ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(721) DIRECTOR, GENERAL STATE TRANSPORT HARYANA AND ANOTHER Vs. ASHOK KUMAR PRAJAPAT AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-10-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 2019 - Section 39(1) - Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 14(1) - Consumer complaints - Failure to implement adequate measures to prevent smoking in public transport buses, particularly by their own employees, including bus drivers and conductors - Guilty for deficiency in service and liable to compensate the affected consumers - Normally many passengers suffer from such deficiency of service in view of smoking by drivers / conductors / co-passengers in the buses ru
India Law Library Docid # 2400230

(722) SUSHILA SINGH Vs. BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 29-09-2023
The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the Order dated 08.10.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar (hereinafter referred as “the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No. 21 of 2017, wherein the Complaint filed by the Complainant (Appellant herein) was dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400185

(723) L. G. ELECTRONICS INDIA PVT. LTD. Vs. JAGANATH LIFE CARE PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-09-2023
This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant, L.G Electronics India Pvt. Ltd./Appellant/Opposite Party No. 1 under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned Order dated 31.12.2015 passed by the Jharkhand State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ranchi in Consumer Complaint No. 06/2011, whereby the Complaint filed by the Complainant was partly allowed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400186

(724) SENIOR POST MASTER SERAMPORE HEAD POST OFFICE P.S. SERAMPORE Vs. JAYANTA GOSWAMI & 2 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-09-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondents as detailed above, under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 08.05.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission West Bengal (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.A/1126/2017 in which order dated 20.09.2017 of Hooghly District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint
India Law Library Docid # 2400187

(725) SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT OF POST OFFICE, DHOLPUR Vs. MAHENDER SINGH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 26-09-2023
The present Revision Petition (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent as detailed above, under section 21 (b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 09.01.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.1375/2017 in which order dated 06.10.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Dholpur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Complaint (C
India Law Library Docid # 2400188

(726) GRUH FINANCE LTD. THROUGH SR. MANAGER, NETAJI MARG, NEAR MITHAKALI SIX ROAD, ELLISBRIDGE, AHMEDABAD GUJARAT Vs. VAIBHAV BALBHIM DESHPANDE[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-09-2023
The present Revision Petition ( RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against the Respondent, as detailed above, under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the order dated 06.03.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Maharashtra ( hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal ( FA) No. A/17/23 in which order dated 25.10.2016 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Thane (hereinafter referred to as District Forum) in Consumer Comp
India Law Library Docid # 2400189

(727) CANARA BANK Vs. PIYUSH TRIPATHI AND 4 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-09-2023
The present Revision Petition under Section 21 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by Canara Bank against the impugned Order dated 29.09.2021 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab in First Appeal No. 745 of 2019 vide which the Appeal filed by the Petitioner was dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400183

(728) VINOD KUMAR LADIA AND OTHERS Vs. M/S. JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-09-2023
These are two consumer complaints where the complainants have come up contending that the opposite party has failed to deliver possession of the premises in question in the project developed by the opposite party known as “Knights Court” at Jaypee Greens, Noida, U.P., in spite of a payment of Rs.1,10,47,424/- and Rs.1,10,45,586/- respectively for which the complainants had also taken loans from the HDFC Bank.
India Law Library Docid # 2400184

(729) SURAT SINGH RATHI Vs. SHIV KUMAR AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(b) - Forged and fabricated LLB Certificate - Suspension of license - Revision petition - Where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence have to be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdiction, this petition is liable to fail - No illegality or infirmity or perversity in the impugned order warranting any interference of this Commission - Petition dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400050

(730) A. INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED Vs. MACROTECH DEVELOPERS LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-09-2023
The complainant filed IA/10746/2023, for amending the name of the complainant as Kanoria Energy & Infrastructure Limited, changed as per provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and recorded in the Registration Certificate in the office of Registrar of Companies, after, reserving the case for judgment. IA/10746/2023 is allowed. A. Infrastructure Limited (now Kanoria Energy & Infrastructure Limited) has filed above complaint for directing the opposite party to (i) refund Rs.226150308/- with interest
India Law Library Docid # 1882289

(731) SATISH KUMAR CHAWLA AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. VATIKA LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(a)(i) - Complaint seeking possession of dwelling unit alongwith delayed compensation in respect of villa booked with Opposite Party - Right of the allottee to seek the relief of refund in case the builder fails to fulfil his contractual obligation to obtain the Occupancy Certificate and offer possession within the time stipulated in the Agreement or a reasonable time - Opposite Party shall hand over possession of the Villa
India Law Library Docid # 2400051

(732) SH. YADVINDER SINGH BHATIA AND OTHERS Vs. EMAAR INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS EMAAR MGF LAND LTD) AND OTHERS[STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH] 19-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(a)(i) - Compensation for the delay in delivery of possession of plot - possession has been delivered to the complainant after almost a period of 13 years on 02.06.2023. Now it has to be seen, whether the possession offered on 09.04.2012 was complete or not - Bare perusal of offering possession of Plot, transpires that the development activities in all the three sectors of Mohali Hills i.e. Sector 105, 108 and 109 are in full swing and the opposite parti
India Law Library Docid # 2400053

(733) MANOJ MEHTA (SINCE DECEASED) AND OTHERS Vs. EMAAR INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS EMAAR MGF LAND LTD) AND OTHERS[STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, U.T., CHANDIGARH] 19-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21(a)(i) - Compensation for the delay in delivery of possession of plot - Bare perusal of Clause 8 of the Plot Buyer’s Agreement transpires that subject to force majeure conditions and reasons beyond the control of the opposite parties (company), the possession of the plot, in question, was to be delivered to the allottee (complainants herein) within a period of 2 (Two) years from the date of execution of the said agreement but not later than 3 (Three) yea
India Law Library Docid # 2400054

(734) PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND OTHERS Vs. SH. PRADEEP KUMAR[STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN] 19-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 15 - Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Credit Act, 1973 - Section 11 and 12(1) - Consumer complaint - Recovery certificate for realization/recovery of bank dues - Specific provisions contained in The Uttar Pradesh Agricultural Credit Act, 1973, the District Commission had no right to entertain and decide the consumer complaint - Bank has taken valid action for realization/recovery of its legitimate dues and in the given facts and circumstances of the case, no def
India Law Library Docid # 2400056

(735) RAMANAND INSTITUTE OF PHARMA, MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY (RIPMT) Vs. SH. BABLU AND OTHERS[STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTARAKHAND DEHRADUN] 19-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 15 - Consumer complaint - Grant of scholarship - Educational matters do not come within the purview of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and, therefore, the complaint is not maintainable - Consumer complaint dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400057

(736) STANDARD CHARTERED BANK AND ANOTHER Vs. MANKUMAR KUNDLIYA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(1)(d) - Pure 'business to business' disputes cannot be construed as 'consumer disputes' - Availing of subject services from the Appellants in the present case by the Respondent cannot be said to be for earning livelihood of the Respondent, and the same are inherently commercial in nature and the relationship between the parties is purely “Business to Business” in nature - Further, the Appellant also has independent commercial interests - Therefore, the t
India Law Library Docid # 2400002

(737) M/S. SILVERTON PULP AND PAPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 19 - Compromise settlement of the claim - Once a final settlement has been reached amicably between the parties, then, it is not open to either of the parties to lay any claim/demand against the other party.
India Law Library Docid # 2400052

(738) ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE RAJPUR ROAD Vs. DEV CATERERS[STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UTTARAKHAND, DEHRADUN] 18-09-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 15 - Consumer complaint - Illegally withdrawn from bank account on different dates - Employee of the Bank is involved in such illegal transaction, the Bank could not be held guilty - Consumer complaint dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400055

(739) GAGANJEET BHULLAR Vs. M/S EMIRATES AIRLINES, DELHI AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-09-2023
Heard Ms. Srejal Mishra, Advocate, for the complainant and Ms. Ritu Singh Mann, Advocate, for the opposite parties. Mr. Gaganjeet Bhullar has filed above complaint for directing the opposite parties to (i) pay Rs.15000000/-, as compensation for the loss suffered by the complainant; (ii) reimburse Rs.100000/- for the loss of baggage containing his 6 boxes of golf balls (TITLIEST), golf clubs, T-shirt, caps, 4 pairs of shoes (FOOTJOY), etc.; (iii) pay Rs.200000/- as compensation for mental agony a
India Law Library Docid # 1882353

(740) M/S. JINDAL POLY FILMS LTD. Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-09-2023
This complaint has been filed by a Poly Film Ltd., a manufacturer, who set up a plant at Nasik in Maharashtra and for the said purpose purchased an equipment (BOPP Film Plant/Machine) from M/s Bruckner Maschinenbav GmBH, Postfach 1161, Germany that was transported to India by sea, and then by road from Mumbai to Nasik. The equipment reached the sea port at Mumbai from where the container carrying the consignment was loaded on a vehicle bearing registration No. HR 55 B 9231 of M/s TCI-Hi-ways Pvt
India Law Library Docid # 1882325