(21) ICICI BANK LIMITED Vs. SUMEET KAELEY[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 16-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Repossession of vehicle — Deficiency in service — Unfair trade practice — Forcible repossession without proper notice amounts to deficiency in service. India Law Library Docid # 2447927
(22) M/S TSR COTTON GINNING MILL Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(1)(d) — Definition of "Consumer" — Insurance policy obtained for commercial purposes — Insured is considered a consumer for services of the insurer in relation to claim settlement. India Law Library Docid # 2447928
(23) VARDAAN TRADELINK PVT LTD Vs. SH MOHAMMAD YASEEN[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2026 Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Delay Condonation — Inordinate delay of 368 days in filing revision petition — Petitioner's explanation based on counsel's and director's ailments supported by private doctor certificates — Insufficient and vague explanation for the entire period of delay — General averments and peculiar India Law Library Docid # 2447929
(24) THE BRANCH MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. SANJEEV KUMAR[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revisional jurisdiction — Limited scope — Cannot re-appreciate evidence or interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless there is patent perversity or illegality. India Law Library Docid # 2447930
(25) JUSTICE RAJESH CHANDRA (RETD.) Vs. AIR INDIA LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 2(46) and Deficiency in Service — Allegations of unfair contract, if factually disclose deficiency in service, can be entertained as such — Incorrect nomenclature in complaint does not defeat substantive grievance. India Law Library Docid # 2447931
(26) LATE JAGDISH PRASAD GAUD AND OTHERS Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-06-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Condonation of delay — Revision petition filed after a significant delay of 760 days — Reasons provided by the petitioner, including the original complainant's old age, ailments, lack of awareness of the order, and time taken by legal heirs to collect documents and obtain India Law Library Docid # 2447932
(27) RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. HARJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 10-06-2026 Insurance Law — Personal Accident Policy — Claim repudiation — Insurers argued death was due to pre-existing illness and not accident, citing post-mortem findings of septicaemia, lung and heart disease — However, the post-mortem also noted a frontal bone fracture, which the court found sufficient to cause death and India Law Library Docid # 2447933
(28) NAVNEET SUREKA AND OTHERS Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD G.E. PLAZA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 27-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21 — Insurance claim — Repudiation — Overseas Travel Policy — Complainant individually covered by an insurance schedule, making them a consumer despite employer paying premium — Employer's payment of medical expenses due to claim repudiation does not extinguish the India Law Library Docid # 2444379
(29) SMT. UMA TIWARI Vs. DR. SANTOSH GUPTA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 & 2019 — Revision Petition — Scope of Revisional Jurisdiction — Limited to jurisdictional error, manifest material irregularity or illegality — High Court's findings on negligence binding on consumer forums — Cannot re-examine negligence after judicial intervention by High Court India Law Library Docid # 2444380
(30) AMARJIT SINGH MINHAS AND OTHERS Vs. JANTA LAND PROMOTERS LIMITED AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in Service — Delayed Possession of Property — Complainant sought possession, compensation for delay, setting aside of imposed penalty, and litigation costs — Builder cited 'force majeure' events for the delay — The Commission acknowledged the delay and directed payment of compensation as per the agreement, limited by the total compensation sought by the India Law Library Docid # 2444381
(31) SURESH BABU BOLLINENI AND ANOTHER Vs. M/S LODHA HEALTHY CONSTRUCTIONS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and 2019 — Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Consumer forums cannot invoke provisions of CPC like Order 7 Rule 10 & 10(A) for returning complaints as such powers are not conferred by the Act — If a forum lacks jurisdiction, it can only consign the complaint with liberty to approach the appropriate India Law Library Docid # 2444382
(32) M/S. J.P. EXPORTS Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 20-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Doctrine of Election — The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) noted that the complainant had first approached the IRDA and then the Appellate Authority under the Insurance Act, consciously electing to pursue remedies within the framework of the Insurance Act — India Law Library Docid # 2444383
(33) SMT. URMILA CHAND AND OTHERS Vs. DR. ATUL CHHABRA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Recusal of Bench — Repeated applications for recusal and transfer of case by complainant, seeking to avoid final hearing and manage proceedings, are rejected as lacking merit and being a tactic to prolong litigation. India Law Library Docid # 2444384
(34) VEER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. DR. RAJEEV LOCHAN[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2026 Medical Negligence — A surgeon's removal of a patient's healthy left kidney instead of the diseased right kidney, despite clear pre-operative diagnosis and imaging, constitutes gross medical negligence — The surgeon's explanation that it was impossible to remove the left kidney from a right-sided incision, coupled with the India Law Library Docid # 2444385
(35) HEART & GENERAL HOSPITAL Vs. MAMAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Medical Negligence — Appellant hospital held liable for 40% of the decretal amount for alleged medical negligence leading to patient's death — Patient admitted to appellant hospital in a critical condition after undergoing Cesarean Section and Hysterectomy at another hospital — Appellant India Law Library Docid # 2444386
(36) STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. PROF. K.P. SREENATH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 51(2) — Second Appeal — Conversion of Revision Petition to Second Appeal — Condonation of Delay — admitted for consideration on substantial questions of law regarding bank's liability for third-party fraud and applicability of RBI Circular dated 06.07.2017. India Law Library Docid # 2444387
(37) M/S. KANGAN PALACE Vs. UNION BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 15-05-2026 Insurance Law — Fire Insurance Claim — Fraudulent Documents — Policy conditions, specifically regarding fraud and utmost good faith, are paramount — If a claim is found to be supported by fraudulent or manipulated documents, the entire claim can be forfeited, justifying the insurer's repudiation. India Law Library Docid # 2444388
(38) MEENAKSHI MISSION HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND TRUSTEE Vs. P.D. AUDIKESAVALU REP. BY POA KAVITHA AUDIKESAVALU[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 62 — Transfer Application — Grounds for transfer — Apprehension of bias due to litigant's status as a High Court Judge — Held, mere status of litigant as a constitutional functionary cannot by itself constitute a ground for transfer unless supported by cogent material establishing a real India Law Library Docid # 2444389
(39) VINOD KUMAR KUCHHAL Vs. TDI INFRASTRUCTURES LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Review Application and Miscellaneous Application to modify an order — The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed both a Review Application (RA) and a Miscellaneous Application (MA) seeking modification of a previous order — The India Law Library Docid # 2444390
(40) THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LIMITED Vs. MR. HEERALAL CHAMPAWAT[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 12-05-2026 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revisional jurisdiction of National Commission is limited and should be exercised only when State Commission has acted without jurisdiction, failed to exercise jurisdiction, or acted illegally or with material irregularity — National Commission cannot interfere with concurrent India Law Library Docid # 2444391