India Law Library

User not Logged..

India Law Library AI
Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Free Practice/Case Management Software

Latest Cases

First
«
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
»
Last

(421) M/S. SRI RAGHAVENDRA SWAMI TRADERS AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Goods and Services Tax (CGST Act) — Confiscation and Recovery — Petitioner challenged recovery notice for penalty and fine following confiscation of goods — Goods were transported with valid e-invoice and e-way bill, but the vehicle deviated from its intended route — Petitioner claimed the deviation was an unintentional mistake.
India Law Library Docid # 2448477

(422) RANJEET SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JAIPUR[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Quashing of FIR — The FIR was registered based on a court order that was subsequently quashed and set aside by a higher bench — Furthermore, the original petition that led to the FIR was dismissed for non-compliance with court orders — Therefore, the FIR, being a consequence of a defunct
India Law Library Docid # 2448478

(423) RAJSTHAN STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION Vs. ORIGO COMMODITIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 37 — Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Section 13 — Appealability of orders — An order passed under Section 36(3) of the Arbitration Act, which conditionally stays the enforcement of an arbitral award pending Section 34 proceedings, is not appealable under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act
India Law Library Docid # 2448479

(424) VINOD VALIYATTOOR Vs. STATE OF KERALA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 17-07-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 175(3) & 175(4) — Applicability of procedural safeguard for public servants — Requirement of obtaining report from superior officer under S. 175(4) not attracted merely because accused is a public servant — Applicable only where act complained of has arisen in course of discharge of official duties — Nexus between act and official function must be
India Law Library Docid # 2448572

(425) DINIL J.K Vs. KERALA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION[KERALA HIGH COURT] 17-07-2026
Kerala Police Act, 2011 — Section 113 — Immunity for acts done in good faith in discharge of official duty — Scope where Human Rights Commission finds dereliction of duty by police officer — Kerala State Human Rights Commission found petitioner, an Assistant Commissioner of Police, had failed to record detention of a person in General Diary for about 40 hours and recommended departmental action — High Court declined to interfere, holding Commission's finding based on documentary evidence and rec
India Law Library Docid # 2448573

(426) P.J. ANTONY Vs. STATE OF KERALA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 17-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 239 — Discharge — Standard for framing charge where criminal conspiracy alleged — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Ss. 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) — Penal Code, 1860, Ss. 409, 465, 468, 471, 120-B — Conspiracy, being hatched in secrecy, need not be proved by direct evidence and may be inferred from circumstantial material — Prima facie materials showing forged receipts in the name of non-existent firms, procedural irregularities in disbursal of
India Law Library Docid # 2448574

(427) JAVEED AHMAD SOFI AND OTHERS Vs. UT OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (SRINAGAR BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 528 [corresponding to Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482] — Quashing of FIRs and Criminal Proceedings — Non-compoundable/Private Offences — Amicable Settlement/Compromise between Private Parties — The High Court in exercise of its inherent powers can validly quash criminal proceedings and FIRs arising out of private/personal disputes (such as local village pathway disputes) where the parties have amicably settled their differences an
India Law Library Docid # 2448645

(428) IMRAN ALI Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 — Sections 8/21, 22, 25, 27-A, 29 — Bail Application — Petitioner sought bail after previous rejection — Alleged recovery of 4.12 grams of heroin, considered small quantity — Co-accused with larger recovery already granted bail — Trial at evidence stage, prolonged
India Law Library Docid # 2448740

(429) UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. GHULAM ALI AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Compensation for injuries — Assessment of functional disability — The court held that the assessment of functional disability must be based on the actual impact of the injury on the claimant's earning capacity, considering their avocation, age, and nature of work, rather than solely on the
India Law Library Docid # 2448741

(430) MOHD. SABER Vs. U.T. OF J&K[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 — Sections 7 and 8 — Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 — Section 127(2) — Bail — While Sections 29 and 30 of POCSO Act create presumptions and culpability, they do not impose a statutory bar to granting bail — The petitioner, detained since
India Law Library Docid # 2448742

(431) DR. SYED WAJID ALI HAMDANI AND OTHERS Vs. UT OF J&K AND ANOTHER[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (SRINAGAR BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 420 and 506 — Quashing of FIR — Dispute over ancestral property inheritance — Complainant alleged fraud and illegal sale of land by petitioners (relatives) — Petitioners claimed the dispute was civil, arising from inheritance and a prior settlement — Court found the core issue was inheritance and entitlement to
India Law Library Docid # 2448743

(432) AMIT KUNDAL AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Recruitment Rules — Physical Standards Relaxation — Petitioners, residents of Jammu and Kashmir, applied for Constable posts under the Scheduled Caste (SC) category — They received height and chest relaxations based on their domicile status, not their SC status — The Court held that such domicile-based relaxations are available to all candidates regardless of category and do not disqualify them from
India Law Library Docid # 2448744

(433) HARI CHAND AND OTHERS Vs. UT OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482, 300 — Double Jeopardy — Abuse of Process of Law — A second complaint or FIR based on the same set of facts and allegations already investigated and decided by a competent court is not maintainable, even if new offences are added or new individuals are named, as it amounts to an abuse of the legal process and violates the principle against double
India Law Library Docid # 2448745

(434) SHEIKH ABDUL REHMAN Vs. GHULAM NABI KABOO[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (SRINAGAR BENCH)] 17-07-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Sections 138, 142(b) — Complaint for dishonour of cheque — Premature filing — Previous complaint dismissed as premature — Fresh complaint filed after expiry of limitation period — Supreme Court in Yogendra Pratap Singh v — Savitri Pandey held that a payee may file a fresh
India Law Library Docid # 2448746

(435) RAHUL KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH[ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 17-07-2026
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)(ii)(B) — Bail — Non-Commercial Quantity, Substantial Completion of Investigation — Bail may be granted to accused found in possession of ganja not amounting to commercial quantity, where investigation qua their role is substantially complete, only official witnesses remain, no adverse antecedents are reported, and the accused, though non-residents of the State, have a fixed and verifiable abode — Relief granted subject to strin
India Law Library Docid # 2448787

(436) NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-07-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 21, 32, 14, 142 — Prisoners, rights of — Elderly and terminally ill convicts — Continued incarceration despite advanced age (above 70 years) or terminal illness — Held, imprisonment does not suspend constitutional guarantees of dignity and humane treatment — Right to life under Art.
India Law Library Docid # 2447675

(437) M/S BAJAJ TRADING COMPANY Vs. UNION OF INDIA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-07-2026
Railways Act, 1989 — Section 93 vis-a-vis S. 97 — Non obstante clause — Effect of — Non obstante clause in S. 97 excludes general obligation of railway administration under S. 93 — Where goods booked at "owner's risk" rate, liability of Railways can be fastened only upon proof of negligence or misconduct on part of railway administration or its servants — General
India Law Library Docid # 2447677

(438) RAHUL S/o. RAMNARAYAN MADANKAR AND ANOTHER Vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-07-2026
Compassionate Appointment — Scheme for Compassionate Appointment in Public Sector General Insurance Companies, Cl. 1.1 — Age threshold of 55 years — Employer's delay in scrutiny — Effect — Employee applying for voluntary retirement on medical grounds before attaining 55 years, supported by Government medical certificate, sending reminders before crossing age threshold — Employer
India Law Library Docid # 2447678

(439) BASAMMA AND ANOTHER Vs. GOPARAPPA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-07-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ of certiorari — Scope and limits of — Certiorari jurisdiction is supervisory, not appellate — High Court cannot review or reweigh evidence, or substitute its own findings for those of subordinate courts — Interference permissible only for errors of jurisdiction, patent illegality, or findings based on no evidence —
India Law Library Docid # 2447676

(440) PRANESH M.K. Vs. A.V. GAYATHRI SHANTHEGOWDA AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 16-07-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 243-R, 171(3)(a) and Part IX-A — Nominated members of Municipalities/Town Panchayats — Voting rights — Art. 243-R read with the proviso to Section 352(1)(b), Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, bars nominated members from voting in meetings of the Municipality/Town Panchayat — Held, such nominated members cannot claim voting rights in elections to the Legislative Council either — Constitutional distinction between elected and nominated
India Law Library Docid # 2447726

First
«
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
»
Last