ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(301) REJANISH K.V Vs. K. DEEPA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 233(2) — Appointment of District Judges — Interpretation of eligibility criteria for direct recruitment from the Bar — Whether judicial officers with prior Bar experience can be appointed against Bar vacancies — This is a substantial question of law requiring consideration by a Constitution Bench.
India Law Library Docid # 2428621

(302) YOGESH MADHAV MAKALWAD Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Scheduled Tribes — Caste Claim — Validation — Pre-Independence documents hold greater probative value than post-Independence documents in establishing caste status.
India Law Library Docid # 2428622

(303) NAVNEESH AGGARWAL AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of FIR — Marriage had been solemnised between appellant No.1 and respondent No.2, but owing to differences, respondent No.2 left matrimonial home — Numerous cases filed by both parties — FIR No.67 dated 15.05.2019 registered against appellants under Sections 323, 406, 498-A IPC — Divorce by mutual consent granted on
India Law Library Docid # 2428623

(304) MANGE RAM Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 498A and 34 — Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 3, 4 — Cruelty by husband or relatives, acts done in furtherance of common intention, penalty for giving or taking dowry, penalty for demanding dowry — Quashing of FIR — Divorce decree obtained by parties — Continuation of criminal proceedings against father-in-law disallowed after divorce — When marital relationship has legally ended, continuing criminal proceedings arising from discord
India Law Library Docid # 2428624

(305) ASHDAN PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS Vs. DSK GLOBAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 61(2) — Appeal to NCLAT — Filing within 30 days — Proviso allows extension of 15 days for sufficient cause — Appeal is defective if not filed with a certified copy of the impugned order and without an application for condonation of delay or exemption from filing the certified
India Law Library Docid # 2428625

(306) DASARI ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs. THE CHILD WELFARE PROJECT DIRECTOR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Sections 3, 36, 37, 38 — Custody of minor children — Adoption — Whether police action of taking custody of children from alleged adoptive parents was illegal and without authority — High Court setting aside Single Judge order, directing Committee to pass orders under Section 37 and competent authority to decide adoption applications — Supreme Court directing return of children to adoptive parents invoking Article 142 of Constitution
India Law Library Docid # 2428701

(307) HARBHAJAN SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 12-08-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 319 — Power to proceed against other persons appearing from evidence to be guilty — Summoning additional accused — Conditions for exercise of power — Court must be satisfied that there is strong and cogent evidence against the person sought to be summoned, which is more than a mere probability of complicity. (Para 8, referencing Hardeep Singh vs. State of Punjab & Ors.)
India Law Library Docid # 2428892

(308) SUNIL SHARMA Vs. M/S HERO FINCORP LIMITED AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 405 — Criminal Breach of Trust — Ingredients — Entrustment of property or dominion over property — Dishonest misappropriation or conversion — Violation of law or contract — Mere debtor-creditor relationship arising from a loan transaction does not constitute criminal breach of trust. A loan advanced by a lender to a borrower, where the borrower has beneficial ownership of
India Law Library Docid # 2428936

(309) ALOK KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-08-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 161 — Statements — Clubbing of FIRs — Where multiple FIRs are registered against a builder for similar offences related to home buyers, and the builder undertakes to settle claims by depositing money and providing security, this Court can direct clubbing of all FIRs and treat subsequent FIRs as statements under Section 161 CrPC to facilitate a comprehensive
India Law Library Docid # 2432123

(310) DR. RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 12-08-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8, 22 — Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 — Sections 4, 7 — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 224, 420 — Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Applicability of exemptions under NDPS Act and Drugs and Cosmetics Act — Conditions for exemption — Mere potential for
India Law Library Docid # 2432427

(311) DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, AND OTHERS Vs. DOLPHIN DRILLING PTE LIMITED[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 12-08-2025
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Sections 147, 148 — Reassessment Proceedings — Appeal against setting aside of reassessment notices — Issue of ownership of drilling ship and eligibility for depreciation — High Court quashed reassessment notices on the ground that the issue of ownership was previously decided, and reopening was barred — Supreme Court held that the question of ownership was not decided in previous
India Law Library Docid # 2432428

(312) TIME CITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING LIMITED LUCKNOW Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Order 39 Rule 3 and Proviso – Grant of ex parte injunction – Requirements – Court must record reasons for granting injunction without notice to the opposite party, and the applicant must comply with clauses (a) and (b) of the proviso – Compliance is mandatory.
India Law Library Docid # 2428626

(313) GURDEEP SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF PUNJAB[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 307, 120B, 225, 186, 332, 353 — Attempt to murder, criminal conspiracy, escape or attempt to escape from custody, obstructing public servant, voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty, assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty — Conviction and sentence upheld — Appellant, an Assistant Superintendent of Jail, facilitated escape
India Law Library Docid # 2428558

(314) ARSHNOOR KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Army Act, 1950 — Section 12 — Notification permitting women to join JAG branch — Restriction on number of women candidates not permissible — Union of India cannot impose additional restrictions beyond Section 12 by policy or administrative instruction.
India Law Library Docid # 2428559

(315) ARVIND KUMAR JALOTA Vs. RAKESH KUMAR GOYAL[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11, Order 8 Rule 1 — Striking off defence — Non-filing of reply to rent petition — Revision petition challenging such order — Court granted tenant-petitioner one opportunity to file reply subject to payment of costs — Emphasised that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the revision petition — Directed expeditious disposal of the matter by the Rent Controller.
India Law Library Docid # 2428888

(316) ASHA RANI AND OTHERS Vs. RAJ KUMAR[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27 — Additional Evidence — Appellate Stage — Additional evidence can be permitted at the appellate stage if the applicant shows that despite due diligence, the evidence was not available during trial — In this case, the applicant was aware of the judgment during the trial, but no reason was given for not producing it earlier — Therefore, the application for additional evidence was correctly dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2428889

(317) VIRENDER SHARMA AND ANOTHER Vs. MANPREET KAUR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 15(1) — Renewal of Driving Licences — Application for renewal filed before expiry — If application for renewal of a driving licence is filed within 30 days before the date of expiry, it is considered automatically renewed and the driver possesses a valid licence, even if an accident occurs during this period.
India Law Library Docid # 2428890

(318) PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORT CORPORATION LTD. Vs. M/S. BHULLAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of delay — Appeal against order of Commercial Court — Period of limitation prescribed by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 — Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act dictates a 60-day period for appeals from District Judge level Commercial Courts — Condonation of delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act is permissible but delay must be explained by sufficient cause —
India Law Library Docid # 2428891

(319) INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-08-2025
Consumer Protection — Misleading Advertisements — Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 — Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Indian Medical Association sought action against Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. for violations. Court noted substantial achievement of petitioners' original prayers through various orders. — Writ Petition disposed of as prayers substantially achieved,
India Law Library Docid # 2432120

(320) KISHUNDEO ROUT AND OTHERS Vs. GOVIND RAO AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) – Section 96, 107 — Adverse Possession — Plea of — Foundation for the plea of adverse possession must be laid in the pleadings and an issue must be framed and tried — A plea not properly raised in the pleadings or in issues at the stage of trial would not be permitted to be raised for the first time at
India Law Library Docid # 2428627