ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(41) JYOTI SHARMA Vs. VISHNU GOYAL AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-09-2025
Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 41 Rule 27 — Production of additional evidence in appeal — Rejection of application to produce probate order obtained after trial court and first appellate court decisions was upheld, as it was not obtained during pendency of earlier proceedings.
India Law Library Docid # 2432636

(42) VANDANA Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 468, 471 — Cheating, Forgery for purpose of cheating, Using as genuine a forged document — Standard of proof — Prosecution must prove mens rea (dishonest intention to make a false document or knowledge of its falsity) beyond reasonable doubt — Overwriting visible to the naked eye without expert corroboration is an unsafe basis for conviction — Document
India Law Library Docid # 2432637

(43) MOHAMMAD AFZAL MOHAMMAD SHARIF Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 11-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 154 — Registration of FIR — Duty of Police — Information relating to commission of a cognizable offence to be recorded — Mandatory registration of FIR if information discloses commission of a cognizable offence — Preliminary inquiry only to ascertain if cognizable offence is disclosed, not to verify veracity — Police cannot avoid duty of registering offence if
India Law Library Docid # 2432638

(44) STATE OF H.P. Vs. RAM PAL[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 279 — Rash Driving or Riding on a Public Way — Appeal against acquittal — High Court interference standard — High Court can interfere with an acquittal if it is patently perverse, based on misreading or omission of material evidence, or leads to a conclusion no reasonable person could reach. If two reasonable interpretations of evidence are possible, acquittal should not be disturbed.
India Law Library Docid # 2432667

(45) MOHAMMED IRFAN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 300 and 304 Part II — Murder vs. Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder — Distinction lies in intention and knowledge — Murder requires intent to cause death or injury likely to cause death, or knowledge of inherent danger — Culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II requires knowledge that the act is likely to cause death but without intent to cause death
India Law Library Docid # 2432699

(46) DEVI SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 304 Part II, 109, 120-B — Appeal against conviction for murder — Alteration of conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder — Absence of premeditation, motive, and undue advantage — Assault occurring on spur of the moment — Factors considered: nature of weapon, vital part of body, force employed, sudden quarrel, pre-meditation, prior enmity, provocation, heat of passion,
India Law Library Docid # 2432697

(47) STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. SUGAN KHAN @ SHOKAT KHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302/34 — Murder — Acquittal — Criminal Appeals — State's appeal against acquittal from murder charge — Accused convicted for lesser offences — Accused not liable for murder if death is due to intervening causes like septicemia, toxemia, delayed treatment, or medical complications, rather than direct act of accused — Prosecution must prove accused's act as direct and proximate cause of
India Law Library Docid # 2432698

(48) SABUDDIN AND OTHERS Vs. GIRIRAJ[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 11-09-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Delay in filing appeal — If explanation for delay is satisfactory, appeal to be decided on merits.
India Law Library Docid # 2432732

(49) POOJA SHARMA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Compassionate Appointment — Rejection of application — Forged documents — Petitioner's mother's application for compassionate appointment was rejected due to submission of a forged Class V marksheet from 1976 — The rejection order was not challenged by the mother during her lifetime or by the petitioner afterwards — Petitioner's subsequent application, based on her mother's original claim, was also rejected.
India Law Library Docid # 2432712

(50) BHANWAR SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. BHOM SINGH AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 — Sections 88, 188, 53, 223, 224 — Revenue Suits — Principles of Natural Justice — Opportunity of Hearing — Suit dismissed for non-prosecution, then restored by S.D.O. without an application for restoration, citing non-appearance of counsel for defendants, but judgment pronounced before the next scheduled date without hearing arguments from defendants — Lower appellate authorities (RAA and Board of Revenue) failed to consider these procedural irregularities
India Law Library Docid # 2432713

(51) M/S RAM NATH AND CO. Vs. MUNICIPAL BOARD, SURATGARH AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 11-09-2025
Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 — Section 271(2) — Limitation for suits against municipality — Section 271(2) applies only to acts done or purportedly done in an "official capacity" — An illegal act by a municipality or its official cannot be considered as done in official capacity — Therefore, the six-month limitation period under Section 271(2) does not apply to illegal actions.
India Law Library Docid # 2432714

(52) MOHD JAFFER SHEIKH Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 10-09-2025
Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 — Section 8 — Preventive Detention — Grounds for detention — Detaining authority must inform the detenu of the time limit within which they can make a representation against the detention order, as this is a constitutional right guaranteed under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India. Failure to do so vitiates the detention order
India Law Library Docid # 2432536

(53) AKHTAR ALI @ ALI AKHTAR @ SHAMIM @ RAJA USTAD Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 376A, 363, 201; POCSO Act, 2012 — Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 — Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 66C — Conviction for offences including murder and sexual assault — Case based on circumstantial evidence — Failure to establish motive, flaws in "last seen" theory, and doubts in scientific/DNA evidence — Accused acquitted.
India Law Library Docid # 2432553

(54) JUPALLY LAKSHMIKANTHA REDDY Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-09-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 420 — Cheating — Ingredients of cheating require deception to dishonestly or fraudulently induce a person to deliver property or do/omit to do something causing harm. Mere deception without dishonest inducement is insufficient.
India Law Library Docid # 2432554

(55) VINOD KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER Vs. SEESH RAM SAINI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 154 — Registration of FIR — Mandatory if information discloses cognizable offence — High Court can direct registration of FIR even if preliminary inquiry report suggests otherwise — Genuineness or credibility of information not a condition precedent for registration.
India Law Library Docid # 2432555

(56) CH. CHIRAG DIN Vs. ZEENAT CHOUHAN[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT AT JAMMU] 10-09-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, Jammu & Kashmir — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — Rejection of closure report by Magistrate without applying judicial mind — Trial court rejected final closure report submitted by SIT and took cognizance of offences without proper consideration of evidence and legal aspects — Magistrate failed to apply judicial mind to the numerous investigation reports, inquiries, and witness
India Law Library Docid # 2432535

(57) SAVITRI DEVI Vs. DAULAT RAM AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of Plaint — Plea of Order II Rule 2 CPC — Rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC on the ground of Order II Rule 2 CPC is impermissible as Order II Rule 2 is not one of the grounds enumerated in Order 7 Rule 11.
India Law Library Docid # 2432561

(58) RAM MURTI (SINCE DECEASED) NOW REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS Vs. SHIV KUMAR[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Evidence Act, 1872 — Sections 101, 102, 106 — Burden of Proof — Benami Transaction — The burden of proving that a sale is benami lies on the person alleging it. This requires more than just conjecture or surmise, necessitating concrete proof.
India Law Library Docid # 2432562

(59) XXXX CCL THR HIS FATHER NATURAL GUARDIAN GOBIND SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 12 — Bail of juvenile — Conditions for denial — Release of a juvenile on bail shall not be if there are reasonable grounds for believing that release is likely to bring the juvenile into association with known criminals, expose them to danger, or defeat the ends of justice — Provisions intended for reformation but bail cannot be granted routinely, requiring consideration of all facts and circumstances of the case.
India Law Library Docid # 2432563

(60) ANKIT YADAV Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 10-09-2025
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 12 — Bail of Juvenile — Conditions for denial of bail — “Ends of justice” — Release on bail is ordinarily mandated unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that release would bring the juvenile into association with known criminals, expose them to danger, or def
India Law Library Docid # 2432564