ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(101) SHRI ANIL KUMAR SHARMA Vs. ADITYA VASHISHTH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-09-2025
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 — Sections 3(b), 20, 28, 20(2), 20(3) — Maintenance of children — Father's liability for major son's expenses — Suit filed by major son for maintenance, educational and marriage expenses — Petitioner sought rejection of suit under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on grounds of cause of action and son being major male child — Trial court dismissed application — High Court held that son's claim cannot be outrightly rejected at initial stage, particularly when father ha
India Law Library Docid # 2432586

(102) PRIYA SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. HEM LATA AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of plaint — Court Fees — Plaintiffs filed suit for declaration and injunction, claiming sale deed was obtained by fraud after taking a loan and executing a mortgage deed — Trial court allowed defendants' application for rejection of plaint for non-payment of ad valorem court fees as per sale consideration — Held, since plaintiffs were executants of the sale
India Law Library Docid # 2432587

(103) M/S. SHEIKHUPURA TRANSPORT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER Vs. JAGJIT SINGH OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 03-09-2025
East Punjab Urban Registration Act, 1949 — Section 15(5) — Revision Petition — Powers of High Court — High Court can entertain revision petitions against orders passed by Appellate Authority under the said Act. (Para 1)
India Law Library Docid # 2432585

(104) M/S.SREE ARAVIND STEELS LIMITED AND OTHER Vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE I DIVISION[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 02-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 173(5) — Applicability — Not applicable to private complaints filed under Special Acts like Central Excise Act, 1944 — Supreme Court held that Section 173(4) and by extension 173(5) are confined to police reports.
India Law Library Docid # 2432213

(105) OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. Vs. M/S G & T BECKFIELD DRILLING SERVICES PVT. LTD.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-09-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 31(7)(a) — Interest on award — Power of arbitral tribunal to award interest pendente lite is subject to the agreement between the parties — A mere clause barring interest on delayed payment does not automatically bar pendente lite interest — Such a bar must be explicit or established
India Law Library Docid # 2432202

(106) MRS. SHAILJA KRISHNA Vs. SATORI GLOBAL LIMITED AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-09-2025
Companies Act, 1956 / 2013 — Sections 397, 398, 242 — Oppression and Mismanagement — NCLT jurisdiction — NCLT has jurisdiction to decide all matters incidental or integral to a complaint of oppression and mismanagement, including validity of gift deeds, unless specifically barred by statute
India Law Library Docid # 2432203

(107) SHREE NAGANI SILK MILLS PVT. LTD Vs. L.D. INDUSTRIES LTD. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-09-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA) — Section 22, 22A — Proceedings under Section 138 N.I. Act against a sick company — No absolute bar — Restraint order under Section 22A does not automatically quash proceedings — Case-specific examination required based on nature of order and facts, especially regarding
India Law Library Docid # 2432204

(108) MANOJ DHANKAR Vs. NEEHARIKA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-09-2025
Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 — Section 25 — Custody of minor — Best Interest of Child — In cases of matrimonial and custody disputes, the primary consideration for the court is the emotional, mental, and physical well-being of the child, not the fault of the parents — The child should grow up in a secure, loved, and
India Law Library Docid # 2432209

(109) PHIRERAM Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 439(2) — Cancellation of Bail — Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 — Breach of Bail Conditions — High Court erred in disposing of bail cancellation application by directing complainant to avail remedy under Witness Protection Scheme; Witness Protection Scheme is not an alternative to bail cancellation for violation of bail conditions.
India Law Library Docid # 2432314

(110) MOHD. TANVEER Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 02-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 22(1) — Right to be informed of grounds of arrest — Mandatory requirement — Failure to communicate grounds of arrest in writing to the arrested person renders the arrest and subsequent custody illegal and vitiated — Supreme Court judgments in Pankaj Bansal and Vihaan Kumar cases reiterated.
India Law Library Docid # 2432342

(111) CHANDRA SINGH SELLA Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 02-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 451, 457 — Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 51, 60 — Release of seized vehicle — No specific bar under NDPS Act for interim release of vehicle used for transporting contraband — Court can invoke general powers under Cr.P.C. for return of seized vehicle pending final decision — Trial court has discretion to release vehicle, exercised in accordance with law based on facts and circumstances of each case.
India Law Library Docid # 2432343

(112) SMT. AMITA VERMA AND OTHERS Vs. NEELAM VERMA AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (GWALIOR BENCH)] 02-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 8 Rule 6-A — Counterclaim by Defendant — A defendant can file a counterclaim against the plaintiff for any right or claim based on a cause of action that arose before or after the suit was filed, but critically, before delivering their defence or within the time limited for defence. The Supreme Court has clarified that while there's no embargo on filing after the written statement, the cause of action must be prior to the framing of issues, and courts pos
India Law Library Docid # 2432525

(113) GULAB AND OTHERS Vs. RADHESHAYAM AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 02-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Scope of Interference — High Court's power to interfere in second appeal is limited to substantial questions of law and not re-appreciation of evidence, unless findings are manifestly perverse or contrary to record.
India Law Library Docid # 2432526

(114) MUNAWAR HUSSAIN Vs. MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE THANA MANDI AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 02-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14, 16, 21 — Principles of Natural Justice — Right to livelihood — Termination of employment — Arbitrary termination without fair procedure and opportunity to be heard — Employee in public employment not to be arbitrarily deprived of livelihood without just, fair, and reasonable procedure — Termination orders quashed for violating principles of natural justice
India Law Library Docid # 2432544

(115) GHULAM NABI KAMLAK AND OTHERS Vs. UT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 02-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Quashing of FIR — Abuse of Process of Law — FIR lodged as a counterblast to a previously filed FIR by the petitioners, with vague and omnibus allegations, indicating an ulterior motive to pressurize the petitioners — Such FIR constitutes an abuse of legal process, warranting quashing.
India Law Library Docid # 2432545

(116) THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS ETC. Vs. KALLURI NAGA NARASIMHA ABHIRAM AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 371D — Presidential Order dated 01.07.1974 under — Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulations of Admissions) Order, 1974 — ‘Local Candidate’ definition — State legislation for preferential admission — Legislative competence — Article 246, Seventh Schedule, List III, Entry 25 — Ordinance/Rules need to trace legislative competence to
India Law Library Docid # 2432163

(117) M/S. TRIVENI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 — Sections 14, 15, 19(1) — Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Sections 21, 22, 24 — Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Sections 7, 8 — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice — Non-Impleadment of Party — Adherence to Statutory Procedure — Adverse orders passed without impleading affected party and without affording opportunity of hearing are
India Law Library Docid # 2432175

(118) SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI Vs. HARE RAM SAH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 223 — Joint trial of persons accused of different offences — High Court set aside conviction solely on the ground of violation of Section 223 Cr.P.C. without considering prejudice or failure of justice — Supreme Court held that mere non-compliance of Section 223 Cr.P.C. does not automatically vitiate the trial — Prejudice or failure of justice must be proven from
India Law Library Docid # 2432176

(119) RAMESH CHAND (D) THR. LRS. Vs. SURESH CHAND AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 54 — Sale — Transfer of immovable property — For a valid sale of immovable property exceeding Rs. 100 in value, a registered instrument (sale deed) is mandatory — An agreement for sale does not create any interest or charge on the property and does not confer title, it merely creates a right to obtain a registered sale deed — Possession delivered under an
India Law Library Docid # 2432177

(120) M/S M.I TEXTILES PTE LTD. Vs. M/S T.T LTD. AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27 — Additional Evidence — Appellant seeking to produce additional evidence by recalling witness and leading defence evidence due to alleged negligence of previous counsel — Court rejected the application finding no exceptional circumstances, especially as appellant is an established international company expected to be vigilant and not negligent in
India Law Library Docid # 2432178