ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(981) PURAB PREMIUM APARTMENT ALLOTTEES ASSOCIATION EDUCATION ZONE AND OTHERS Vs. GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PUDA BHAVAN AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-05-2023
Since the facts and question of law involved and the reliefs prayed for in these complaints are similar/identical and filed by same complainant against the same Opposite Party except for minor variations in the dates, events and flat numbers of allottees etc., these complaints are being disposed of by this common order. However, for the sake of convenience, Consumer Complaint (CC) No. 1278 of 2016 is treated as the lead case and facts enumerated herein under are taken from CC 1278/2016. CC 1278
India Law Library Docid # 1882168

(982) SAVIOR GREENISLE CONSUMER AND BUYERS ASSOCIATION Vs. SAVIOR BUILDERS PVT. LTD. & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-05-2023
The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed by the Complainant (hereinafter referred to as Association or Society) against Opposite Parties (OPs) as detailed above, inter alia praying for directions to the OPs to:-
India Law Library Docid # 1882176

(983) SMT. JASMINDER KAUR JAGGI Vs. AEGON RELIGARE LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. [GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
This complaint is filed by widow of deceased Lt. Gen. Parminder Singh Jaggi in her capacity as legal heir and also being nominee for the insurance that was taken from the opponent Insurance Company. The complainant has prayed for Rs. 50,00,000/- towards accidental death rider and also Rs. 10,00,000/- towards the compensation for mental harassment and agony and also prayed for cost of Rs. 2,00,000/- for this complaint.
India Law Library Docid # 1882059

(984) RAINBOW PAPERS LIMITED Vs. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD. [GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
The present complainant has been filed by a public limited company and prayed for direction to the opponent to pay the complainant the sum of Rs. 82,97,446/- towards reimbursement of loss suffered by it on account of machinery breakdown which was insured under the policy issued by the opponent and further prayed for interest @18 % from the date of loss. The complainant also claimed special compensation for alleged hardship, mental agony, harassment due to negligent attitude and indulgence of opp
India Law Library Docid # 1882068

(985) BATHINDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SHIVANI GUPTA [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
Learned counsel for the complainant strongly opposes. He submits that on 09.03.2022 the application seeking condonation of delay of 34 days in filing the present appeal was allowed by a co-ordinate bench as it was not opposed by the complainant (This application seeking condonation of delay is allowed as not opposed by the Respondent.). The complainant is craving for an early decision on merits. However the development authority is unduly delaying the case. Earlier, on 08.08.2022, 14.09.2022, 09
India Law Library Docid # 1882108

(986) GENERAL MANAGER, EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY & 3 Others Vs. DR. LAVLEEN MISHRA [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
This Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioners/ Opposite Parties against Respondent / Complainant challenging the impugned Order dated 14.09.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar, Patna, in Appeal bearing No. 390 of 2015. Vide such Order, the State Commission had dismissed the Appeal while upholding the Order dated 10.11.2015 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Buxar, in Complaint Case No. 81/2014.
India Law Library Docid # 1882125

(987) NEENA ANEJA & ANOTHER Vs. JAI PRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
This Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, seeking refund of Rs.53,84,328/- along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the respective dates of payment till the date of filing of the complaint, totalling to Rs.2,18,86,850/-, and other ancillary reliefs.
India Law Library Docid # 1882137

(988) M/S HCC-CPPL JV Vs. M/S ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) by M/s HCC-CPPL JV (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant Company) against Opposite Party, i.e., ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Opposite Party Insurance Company).
India Law Library Docid # 1882149

(989) SATISH KUMAR S/O. HARENDRA PRASAD Vs. DR. SHAILESH KUMAR SINHA & 2 OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
The present Appeal has been filed against the order dated 19.02.2018 in complaint no. 11/2003 of the Appellant whereby his complaint was dismissed on merit. The complainant has submitted that the findings of the State Commission are perverse and contrary to the records available before the State Commission. It is submitted that there are enough documents to prove on record that right kidney of the complainant had been removed at the time when he was operated upon by the respondents on 13.09.2000
India Law Library Docid # 1882173

(990) A. VIZAYA, W/O.ANANDOU Vs. THE MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT [PUDUCHERRY STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
The present application has been filed under section 50 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 praying to review the order dated 10.11.2022 made in CC.No.09/2017 by this Commission. Earlier, the petitioners herein filed the complaint as against the respondent alleging that while at the time of giving treatment to their father, viz., the deceased Arumugam, there was medical negligence on the part of the respondent. Therefore, the respondent is liable to pay compensation for a sum of Rs.50,000/-. Furthe
India Law Library Docid # 1882219

(991) C.PARTHIBAN AND OTHER Vs. DR. LATHA CHATURVEDULA GYNECOLOGY DEPARTMENT [PUDUCHERRY STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
This complaint has been filed by the complainants against the Opposite parties under section 14 and 17 of Consumer Protection Act, herein after called the CP Act, alleging negligence in treating their daughter Ms. P.Sri Raja Rajeswari (hereinafter referred as the patient) resulting in her untimely death. The complainants have sought Rs.99,99,999 towards damages from the Opposite parties on account of loss of life, shock and mental agony and cost of the complaint. Gist of the complaint is as foll
India Law Library Docid # 1882223

(992) SMT RANI DEVI Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD AND OTHERS [BIHAR STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
The complainant Smt. Rani Devi filed this consumer complaint seeking the reliefs against the opposite parties and prayer has been made, for directing the O.Ps. to pay the complainant:- i. Sum assured as well as other benefits along with interest @ 10% from the date of death of life assured ( Suman Kumar@ Suman Kumar Singh - now deceased) till realization; ii. Rs. 5 lacs as the compensation. And iii. Rs. 10,000/- as litigation cost. The facts as stated in the complaint case and emerged from the d
India Law Library Docid # 1882247

(993) DR.USHAKIRAN CHAVAN @ DR.SANJANA S. WAHVEL Vs. MRS.SONU PANKAJ KAREER AND OTHER [MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-05-2023
Appellant Dr.Ushakiran Chavan has preferred present appeal feeling aggrieved by the Judgment and Order dated 02/03/2015 passed by the learned Mumbai Suburban District in consumer complaint No.251 of 2005 by which complaint filed by the respondent/complainant came to be allowed. Short facts leading to the filing of the present complaint may be narrated as under Complainant-Smt.Sonu Pankaj Karir- claims to be housewife and became pregnant in the month of February 2003. Complainant therefore consul
India Law Library Docid # 1882269

(994) HAKIM SINGH CHAUHAN & 11 OTHERS Vs. JKG CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 02-05-2023
The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 read with Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) initially by the 12 Complainants against the Opposite Party, M/s. JKG Constructions Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter to be referred to as the Developer) seeking possession of the booked Residential Units along with delayed compensation or in the alternative refund of amount paid by them along with interest as the Opposite Party Developer has failed to deliver the pos
India Law Library Docid # 1882126

(995) THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MEHTA'S HOSPITAL PVT. LTD., (GROUP OF DR. MEHTA'S HOSPITALS) Vs. MR. RAJKAMAL, S/O. MR. KANNIAH AND OTHERS [TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 02-05-2023
The Revision Petitioner is the 1st Opposite Party/Hospital in the main case-CC. No.66 of 2022, on the file of the DCDRC, Perambalur, and they filed CMP No.48 of 2023 in the said C.C., seeking the District Commission to receive their additional proof affidavit along with documents and, aggrieved by the said Commissions order, dated 23.02.2023, in rejecting the said Miscellaneous Petition, they have come up with the present Revision.
India Law Library Docid # 1882197

(996) STANDARD AUTO AGENCY Vs. SUKHDEV GUPTA AND OTHER [MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 02-05-2023
This appeal by the opposite party no.1/appellant-Standard Auto Agency is directed against the order dated 11.01.2011 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jabalpur (for short District Commission) in C.C.No.531/2009, whereby the complainants complaint has been allowed directing the opposite party no.1-dealer to pay compensation of Rs.40,000/- to the complainant towards mental harassment suffered by him, with interest @ 8% p.a. from the date of filing of complaint i.e. 10.
India Law Library Docid # 1882287

(997) BHARTHI AXA LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. SNEHA AND OTHER [KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 02-05-2023
This appeal is filed by the appellants/Complainants being aggrieved by the order dated 13.06.2019 passed by the District Consumer Commission, Bidar in CC.No.96/2018 and prays to set-aside the order and to allow the appeal in the interest of justice and equity. The brief facts of the complaint are as under:- The complainants mother, the deceased policy holder Sanjana w/o late Sanjeev Kumar was a business woman by profession and during her life time had obtained life insurance policy for sum assur
India Law Library Docid # 1882368

(998) BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA Vs. PRADYUT KUMAR SAHA AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-05-2023
The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Opposite Party No.1 Bank in the Complaint against the Order dated 29.12.2015, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, Kolkata (for short "the State Commission") in FA/641/2014 whereby the State Commission partly allowing the Appeal filed by the Petitioner has modified the Order dated 30.4.2014 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, South 24 Parganas, Alipore
India Law Library Docid # 1873469

(999) BRANCH MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA Vs. PRADYUT KUMAR SAHA AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-05-2023
The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Opposite Party No.1 Bank in the Complaint against the Order dated 29.12.2015, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, West Bengal, Kolkata (for short the State Commission) in FA/641/2014 whereby the State Commission partly allowing the Appeal filed by the Petitioner has modified the Order dated 30.4.2014 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, South 24 Parganas, Alipore
India Law Library Docid # 1877402

(1000) M/S. FLOWTEX PRODUCTS Vs. M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 01-05-2023
The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) by M/s Flowtex Products (hereinafter referred to as the Complainant Company) against Opposite Party, i.e., United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Opposite Party Insurance Company).
India Law Library Docid # 1882124