India Law Library

User not Logged..

Quick Judgments/News

Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting

Latest Cases

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
»
Last

(61) BUNTY KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 392 (Robbery) read with Section 34 — Conviction — Appellate Court found complainant's testimony cogent, credible, and supported by identification of appellants, corroboration from other witnesses regarding possession of money, and recovery of stolen amount, motorcycle (used in offense), and items purchased from robbed money at instance of accused —
India Law Library Docid # 2435971

(62) MANJU DUA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF NCT GOVERNAMENT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Criminal Procedure — Quashing of FIR — Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Matrimonial disputes — Settlement between parties — FIR arising out of matrimonial dispute (Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Sections 3/4 DP Act) quashed in exercise of
India Law Library Docid # 2435972

(63) PRASHANT PRAKASH RATNAPARKI AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-11-2025
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 310(2) [IPC Section 395] — Dacoity — Accused entered school premises seeking specific files, forcibly took cheque book, letterheads, stamps, cash, and computer — Complainant later settled the dispute amicably and returned all items — Supreme Court held that the primary motive was retrieval of institutional files, not wrongful gain, thus lacking the dishonest intention required for theft, robbery, or dacoity — Complete restitution and amicable settlement
India Law Library Docid # 2435387

(64) RAJ KUMAR @ BHEEMA Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-11-2025
Evidence — Video Conference Deposition — Procedure for Confronting Witness — The Supreme Court clarified and directed that in cases where a witness's statement is recorded via video conferencing and a previous written statement is to be used for confrontation, a copy of the statement must be transmitted electronically to the witness, and the procedure under Sections 147 and 148 of the Bharatiya Sakshya
India Law Library Docid # 2435388

(65) NITIN Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 17-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 141 and Order 41 Rule 17 — Applicability to Writ Proceedings — Proceedings under Article 226 of Constitution of India are explicitly excluded from the scope of "proceedings" defined under the Explanation to Section 141 CPC (Miscellaneous proceedings) — Consequently, the procedural provisions of CPC, including principles governing dismissal of appeals for
India Law Library Docid # 2435655

(66) SUSHANT NAYAK Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 17-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 375 (Explanation 2), Section 376(2)(n), Section 90, Section 44 — Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 67 — Rape — Consent — Consent obtained by 'fear of injury' — Meaning of 'Injury' (Section 44 IPC) includes harm to body, mind, reputation, or property — Whether ostensible consent was vitiated by 'fear of injury' under Section 90 IPC, thereby constituting rape under Section 375 IPC — The victim (major, aged 24) maintained a relationship with the appellant f
India Law Library Docid # 2435848

(67) SUMEET KUMAR BEHRA Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 17-11-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) — Sections 22(a), 22(b) — Quantification of Narcotic Substance — Small Quantity vs. Intermediate Quantity — Conviction — Determination of quantity of psychotropic substance must be based on the actual content of the active narcotic drug and not the total weight of the mixture or preparation — Reliance on Standing Order No. 1055(E) dated 19.10.2001.
India Law Library Docid # 2435849

(68) SRI MAHESH SHETTY THIMARODI Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 17-11-2025
Karnataka Police Act, 1963 — Section 55 (a), (b), (c) — Order of Externment — Grounds for issuance — Requirement to specify clause — An externment order must clearly indicate under which provision {Clause (a), (b), or (c) of Section 55} it is passed.
India Law Library Docid # 2435936

(69) ANAND S/O. DURGAPPA GOLLAR Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 17-11-2025
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) — Sections 9, 10, 29, 30 — Sexual Assault on a child below 12 years of age — Aggravated Sexual Assault (Section 9(m)) — Presumption of guilt (Section 29) and mens rea (Section 30) — Requirement for conviction — Solitary testimony of the victim girl (PW-8) found natural, reliable, and inspiring confidence, corroborated by medical
India Law Library Docid # 2435943

(70) SHUKAL GUPTA Vs. EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION[DELHI HIGH COURT] 15-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 22 Rule 3 — Substitution of Legal Representatives (LRs) — Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of Delay — Limitation — Application for substituting LRs must be filed within 90 days as per Article 120 of the Limitation Act, 1963 — Where LRs filed substitution application after a delay of over two years (871/819 days) based on alleged ignorance of
India Law Library Docid # 2435973

(71) DINESH KUMAR SACHDEVA Vs. ROHIT SACHDEVA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order XXI Rule 58 — Execution First Appeal — Partition Suit — Preliminary decree for partition — Inter se bidding — Joint owners (siblings) of property in equal shares (1/3rd each) — Property incapable of physical partition — Disposal of property via inter se bidding — Challenge to High Court order disposing of Execution Appeal on ground of offer matching — Where an offer
India Law Library Docid # 2435452

(72) M/S A.S. MET CORP PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. THE REGISTRAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 32 — Writ Petition (Criminal) — Seeking registration of FIR and investigation into attempt to influence judicial outcome — Relief for criminal investigation based on disclosure in a judicial order of NCLAT, Chennai Bench — Issues raised are of vital public importance but deemed capable of
India Law Library Docid # 2435455

(73) PRATIK JAIN Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Bail — Stage of investigation/Trial — Accused initially not named in FIR but later implicated in Final Report (Chargesheet) for offenses under Sections 318(4), 111, and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, based on allegations of facilitating the prime accused in operating "mule accounts" — When the final report is filed, the necessity
India Law Library Docid # 2435459

(74) KOLANJIAMMAL (D) THR LRS. Vs. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER PERAMBALUR DISTRICT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 — Sections 37-A, 38 — Setting aside of sale — Statutory remedies for setting aside auction sale by deposit or challenging irregularity and fraud — Prescribed limitation period of 30 days from date of sale — Failure to avail remedy within time — Bar of limitation applies — Belated challenge
India Law Library Docid # 2435235

(75) GOVIND Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25 — Conviction solely based on recovery of weapon and FSL report — Insufficient when eyewitnesses turn hostile and do not support prosecution — Lack of independent witnesses — Recovery from a location accessible to other family
India Law Library Docid # 2435236

(76) JAYAKANDAMMAL Vs. A. SELVARAJU[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 — Contempt Petition — Non-compliance with Court Directions — Contemnor avoiding appearance — Where contemnor failed to appear despite notice and subsequent issuance of bailable warrant, and provided excuses (age and lack of financial source), the Supreme Court issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW)
India Law Library Docid # 2435412

(77) PRAVINBHAI DEVIBHAI BHARPODA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Anticipatory Bail — Rejection by High Court — Appeals before Supreme Court — Appellants (Pravinbhai Devibhai Bharpoda and Ravindrasinh Jayvantsinh Jadeja) seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR registered under IPC Sections 170, 419, 465, 467, 468, 471, 472
India Law Library Docid # 2435419

(78) KRISHNAKANT SHARMA Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) — Section 20(B) — Bail — Grant of — Factors considered — Appellant seeking bail for offence under Section 20(B) of NDPS Act — Length of incarceration (more than one year and nine months) — Trial yet to commence — Previous criminal antecedents pertaining to
India Law Library Docid # 2435420

(79) KOTHAPA PUNEETH Vs. STATE OF TELANGANA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Condition for Reissuance of Passport to Accused on Bail — Modification of Conditions — Accused facing trial under Section 212 of IPC, holding top positions in multiple organizations, and previously permitted to travel abroad multiple times — Trial Court granted permission for reissuance of passport subject to the condition of depositing the passport immediately upon reissuance — High Court diluted the condition of
India Law Library Docid # 2435549

(80) SANJEEV KUMAR CHHIKARA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-11-2025
Criminal Procedure — Allegation of threat to complainant — Verification by Police — Jurisdictional Police investigation and CCTV footage review found no basis for the alleged threat, indicating the complainant's omnibus statement was not sustained — Complainant did not cooperate with police inquiry to clarify the allegations.
India Law Library Docid # 2435557

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
»
Last