India Law Library

User not Logged..

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
»
Last

(461) PRIYANK CHAUHAN Vs. SMT. VINITA CHAUHAN[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Section 13(1)(ia) (Cruelty) — Mental Cruelty — Baseless or Reckless Allegations — Unsubstantiated and defamatory allegations of illicit relationships or infidelity made by one spouse against the other constitute grave mental cruelty, causing mental agony and loss of reputation — Continuous and unfounded accusations render it impossible for the aggrieved spouse to cohabit and justify
India Law Library Docid # 2436555

(462) GHANSHYAM GUPTA ALIAS GHANSHYAM VAISH Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder (Strangulation) — Circumstantial Evidence — Last Seen Theory — Motive — The case against the appellant (father) for the murder of his daughter (deceased) rested on circumstantial evidence, including the deceased being last seen with the appellant in a rented room and overwhelming evidence suggesting homicidal death by strangulation.
India Law Library Docid # 2436556

(463) M/S. SRI SARASWATHI BUS SERVICE AND OTHERS Vs. M. CIBIRAJ AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Hindu Law — Joint Family Property — Presumption of Jointness — Properties in the name of male members of a joint family enjoying sufficient ancestral nucleus are presumed to be joint family properties, shifting the burden to the party claiming them as self-acquired — No such presumption exists for properties standing in the name of female members; the party claiming them as joint family property must specifically plead and prove it — Where the evidence shows properties were acquired in the wife'
India Law Library Docid # 2436742

(464) JEYARAJ AND OTHERS Vs. A. STALIN AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 19-11-2025
Hindu Law — Marriage — Validity of Second Marriage — Customary Divorce — When a second marriage is performed in 1961 during the subsistence of the first marriage, it is inherently void unless a valid customary divorce is established between the first husband and wife prior to the second marriage — The burden of proving customary divorce lay upon the defendants (seeking to uphold the second marriage) — Where the
India Law Library Docid # 2436743

(465) COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, EZHILAGAM AND OTHERS Vs. R. MUNIYANDI @ CHANDRAN[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 (Act XXVI of 1948) — Section 7(c) — Powers of Control of Board of Revenue (now Commissioner of Land Administration) — Suo-motu revisionary power — Scope — Section 7(c) empowers the Commissioner of Land Administration to cancel or revise orders of a Settlement Officer (including Assistant Settlement Officer) except those orders where an appeal lies to the Tribunal — Where the Assistant Settlement Officer grants patta under
India Law Library Docid # 2436744

(466) R. KARTHIKEYAN AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Service Law — Seniority and Promotion — Sub Inspector of Police (SIP) — Challenge to promotion of batchmates and draft seniority list — SIP recruitment under three categories: Law & Order (Category I), Armed Reserve (Category II), and Tamil Nadu Special Police (Category III) based on marks, preference, and communal rotation — Petitioners selected in Categories II and III, subsequently converted to Category I on
India Law Library Docid # 2436745

(467) SUNIL Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 19-11-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ Petition — Challenge to Caste Validity Certificate Invalidation — Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee — Invalidation of 'Halba Scheduled Tribe' claim based on unrelated 'Koshti' entries and alleged incorrect language ('Modi') of pre-Constitution documents — Judicial scrutiny of Scrutiny Committee's decision — High Court found Committee failed to
India Law Library Docid # 2436997

(468) KRISH Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 19-11-2025
Scheduled Tribes Certificate Verification — 'Halbi' Scheduled Tribe Claim — Rejection of Caste Claim — Caste Scrutiny Committee — Perversity and Arbitrariness — The Caste Scrutiny Committee (Committee) invalidated petitioner's caste claim despite a previous High Court judgment validating the caste claim of his father as 'Halbi' Scheduled Tribe on identical facts — The Committee's rejection, which relied on
India Law Library Docid # 2436998

(469) PARMINDER SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. NARENDRA KAUR ALIAS JASWINDER KAUR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of Plaint — Insufficient Court Fee — Suit for Declaration and Joint Possession as Co-owner/Co-sharer — Defendants sought rejection of plaint arguing plaintiffs were not in possession and thus required to affix ad valorem court fee instead of fixed court fee on the relief of joint possession — Held, fixed court fee is payable on a suit filed by a
India Law Library Docid # 2437094

(470) HARPREET SINGH Vs. SUMAN LATA SUD AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227 — Civil Revision Petition — Scope of interference — High Court's power of superintendence under Article 227 is to be exercised with judicial discipline, keeping interference to the minimum, and not acting as a court of appeal, especially when the orders under challenge are in accordance with law — Impugned order dismissing application for amendment of
India Law Library Docid # 2437095

(471) SIMRANPREET KAUR MINOR THROUGH HER MOTHER AND ANOTHER Vs. RAJENDER SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Second Appeal (Section 100) and Punjab Courts Act, 1918 — Section 41 (Old Section 100 CPC scope) — Scope of Interference — Jurisdiction in second appeal is limited to errors in law or procedure; it does not extend to interfering with findings of fact, even if they appear erroneous, including findings based on documentary evidence — Citing Supreme Court
India Law Library Docid # 2437096

(472) YAKUB AND OTHERS Vs. SULEMAN AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 58, 60, 62 — Limitation Act, 1963 — Article 61(a) — Mortgage — Usufructuary Mortgage — Right of Redemption — Acquisition of Ownership by Mortgagee by Prescription — Principle of "Once a mortgage, always a mortgage" applies; a mortgage is always redeemable — In usufructuary mortgage, the mortgagee does not become owner merely by efflux of
India Law Library Docid # 2437097

(473) PREM CHAND Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Regular Second Appeal (RSA) — Scope of Second Appeal in Punjab and Haryana — Second appeals filed in Punjab and Haryana are governed by Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act, 1918, and not Section 100 CPC — Consequently, the framing of a 'substantial question of law' is not mandatory for entertaining such appeals, following Supreme Court precedents
India Law Library Docid # 2437098

(474) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. SUKHI DEVI AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Contributory Negligence — Death caused by collision with a stationary truck parked without warnings — Allegation of contributory negligence against deceased driver rejected where the driver of the offending (parked) vehicle did not appear as a witness to corroborate facts of deceased's negligence — Burden of proving contributory negligence lies on the party
India Law Library Docid # 2437099

(475) AMANDEEP KUMAR @ ANNU Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 19-11-2025
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA) — Sections 13, 16, 17, 18, 18-B, 20 — Explosive Substances Act, 1908 — Sections 3, 4, 5 — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 307, 212, 427, 120-B — Arms Act, 1959 — Sections 25, 25(6), 25(7), 25(8)-54-59 — Bail — Grant of bail in UAPA cases based on long pre-trial incarceration — Right to speedy trial (Article 21 of the Constitution) — Accused in custody for 3 years, 6 months, and 14 days — Co-accused released on bail after over
India Law Library Docid # 2437100

(476) DR. LOKESH B.H. AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] 18-11-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 498A — Applicability — Whether applicable only to legally valid marriages — Held, the term “husband” must receive a purposive and expansive construction consistent with the legislative intent to protect women from cruelty — Section 498A is not confined to legally valid marriages but extends to relationships recognized as void, voidable, or in the nature of marriage (live-in
India Law Library Docid # 2435922

(477) CONFEDERATION OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS OF INDIA (CREDAI) Vs. VANASHAKTI AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Review Petition — Grounds for Judicial Review — Recall of Judgment (JUR) dated 16th May 2025 (Vanashakti v. Union of India) — Judgment based on precedents (Common Cause, Alembic, Electrosteel) not considered in entirety — Failure of JUR to notice crucial paragraphs in preceding judgments which
India Law Library Docid # 2435408

(478) SHRI DIGANT Vs. M/S. P.D.T. TRADING CO. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227 — Scope of Supervisory Jurisdiction — High Court's jurisdiction under Article 227 is to be used sparingly, primarily for keeping subordinate courts within jurisdictional bounds, and not for correcting mere errors — Interference is warranted only in cases of grave injustice, failure of justice, assumption of jurisdiction not possessed, failure to exercise jurisdiction resulting in
India Law Library Docid # 2435871

(479) ASHOK S/O VITTHALRAO JAGTAP Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2025
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Compensation — Enhancement — Principle of Parity — Where lands are acquired for setting up an Industrial Area under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, and claimants' appeals challenging the compensation quantum were dismissed by the High Court — If other similarly situated landowners' appeals against the same common judgment were allowed by the
India Law Library Docid # 2435872

(480) T.H. HOSAMANI Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 18-11-2025
Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments, Etc.), Rules, 1992 — Rule 7(4) — Power of Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement (CRE Cell) — Investigation into Caste Certificates — Rule 7(4) mandates that the CRE Cell can only initiate a detailed investigation upon a reference being made by the District Caste Verification
India Law Library Docid # 2435944

First
«
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
»
Last