(721) M/S. CLINIC NALLAM AND ANOTHER Vs. A. HELEN VICTORIA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-11-2023 The Appellant filed the instant Appeal under section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short “the Act”), against the Order dated 20.04.2012 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Puducherry (hereinafter referred to as the “State Commission”) in Consumer Complaint No. 2 of 2004, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the Complaint filed by the Complainant India Law Library Docid # 2400574
(722) M/S. SWARNA MOTORS Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023 This Complaint under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short the Act) has been filed against the repudiation of the insurance claim under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy obtained by the Complainant who is a proprietorship firm operating as a premier distributor of genuine spare parts of commercial vehicles, on account of a fire incident on 12.10.2013 at the office-cum-warehouse of the Complainant at Panipat, Haryana. The Complainant lodged a claim for 6,97,37,720/- w India Law Library Docid # 1882333
(723) HDFC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. VIKRAMBHAI RANCHODDAS RANA[GUJARAT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023 The appellants - original opponent has preferred the present appeal as per the provisions of Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act, 1986”) against the impugned order passed by the learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Surat (Addl.) (for short “learned District Commission”) in India Law Library Docid # 2400579
(724) M/S. SWARNA MOTORS Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023 This Complaint under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) has been filed against the repudiation of the insurance claim under a Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy obtained by the Complainant who is a proprietorship firm operating as a premier distributor of genuine spare parts of commercial vehicles, on account of a fire India Law Library Docid # 2400566
(725) MONIKA DHINGRA AND OTHERS Vs. PIONEER URBAN LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND 3 OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023 This complaint has been filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) alleging deficiency in services in respect of non-delivery of a flat booked by the Complainant with the Opposite party in the project ‘Araya’, promoted and developed by it India Law Library Docid # 2400567
(726) M/S. REDDY VEERANNA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023 This complaint has been filed by a Private Limited Company through its Director that undertakes contracts for construction of public works, including roads, dams etc. The present complaint is filed with regard to the non-settlement of an insurance claim that had been registered with the insurance company, claiming a loss while carrying out the work of construction of a water storage tank under the lift irrigation scheme at Village Muchonipally in Gattu Mandal, Mehbubnagar, Andhra Pradesh. The pr India Law Library Docid # 2400568
(727) ANUBHAV SINGHAL AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023 This consumer complaint under section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) alleges unfair trade practice and deficiency in service in delay in handing over possession of a flat booked by the complainants in a project promoted and executed by the opposite party within the promised time and seeking refund of the amount deposited with compensation and other costs. India Law Library Docid # 2400569
(728) AVALON ROJECTS (A UNIT OF GRJ DISTRIBUTORS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.) Vs. NARENDER KUMAR GOYAL[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023 This order shall dispose of First Appeals No. 872 of 2021 and 873 of 2021 since they arise from the same impugned order which pertains to the same project and have the same conspectus of facts. For convenience, facts are being taken from First Appeal No. 872 of 2021 India Law Library Docid # 2400570
(729) VIPUL MOTORS PVT. LTD. Vs. PADMINI JOSHI AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-11-2023 This revision petition under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ‘Act’) assails the order dated 16.11.2016 in First Appeal No. 791 of 2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajasthan, Jaipur (in short, the ‘State Commission’) dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against order dated 29.04.2016of the District Consumer India Law Library Docid # 2400571
(730) B.B. CHOPRA S/O KRISHAN LAL NOW DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS Vs. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (HSIDC) AND OTHERS[HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-11-2023 Challenge in this appeal No.1507 of 2017 has been invited by complainant-B. B. Chopra (since deceased, now represented by his LRs), to the legality of order dated 13.11.2017 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-Panchkula (In short “District Consumer Commission”) in complaint case No.146 of 2015, vide which his complaint has been allowed. India Law Library Docid # 2400580
(731) ANSAL HOUSING LIMITED (ERSTWHILE ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Vs. MR. VIKAS AGARWAL[DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-11-2023 The present appeal has been filed on 20.10.2023 challenging the impugned order dated 28.02.2023 vide which Complaint Case No.13/2022 was allowed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-VI, M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi. India Law Library Docid # 2400576
(732) BRIJ MOHAN Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-11-2023 Mediclaim Policy - A contract of Insurance is to be honoured strictly in terms of the conditions specified in the Policy without making any alteration in the words used therein - When written advise by a Medical Practitioner was necessary to constitute Hospitalisation in terms of the specific Clause 3.4 of the Policy, failure to secure such written advise prior to the admission would consequently have the effect of exempting the Insurance Company from any liability to satisfy the Insurance claim India Law Library Docid # 2400498
(733) PITHAMBER R. POLSANI AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. PIONEER URBAN LAND & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-11-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21 - Consumer Complaint - Possession of Flat - It is the case of the Complainants that they were coerced to take possession of an incomplete and unsafe Project; that the possession along with Occupation Certificate was not given within the committed period of 36 months; that the Opposite Party is not in a position to handover the possession of the plot in habitable condition as the construction was incomplete till the filing of the Complaint and the Opposi India Law Library Docid # 2400494
(734) P.B. VISHNU ALIAS NAVNEETH VISHNU Vs. THE THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-11-2023 Consumer Complaint by minor child - Complainant was a minor child aged about 3½ years old when his father on 22.04.1996 and 23.04.1996 invested into 50 Fixed Deposits of Rs.50,000/- each in 25 branches of the respondent-Co-operative Bank - Due to some internal family arrangement that was presumably on account of some dispute between the husband and the wife, the mother of the complainant was made the guardian in relation to the said deposits - Deposits matured in the year 2012 that were to bear India Law Library Docid # 2400495
(735) LIBERTY VIDEOCON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. SULAKSHNA DEVI AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-11-2023 Motor Insurance Claim - Repair liability of Insurance Company - Insured's Car met with an accident and was lodged in a waterlogged ditch in the middle of the road and got damaged - The insured vehicle shall be treated as a Constructive Total Loss (CTL) if the aggregate cost of retrieval and/or repair of the vehicle, subject to terms and conditions of the policy, exceeds 75% of the insured declared value (IDV) of the vehicle - Actual cost that would have to be paid for repairs would be about 77.2 India Law Library Docid # 2400497
(736) ASHWANI SHARMA Vs. SIRDA GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS NAULAKHA [HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2023 Briefly, the case of the complainant is that the opposite party/Sirda Group of Institutions is running an institute. Various courses including engineering are there for the students in the institute. In August, 2016, the complainant applied for admission to 2nd year of Diploma in Electrical Engineering. After receiving Rs.19,000/- vide receipt dated 11.08.2016, the opposite party allowed him to sit in the course. The complainant has basic qualification of Diploma in ITI from ITI, Shamshi (Kullu) India Law Library Docid # 1882296
(737) ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATION Vs. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-11-2023 Consumer Law – Housing - The Army Welfare Housing Organisation filed a complaint against the Meerut Development Authority over a breached allocation for a 30-acre housing society plot. The complainant deposited Rs.3,82,41,541 on 28.10.1989. The dispute centers on the direction of refund, with no objection to the principal amount. The main issues are determining the interest rate and period. The opposing party accepts the principal amount but opposes an 18% interest rate, citing a 4% maximum unde India Law Library Docid # 2400459
(738) DAKSHAT K. TRIVEDI AND OTHER Vs. MAHINDRA HOLIDAYS AND RESORTS INDIA LTD.[GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 06-11-2023 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(1)(g) - deficiency in service - Complainant applied for Club Mahindra membership, received benefits after down payment, but couldn't book holidays – Called for Cancelling of membership – Filed complaint for refund, interest, and compensation with Ld. District Commission - The complainant claims to have purchased the membership based on the benefits offered and the option to cancel if not satisfied with the opponent's services - The Ld. District Commissio India Law Library Docid # 2400461
(739) KISHAN SINGH JADAUN Vs. IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOTHER [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-11-2023 This revision petition under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails order dated 07.10.2016 in First Appeal No. 2110 of 2010 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal (in short, the State Commission) setting aside the order dated 15.06.2010 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Morena (in short, the District Forum) in Consumer Complaint no. 94 of 2009. The brief conspectus of facts is that the petitioner purchased a Scorpio car India Law Library Docid # 1882326
(740) ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. RAJ KAURA AND OTHERS [NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-11-2023 This revision petition under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the Act) assails the order dated 07.02.2017 in First Appeal No. 338 of 2011 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow (in short, the State Commission) dismissing the appeal of the petitioner against order dated 31.12.2014 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Hardoi (in short, the District Forum) in Consumer Complaint no. 92 of 2011. The brief facts of the cas India Law Library Docid # 1882358