(941) MAGMA HDI GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Vs. HITENDRA SINGH RAJPUT [MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-05-2023 The following order of the Commission was delivered by Dr.(Mrs) Monika Malik, Member: This appeal by the opposite party/appellant-Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as insurance company) is directed against the order dated 02.03.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sagar (for short District Commission) in C.C.No.183/2014 whereby the complaint filed by the complainant/respondent (hereinafter referred to as complainant) has been allo India Law Library Docid # 1882216
(942) DILKUMAR SANDE S/O. SHRI BARELAL SANDE Vs. MAA MAHAMAYA TRACTORS [CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ] 10-05-2023 This appeal, filed under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 (hereinafter called the Act for short) is directed against order dated 10/12/2021 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Janjgir-Champa (hereinafter referred to as District Commission for short), in Complaint Case No.CC/21/10, whereby the complaint filed by the appellant herein alleging deficiency in service against the respondent herein, was dismissed. Feeling aggrieved, the complainant has preferred thi India Law Library Docid # 1882372
(943) CHANDRASHEKHAR VAISHWADE S/O. SHRI RAMAYAN VAISHWADE Vs. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, THROUGH: DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND OTHERS [CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-05-2023 This appeal, filed under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 (hereinafter called the Act for short) is directed against order dated 29/11/2021 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bilaspur (hereinafter referred to as District Commission for short), in Complaint Case No.CC/2016/28, whereby the complaint filed by the appellant herein alleging deficiency in service against the respondent No.1 herein in repudiating his insurance claim was partlly allowed and the insu India Law Library Docid # 1881920
(944) SHRI JOGU RAM S/O SHRI GANGU RAM Vs. SHRI RAM LAL, AUTHORIZED AGENT OF PHILIPS AND OTHERS [HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-05-2023 Briefly, the case of the complainant is that on 03.06.2013 he had purchased one refrigerator, LCD and DTH set from the opposite party No.1 for a total sum of Rs.26,500/-. Rs.17,000/- were paid on the same day and balance amount was agreed to be paid after some time. Warranty of one year was given on the aforesaid products. India Law Library Docid # 1882093
(945) M/S.TELENOR (INDIA) COMMUNICATIONS PVT.LTD. Vs. SRI BELLAMKONDA NARENDRA [TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-05-2023 This is an appeal filed U/s.15 of Consumer Protection Act,1986 praying this Commission to call for the records and allow the instant appeal and set aside the order dated 01.02.2018 in CC.No.194/2016 passed by the District Consumer Redressal Commission-II, Hyderabad. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint. Briefly stated, the facts are that the Complainant had a pre- paid SIM card of Opposite Party (formerly Uninor) vide mobile No.9059102030 for five ye India Law Library Docid # 1882267
(946) HUBLI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY Vs. SANTOSH PEETAMBAR TANDEL [KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-05-2023 This appeal is filed by the appellants/Opposite parties being aggrieved by the Order dated 22.03.2014 passed in CC.No.66/2012 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Kannada at Karwar and prays to set-aside the order and to allow the appeal in the interest of justice and equity. India Law Library Docid # 1882073
(947) MR. KETAN MANDREKAR Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED [GOA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-05-2023 The Appellant being aggrieved by the Order passed by the District Commission, North dated 10/09/2018 filed the present Complaint on 12/10/2018 to challenge the Impugned Order on the grounds that The District Commission had erred in not considering the bill receipts of hired car on rent for travelling, additionally that the District Commission had erred in coming to a conclusion that the Claim cannot be allowed for transportation charges for the car rental as cogent evidence not placed on record. India Law Library Docid # 1882208
(948) YASOBANT DAS Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA [ODISHA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-05-2023 The factual matrix leading to the case of the complainant is that the complainant is a senior advocate practicing in Supreme Court of India and various High Courts in the country and permanent resident of Stony Road, Dagarpada, Cuttack. It is alleged inter alia that complainant in order have a residential house at New Delhi for the health of his wife purchased a built up property in B-100, Sector - 14, Noida, U.P. by incurring loan of Rs.1,10,79,835/- from the Ops - Bank on 17.9.2009. Out of tis India Law Library Docid # 1882293
(949) AGEAS FEDERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SMT.SUKANYA DEVI AND OTHER [HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-05-2023 Present revision petition is preferred against the order dated 30.11.2022 of learned District Commission, Kangra at Dharamshala, whereby the application filed by the petitioner/opposite party No.1 for setting aside the ex-parte order dated 04.05.2022 was dismissed and also the order dated 14.06.2022, whereby right to file reply beyond stipulated period of 45 days of the petitioner/opposite party No.1 was struck off. We have perused the revision petition as well as the impugned order. Learned cou India Law Library Docid # 1882366
(950) ARUN AGRAWAL Vs. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. [MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-05-2023 The following order of the Commission was delivered by Dr.(Mrs) Monika Malik, Member: This appeal by the complainant/appellant (hereinafter referred to as appellant) is directed against the order dated 09.03.2017 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shivpuri (for short District Commission) in C.C.No.420/2012, whereby the District Commission has dismissed the complaint filed by him. Briefly put, facts of the case are that the appellant is owner of Ford Fiesta car bearing India Law Library Docid # 1882367
(951) ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. (FORMALLY KNOWN AS BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.) AND OTHERS Vs. MEETABEN SUBHASHBHAI DIXIT WIDOW OF SUBHASHBHAI B. DIXIT [GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-05-2023 The applicant in Compliant No. 24/2010 has filed present Review Application under Section 50 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (herein after referred to as the C.P. Act). wherein the main relief is prayed in present Review Application are as under: India Law Library Docid # 1881923
(952) URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, ALWAR THROUGH ITS SECRETARY Vs. RAJENDRA SINGH YADAV SON OF SHRI CHANDRABHAN YADAV [RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-05-2023 As per office report the appeal has been filed after delay of 5 years 237 days. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant on the point of limitation. In the application for condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act it has specifically been mentioned that the copy of order dated 13.07.2017 was received by the counsel of the appellant on 17.07.2017 who sent it to the appellant and it came to the knowledge of appellant that reply to the application has been misinterpreted and India Law Library Docid # 1881907
(953) MR. ANTONIO JOSE JACQUES (SINCE DECEASED) S/O LATE MR. LUIS JACQUES AND OTHERS Vs. MRS. CONCEICAO CARDOZO [GOA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-05-2023 This Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 26/08/2021 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, South Goa (The District Commission for short) in Consumer complaint number 13/2021. The Appellant were the Complainants and Respondent was the Opposite Party in the said complaint. Parties shall herein after be referred to as per their status in the said complaint. India Law Library Docid # 1881912
(954) PURAB PREMIUM APARTMENT ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION EDUCATION ZONE AND OTHERS Vs. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUDA BHAVAN AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-05-2023 Since the facts and question of law involved and the reliefs prayed for in these complaints are similar/identical and filed by same complainant against the same Opposite Party except for minor variations in the dates, events and flat numbers of allottees etc., these complaints are being disposed of by this common order. However, for the sake of convenience, Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 1278 of 2016 is treated as the lead case and facts enumerated herein under are taken from CC 1278/2016. CC 1278 India Law Library Docid # 1882168
(955) SAVIOR GREENISLE CONSUMER AND BUYERS ASSOCIATION Vs. SAVIOR BUILDERS PVT. LTD. & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-05-2023 The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed by the Complainant (hereinafter referred to as Association or Society) against Opposite Parties (OPs) as detailed above, inter alia praying for directions to the OPs to:- India Law Library Docid # 1882176
(956) SMT. JASMINDER KAUR JAGGI Vs. AEGON RELIGARE LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. [GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023 This complaint is filed by widow of deceased Lt. Gen. Parminder Singh Jaggi in her capacity as legal heir and also being nominee for the insurance that was taken from the opponent Insurance Company. The complainant has prayed for Rs. 50,00,000/- towards accidental death rider and also Rs. 10,00,000/- towards the compensation for mental harassment and agony and also prayed for cost of Rs. 2,00,000/- for this complaint. India Law Library Docid # 1882059
(957) RAINBOW PAPERS LIMITED Vs. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD. [GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023 The present complainant has been filed by a public limited company and prayed for direction to the opponent to pay the complainant the sum of Rs. 82,97,446/- towards reimbursement of loss suffered by it on account of machinery breakdown which was insured under the policy issued by the opponent and further prayed for interest @18 % from the date of loss. The complainant also claimed special compensation for alleged hardship, mental agony, harassment due to negligent attitude and indulgence of opp India Law Library Docid # 1882068
(958) BATHINDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SHIVANI GUPTA [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023 Learned counsel for the complainant strongly opposes. He submits that on 09.03.2022 the application seeking condonation of delay of 34 days in filing the present appeal was allowed by a co-ordinate bench as it was not opposed by the complainant (This application seeking condonation of delay is allowed as not opposed by the Respondent.). The complainant is craving for an early decision on merits. However the development authority is unduly delaying the case. Earlier, on 08.08.2022, 14.09.2022, 09 India Law Library Docid # 1882108
(959) GENERAL MANAGER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY & 3 Others Vs. DR. LAVLEEN MISHRA [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023 This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners/ Opposite Parties against Respondent / Complainant challenging the impugned Order dated 14.09.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar, Patna, in Appeal bearing No. 390 of 2015. Vide such Order, the State Commission had dismissed the Appeal while upholding the Order dated 10.11.2015 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Buxar, in Complaint Case No. 81/2014. India Law Library Docid # 1882125
(960) NEENA ANEJA & ANOTHER Vs. JAI PRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023 This Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking refund of Rs.53,84,328/- along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the respective dates of payment till the date of filing of the complaint, totalling to Rs.2,18,86,850/-, and other ancillary reliefs. India Law Library Docid # 1882137