(401) KRISHNA KUMAR KUSHWAHA Vs. MANAGING DIRECTOR, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Revisionary Jurisdiction — Scope — Limited jurisdiction of National Commission under Section 21(b) — Interference only when State Commission exceeded or failed to exercise jurisdiction, or acted illegally or with material irregularity — No interference with concurrent findings of fact based on appreciation of evidence. India Law Library Docid # 2420416
(402) ONE SCHOOL GOA Vs. VIBHA SINGH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revision Petition — Delay in filing appeal — Condonation of delay due to Covid-19 pandemic — Supreme Court order extending limitation period — Factual position on receipt of order and subsequent administrative delays — Grounds for condonation accepted — Appeal restored to file. India Law Library Docid # 2420417
(403) BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Vs. MOOL CHAND LALWANI[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Delay condonation — Delay of 107 days in filing Revision Petition — Condoned as delay occurred during suspended period of limitation due to Covid-19 pandemic. India Law Library Docid # 2420418
(404) MUKESH KUMAR KAUSHAL Vs. ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 25-11-2024 CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW — Revision Petition — Scope of Jurisdiction — National Commission's revisional jurisdiction is limited to cases involving jurisdictional errors, material irregularities, or perversity in lower fora's orders — Cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact based on appreciation of evidence unless such findings are illegal, irregular, or perverse. India Law Library Docid # 2420419
(405) FAST ENGINEERS Vs. DEEPSHIKHA KALA SANSTHAN[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Section 51 Appeal against State Commission Order Appellant filed appeal against order allowing consumer complaint. India Law Library Docid # 2420379
(406) ABDUL GAGOOR Vs. JOSE K.V[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Appeal against State Commission order reversing District Forum order — Parties referred to their original complaint roles — Complainant alleged defective construction and demanded refund — Opposite Party (OP) claimed delayed payments by complainant caused construction delays — District Forum directed both parties to fulfill obligations — State Commission allowed complainant's appeal, ordering OP to refund excess amount with inte India Law Library Docid # 2420380
(407) STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revision Petition — State Commission order setting aside District Forum order without hearing parties — Held to be illegal. India Law Library Docid # 2420381
(408) DR. HARISH GUPTA Vs. KUMARI KRITIKA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 21-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 58(1)(b) — Revision Petition — Powers of National Commission — National Commission can set aside the order of the State Commission if no deficiency in service or medical negligence is found on the part of the Opposite Parties. India Law Library Docid # 2420382
(409) DCB BANK LIMITED Vs. MR. AJOY KUMAR MEHTA AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(d)(ii) and 2(o) — Consumer and Service — Definition of; Commercial Purpose — Overdraft facility for personal use, meeting children's educational expenses and regular affairs, not for profit generation, qualify for consumer protection, even if form indicated business purpose. India Law Library Docid # 2420377
(410) CHANDRAPRATAP SINGH BAIS Vs. PRAKRIYA PRABHARI (PROCESS IN-CHARGE) AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 19-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 17(1)(b) — Revisional Jurisdiction — Perversity of findings — Dismissal of appeals at admission stage — State Commission summarily dismissed appeals at admission stage — This is amenable to revisional jurisdiction if there are perversity, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or irregularities in the lower fora's decisions. India Law Library Docid # 2420378
(411) MOHD. MUKHTAR Vs. BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 21(b) — Revision Petition — Jurisdiction — National Commission's power to revise orders of State Commission. India Law Library Docid # 2420375
(412) AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Vs. BASUDEV AUTO LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 18-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Sections 11, 15, 21(b) — Revisionary powers of National Commission — Scope and limitations — National Commission can only interfere if there is jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or illegal/material irregularity in proceedings — Cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact on appreciation of evidence unless there is perversity or illegality. India Law Library Docid # 2420376
(413) ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. M/S. HIND METALS & INDUSTRIES (P) LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 14-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 19 Appeal against State Commission order Allowed delay in filing appeal condoned in the interest of justice. India Law Library Docid # 2420374
(414) M/S SEQUEL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. Vs. SANWLI SHARMA AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 13-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 2(1)(d) — Consumer — Appellant logistics company's agreement with Respondent No. 4 (stem cell company) explicitly stated that neither party could make commitments on behalf of the other, and were not liable for the other's actions. Respondent No. 4 therefore could not pass on liability to the Appellant to the Complainants, as the Complainants had no direct contractual relationship with the Appellant. This excluded the Appellant from being a necessary party India Law Library Docid # 2420373
(415) M/S. JAGDISH WOOLLEN'S (P) LTD. Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — FIR — Insurance Claim — Indemnity — Delay in settlement — Application of depreciation against reinstatement value — Calculation of claim amount — Role of surveyor's report — Court's power to examine surveyor's report — Necessity of second surveyor — Payment within specified period — Costs. India Law Library Docid # 2420371
(416) D PRABHU Vs. J. GOVINDARAJ[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 11-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 69 — Condonation of Delay — Limitation period prescribed is a legislative command and must be strictly followed. India Law Library Docid # 2420372
(417) O.P. SRIVASTAVA Vs. MAHENDRA TANK AND ANOTHER[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 08-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 & 2019 — Section 27 (1986 Act) / Section 72 (2019 Act) — Execution proceedings — Liability of former director — Appellant resigned as director before complaint was filed against the company — Apex Commission held that a former director who resigned before the consumer complaint was instituted cannot be held liable for the company's obligations or the execution of the decree — The State Commission erred in issuing warrants against the appellant ignoring documentary e India Law Library Docid # 2420370
(418) M/S. ROHIT EXTRACTIONS PVT. LTD. Vs. M/S. AMARDEEP PACKAGING[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Section 51 Appeal against State Commission Order Delay in filing appeal condoned for stated reasons. India Law Library Docid # 2420358
(419) NISHA T.S. Vs. BIOTECH PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 19 — Appeal against State Commission's order — Delay in filing — Delay of 41 days condoned. India Law Library Docid # 2420359
(420) NEETA SINGH Vs. HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 07-11-2024 Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Section 51(1) — Appeal against State Commission order — Condonation of delay — Delay in filing appeal was condoned based on reasons provided in the application. India Law Library Docid # 2420360