including inter alia the Order dated 04.04.2022 of the District Commission, the impugned Order dated 09.06.2 India Law Library Docid # 1882224
(889) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. M/S SHARMA AGENCY [PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-06-2023 The appellants/OPs No.1 and 2 i.e. United India Insurance Company Limited and another, through its Assistant Manager have filed the present appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (in short the Act) to challenge the impugned order dated 08.03.2022 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Moga (hereinafter referred as the District Commission), whereby the complaint filed by the respondents-complainants was partly allowed against OPs No.1 and 2. It would India Law Library Docid # 1882370
(890) PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED Vs. SUNITA RAHEJA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-05-2023 The present Appeal has been filed against the Order dated against the Order dated 11.03.2015, passed by the Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi (hereinafter to be referred to as the State Commission) in Complaint Case No. 174 of 2012, whereby the Complaint, filed by Mrs. Sunita Raheja (hereinafter to be referred to as the Complainant/Respondent) was allowed and the Opposite Party/Appellant herein i.e. Parsvnath Developers Limited (hereinafter referredto as the Appella India Law Library Docid # 1873311
(891) MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AUTOMOBILES DIVISION AND OTHERS Vs. SHAILESH KUMAR SINGH S/O SHRI SHARDA PRASAD SINGH AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-05-2023 Briefly, the case of the complainant is that on 30.06.2017, the complainant purchased car (KUV100 K4 6str) from opposite party No.3 (Snow View Automobiles Pvt. Ltd), for a total consideration of Rs.5,18,494/-. The said vehicle was manufactured by opposite party No.1(Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd). The vehicle in question got insured from opposite party No.4 (New India Assurance Company Ltd) through opposite party No.5 (insurance broker) and vehicle was financed from opposite party No.6 (State Bank of India Law Library Docid # 1882095
(892) ANIL KUMAR APPAN & 2 OTHERS Vs. M/S. A R LANDCRAFT LLP & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-05-2023 Anil Kumar Appan, Dilip Raj and Mrs. Lalita Rani have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.5953370/- with interest @15% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund; (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as costs of litigation; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. India Law Library Docid # 1882146
(893) RUJDAR KHAN Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-05-2023 The present First Appeal (FA) has been filed by the Appellant against Respondent as detailed above, under section 19 of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 26.09.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 89 of 2016 inter alia praying for quashing the impugned order dated 26.09.2017 of the State Commission. India Law Library Docid # 1882153
(894) J.PRAKASH Vs. THE MANAGER [TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-05-2023 The unsuccessful complainant has filed the present Appeal being aggrieved by the Order, dated 22.01.2019, passed by the DCDRF, Chennai South, in C.C. No.216 of 2015, dismissing his complaint filed against the present respondents/OPs therein-Insurance Company. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to in the course of this Order as per their respective rankings before the District Forum. Since the actual point in issue lies in a very narrow compass, it is unnecessary to burden this India Law Library Docid # 1882206
(895) HARISH GAS AGENCIES Vs. JAYANTHI [TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-05-2023 The present Revision is filed by the 1st OP in the main C.C. as against the order, dated 20.07.2022, passed by the DCDRC, Vellore, in allowing the petition/CMP No.4 of 2021 in C.C. No.41 of 2010 that was filed by the complainants/respondents-1 and 2 herein, seeking to condone the delay of 33 days in filing of the Complaint. Before the District Commission, it is the case of the complainants/respondents-1 and 2 herein that the complaint was filed in the year 2010; that, for the reason that the com India Law Library Docid # 1882236
(896) PROPRIETOR Vs. GAS AGENCIES, H.P. GAS DISTRIBUTORS [TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-05-2023 The present Revision is filed by the 1st OP in the main C.C. as against the order, dated 20.07.2022, passed by the DCDRC, Vellore, in allowing the petition/CMP No.4 of 2021 in C.C. No.41 of 2010 that was filed by the complainants/respondents-1 and 2 herein, seeking to condone the delay of 33 days in filing of the Complaint. Before the District Commission, it is the case of the complainants/respondents-1 and 2 herein that the complaint was filed in the year 2010; that, for the reason that the com India Law Library Docid # 1882243
(897) MR. ABHIMANYU SINGH BIKA Vs. GRJ DISTRIBUTORS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. [DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-05-2023 The present appeal has been filed on 10.12.2020 impugning order dated 21.10.2020 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-VI (New District), M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110001 in CC No. 87/2020. Along with this appeal, an application (IA No.302/2020) seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal has also been filed. Therefore, before deciding the present appeal on merits, the pending application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal is yet to be India Law Library Docid # 1882360
(898) AARAM HOSPITAL, MOTA MANDIR ROAD AND OTHERS Vs. JIGNISHABEN PRADEEPBHAI SHAH STATION ROAD AND OTHERS [GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023 These two appeals have been arisen out of order and judgment dated 18th October 2013 by the District Commission, Surat (Additional) in Complaint No. 259/2011 (old case no. 183/2004). The District Commission has directed opponents to pay Rs.63,000/- together with the interest @ 9% p.a., compensation of Rs.2,000/- and also cost of Rs.1,000/-. Being aggrieved by the said order, original opponents have preferred Appeal No. 2006 of 2013 and prayed for setting aside the order, whereas the complainants India Law Library Docid # 1881908
(899) LT. COL. (RETD.) J.S. AHLUWALIA Vs. FORTIS HOSPITAL & 4 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023 The First Appeal has been filed under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the Act) against the order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (in short, the State Commission) in CC No. 13/2016, whereby the Complaint was dismissed. India Law Library Docid # 1882134
(900) DR. S. MOHANKUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. MANGAYARKARASI AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-05-2023 This Order shall decide both the first appeals arising from the impugned Judgment /Order dated 03.02.2012 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Puducherry (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Dispute no. 2/2006, wherein the State Commission allowed the complaint and awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.12,00,000/- & Rs.2,00,000/- towards costs. India Law Library Docid # 1882141