ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(201) TARKENDRA VAISHNAV AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 25-08-2025
Uttarakhand Cooperative Societies Rules, 2004 — Rule 271(ii) and Rule 272(4) — Pension and Post-Retiral Benefits — Revision — Members of Cooperative Tribunal appointed after superannuation from parent service are entitled to recalculation of pension and gratuity based on their tenure as Tribunal members, in addition to benefits already received from parent service
India Law Library Docid # 2432357

(202) DEEPAK SINGH BISHT Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 25-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 201 — Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)(v) — Murder, Causing disappearance of evidence of offence — Conviction based on circumstantial evidence — Prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the room from which blood-stained articles were recovered belonged to the appellant — Witness testimonies regarding the ownership of the room were hearsay and uncorroborated —
India Law Library Docid # 2432358

(203) BHEEMARAYA @ BHEEMAREDDY @ REDDY Vs. STATE[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (KALABURAGI BENCH)] 23-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 366A — Procuration of minor girl — Ingredients of Section 366A require inducing a minor girl with the intent that she may be forced or seduced into illicit intercourse with another person — Evidence showed the accused took the minor girl and subjected her to sexual acts, but not that he procured her for intercourse with another person — Conviction under Section 366A was set aside as the
India Law Library Docid # 2432155

(204) SRI. KAMAL KUMAR JAIN Vs. BENAKA SPONGE IRON PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (DHARWAD BENCH)] 23-08-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Sections 138 and 139 — Dishonour of cheque — Presumption in favour of holder — Issuance of cheque admitted — Trial court erred in acquitting accused when presumption of legally enforceable debt under Section 139 was not rebutted — Accused failed to rebut presumption by adducing evidence — Appeal allowed, acquittal set aside, and accused convicted.
India Law Library Docid # 2432156

(205) SALDANHA REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. BISHOP JOHN RODRIGUES AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 — Sections 3B, 3C, 13, 14 — Slum Rehabilitation Area (SR Area) — Landowner's preferential right to redevelop — Pre-amendment settled law holds landowner has preferential right, must be notified and invited to develop, and acquisition under Section 14 cannot precede extinguishment of this right — 2018 Amendment does not
India Law Library Docid # 2428976

(206) TARABAI NAGAR CO-OP. HOG. SOCIETY (PROPOSED) Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 — Chapter I-A — Slum Rehabilitation Schemes — Preferential right of landowner to redevelop — Section 3B(4)(e) and Section 13(1) confer a preferential right on the landowner to redevelop a Slum Rehabilitation Area (SR Area) — SRA can undertake redevelopment only if the landowner fails to come forward with a scheme within a
India Law Library Docid # 2428977

(207) SHAH SAMIR BHARATBHAI AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14, 39(d) and 43 — Equal pay for equal work — Contractual Assistant Professors performing identical duties as regularly appointed or ad-hoc Assistant Professors are entitled to the minimum pay scale of Assistant Professors.
India Law Library Docid # 2428985

(208) UNION TERRITORY OF J & K (PREVIOUSLY STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR) AND ANOTHER Vs. RAJA MUZAFFAR BHAT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Environment Protection Act, 1986 and EIA Notification, 2006 — Sand Mining — Prior Environmental Clearance (EC) — District Survey Report (DSR) — Replenishment Study — Validity of EC granted without a proper DSR and replenishment study.
India Law Library Docid # 2428986

(209) PALM GROVES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. Vs. M/s MAGAR GIRME AND GAIKWAD ASSOCIATES ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 25 — Enforcement of orders — Amendment by 2002 Act — Anomalous position for final orders — Court can interpret to fill lacunae, applying purposive construction to achieve legislative intent of effective redressal for consumers.
India Law Library Docid # 2428988

(210) P. MARUTHI PRASADA RAO Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Indian Forest Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1966 — Rule 2(g) — "State Forest Service" — Meaning of — Interpretation of Rule 2(g)(i) — Requires approval of Central Government in consultation with State Government for a State service connected with forestry with gazetted members to be considered a "State Forest Service" for promotion to Indian Forest Service — Approval is relatable to the
India Law Library Docid # 2428989

(211) TANKADHAR TRIPATHY Vs. DIPALI DAS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Section 83(1)(c) proviso and Rule 94-A of the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 (as amended by Form 25 affidavit) — Election Petition — Affidavit in Form 25 — Requirement of substantial compliance — Held, substantial compliance with the requirements of Form 25 affidavit would suffice, and in cases where an affidavit is already on record but not in the prescribed Form 25, the Election Petitioner should be given an opportunity to file a corrected
India Law Library Docid # 2428991

(212) THE TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF TELANGANA STATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. CHUKKALA KRANTHI KIRAN AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Public Employment — Selection Process — Cancellation of — Validity of — Selected candidates do not have a vested right to appointment — However, any decision to not fill vacancies from a select list must be bona fide and for appropriate reasons — Court cannot second-guess the authority's decision-making process regarding legitimate expectations, provided the issue was considered and reasonable
India Law Library Docid # 2428982

(213) KAVIN Vs. P. SREEMANI DEVI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal — Compensation — Reduction by High Court — Supreme Court held High Court was not justified in reducing compensation for future medical expenses without considering life expectancy and set aside the finding of High Court.
India Law Library Docid # 2428983

(214) IQBAL AHMED (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ANOTHER Vs. ABDUL SHUKOOR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27(1) — Additional evidence in appeal — Appellate Court must consider pleadings of the party seeking to lead additional evidence before allowing the application — Allowing additional evidence without examining alignment with pleadings considered an error.
India Law Library Docid # 2428984

(215) M/S C.L. GUPTA EXPORT LTD. Vs. ADIL ANSARI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 — Section 15 — Powers of Tribunal — Environmental protection and conservation — NGT has power to direct monitoring and audit of pollution control measures to ensure compliance, but not to direct prosecution under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
India Law Library Docid # 2429055

(216) SUNIL NAUDIYAL Vs. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of FIR — Settlement between parties — Parties entered into a settlement agreement where a significant sum was paid towards maintenance and alimony, and all prior and subsequent legal proceedings were to be quashed — High Court had dismissed the appellant's petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR and
India Law Library Docid # 2432128

(217) SANJAY SINGH BHANDARI @ SANJAY BHANDARI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 22-08-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Abuse of process of Court — Criminal proceedings can be quashed by superior courts to prevent abuse of process and secure justice — Courts can consider circumstances beyond the FIR/complaint to determine if proceedings are frivolous or vexatious
India Law Library Docid # 2432359

(218) GOKULANAND SALWASI Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ANOTHER[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 22-08-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Application to challenge cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings — Allegations of rape under Section 376 IPC — FIR lodged promptly, victim young and from respectable family — Delay in FIR not inordinate — Absence of specific circumstances like prior marriage or caste differences, distinguishing from
India Law Library Docid # 2432360

(219) SARTHAK CHHILLAR Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 22-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 147, 148, 307, 308, 323, 324, 325, 504, 505, 506 — Charge framing — Revisional jurisdiction limited to perversity, illegality or material irregularity — Prima facie case established under Section 307 IPC based on FIR, witness statements, and medical reports — Delay in FIR and private medical examination do not automatically vitiate proceedings or suggest concoction — Court has discretion to consider an application for charge alteration or addition filed by a
India Law Library Docid # 2432361

(220) RAMVIR Vs. STATE OF U.P.[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 21-08-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 363 and 366 — Kidnapping and abduction of a woman for marriage or illicit intercourse — Appeal against conviction — Victim's testimony and documentary evidence (High School mark sheet) establishing her age as 15 at the time of incident — Prosecution successfully proved all ingredients of the offences.
India Law Library Docid # 2428956