ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(381) PRITI KALLA Vs. JAI NARAIN VYAS UNIVERSITY, JODHPUR AND OTHER[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
University Ordinances — Study Leave and Extra Ordinary Leave — Interpretation of Ordinance 327 regarding grant, extension, and conversion of study leave and the conditions for Extra Ordinary Leave (EOL). The petitioner's initial study leave for post-graduation was extended, but subsequent requests for study leave for PhD and conversion of absence to EOL were denied based on university rules and her service
India Law Library Docid # 2433992

(382) GRAM PANCHAYAT THALADKA Vs. AMAR SINGH AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 1 Rule 10 — Impleadment of parties — Appeal stage — Application for impleadment as intervener in appeal dismissed by Appellate Court — Trial Court had allowed impleadment as intervener and permitted petitioner to adduce evidence on behalf of Gram Panchayat, though not as a party to suit — petitioner's application for impleadment in appeal rejected as belated and
India Law Library Docid # 2433993

(383) STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. NANU AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378 — Appeal against acquittal — Scope of interference — Appellate Court can interfere with an acquittal order only if the trial court's view is legally implausible, perverse, or based on misreading of evidence, and no other reasonable view is possible. The appellate court must address all reasons for acquittal and demonstrate an illegality or error.
India Law Library Docid # 2433994

(384) KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, SRI GANGA NAGAR Vs. AUTHORITY UNDER THE SHOPS AND COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT ACT, SRI GANGANAGAR AND OTHER[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Rajasthan Shops and Commercial Establishment Act, 1958 — Section 28A — Termination of service — Exemption for 'Offices' of local authorities — Employee working in Market Yard is not covered by exemption applicable to offices — Employee working as Chowkidar in Market Yard should be governed by the Act of 1958.
India Law Library Docid # 2433995

(385) XXXX Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 — Section 3(2B) — Termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks — Permissible only if a Medical Board diagnoses substantial foetal abnormalities necessitating termination, and the procedure is safe for the woman.
India Law Library Docid # 2433997

(386) UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND OTHERS Vs. MUSHTAQ AHMAD SHEIKH[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT SRINAGAR] 08-10-2025
Police Rules, Rule 111 — Seniority of direct recruits — Determined by merit in Basic Recruitment Training Course (BRTC) — Appointed Sub-Inspector in 2016 after court order granting age relaxation and appointment despite being overage and having missed 2010 recruitment — Claim for notional seniority at par with those appointed in 2010 — Court directs notional fixation of seniority from 2010, but without monetary benefits —
India Law Library Docid # 2434068

(387) H.P. STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ Petition — Delay and Laches — Initiation of proceedings after an inordinate delay of 11 years — Held, not a reasonable period, especially for writ petitions — Condonation of delay cannot be liberally granted to the State or its instrumentalities without cogent reasons, as it institutionalizes inefficiency and erodes accountability — Public interest is in
India Law Library Docid # 2434085

(388) BANABHAI RAMSANGBHAI REVAR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Electricity Act, 2003 — Section 135 — Theft of electricity — Essential elements — Prosecution must prove the commission of the offence beyond reasonable doubt, including the unauthorized use of electricity and the accused's connection to it — In this case, the prosecution failed to establish the actual place of offence, failed to corroborate ocular evidence with documentary evidence, and did not produce crucial
India Law Library Docid # 2434200

(389) WELSPUN MAXSTEEL LIMITED Vs. ALANG MARINE LIMITED[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 8 Rule 6A — Counterclaim — Filing of — Trial commencement defined — Trial commences when issues are framed and the case is set down for recording of evidence — Filing of affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief constitutes commencement of trial — Once trial has commenced, a counterclaim cannot be permitted to be filed. (Paras 12, 12.2,
India Law Library Docid # 2434201

(390) STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. HAMIDABEN ISMAILBHAI JADEJA[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Appeal against acquittal — Prosecution rested on dying declarations — Trial court acquitted accused after finding dying declarations not credible due to discrepancies.
India Law Library Docid # 2434202

(391) STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. RAJA MAHMED SAIYED ALIAS RAJU MADRASI AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 376, 506(2), 304-A, 312, 314, 338 — Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(11) — Appeal against acquittal — Reappreciation of evidence — Supreme Court guidelines regarding appellate jurisdiction in acquittal appeals — Appellate court must be slow to interfere if two views are possible and the trial court's view was plausible — Acquittal reinforces
India Law Library Docid # 2434203

(392) NAWANG AND ANOTHER Vs. BAHADUR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-10-2025
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — Section 2(2) — Application to Scheduled Tribes — The Hindu Succession Act, 1956, does not apply to members of Scheduled Tribes unless the Central Government directs otherwise by notification in the Official Gazette.
India Law Library Docid # 2434219

(393) PATEL CHANDRIKABEN Vs. PATEL MANGUBEN AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 96 — First Appeal — Rejection of Plaint under Order 7, Rule 11 (a) and (d) — Prima facie case — Suit for declaration of share in agricultural land and permanent injunction — Appeal against rejection of plaint on grounds of limitation and lack of cause of action — Held, rejection of plaint is a drastic power and should be exercised cautiously — Limitation involving mixed question of law and facts requires leading of evidence — Knowledge of revenue
India Law Library Docid # 2434253

(394) GENERAL MANAGER WESTERN RAILWAY Vs. RANJIT CONSTRUCTION CO.[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 08-10-2025
Contract Law — Breach of Contract — Delay in project — Claims for damages — Responsibility for delay — Approval of designs and drawings — Handing over of site — Contractor's responsibility for site inspection and design submission — Clause 2.5.2.2 of Tender Document and Clause 19 of GCC interpreted — No claim for late approval or consequent delay.
India Law Library Docid # 2434254

(395) AMIT KUMAR AGRAWAL Vs. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 120B, 406, 420, 467, 468, 201, 471 — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7, 7A — Chhattisgarh Gambling (Prohibition) Act, 2022 — Sections 4, 7, 8, 11 — Public Gambling Act, 1867 — Section 4A — Bail — Grant of bail considered based on investigation progress, period of incarceration, bail granted to co-accused for related offences (PMLA)
India Law Library Docid # 2434260

(396) BABITA LOHANI Vs. LALVRAT SINGH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-10-2025
Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Section 12 — Transfer of proceedings — Wife seeking transfer of domestic violence complaint from Uttar Pradesh to Delhi — Parties married in 2014, living separately since 2017 — Wife, initially residing in Kanpur, moved to New Delhi for education and career — Wife has meagre income,
India Law Library Docid # 2434262

(397) IN RE : T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-10-2025
Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 — Section 35 — Declaration of wildlife sanctuary — State of Jharkhand — Proposal for declaration of Saranda Wildlife Sanctuary — Earlier confusion regarding area due to communication from Wildlife Institute of India (WII) — WII later clarified earlier letter was internal communication and not authenticated — State assured no intention to evade earlier proposal — Area of
India Law Library Docid # 2434263

(398) ANIL VITTHAL KALE Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 307, 326, 506 read with Section 34 — Appeal against conviction — Bail during pendency of appeal — Appellant convicted by Trial Court, appeal dismissed by High Court — Appellant incarcerated for over 10 years — Co-accused granted bail — Court inclined to grant bail to appellant during pendency of appeal, subject to satisfaction of Trial Court.
India Law Library Docid # 2434273

(399) FOREIGN REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICE Vs. EMECHERE MADUABUCHKWU AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-10-2025
Foreigners Act, 1946 & Delhi Excise Act & Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 324 read with Section 34 — Prosecution for overstaying in India, violation of excise laws, and causing hurt — Foreign national released on bail by High Court with conditions, including surrendering passport, reporting to police, and providing wife's details —
India Law Library Docid # 2434279

(400) RAJESH KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-10-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)(ii)(C) — Suspension of Sentence — Appeal pending scrutiny — Appellant undergone more than 6 and a half years of sentence — No criminal antecedents — Criminal appeal filed in 2022 and likely to take time for final adjudication — Suspension of sentence and release on bail granted considering these circumstances.
India Law Library Docid # 2434316