ive
THE BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(941) MOHAN KHANNA Vs. JAI PRAKASH ASSOCIATE LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
This complaint has been filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on account of delay in handing over the possession of the flat booked with the opposite party in a project promoted and developed by it.
India Law Library Docid # 1850326

(942) M/S CITIZEN SCALE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant who is in the business of electronic weighing scales and balances had obtained two policies for Standard Fire and Special Perils from the opposite party in March 2009. The policies related to stocks and for building with plinth, foundation, furniture, fixtures, and electronic equipments respectively. The two policies covered his premises at Citizen House, Plot 50 AB, Government Industrial Estate, Charkop Naka, Kandivali, Mumbai 400 067 fo
India Law Library Docid # 1850327

(943) KULIN BHUPATRAI SHAH Vs. NUTAN KAILAS NIWAS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
Consumer Complaint Nos. 2597 of 2018 (CC) has been filed by the Complainant against the opposite parties (OPs) as detailed above, inter aila praying for directing the OPs to:- (i) hand over peaceful possession of Flat No. 902 with occupation certificate alongwith car parking and other amenities as per the Development Agreement and the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act (MOFA) Agreement.
India Law Library Docid # 1850328

(944) CONSUMERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER Vs. SSV DEVELOPERS AND BUILDERS PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
This complaint has been filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) alleging deficiency in service against the opposite party in not delivering the flat booked by the complaint in a project promoted and executed by it even after the promised date of delivery.
India Law Library Docid # 1850329

(945) TARUN GUPTA AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER @RESPONDEN [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by the Complainants against the opposite parties as detailed above, inter alia praying for :- (i) Refund of the entire amount paid by the complainant to the opposite parties towards consideration of the flat booked by them in the project of Opposite Parties known as RISE, situated in RP City, Sector 37-D, Gurgaon, Haryana, alongwith interest @18%.
India Law Library Docid # 1850330

(946) VIJAY KUMAR SARAOGI AND OTHERS Vs. IREO GRACE REALTECH PRIVATE LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
Vijay Kumar Saraogi and others have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) refund Rs.15530529/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund, (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment, (iii) pay Rs.100000/-, as litigation cost; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 1850331

(947) VIKAS CHADHA Vs. IREO GRACE REALTECH PRIVATE LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
Vikas Chadha has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.17836357.04/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund, (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment, (iii) pay Rs.50000/-, as litigation cost; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 1850332

(948) RAJ KUMAR MALLICK Vs. M/S BESTECH INDIA PVT. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
In brief, the facts of the case are that on 16.02.2006 the opposite party issued an allotment letter in the name of the complainant allotting him Flat No. A-1501, Park View SPA, Sector-47, Gurgaon for a sale consideration of Rs.95,25,500/- along with the details of payment of the balance amount as per a payment plan. On 10.05.2006 a Flat Buyer Agreement (In short Agreement) was executed between the parties in respect of the above flat with an approximate super area of 2875 sq. ft. The possession
India Law Library Docid # 1850338

(949) B. RUDRAGOUDA Vs. M/S GODREJ BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
This consumer complaint has been filed under section 21 (1) (a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) against the opposite party M/s Godrej Buildwell Pvt., Ltd., alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice in respect of the apartment booked by the complainants in a project promoted and executed by the opposite party.
India Law Library Docid # 1850339

(950) SANJEEV BHARDWAJ Vs. M/S IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
Sanjeev Bhardwaj has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund the entire amount collected from the complainant towards the consideration with interest @18% p.a. from the date of collection of the amounts till it is actually returned to the complainant, (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 1850340

(951) M/S. SUBHASH KABINI POWER CORPORATION LTD. Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
This is a complaint under Section 21 (a) (i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) alleging deficiency in service in the repudiation of the claim filed under a Special Contingency Insurance Policy (SCIP) obtained by the complainant from the opposite party in respect of a mini hydel supply project operated by the complainant.
India Law Library Docid # 1850341

(952) NIDHI SACHAN Vs. IREO GRACE REALTECH PRIVATE LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
Nidhi Sachan has filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) refund Rs.12460868.97/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund, (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment, (iii) pay Rs.100000/-, as litigation cost; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 1850342

(953) VARSHA AHUJA AND ANOTHER Vs. IREO GRACE REALTECH PRIVATE LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
Varsha Ahuja and Aseem Ahuja have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to (i) refund Rs.19281625.88/- with interest @18% per annum from the date of respective deposit till the date of refund, (ii) pay Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment, (iii) pay Rs.150000/-, as litigation cost; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 1850343

(954) MADHU DWIVEDI AND ANOTHER Vs. JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-12-2022
This complaint has been filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on account of delay in handing over the possession of the flat booked with the opposite party in a project promoted and developed by it.
India Law Library Docid # 1850349

(955) DR. DEBDAS BISWAS Vs. DR. SOURAV SINHA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2022
The present Consumer Complaint has been filed by Dr. Debdas Biswas the US resident (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant) under section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) against the Ophthalmologist- Dr. Sourav Sinha (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Party No. 1) and B. B. Eye Foundation (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Party No. 2) for alleged medical negligence due to wrong medical advice and the Complainant suffered permanent and irreversibl
India Law Library Docid # 1850320

(956) ANSAL CROWN HEIGHTS FLAT BUYERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) AND OTHERS Vs. ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD INDIA PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2022
The present Execution Applications has been filed by Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association, Complainant/ Decree Holder against M/s Ansal Crown Infrabuild India Pvt Ltd and its Directors (hereinafter referred to as Opposite Parties / Judgment Debtors).
India Law Library Docid # 1850321

(957) ANSAL CROWN HEIGHTS FLAT BUYERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) AND OTHERS Vs. ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD INDIA PVT. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2022
The present Execution Applications has been filed by Ansal Crown Heights Flat Buyers Association, Complainant/ Decree Holder against M/s Ansal Crown Infrabuild India Pvt Ltd and its Directors (hereinafter referred to as Opposite Parties / Judgment Debtors). Since the facts and question of law involved in these Execution Applications are similar except for minor variations in the dates and events, these Execution Applications are being disposed of by this common Order. However, for the sake of co
India Law Library Docid # 1850322

(958) SANGEETA OBEROI AND ANOTHER Vs. DLF UNIVERSAL LIMITED PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS DLF INDIA LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2022
Mrs. Sangeeta Oberoi and Mr. Rajiv Oberoi have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite party to pay (i) compensation by way of interest @18% per annum on their deposits, from the date of respective deposit till 04.10.2016, (ii) Rs.500000/- as compensation for deficiency in service, (iii) Rs.500000/-, as compensation for mental agony and harassment, (iv) Rs.100000/-, as cost of the litigation, (v) compensation under Section 14 (hb) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, for unfair trade
India Law Library Docid # 1850323

(959) KAMAL GIROTRA AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S ANSAL CROWN INFRABUILD PVT. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2022
Brief facts of the Case are that the Complainants had booked a Residential Apartment vide their Application dated 12.08.2012 in the Group Housing Project, namely, Ansal Crown Heights, proposed to be developed by the Opposite Parties, whereupon vide Letter dated 15.09.2012 Flat No. 102, Tower-4 of the Project, having approximate Super Area of 1788 sq. ft., against total sale consideration of Rs.70,23,264/-, was allotted to the Complainants. The Complainants had paid ? 56,19,972/- to the Opposite
India Law Library Docid # 1850334

(960) SHEKHAR SETHU AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. EMAAR MGF LAND LIMITED AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 05-12-2022
Shekhar Shethu and Smrita Jain have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover possession of apartment No. TDP-F-F06-602, complete in all respect as per specification and execute conveyance deed in favour of the complainants; (ii) pay compensation for delayed possession in the form of interest @12% per annum on the deposit of the complainants from due date of possession till handing over possession, (iii) exempt the complainants from paying the escalation in cost i
India Law Library Docid # 1850336