(521) M/S MITTAL TOWNSHIP PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. GURPREET SINGH GILL AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-01-2024 The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act”) against the Order dated 04.05.2018 passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh (“the State Commission”), in CC No. 444 of 2017, wherein the learned State Commission allowed the Complaint filed by the Respondents herein. India Law Library Docid # 2401693
(522) UNIVERSAL SOMPO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. FOOD COURT THE COMPANY GARDEN SOCIETY AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-01-2024 The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act”) against the Order dated 31.05.2017 passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttarakhand (“the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No. 10 of 2014, wherein the Complaint filed by the Complainants (Respondents No.1 & herein) was partly allowed. India Law Library Docid # 2401694
(523) PAWAN SALUJA Vs. IMPERIAL HOUSING VENTURES PVT. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-01-2024 The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act”) against the Order dated 25.07.2019 passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi (“the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No. 863 of 2017, wherein the Complaint was dismissed. India Law Library Docid # 2401695
(524) NARAYAN LAL GUJAR Vs. CIGNA TTK HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-01-2024 The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act”) against the Order dated 06.12.2018 passed by the learned Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur (“the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No. 127 of 2016, wherein the Complaint filed by the Complainant (Appellant herein) was dismissed. India Law Library Docid # 2401696
(525) PROVAT KUMAR PAL Vs. DR. NILAABHA BHADURI AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-01-2024 Two appeals have been filed, one appeal (FA/183/2019) by the complainant alleging deficient and disproportionate compensation having been awarded by the State Commission in spite of the findings of medical negligence against the doctor and the hospital, and the other (FA394/2019) has been filed by the doctor running the hospital to set aside the impugned order dated 28.12.2018 in its entirety. India Law Library Docid # 2401697
(526) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA Vs. RAMA MISHRA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-01-2024 The present First Appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (“the Act”) against the Order dated 14.05.2019 passed by the learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, UP, Lucknow (“the State Commission”), in Consumer Complaint No. 299 of 2017 whereby the State Commission partly allowed the Complaint. India Law Library Docid # 2401698
(527) BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER Vs. SUMAN DEVI AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-01-2024 Life Insurance Policy - The policyholder, ‘M’ passed away and his wife filed a claim with the insurance company - The insurance company denied the claim, stating that the policy was not in force at the time of death – Respondent then filed a complaint with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission - The Commission ruled in favor of Respondent and ordered the insurance company to pay the sum assured under the policy, along with interest and compensation - The insurance company appealed India Law Library Docid # 2401699
(528) CONSUMERS WALFARE ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S. VASUNDHARA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-01-2024 Consumer Law – Housing - ‘K' had booked a flat with Vasundhara Builders in 1995 and made an initial payment of Rs. 1 lakh - However, the construction of the flat was delayed for several years - 'K’ repeatedly contacted the builder about the delay, but the builder did not provide any satisfactory explanation - In 2000, ‘K’ received a demand letter from Kandur Corporation, a different company, asking him to pay installments for the flat. – ‘K’ contacted Vasundhara Builders and was told that Kandur India Law Library Docid # 2401700
(529) M/S. HARISH PROCESSORS PVT. LTD. Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-01-2024 In the present Appeal, the learned State Commission passed the Impugned Order on 26.09.2022. The limitation for filing the First Appeal before this Commission is 30 days from the date of the Impugned Order i.e. 26.09.2022. As the Appellant received the copy of the impugned order on 13.10.2022, the period of limitation lapsed on 11.11.2022. However, the present Appeal has been filed on 28.04.2023. Thus, there is 167 days delay in filing the Appeal. India Law Library Docid # 2401688
(530) A. ILYAS AHMED Vs. THE EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-01-2024 The present Original Petition (OP) has been filed by the Complainant against Opposite Parties (OPs) as detailed above, inter alia praying for directions to the OPs to pay to the Complainant an amount of Rs. 1,36,32,761/- (Rupees One Crore thirty six lakhs thirty two thousand seven hundred sixty one only). India Law Library Docid # 2401689
(531) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. BELABEN HARISH KUMAR GANDHI AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-01-2024 The present two Revision Petitions (RP) has been filed by the Petitioner against Respondent(s) as detailed above, under section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act 1986, against the common order dated 14.02.2019 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Ahemdabad, Gujarat (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’), in First Appeal (FA) No.524-525/2017 in which order dated 28.07.2017 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ahemdabad India Law Library Docid # 2401690
(532) JAHIR KHAN Vs. ASHOK LEYLAND AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-01-2024 The present Revision Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act”) against impugned order dated 26.03.2016, passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ( ‘State Commission’) in First Appeal No. FA/2016/26 & FA/2016/33, wherein the Appeals filed by the Respondents/ OPs was partly allowed and setting aside the Order dated 07.01.2016, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum India Law Library Docid # 2401691
(533) SATBIR SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LIMITED AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-01-2024 Housing - The complainants filed a consumer complaint against the Opposite Parties, namely, Raheja Developers Limited and ICICI Bank Limited, for deficiency in service - The complainants had booked a plot of land in a residential project, Raheja Aranya City - Phase-2, situated in Gurugram, Haryana - The complainants had availed of a subvention scheme for the purchase of the plot -Under the terms of the agreement to sale and the memorandum of understanding, the complainants were entitled to cance India Law Library Docid # 2401686
(534) SANDEEP NATHURAM NALAVADE Vs. SHIVASAHYADRI EMU FARM AND HATCHRIES AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-01-2024 This revision petition has been filed in challenge to the Order dated 06.04.2018 in Appeal No. 1028 of 2014 of the State Commission Maharashtra arising out of Order dated 08.10.2014 of the District Commission in Complaint no. 19 of 2014. India Law Library Docid # 2401687
(535) PREM KUMAR CHAUDHARY Vs. M/S. BESTECH INDIA PVT. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-01-2024 Consumer Law – Housing - Booking of Flat –Project was delayed – Request for a refund of his money – Respondent argued that Appellant had voluntarily cancelled the booking and was not entitled to a refund - They also claimed that he was in default of payments under the agreement - The NCRDC found that Appellant had indeed requested a refund, but that this was after Respondent had informed him of a delay in the project caused by a gas pipeline - The NCRDC also found that Respondent had not informe India Law Library Docid # 2401684
(536) DR. H.B. M. PANTH Vs. ASKARI HUSSAIN AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-01-2024 Medical Negligence - The State Commission had found the doctors liable for medical negligence in connection with the treatment of a pregnant woman - The woman had suffered hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) after a caesarean section, which resulted in brain damage - The State Commission had awarded the woman and her husband compensation of Rs. 1.19 crore - The doctors appealed the decision, arguing that they were not negligent and that the State Commission had not properly considered the evid India Law Library Docid # 2401685
(537) DR. H.B. M. PANTH Vs. ASKARI HUSSAIN AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 09-01-2024 The present three Appeals have been filed by the Appellants against the impugned Order dated 04.12.2012 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh in Complaint No. 13 of 2006, vide which the Complaint filed by the Complainants was partly allowed. India Law Library Docid # 2401609
(538) VIRENDRA AGRAWAL AND OTHERS Vs. NEEPA REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 04-01-2024 Virendra Agarwal, Shalabh Virendra Agarwal and Ritika S. Agarwal have filed above complaint, for directing the opposite parties to (i) handover physical possession of flat No.801, 8th Floor, Veronica in Vasant Oasis on the land bearing CTS No.246, 340-345/61-B, Village Marol, Taluka & District Andheri, Mumbai; (ii) execute sale deed of the flat in favour of the complainants; (iii) refund an amount of Rs.14.17 lacs with interest @ 21% p.a. w.e.f. 25.11.2011; (iv) jointly and severally pay interes India Law Library Docid # 2401608
(539) BHAJAN BHAGWANT SINGH Vs. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 03-01-2024 This Revision Petition has been filed by Complainant Bhajan Bhagwant Singh under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned Order dated 26.03.2018 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab at Chandigarh in F.A. No. 745 of 2017, vide which the Appeal filed by the Respondents was allowed, the Order of the District Forum was set-aside, and the Complaint was dismissed. India Law Library Docid # 2401607
(540) A.C. DHARMADEVI Vs. INDIAN BANK AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 02-01-2024 These two first appeals arise out of a common order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Tamil Nadu (hereinafter referred to as ‘the State Commission) dated 23.07.2015, where the complainant, Smt. A. C. Dharmadevi in complaint no. 3 of 2008, alleged deficiency in service on the part of the Indian Bank, Chennai for not returning the original documents/ title deeds deposited with them that was transferred to the Esplanade Branch of the Bank, and were ultimately lost in their custod India Law Library Docid # 2401610