ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(181) JASBIR SINGH Vs. BAGICHA SINGH[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 02-09-2025
Contract Law — Agreement to Sell — Specific Performance — Refund of Earnest Money — Plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract, specifically the availability of funds on the stipulated date, disentitles them from claiming a refund of earnest money, particularly when the agreement contains a forfeiture clause and the plaintiff's failure to appear in person to depose.
India Law Library Docid # 2432687

(182) ANAND SWARUP Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 02-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ Petition — Reconsideration while selecting candidates — Selection Committee ignored teaching experience certificate of petitioner for post of Drawing Master — Petitioner possessed experience certificate from Principal of Government Senior Secondary School certifying three years of service — Respondents argued appointment was made without departmental permission and thus certificate should not be considered — Court held reason assigned by Selection
India Law Library Docid # 2432702

(183) TULSI RAM Vs. MUSTAQ QURESHI[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 02-09-2025
Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 — Section 24(5) — Revision — Scope of Revisional Jurisdiction — High Court cannot convert revisional jurisdiction into an appellate jurisdiction and cannot re-appreciate evidence to substitute its own findings of fact for those of the courts below.
India Law Library Docid # 2432703

(184) THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS ETC. Vs. KALLURI NAGA NARASIMHA ABHIRAM AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 371D — Presidential Order dated 01.07.1974 under — Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulations of Admissions) Order, 1974 — ‘Local Candidate’ definition — State legislation for preferential admission — Legislative competence — Article 246, Seventh Schedule, List III, Entry 25 — Ordinance/Rules need to trace legislative competence to
India Law Library Docid # 2432163

(185) M/S. TRIVENI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 — Sections 14, 15, 19(1) — Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, Sections 21, 22, 24 — Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, Sections 7, 8 — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice — Non-Impleadment of Party — Adherence to Statutory Procedure — Adverse orders passed without impleading affected party and without affording opportunity of hearing are
India Law Library Docid # 2432175

(186) SUSHIL KUMAR TIWARI Vs. HARE RAM SAH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 223 — Joint trial of persons accused of different offences — High Court set aside conviction solely on the ground of violation of Section 223 Cr.P.C. without considering prejudice or failure of justice — Supreme Court held that mere non-compliance of Section 223 Cr.P.C. does not automatically vitiate the trial — Prejudice or failure of justice must be proven from
India Law Library Docid # 2432176

(187) RAMESH CHAND (D) THR. LRS. Vs. SURESH CHAND AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 54 — Sale — Transfer of immovable property — For a valid sale of immovable property exceeding Rs. 100 in value, a registered instrument (sale deed) is mandatory — An agreement for sale does not create any interest or charge on the property and does not confer title, it merely creates a right to obtain a registered sale deed — Possession delivered under an
India Law Library Docid # 2432177

(188) M/S M.I TEXTILES PTE LTD. Vs. M/S T.T LTD. AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27 — Additional Evidence — Appellant seeking to produce additional evidence by recalling witness and leading defence evidence due to alleged negligence of previous counsel — Court rejected the application finding no exceptional circumstances, especially as appellant is an established international company expected to be vigilant and not negligent in
India Law Library Docid # 2432178

(189) GL LITMUS EVENTS PVT. LTD. Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34 — Setting aside of arbitral award — Delay in pronouncement — Inordinate and unexplained delay in pronouncing an arbitral award, specifically 19 months from the conclusion of proceedings, is contrary to the public policy of India and violates basic notions of justice, thus making the award amenable to challenge under Section
India Law Library Docid # 2432179

(190) STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Vs. AJAY DANIEL AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378 — Appeal against acquittal — Standard of review — Appellate court must be slow in reversing an acquittal and give proper weight to trial judge’s views, presumption of innocence, benefit of doubt, and advantage of seeing witnesses — Acquittal by trial court strengthens presumption of innocence, requiring thorough scrutiny by appellate court on accepted legal parameters.
India Law Library Docid # 2432180

(191) HINDUSTAN LATEX FAMILY PLANNING PROMOTION TRUST Vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS[GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Jurisdiction of High Court — Review powers — High Court, as a court of record, has inherent powers to correct its own errors, which are plenary in nature. However, review powers are circumscribed by Order 47 Rule 1 and Section 114 of CPC. Review is not a re-hearing and only patent errors can be corrected.
India Law Library Docid # 2432212

(192) K.KRISHNASAMY PANDIAN Vs. THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 01-09-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of delay — Sufficient cause — Petitioner sought to condone a delay of 342 days in filing a criminal revision petition — Petitioner claimed the delay was due to his cardiac condition and medical treatment — Court found the explanation unsatisfactory and lacked supporting medical documents — The Court emphasized the need for a reasonable, bona fide
India Law Library Docid # 2432214

(193) HAREESH @ HARISHKUMAR Vs. A.S.UMESH AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 26 Rule 10A — DNA Test — Presumption of Legitimacy under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act — High Court quashes order directing DNA test, observing that such tests cannot be ordered as a matter of course and must be based on strong prima facie case satisfying Section 112, balancing right to privacy and dignity.
India Law Library Docid # 2432215

(194) SRI G.SATYANARAYANA VARMA Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Second petition on grounds available in first petition — Subsequent petitions are not maintainable if grounds were available but not raised in the first petition, unless there is a demonstrable change in circumstances.
India Law Library Docid # 2432216

(195) KARNATAKA STATE MEDICAL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED Vs. PLASTI SURGE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 47 — Question to be determined by the executing court — Arbitral award — Grounds for challenging an arbitral award are limited to Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Objections that could have been raised under Section 34 cannot be raised in execution proceedings under Section 47 of the CPC — Attempting to challenge an award in execution is impermissible and frustrates the purpose of the Arbitration Act — The Act is a self-contain
India Law Library Docid # 2432217

(196) VALLEPALLI SUBBA RAO AND OTHER Vs. KONDAREDDY LAKSHMIPATHI DIED THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Second Appeal — Jurisdiction — High Court cannot re-appreciate evidence or substitute its opinion for that of the lower appellate court unless findings are erroneous, contrary to mandatory provisions of law, pronouncements of Apex Court, or based on inadmissible/no evidence.
India Law Library Docid # 2432218

(197) THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD Vs. PAIDIKALVA MARIYAMMA AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166 — Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 (A.P.), Rule 252 — Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal — Compensation — Liability of Insurance Company — Tractor used as goods vehicle — Carrying of passengers — Violation of policy terms and conditions — Rule 252 prohibits carrying persons in goods vehicle beyond seating capacity or in a manner that endangers them —
India Law Library Docid # 2432219

(198) THE STATE OF A.P., REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD Vs. REDDOLLA KURUVA SIDDA REDDY AND OTHERS[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378(1) & (3) — Appeal against acquittal — Powers of Appellate Court — Appellate Court should not interfere with acquittal unless the lower court's approach is vitiated by manifest illegality, conclusions are unreasonable, or there's a perverse appreciation of evidence — Merely because another view is possible does not permit upsetting the acquittal judgment.
India Law Library Docid # 2432220

(199) KIRAN Vs. RAJKUMAR JIVRAJ JAIN AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-09-2025
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 18 — Bar on anticipatory bail — Section 18 of the Act bars the application of Section 438 of the Cr.PC in cases involving arrest for offences under the Act. This bar is not absolute and can be relaxed if a prima facie case for an offence under Section 3 of the Act is not made out based on the FIR and attendant facts.
India Law Library Docid # 2432205

(200) MD. BANSER ALI Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHER[GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 01-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 397 & 401 — Revision — Setting aside Conviction — Rape — Victim’s Statement Inconsistency — Inconsistency in victim’s statement before police, magistrate, and trial court regarding the incident and to whom the incident was reported raises serious doubts.
India Law Library Docid # 2432210