ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(21) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. SUNIL KHAN[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 12-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 378 — Appeal against acquittal — Appellate court powers — Appellate court can review, re-appreciate, and reconsider evidence but must remember presumption of innocence is doubled for accused after acquittal — If two reasonable views are possible, appellate court should not disturb acquittal.
India Law Library Docid # 2432663

(22) RISHITA KAPUR AND ANOTHER Vs. VIJAY KAPUR AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 12-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 125 — Maintenance — Children — Entitlement for maintenance extends only until the age of majority, unless the child suffers from a physical or mental abnormality or injury rendering them unable to maintain themselves.
India Law Library Docid # 2432664

(23) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. MOHINDER SINGH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 12-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A — Rash and Negligent Driving — Appeal against Acquittal — Scope of Interference by High Court — High Court can interfere only if acquittal judgment is patently perverse, based on misreading/omission of material evidence, or no two reasonable views are possible, with only view consistent with guilt being plausible.
India Law Library Docid # 2432665

(24) BALKAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 15/61/85 — Possession of poppy husk — Appeal against conviction — Appellant not challenging conviction on merits — Prayer for modification of sentence on quantum — Appellant had undergone 04 months and 02 days of imprisonment — FIR pertains to 2011 — Case involves protracted trial of over 14 years — Appellant living peacefully since then —
India Law Library Docid # 2432560

(25) SARDAR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR SURESH AND OTHERS Vs. PIARE LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR JAL SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Civil Procedure — Second Appeal — Scope — In Punjab and Haryana, second appeals are treated under Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, not Section 100 CPC. No question of law needs to be framed in such appeals.
India Law Library Docid # 2432558

(26) SHYAM SUNDER YADAV Vs. RIMPLE AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Conviction and sentence upheld by Appellate Court found to be appealable by way of revision. Offence under Section 138 of NI Act is compoundable despite consequences and provisions of CrPC, 1973, as per Section 147 of the NI Act. Parties arrived at a voluntary compromise.
India Law Library Docid # 2432559

(27) JYOTI SHARMA Vs. VISHNU GOYAL AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-09-2025
Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 41 Rule 27 — Production of additional evidence in appeal — Rejection of application to produce probate order obtained after trial court and first appellate court decisions was upheld, as it was not obtained during pendency of earlier proceedings.
India Law Library Docid # 2432636

(28) VANDANA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 468, 471 — Cheating, Forgery for purpose of cheating, Using as genuine a forged document — Standard of proof — Prosecution must prove mens rea (dishonest intention to make a false document or knowledge of its falsity) beyond reasonable doubt — Overwriting visible to the naked eye without expert corroboration is an unsafe basis for conviction — Document
India Law Library Docid # 2432637

(29) MOHAMMAD AFZAL MOHAMMAD SHARIF Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 154 — Registration of FIR — Duty of Police — Information relating to commission of a cognizable offence to be recorded — Mandatory registration of FIR if information discloses commission of a cognizable offence — Preliminary inquiry only to ascertain if cognizable offence is disclosed, not to verify veracity — Police cannot avoid duty of registering offence if
India Law Library Docid # 2432638

(30) STATE OF H.P. Vs. RAM PAL[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 279 — Rash Driving or Riding on a Public Way — Appeal against acquittal — High Court interference standard — High Court can interfere with an acquittal if it is patently perverse, based on misreading or omission of material evidence, or leads to a conclusion no reasonable person could reach. If two reasonable interpretations of evidence are possible, acquittal should not be disturbed.
India Law Library Docid # 2432667

(31) MOHD JAFFER SHEIKH Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 10-09-2025
Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 — Section 8 — Preventive Detention — Grounds for detention — Detaining authority must inform the detenu of the time limit within which they can make a representation against the detention order, as this is a constitutional right guaranteed under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India. Failure to do so vitiates the detention order
India Law Library Docid # 2432536

(32) AKHTAR ALI @ ALI AKHTAR @ SHAMIM @ RAJA USTAD Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 376A, 363, 201; POCSO Act, 2012 — Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 — Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 66C — Conviction for offences including murder and sexual assault — Case based on circumstantial evidence — Failure to establish motive, flaws in "last seen" theory, and doubts in scientific/DNA evidence — Accused acquitted.
India Law Library Docid # 2432553

(33) JUPALLY LAKSHMIKANTHA REDDY Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 420 — Cheating — Ingredients of cheating require deception to dishonestly or fraudulently induce a person to deliver property or do/omit to do something causing harm. Mere deception without dishonest inducement is insufficient.
India Law Library Docid # 2432554

(34) VINOD KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER Vs. SEESH RAM SAINI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 154 — Registration of FIR — Mandatory if information discloses cognizable offence — High Court can direct registration of FIR even if preliminary inquiry report suggests otherwise — Genuineness or credibility of information not a condition precedent for registration.
India Law Library Docid # 2432555

(35) CH. CHIRAG DIN Vs. ZEENAT CHOUHAN[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 10-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, Jammu & Kashmir — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Rejection of closure report by Magistrate without applying judicial mind — Trial court rejected final closure report submitted by SIT and took cognizance of offences without proper consideration of evidence and legal aspects — Magistrate failed to apply judicial mind to the numerous investigation reports, inquiries, and witness
India Law Library Docid # 2432535

(36) SAVITRI DEVI Vs. DAULAT RAM AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of Plaint — Plea of Order II Rule 2 CPC — Rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on the ground of Order II Rule 2 CPC is impermissible as Order II Rule 2 is not one of the grounds enumerated in Order 7 Rule 11.
India Law Library Docid # 2432561

(37) RAM MURTI (SINCE DECEASED) NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS Vs. SHIV KUMAR[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Evidence Act, 1872 — Sections 101, 102, 106 — Burden of Proof — Benami Transaction — The burden of proving that a sale is benami lies on the person alleging it. This requires more than just conjecture or surmise, necessitating concrete proof.
India Law Library Docid # 2432562

(38) XXXX CCL THR HIS FATHER NATURAL GUARDIAN GOBIND SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 12 — Bail of juvenile — Conditions for denial — Release of a juvenile on bail shall not be if there are reasonable grounds for believing that release is likely to bring the juvenile into association with known criminals, expose them to danger, or defeat the ends of justice — Provisions intended for reformation but bail cannot be granted routinely, requiring consideration of all facts and circumstances of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 2432563

(39) ANKIT YADAV Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 12 — Bail of Juvenile — Conditions for denial of bail — “Ends of justice” — Release on bail is ordinarily mandated unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that release would bring the juvenile into association with known criminals, expose them to danger, or def
India Law Library Docid # 2432564

(40) GURDHYAN SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. VIRENDRA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Compensation for motor accident — Deceased was homemaker aged 59 years — Claimants contended that her notional income should be assessed as a skilled worker, citing Kirti & Anr. Vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. — Court accepted contention based on Supreme Court judgment
India Law Library Docid # 2432565