ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(601) EMAAR INDIA LIMITED Vs. RADHIKA SAREEN[CHANDIGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
In the case in hand, the opposite party-Emaar India Limited has come up in this appeal, assailing the order dated 21.09.2023 passed by the District Commission-II, U.T., Chandigarh, vide which, an application for amendment filed during pendency of consumer complaint bearing no.131 of 2021 was allowed by it and the respondent-complainant was allowed to add relief of delivery of possession of the plot in the relief clause
India Law Library Docid # 2400961

(602) S.B.I. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. MRS. RANJNA BAJAJ[PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
The briefs facts for disposal of this appeal are that the husband of the complainant; namely, Sh. Arun Bajaj (hereinafter referred to as “DLA”), had availed a loan from State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Sahnewal Branch, Ludhiana and in order to secure the said loan, he purchased an insurance policy
India Law Library Docid # 2400998

(603) NEELAM SETH WIFE OF SHRI ANIL SETH Vs. M/S SANDHU AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
The appellant/complainant Neelam Seth being aggrieved by the order dated 06.01.2023 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ludhiana (hereinafter referred as the “District Commission”) in C.C. No.97 of 2019
India Law Library Docid # 2400999

(604) MR. RAJESH KUMAR Vs. STAR HEATH AND ALLIED INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED[PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
Briefly, the facts of the case as made out by the Complainant in the complaint filed before the District Commission are that the complainant had purchased a Family Health Benefit Mediclaim Insurance Policy for the period w.e.f. 31.08.2019 to 30.08.2020.
India Law Library Docid # 2401000

(605) VIJAY BHARGAVA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 19 - Railways Claim Tribunal Act, 1987 – Sections 13, 15 and 8 - Railways Act, 1989 – Section - 124, 124-A and 125 – ‘untoward incident’ - On 05.05.2007, the Appellant was traveling from Kolkata to New Delhi on the Howrah-Delhi Rajdhani Express. - He encountered an unruly crowd near the coach entrance and was pushed towards the main door, - He fell on the railway track
India Law Library Docid # 2400944

(606) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. M/S. THE DESIGN SANGRAH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
Consumer Law - ‘Standard Fire' and 'Special Perils Policy' – The Complainant filed a complaint against the OP/Insurer for a fire that broke out in a factory - The OP had three insurance policies covering the building, plant, machinery, accessories, stocks, and pressing tables and sewing machines
India Law Library Docid # 2400945

(607) HYUNDAI MOTORS INDIA LTD. Vs. P.R.MEENA AND OTHERS[DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
Consumer Law – Motor Vehicle - Improper functioning of the vehicle - The complainant purchased a new Hyundai I 10 car on 04.09.09, which was allegedly damaged when the rear tire and rim broke off during normal driving, causing an accident and injury - Consumers may be dissatisfied with the services provided by a multinational company if the car starts experiencing problems or defects within a month of purchase.
India Law Library Docid # 2400966

(608) DR. ROOPA SALWAN Vs. UCO BANK AND ANOTHER[DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 2(1)(g) - Deficiency in service – Burden of Proof - Summary proceedings cannot decide complaints involving highly disputed facts or cases of criminality like fraud or cheating under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - The burden of proving deficiency in service lies with the person alleging it - The Appellant failed to prove a deficiency in service, so the appeal is dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400967

(609) NIAKSHA THAKUR D/O SH. MANISH THAKUR AND OTHERS Vs. HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
The complainants have filed the instant complaint seeking directions to the opposite parties to pay Rs.1,00,00,000/- along with interest @ 12% per annum from 05.01.2019, till its realization, Rs.30,00,000/- for the unfair trade practices and deficiency in service and Rs.1,10,000/- for litigation charges.
India Law Library Docid # 2400985

(610) RAMAKRISHNA HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. VIJAYA M KANCHANAHALLI AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 24-11-2023
These are the appeals filed U/s.41 of CPA 2019 by OP.1 & 2/Appellants aggrieved by the order dtd.31.03.2022 & 31.05.2022 passed in CC/23, 21, 13 & 18/2017 on the file of Mysuru District Commission.
India Law Library Docid # 2400988

(611) M/S. LAXMI CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD. Vs. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL INUSRNACE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-11-2023
Consumer Law – ‘Contractors All Risk Insurance Policy’ - The complainant company was awarded a contract for road construction - Heavy rain caused damage, causing a loss estimated at Rs. 2 crore, but subsequently in the second report he reduced the loss suffered by the complainant to the tune of Rs. 71,34,518/ - and a cheque for this amount was received by complainant company and submitted discharge voucher in full and final settlement
India Law Library Docid # 2400955

(612) THIRTHANKAR SUPERSPECIALITY HOSPITAL AND OTHERS Vs. MANZOOR HUSSAIN NADEEM[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-11-2023
Consumer Law – Medical Negligence – The complainant's daughter, suffering from fever and kidney issues, underwent a minor operation called stanting - The doctor performed nine operations, but the complainant alleges that the doctor failed to monitor her condition in the post-operation care room, recording vital signs every hour -A patient died during an operation due to abnormal blood pressure and lack of proper antibiotics - The complainant filed a complaint for compensation of Rs. 25,00,000/-,
India Law Library Docid # 2400953

(613) ECGC INDIA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.) Vs. SAR AUTO PRODUCTS LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-11-2023
Consumer Law – Insurance Policy - Repudiation of the claim – Repudiation on the ground of delay could be taking a hypertechnical view if the claim is a genuine one - Since there is claim of settlement on behalf of the buyer, which was not controverted by the insured before any forum, it cannot be said that the claim of insurance is a genuine one - On the ground of delay also, the State Commission’s findings cannot be upheld.
India Law Library Docid # 2400954

(614) ORIENT BELL LIMITED Vs. KANTA GOYAL, WIFE OF SH.SURINDER KUMAR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-11-2023
In nutshell, the complainant purchased 55 boxes of Orient Tiles for the area of 1200 sq. ft. for use the same in her house from opposite party No.1 and paid an amount of Rs.90,948.00, vide against invoice No.41 dated 25.06.2017.
India Law Library Docid # 2400997

(615) ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. RAJEEV KANT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-11-2023
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Section 21(b) – Revisional Jurisdiction - The revisional jurisdiction of the National Commission under Section 21(b) of the said Act is extremely limited - It should be exercised only in case as contemplated within the parameters specified in the said provision, namely when it appears to the National Commission that the State Commission had exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or had failed to exercise jurisdiction so vested, or had acted in the exerc
India Law Library Docid # 2400943

(616) COUNTRY CLUB (INDIA) LIMITED Vs. MR. VIJAY SEHGAL[DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-11-2023
The present appeal has been filed on 27.10.2023 challenging the impugned order dated 13.04.2023 in Complaint Case No.367/2014 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-III (West), C-150-151, Community Centre, Pankha Road, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110058 whereby the complaint was allowed.
India Law Library Docid # 2400965

(617) NEW INDIAASSURANCE CO. AND OTHERS Vs. M/S LAYALPUR TRANSPORT CORPORATION RAINBOW MARKET, POLYTECHNIC CHOWK, AMBALA CITY AND OTHERS[HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-11-2023
Consumer Law – Motor Vehicle Insurance – Non holding of genuine license - The complainant, owner of a truck, suffered injuries and its cleaner expired after falling down in a drain due to heavy fog - The insurer surveyed the vehicle and paid Rs.4,75,000 for repairs - The insurer repudiated the claim, claiming it was a breach of contract - The complainant filed a complaint seeking compensation for damages, loss, mental agony, harassment, and crane charges - The insurer argued that refusal to pay
India Law Library Docid # 2400976

(618) M/S MANN AND HUMMEL FILTER PVT. LTD. Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-11-2023
M/s. Mann and Hummel Filters Private Limited (the Insured) has filed above complaint, for directing Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited (the Insurer) to pay (i) Rs.15569940/- with interest @24% per annum from 12.06.2012 till the date of payment, towards insurance claim; and (iii) any other relief which is deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 2400960

(619) SURESH KUMAR Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER[HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-11-2023
Complainant alleges that: he is owner of vehicle/Dumper make TATA LPT registration No.HR38-M/7387 (Truck), Engine No.60C62467723, Chassis No.396522DTZ-207895. It was comprehensively insured with OPs vide insurance policy No.261701/31/2017/1320 valid from 07.05.2016 to 06.05.2017. He paid premium.
India Law Library Docid # 2400977

(620) SMART ASSET SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. ANANTH PARIMI[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 22-11-2023
Consumer Law – Housing - The respondent, a non-resident Indian, was involved in a dispute with a company selling properties - The company misled the respondent by granting a 12-month extension for approval, leading to a dispute over the authenticity of the supplementary agreement - The respondent revoked the power of attorney, seeking a refund and compensation for mental harassment
India Law Library Docid # 2400951