ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(621) YASH Vs. DR. AJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-11-2023
This Revision Petition has been filed by Petitioner/Complainant under Section 21(b) against the impugned Order dated 24.05.2017 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, Panchkula in F.A. No. 227 of 2016, vide which the Appeal filed by the Complainant was partly allowed and the Order of the District Forum was modified.
India Law Library Docid # 2400952

(622) GURDEEP SINGH Vs. DALJEET KUMAR S/O PRITAM AND OTHERS[PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-11-2023
The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant/complainant against the impugned order dated 01.08.2022 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ludhiana (in short “District Commission”)
India Law Library Docid # 2400996

(623) SMT. DROPATI DEVI Vs. TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE LTD.[HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-11-2023
Briefly, the case of the complainant is that complainant is the owner of the vehicle (Mahindra Bolero Pick-up) bearing registration No.HP-32A-2561. The said vehicle was insured with the opposite party/insurance company for a sum of Rs.5,70,855/- and the risk was covered from 17.01.2014 to 16.01.2015.
India Law Library Docid # 2400984

(624) KOTHOTTIL PHARMACEUTICAL DISTRIBUTORS AND OTHERS Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD AND OTHERS[KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-11-2023
This is a complaint filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. This complaint is filed claiming a compensation of Rs.81,00,000/-(Rupees Eighty One Lakhs) from the opposite parties for losses sustained through fire. According to the complainant, though there
India Law Library Docid # 2400989

(625) SHRI KRISHAN COLD STORAGE Vs. DEEP SINGH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
Consumer Law - Deficiency in service - Revisional Jurisdiction - The respondent stored 1087 bags of potatoes in the petitioner's cold storage in May 2015, charging Rs.20,000 as part payment - In November 2015, the potatoes were spoiled, and the complainant filed a complaint, claiming negligence - The District Forum partially allowed the complaint and directed payment of Rs 2,64,600, compensation, and litigation expenses - The State Commission affirmed the District Forum's order, holding the pet
India Law Library Docid # 2400958

(626) MANAGER, HDFC EGRO GENRAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. BHARAT LAL MOGRE[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
Consumer Law – Medical – ‘Critical Illness Policy’ – ‘D’, the late son of the respondent, purchased a Critical Illness Policy for Rs 5,00,000/- on 30.05.2014 - He was admitted to various hospitals and underwent brain surgery - On 20.04.2015, he died during treatment - The claim was repudiated due to the insured's inability to survive for at least 30/15 days and expiration of intracranial hemorrhage and hypertension, which are not covered under "critical illness.
India Law Library Docid # 2400959

(627) M/S INTERNATIONAL TRACTORS LTD. Vs. VIJAY KUMAR S/O SH. BANKU RAM AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
Brief facts of the case are that the complainant had purchased Sonalika tractor in sum of Rs.6,15,000/- from opposite party No.2/dealer on 29-10-2012 which was financed by K.C.C. Bank, Kangoo.
India Law Library Docid # 2400980

(628) PAWAN KUMAR Vs. THE SENIOR MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. MEHATPUR[HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
Briefly, the case of the complainant is that the complainant is registered owner of multi Axle trailer HGV Tralla No. HR-55C-1161 and it was insured with opposite party/insurance company w.e.f. 02-08-2014 to 01-08-2015. On 13-9-2014
India Law Library Docid # 2400981

(629) NARESH VERMA Vs. SINGH BROTHERS (SHOE PALACE)[HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
Briefly, case of the complainant is that the complainant purchased a one pair of shoes from the opposite party on 22.04.2019, for a sun of Rs.3,400/-. It is stated that the complainant paid the entire amount to the opposite party in cash
India Law Library Docid # 2400982

(630) UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. Vs. REEMA JEETSINGH CHAWLA[MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
The Petitioner – Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd., has preferred the present Revision Petition feeling aggrieved by the order dated 18/11/2022 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Central Mumbai,
India Law Library Docid # 2400992

(631) DUA HOSPITAL & MATERNITY HOME, AZAD CHOWK AND OTHERS Vs. JATINDER KAUR W/O MANDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
Appellants/opposite parties No. 1 & 2 i.e. Dua Hospital and Maternity Home (hereinafter referred as OPs No.1&2), have filed the present appeal through its Incharge Dr. Chetan Dua to challenge the impugned order dated 22.01.2021 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar (in short, “the District Commission”)
India Law Library Docid # 2400993

(632) INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED Vs. MOHAN KATARA SON OF SH. SHAM LAL AND OTHERS[PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
It would be apposite to mention here that hereinafter the parties will be referred, as have been arrayed before the District Commission.
India Law Library Docid # 2400994

(633) CHARANJIT SINGH S/O SR. SURJIT SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. C & C TOWERS LTD., AND OTHERS[PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
This order of ours shall dispose off two Complaints i.e. Consumer Complaint No.182 of 2019 and Consumer Complaint No.184 of 2019 filed by the complainants under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the Act”)
India Law Library Docid # 2400995

(634) MR. NEERAJ GAUBA AND ANOTHER Vs. BESTECH INDIA PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER[DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
The brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present complaint are as that the Complainants booked a unit bearing number A-1102 with the Opposite Parties in the project called "Park View Sanskruti," situated in Sector 91, Gurgaon, Haryana. The Complainants also paid a booking amount of Rs. 10,00,000 towards the said unit, which was duly acknowledged by Opposite Party No. 1.
India Law Library Docid # 2400964

(635) MR. STEPHEN ROGER AFONSO Vs. SHRI. CHANDRAS PEDNEKAR[GOA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
This Judgement and Order arises out of appeal filed by Appellant against Judgment and Order dated 04/08/2017 passed by District Commission North at Porvorim-Goa in CC/20/2011.
India Law Library Docid # 2400969

(636) SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. SMT. RACHNA KUMARI W/O LATE SH. KULDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
The opposite parties No.1&2/Insurance company resisted and contested the complaint by filing joint reply. The opposite parties/insurance company stated that after receiving information regarding accident, opposite parties/insurance company immediately deputed independent surveyor. The loss to the tune of Rs.3,97,340/-
India Law Library Docid # 2400983

(637) MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND OTHERS Vs. VYSYAN HAMZA PROPRIETOR SAHIRA FURNITURE AND INDUSTRIES MAIN ROAD KAMBALAKKAD POST KANIYAMBETTA[KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2023
The opposite parties 1 and 2 in C.C.No.139/2013 of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Wayanad, Kalpetta (the District Forum for short) challenge in this appeal an order dated 18.05.2015, partly allowing the complaint. The complainant is the 1st respondent and the 3rd opposite party in the complaint is the 2nd respondent herein. As per the order appealed against, the District Forum has disallowed the claim of the appellants
India Law Library Docid # 2400990

(638) AJIT SINGH Vs. M/S. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-11-2023
Consumer Law – Motor Vehicle Insurance Policy - Leaving ignition key in the vehicle by the driver for a short period, during which, the vehicle was stolen is not a breach of the condition of the policy – Appeal Allowed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400956

(639) PRADEEP & COMPANY Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-11-2023
Consumer Law – Railway – Damage in transit – Revisional Jurisdiction - During delivery, the complainant detected a shortage of 152 bags of cement, 2705 bags were water damaged - The complainant submitted a claim of Rs.3,58,807-, but the OP did not take action - The complaint filed a CC before the District Forum, which was allowed by the District Forum – State Commission has given a well-reasoned order and the revisional jurisdiction of the National Commission under Section 21(b) of the said Act
India Law Library Docid # 2400957

(640) NEW INDIAASSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. AMIT EARTH MOVERS[HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-11-2023
Complainant alleged that: on 19.11.2009 he purchased Hydraulic Excavator PC 200 M/C 5.7M for basic value of Rs.40,50,000/- and total value (including taxes) was Rs.44,71,394/-. He got insured aforesaid machine with OP/appellant and renewing insurance policy of machine for past four years, continuously from 2012-13 till 2015-16.
India Law Library Docid # 2400978