India Law Library

User not Logged..

Quick Judgments/News

Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting

Latest Cases

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
»
Last

(61) ANIKET KUMAR Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-11-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 142 — Power of Supreme Court to pass directions — Dissolution of Marriage by Mutual Consent — Where parties filed a joint application for directions under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve marriage by mutual consent based on a comprehensive settlement, the Supreme Court, acknowledging the efforts for amicable resolution, granted divorce by mutual consent
India Law Library Docid # 2436057

(62) THE STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. BAWA SINGH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 439 — Bail — Jurisdiction and Scope — Power of High Court / Sessions Court while granting bail — Observations / Directions regarding penal action against investigating officers — High Court directed that if the accused were acquitted, the recovery of contraband would be deemed to be effected from and charged upon the police officers who signed the
India Law Library Docid # 2436089

(63) KEYUR HARISHBHAI PATEL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-11-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) — Regular Bail — Factors for consideration — Allegation of recovery of contraband from co-accused's factory where appellant was present — Appellant lacked control or ownership of factory; mere presence not sufficient for complicity — Co-accused granted bail by Supreme Court — Appellant incarcerated for over two years while trial incomplete — Considering co
India Law Library Docid # 2436149

(64) THE CHENNAI METROPOLITAN CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED Vs. S. LAKSHMI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-11-2025
Allotment of Land — Failure to Deliver Possession — Refund vs. Alternate Plot — Appellant executed sale deed in 2006 but failed to hand over physical possession due to discrepancy between allotted land on paper and actual ground availability after demarcation/provision for roads — Single Judge directed refund of Rs. 10,89,000/- with 18% interest p.a. OR allotment of alternate site of comparable value — Division Bench
India Law Library Docid # 2436158

(65) KARANARTHAM VIRAMAH FOUNDATION Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-11-2025
Companies Act, 2013 — Section 212(1)(c) — Investigation by Serious Fraud Investigating Office (SFIO) — Necessity and Conditions for direct investigation — For a valid order directing SFIO investigation, mandatory requirements include recording of reasons, demonstrable circumstances justifying SFIO involvement, and necessity of investigation being in public interest — Application seeking direction for SFIO investigation rejected where these conditions were not met.
India Law Library Docid # 2436167

(66) IRFAN Vs. STATE[DELHI HIGH COURT] 22-11-2025
Criminal Law — Rape (IPC Section 376) and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO Act, Section 4) — Appeal against conviction — Appreciation of evidence of prosecutrix (victim) — Consistency of testimony — Allegations of rape against a victim aged less than 17 years by a building co-tenant — Victim's testimony
India Law Library Docid # 2435959

(67) RAMESH CHANDRA AGARWAL Vs. DEVENDER YADAV AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 21-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of Plaint — Scope of Examination — The court, when considering an application under Order 7 Rule 11, must only examine the averments made in the Plaint and not the defense or disputed facts — Rejection is warranted only if the Plaint discloses no cause of action
India Law Library Docid # 2435960

(68) SONALI JAIN Vs. DHEERAJ CHAUHAN AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 21-11-2025
Family Law — Custody of Minor — Best Interest and Welfare of Child — Paramount consideration is the minor’s physical, emotional, moral, and intellectual welfare, transcending the legal rights or emotional claims of the parents — Court must guard against the bitterness of matrimonial disputes clouding the judgment on the child's welfare.
India Law Library Docid # 2435961

(69) MR. SUNNY SANGWAN Vs. DR. SAURABH SHANDILYA THROUGH HIS DULY CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MR. NIKHIL PRASAD OJHA AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 21-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 8 Rule 1 — Written Statement — Timelines for filing — Extension of time beyond 90 days — Extension must be granted only in exceptional circumstances, by way of exception, and only if the defendant demonstrates bona fide reasons supported by credible material — Extension cannot be granted where delay stems from negligence, indifference, lack of
India Law Library Docid # 2435962

(70) DEVENDER SINGH Vs. STATE[DELHI HIGH COURT] 21-11-2025
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) — Demand and Acceptance of Illegal Gratification — Proof of demand is sine qua non for conviction — Mere proof of acceptance or recovery of currency notes without evidence of demand is insufficient to establish the offence — Conviction requires proof of prior demand for illegal gratification by the public servant as a fact in issue
India Law Library Docid # 2435963

(71) MR. APPUTHA RAJ Vs. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 21-11-2025
Education Law — Admission — Excess Admissions — M.Pharma (Drug Regulatory Affairs) — Cancellation of Admission — Student admitted under Management Quota removed after admission found to be in excess of sanctioned intake limit — College claimed excess admission due to technical glitch in ERP system — Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) is empowered to regulate pharmacy education under Pharmacy Act, 1948 —
India Law Library Docid # 2435887

(72) GODOLPHINE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. UM PROJECTS LLP AND ANOTHER[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 21-11-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 37(1)(c) — Appeal challenging dismissal of Section 34 application — Grounds for setting aside Arbitral Award — Patent illegality — Failure to refer to every document or correspondence — An arbitral award must be informed by reasons (Section 31(3)) after appreciating and evaluating materials; however, it is not necessary for the Arbitral Tribunal to specifically refer to each and
India Law Library Docid # 2435889

(73) ASKINS BIOFUELS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 21-11-2025
Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 — Scope and Applicability — Standalone Distilleries and Jaggery Units — Applicability of Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 to standalone distilleries manufacturing ethanol (Appellant 1, M/s. Askins) — Division Bench previously held that the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966, as amended, does not apply to standalone distilleries established under notifications of the Ministry of
India Law Library Docid # 2435891

(74) BALAJI STEEL TRADE Vs. FLUDOR BENIN S.A. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-11-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(6), Section 11(12)(a), Section 2(1)(f), Section 2(2) — Applicability of Part I, including Section 11, to International Commercial Arbitration (ICA) — Dispute arising from a Buyer and Seller Agreement (BSA) where Respondent No. 1 is foreign company (incorporated in Benin) — BSA stipulates arbitration “will take place in Benin” and is governed by
India Law Library Docid # 2435695

(75) P.U. SIDHIQUE AND OTHERS Vs. ZAKARIYA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-11-2025
Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Act, 1965) — Sections 12 and 18 — Eviction for non-payment of rent — Procedure under Section 12 in Appeal against Section 12(3) eviction order — Whether the entire summary procedure under Section 12 must be repeated before the Rent Control Appellate Authority when challenging an eviction order passed under Section 12(3) — Held: A fresh application under Section 12(1) of the Act is not mandatory when challenging an eviction order
India Law Library Docid # 2435697

(76) M/S. DNA ENTERTAINMENT NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 21-11-2025
Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 — Sections 3(1), 8B, and 8C — Constitution of Commission — Role of Commission — Judicial Review of Inquiry Report — A One Member Commission appointed under Section 3(1) to inquire into a stampede during a victory celebration was primarily a 'fact finding body' tasked with ascertaining facts, reasons/responsible parties for the tragedy, and suggesting precautionary measures, not
India Law Library Docid # 2435882

(77) HITUBHA BABBHA ZALA @ HITESHSINH HARISINH ZALA Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-11-2025
Labour Law — Termination of Employment — Relief — Compensation vs. Reinstatement — Appellants’ services terminated after 10 years of employment (1989-1999); Labour Court granted reinstatement with continuity of service but without backwages (Award in 2014) — High Court Single Judge set aside the Labour Court award and granted a lump-sum compensation of Rs. 40,000/-, upheld by
India Law Library Docid # 2436071

(78) A.V.N. SATHISH Vs. A KALYANI[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-11-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 142 — Power of Supreme Court — Dissolution of Marriage — Divorce by Mutual Consent — In exercise of power under Article 142, Supreme Court granted decree of divorce by mutual consent upon joint application (IA No. 283420/2025) preferred by the parties, thereby dissolving the marriage solemnized on July 1, 2010.
India Law Library Docid # 2436080

(79) VIKASH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-11-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Anticipatory Bail — Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 419, 420, 354A, 354C, 384, 504, 376, 511 — Information Technology Act, 2000 — Sections 66(D), 66(E), 67 — Allegations of sexual abuse, secretly recording a video of the victim bathing, blackmailing, extorting money, and threatening to make the video viral — Appellant contends the FIR is a
India Law Library Docid # 2436086

(80) THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION INDORE Vs. M/S MSD REAL ESTATE LLP AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-11-2025
Property Law — Title Dispute — Eviction under Summary Proceedings — M.P. Lok Parisar (Bedakhali) Adhiniyam, 1974 — Where the title over the subject property is in dispute, the High Court correctly held that the Municipal Corporation could not declare the respondent as an unauthorized occupant and that eviction could not be carried out through summary proceedings under the Act of 1974.
India Law Library Docid # 2436087

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
»
Last