India Law Library

ive

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
»
Last

(81) ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD. Vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 2(28) — Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958 — Section 3 — Constitution of India — Article 265 and Seventh Schedule, List II, Entry 57 — Interpretation — Whether Heavy Earth Moving Machinery (HEMM) and Construction Equipment Vehicles (CEV), such as Dumpers, Loaders, Excavators, Surface Miners, Dozers, Drills
India Law Library Docid # 2437975

(82) SH. DAYAL SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR. SHAM SINGH Vs. LUDHIANA IMPROVEMENT TRUST AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 18 — Land Acquisition Reference — Dismissal in Default — Restoration — Limitation — Applicability of Limitation Act, 1963 — A reference under Section 18, even if improperly dismissed in default, necessitates an application for restoration, which is governed by the residuary Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, prescribing a period of three years — The legality of the
India Law Library Docid # 2437930

(83) SUKH PAL (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. Vs. RAJA RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100 — Regular Second Appeal — Scope of Interference — Concurrent Findings of Fact — While jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC is limited, the High Court is obligated to interfere where concurrent findings of fact are perverse, meaning they are based on misreading of evidence, non-consideration of material circumstances, selective appreciation of evidence, or an erroneous approach
India Law Library Docid # 2437932

(84) SHRI HARDAYAL SINGH (DECEASED) THR LRS. Vs. GURCHARAN KAUR(DECEASED) THR LRS.[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Hindu Law — Succession to Agricultural Land (Pre-1956) — Exclusion of Widow in presence of Son — Where a male Hindu died in November 1955 (prior to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956), succession to agricultural land in the erstwhile Punjab/Haryana region was governed by customary law — Under the customary law applicable to Jat agriculturalists, a widow was excluded from inheriting the estate in the presence of a legitimate son — Consequently, the deceased’s widow (Smt. Bhagwan Kaur) inherited
India Law Library Docid # 2437933

(85) KANHIYA LAL AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 15(c) — Conviction and Sentence — Appeal seeking acquittal — Material Contradictions in Official Witness Testimony — Prosecution case hinges on testimony of official witnesses (DSP, Inspector, Constable) — Significant contradictions found regarding the time the Gazetted Officer (DSP) was present at the spot, making his presence at two different
India Law Library Docid # 2437934

(86) XYZ Vs. STATE OF H.P.[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 102, Section 12, Section 3 — Bail for Child in Conflict with Law (CCL) — Mandatory nature of bail requirement — Denial of bail under Section 12(1) proviso requires objective 'reasonable grounds' — Bail to a CCL, even in case of heinous offence (Sections 302, 201, 120B, 34 of IPC), is the rule, irrespective of the nature or gravity of the offence, unless exceptional circumstances defined in the proviso exist — Exceptional circ
India Law Library Docid # 2438003

(87) PAWAN KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 — Rule 10(6) and 10(7) — Suspension — Review Period — Mandatory nature of 90-day review — An order of suspension must be reviewed by the competent authority before the expiry of 90 days from the effective date of suspension — Subsequent extension of suspension must also be done before the expiry of the extended period— If review and extension are not carried out within 90 days, the suspension order ceases to be valid as per
India Law Library Docid # 2438004

(88) KHEM RAJ (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Sections 4, 18, 23 — Determination of Market Value — Acid Test — Market value is the price a willing vendor might reasonably expect from a willing purchaser, prevailing on the date of the Section 4 notification — Factors under Section 23, including existing advantages and potential possibilities, must be considered, disregarding the vendor's disinclination or the purchaser's necessity
India Law Library Docid # 2438019

(89) DINU @ DINESH Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Criminal Revision — Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) — Conviction affirmed but sentence modified — Release on Probation — Convict sentenced to simple imprisonment for four months each for offences under Section 279 IPC (rash driving) and 337 IPC (causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others) — Convict not pressing challenge to conviction but seeking release on probation
India Law Library Docid # 2438020

(90) VIJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 401 & 397 — Criminal Revision Petition — Delay in disposal — Supreme Court expresses grave concern over delay of 23 years by High Court in deciding a criminal revision petition challenging framing of charge in a dowry death case — Directs Registrar General to submit entire record, order sheets, and statistics of case disposal by the High Court. (Paras 19, 21, 23, 24,
India Law Library Docid # 2438182

(91) SOUMYA GOPAL Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS[KERALA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 413 — Appeal by victim — A victim has the right to appeal against an order of acquittal, a conviction for a lesser offense, or inadequate compensation, and such appeal lies to the court where an appeal would ordinarily be filed against the conviction order of the trial court.
India Law Library Docid # 2438262

(92) MR. V. NARAYANA REDDY Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA[KERALA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonor of cheque — Competency of complainant's representative — Whether Assistant Manager (Law) is competent to file complaint — Disputed question of fact to be decided by trial court.
India Law Library Docid # 2438264

(93) APSRTC, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF CIVIL ENGINEER-II MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER Vs. R. VENKAT REDDY[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Arbitration Act, 1940 — Section 20 — Reference to arbitration — Powers of the "Court" — Under the 1940 Act, the Court does not become functus officio after appointing an arbitrator, and retains control over the arbitral proceedings until a judgment and decree are passed — The Court can entertain subsequent applications arising out of the reference.
India Law Library Docid # 2438265

(94) REGENTA HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. M/S HOTEL GRAND CENTRE POINT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-01-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 9(2) read with 21 and 43(2) — Commencement of Arbitral Proceedings — Interpretation of “commencement” — Commencement of arbitral proceedings is exclusively governed by Section 21 of the Act, which stipulates that proceedings commence on the date the respondent receives a request/notice invoking arbitration, unless otherwise agreed by the parties — This
India Law Library Docid # 2437806

(95) MUSLIMVEETIL CHALAKKAL AHAMMED HAJI Vs. SAKEENA BEEVI[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-01-2026
Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell — Denial of execution of sale deed by co-sharer (defendant) regarding her 1/11th share of property (land for school) — Affirmation and ratification — Effect of subsequent affidavit ratifying earlier acts of
India Law Library Docid # 2437830

(96) JAN DE NUL DREDGING INDIA PVT. LTD. Vs. TUTICORIN PORT TRUST[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-01-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sections 5, 34, and 37 — Scope of Judicial Intervention — Minimum intervention of judicial authority in domestic arbitration matters is required under Section 5 — Challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 is limited to specific grounds, including patent illegality or conflict with the public policy of India — Scope of interference by the Appellate Court under
India Law Library Docid # 2437831

(97) THE PROPERTY COMPANY (P) LTD. Vs. ROHINTEN DADDY MAZDA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-01-2026
Companies Act, 2013 — Section 58(3) and 433 — Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 and 29(2) — Company Law Board (CLB) — Power to condone delay — CLB, being a quasi-judicial body and not a 'court', cannot apply the provisions of the Act of 1963, including Section 5, unless specifically empowered by the special statute (Companies Act, 2013) — During the period 12.09.2013 to 01.06
India Law Library Docid # 2437828

(98) MD IMRAN @ D.C. GUDDU Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 319 — Power to proceed against persons appearing to be guilty of offence — Summoning of additional accused — Principles for granting bail to an accused summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. — Test applied for considering bail plea of an accused summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C. must involve consideration of strong and cogent evidence rather than mere
India Law Library Docid # 2437829

(99) BAJRANG PAL Vs. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)[DELHI HIGH COURT] 07-01-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 10 — Sexual Assault — Conviction affirmed — Appeal against conviction and sentence (5 years RI and fine) under Section 10 POCSO dismissed — Prosecution evidence, including clear, cogent, and consistent testimony of the 6-year-old child victim (PW-3) and her mother (PW-4/complainant), established that the appellant, a tenant in the same building, lured
India Law Library Docid # 2437878

(100) STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. AMARSINH NAGUBHAI KHARAD[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 07-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 378 — Appeal against Acquittal — Scope of Interference — High Court can interfere with a judgment of acquittal only when there are compelling substantial reasons, such as when the findings are perverse, unreasonable, or contrary to evidence — The Appellate Court must keep in mind the presumption of innocence of the accused, which is further
India Law Library Docid # 2437904

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
»
Last