ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(741) JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND ANOTHER Vs. SHRADHANJALI MANIYA AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-09-2023
Above appeal has been filed against the order of Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur, dated 12.05.2016, passed in CC/14/39, partly allowing the complaint and directing the appellants to pay Rs.1500000/- as the compensation and Rs.5000/-as litigation cost. Mrs. Shradhanjali Maniya, Ms. Tinkle Maniya and Ms. Manashvi Maniya (respondents-1 to 3) filed CC/39/2014, for directing the opposite parties jointly and severally to pay (i) Rs.2025000/-, as compensation for monet
India Law Library Docid # 1882323

(742) YOGENDER S. BANSAL Vs. M/S BPTP LTD. [CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-09-2023
Initially, a residential plot measuring 500 Sq. Yards bearing No.F-52, Block-F, Phase II was purchased by one Sunil Jain & Manjula Jain in the project of the opposite parties namely Parklands at Sector 88, Faridabad being developed by opposite party No.1. The basic sale price of the said plot was Rs.46,75,000/-but after discount of Rs.13,00,244/- given by the opposite parties, the basic sale price was fixed at Rs.33,74,756/-. A buyer agreement was executed on 05.02.2007. Apart from the final bas
India Law Library Docid # 1882237

(743) ANSHUL AGARWAL Vs. SHREENIWAS COTTON MILLS LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-09-2023
This consumer complaint under section 21(1)(b)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) alleges unfair trade practice and deficiency in service on part of the opposite party in completing the project as per the proposed plan and delay in handing over possession of a flat booked by the complainants within the promised time resulting in loss to the complainants who are therefore seeking refund of the amount deposited with compensation and other costs. This order will also dispos
India Law Library Docid # 1882355

(744) VEENA BAJAJ AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. NEXGEN INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED (A MAHAGUN GROUP COMPANY) [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-09-2023
These consumer complaints have been filed under section 21 (1) (a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) against the opposite party M/s Nexgen Infracon Pvt. Ltd. alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice in respect of the apartment booked by the complainants in a project promoted and executed by the opposite party. By this common order, all the above-mentioned complaints are proposed to be disposed since they relate to the same project Mahagun Mezzaria of the sa
India Law Library Docid # 1882361

(745) M/S. HARSH CONSTRUCTIONS AND ANOTHER Vs. CONSUMER WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-09-2023
The two Appeals, bearing Nos. FA/995/2016 and FA/996/2016 were filed by M/s. Harsh Constructions & Anr (hereinafter referred to as the Appellants/ Opposite Parties) against Consumer Welfare Association & Anr (hereinafter referred to as the Respondents/Complainants). These appeals challenge the Orders dated 21.06.2016 in (1) CC/13/244 and (2) CC/13/245 respectively passed by the learned State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the State Commissi
India Law Library Docid # 1882354

(746) VIRENDER SHARMA AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. HAAMID REAL ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-08-2023
The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed by the Complainant against Opposite Parties (OPs) as detailed above, inter alia praying for directions to the OPs to refund the entire amount of Rs.29,99,682/- with interest of 18% per annum from the date of payment till the date of realization and Rs.20,00,000/- for mental agony and harassment. Notice was issued to the OPs. Parties filed Written Statement/Reply, Rejoinder, Evidence by way of an Affidavit and Written Arguments/Synopsis etc. as p
India Law Library Docid # 1882122

(747) AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Vs. PRATEEK INFRA PROJECTS INDIA PVT. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-08-2023
This consumer complaint under section 21(a)(i) read with 12(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) is filed against the opposite party alleging deficiency in not handing over possession of the flat booked by the complainants within the promised time and seeking refund of the amount deposited with interest as compensation and other costs. The complainant states that he booked flat G-2315, 22nd Floor, Tower G, Prateek Edifice, Sector 107, Gautam Budh Nagar on transfer from
India Law Library Docid # 1882250

(748) ALOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs. VATIKA LIMITED [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-08-2023
This consumer complaint under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) is filed against the opposite party alleging deficiency in not handing over possession of the flat booked by the complainants within the promised time and seeking refund of the amount deposited with interest as compensation and other costs. The complainants state that they paid a booking amount of Rs.8,00,000/- towards a flat in the opposite partys project, Tranquil Heights, Vatika India Next, Secto
India Law Library Docid # 1882255

(749) ARTI Vs. DR. GAGANDEEP GOYAL AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-08-2023
This revision petition under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order dated 05.05.2016 in First Appeal No. 316 of 2013 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh (in short, the State Commission) allowing the appeal and dismissing order dated 28.01.2013 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhatinda (in short, the District Forum) in Consumer Complaint no. 216 of 2012. The impugned order disposed of 3 connected
India Law Library Docid # 1882274

(750) KRISHNA JAIN Vs. PNB MET LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-08-2023
This complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) has been filed by the widow and nominee of her late husband Mr. Rakesh Jain, who had purchased a MetLife Family Income Protector Plus Insurance Policy (in short, the policy) from the Opposite Party for a term plan of 15 years on 07.03.2016 (effective from 19.02.2016) on half yearly premium instalment of Rs.1,14,632/-. The life assured expired on 21.05.2016 and the claim under the said policy was disallowed b
India Law Library Docid # 1882327

(751) MAHENDRA RANGARE, PARTNER, M/S. SHREE VINAYAKA PACKAGING SOLUTION Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 31-08-2023
This complaint under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) is filed by the Partner of the complainant firm engaged in the manufacturing of PP / HDPE laminated fabric and L D agricultural pipes located at 81 Industrial Area, Rao Extension, Indore, M.P against the Opposite Party from whom it had obtained a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy (SFPPS) (in short, the Policy). Deficiency in service and unfair trade practice is alleged in the repudiation of the loss cl
India Law Library Docid # 1882328

(752) M/S. VALIENT SHIPPING CO. PVT. LTD. Vs. NEW INDIAASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-08-2023
This appeal raises certain seminal questions regarding the correctness or the infirmity of the impugned judgment of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Goa at Panaji (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) dated 12.04.2012 whereby after taking notice of the fact that certain substantial amount was paid by the complainant/appellant herein as against the marine hull policy proceeded to assess the nature of the complaint which was essentially for a claim on repairs incurred
India Law Library Docid # 1882118

(753) AD BUREAU ADVERTISING PVT LTD REPT BY MD ABIRCHAND NAHAR RAYALA TOWERS Vs. THE CHIEF MANAGER , CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 30-08-2023
The present Consumer Complaint (CC) has been filed by the Complainant against Opposite Parties (OPs) as detailed above, inter alia praying for directions to the OPs to:- (i) Pay a sum of Rs. 16,56,00,000/- towards damages and mental agony suffered by the complainant; (ii) Pay a sum of Rs. 25,000/- towards cost of this complaint Or (iii) Pass such further or other orders as this Honble Commission may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice. Notice w
India Law Library Docid # 1882299

(754) MINAKSHI BALAKRISHNAN AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. QURESHI BUILDERS AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-08-2023
The two complainants who are Non-Resident Indians before us have come up claiming legal possession of Flat No. 12 (12th Floor), Area 1750 sq. ft. in a building described as ‘Skyper’ located at Pali Market Road, Pali Hill, Bandra (West), Mumbai or in the alternative to refund the entire amount of Rs.5,40,00,000/- together with 18% interest from the date of payment till actual realization of the amount coupled with compensation of Rs.30,00,000/-and an additional amount of Rs.10,00,000/- for mental
India Law Library Docid # 1603886

(755) UMESH KUMAR GARG Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-08-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 09.08.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, Jaipur, (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in First Appeal (FA) No. 282 of 2017 in which order dated 25.01.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bharatpur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer
India Law Library Docid # 1882113

(756) SUKHVIR SINGH RAGHAV AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. SKG HOMES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-08-2023
This Complaint has been filed by 30 Complainants for the following reliefs: Direct the Opposite Parties to refund the amount received in lieu of extra area i.e. difference in the area of the Flats with 18% rate of interest.. Direct the Opposite Party to pay the Complainants for the delay in completion of the construction and handing over the possession of flats till actual delivery of possession with 18% rate of interest. Direct payment of amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Ten Lakhs Only) towards compen
India Law Library Docid # 1882270

(757) CHOTANAGPUR GRAPHITE (P) LTD. Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 28-08-2023
This first appeal arises out of a final Order dated 09.09.2022 passed by the Jharkhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ranchi, whereby the appellant-complainants claim of insurance regarding the upturning of a Hydraulic Excavator has been rejected on the ground that such a vehicle was not classified as a vehicle in respect whereof the insurance claim, on an alleged accident of the nature involved, could be extended any benefit under the insurance policy. The State Consumer Disputes
India Law Library Docid # 1882304

(758) JAIMANTI DEVI Vs. BRANCH MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD VIBHUTIKHAND [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-08-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent as detailed above, under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 08.11.2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Uttar Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in First Appeal (FA) No.2139 of 2011 in which order dated 30.11.2011 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Aligarh (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint
India Law Library Docid # 1882321

(759) MANAGER, SREI PARIBAS, SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. K.A. HANUMESH [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-08-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioners against Respondent as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 25.07.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru, Karnataka, (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission), in First Appeal (FA) No. 811 of 2016 in which order dated 05.02.2016 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bellary (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer
India Law Library Docid # 1882331

(760) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. BALBIR SINGH [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-08-2023
The present Revision Petition ( RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against the Respondent, as detailed above, under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 31.07.2017of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Haryana ( hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in First Appeal ( FA) No. 1174 of 2016 in which order dated 01.06.2016 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Rewari (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Compla
India Law Library Docid # 1882115