ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(641) REKHA KUMARI W/O SH. VEERU ALIAS RAUJENDER Vs. SH.TULSI RAM BANSAL, S/O SH. JINDU RAM AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-11-2023
Instant appeal is arising out of the order dated 24.04.2018 passed by learned District Consumer Commission, Una camp at Bilaspur in Consumer Complaint No.128/2015, titled as Rekha Kumari Versus Tulsi Ram & Another.
India Law Library Docid # 2400979

(642) THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. M/S ORIENT RESINS LTD.[DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-11-2023
Consumer Law – Vehicle Theft – Repudiation of claim - The Appellant/Opposite Party appeals a District Commission judgment, arguing that the commission erred in ignoring insurance policy terms and awarded a claim for a lower sum than insured, resulting in a repudiation - However, it is clear from the insurance policy that the IDV value of the vehicle in question was Rs. 2,00,000/-.
India Law Library Docid # 2400963

(643) RAGHUVEER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. NARAYANA HRIDAYALAYA LTD. (NARAYANA MULTISPECIALTY HOSPITAL) AND 2 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 17-11-2023
This Order shall decide both the appeals arising out from the impugned Judgment /Order dated 30.07.2019 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Complaint No. 157/2017, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the complaint.
India Law Library Docid # 2400780

(644) M/S. SHAKAMBARI POLYMERS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & 3 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-11-2023
The complaint arises out of an insurance claim relating to the damage stated to have caused to the goods that was sustained due to a fall during transit. The claim has been repudiated by the insurance company. Hence this complaint.
India Law Library Docid # 2400777

(645) MAYA SHARMA AND 2 OTHERS Vs. RAJ HOSPITAL AND 3 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-11-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner(s) against Respondent(s) as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 22.05.2018 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jharkhand, Ranchi, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No. 82/2017 in which order dated 28.11.2016
India Law Library Docid # 2400778

(646) NEW INDIAASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. M/S. N.R.H. CO.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-11-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent as detailed above, under section 58 (1) (b) of Consumer Protection Act 2019, against the order dated 23.03.2021 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.1389 of 2013
India Law Library Docid # 2400779

(647) KHANNA PAPER MILLS LTD. Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-11-2023
This complaint is by a Paper Mill about an insurance claim that has been repudiated by the opposite party, United India Insurance Company Limited on 01.12.2010. The present complaint was filed praying for damages suffered by the complainant due to breakdown of an Industrial Steam Turbine installed by the complainant for power generation.
India Law Library Docid # 2400776

(648) M/S EMPIRE HOME APPLIANCES LTD. Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-11-2023
This is an insurance claim which was filed in respect of a claim under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy the duration whereof was from 15.04.2011 to 14.04.2012. On 15.07.2011 a fire is alleged to have taken place in which the goods stored within the premises as mentioned in the policy are said to have been gutted and destroyed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400775

(649) M/S. CLINIC NALLAM AND ANOTHER Vs. A. HELEN VICTORIA AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
The Appellant filed the instant Appeal under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the Act), against the Order dated 20.04.2012 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Puducherry (hereinafter referred to as the State Commission) in Consumer Complaint No. 2 of 2004, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the Complaint filed by the Complainant.. For the sake of Convenience, the parties in the present matter being referred to as position held in Consumer
India Law Library Docid # 1882350

(650) SAHARA HOSPITALITY LTD. Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
This complaint was heard on 16.10.2023 and again on 26.10.2023 when inal arguments proceeded and the judgment was reserved on 3.11.2023 when the Ld. Counsel for the parties finally concluded their arguments supported by their Written Submissions and the Judgments relied upon by them. However, in order to reduce the narration of facts in this judgment, the
India Law Library Docid # 2400573

(651) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. STERLITE POWER TRANSMISSION LIMITED[DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
The Appellant has preferred the present Appeal under Section 41 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 to set aside the impugned order dated 02.06.2023 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-X, Udyog Sadan, C- 22 & 23 Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi in Complaint Case no. 190/2020 filed by Respondent/Complainant against the Appellant/Opposite Party. Vide impugned order dated 02.06.2023, the District Commission while deciding
India Law Library Docid # 2400577

(652) MR. KRISHAN CHANDER MALIK Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGIONAL MANGER AND OTHERS[DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
Complainant joined the service of the OP in the year of 1983 and retired from there on 31st March 2001 under the voluntary retirement scheme opened by the Bank. At the time of his retirement interalia he also received a sum of Rs. 56,042/- towards leave encashment of the total service rendered by him to the Bank. He deposited the said amount in his
India Law Library Docid # 2400578

(653) J. NAGI REDDY MANAGING PARTNER, SRI MEENAKSHI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS Vs. RAVI SHANKAR AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
The present First Appeal, filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is brought forth by J Nagi Reddy, (henceforth referred to as the "Appellant" or "Opposite Party No.3"). This Appeal challenges the Order dated 08.12.2011 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bangalore, Karnataka, (henceforth termed as "the State Commission"), in Consumer Complaint No. 145 of 2009, wherein the complaint filed by the Complainants (Respondents No. 1 & 2 herein) was allowed
India Law Library Docid # 2400572

(654) M/S. CLINIC NALLAM AND ANOTHER Vs. A. HELEN VICTORIA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023
The Appellant filed the instant Appeal under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”), against the Order dated 20.04.2012 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Puducherry (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 2 of 2004, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the Complaint filed by the Complainant
India Law Library Docid # 2400574

(655) M/S. SWARNA MOTORS Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This Complaint under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) has been filed against the repudiation of the insurance claim under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy obtained by the Complainant who is a proprietorship firm operating as a premier distributor of genuine spare parts of commercial vehicles, on account of a fire incident on 12.10.2013 at the office-cum-warehouse of the Complainant at Panipat, Haryana. The Complainant lodged a claim for 6,97,37,720/- w
India Law Library Docid # 1882333

(656) HDFC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. VIKRAMBHAI RANCHODDAS RANA[GUJARAT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
The appellants - original opponent has preferred the present appeal as per the provisions of Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act, 1986”) against the impugned order passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Surat (Addl.) (for short “learned District Commission”) in
India Law Library Docid # 2400579

(657) M/S. SWARNA MOTORS Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This Complaint under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) has been filed against the repudiation of the insurance claim under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy obtained by the Complainant who is a proprietorship firm operating as a premier distributor of genuine spare parts of commercial vehicles, on account of a fire
India Law Library Docid # 2400566

(658) MONIKA DHINGRA AND OTHERS Vs. PIONEER URBAN LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND 3 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This complaint has been filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) alleging deficiency in services in respect of non-delivery of a flat booked by the Complainant with the Opposite party in the project ‘Araya’, promoted and developed by it
India Law Library Docid # 2400567

(659) M/S. REDDY VEERANNA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This complaint has been filed by a Private Limited Company through its Director that undertakes contracts for construction of public works, including roads, dams etc. The present complaint is filed with regard to the non-settlement of an insurance claim that had been registered with the insurance company, claiming a loss while carrying out the work of construction of a water storage tank under the lift irrigation scheme at Village Muchonipally in Gattu Mandal, Mehbubnagar, Andhra Pradesh. The pr
India Law Library Docid # 2400568

(660) ANUBHAV SINGHAL AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023
This consumer complaint under section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) alleges unfair trade practice and deficiency in service in delay in handing over possession of a flat booked by the complainants in a project promoted and executed by the opposite party within the promised time and seeking refund of the amount deposited with compensation and other costs.
India Law Library Docid # 2400569