India Law Library

User not Logged..

Law Books shopping cart Launched! - Big Offers & Huge Discounts - All Law Books at One Place — Limited Time Deals!!

Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer

Latest Cases

First
«
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
»
Last

(661) DR. ABDUL GHAFFAR Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 09-01-2026
National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 — Section 21(4) — Appeal against order rejecting anticipatory bail — FIR lodged under sections of IPC related to cheating, forgery, human trafficking and Foreigners Act and Passport Act — Allegations of creating a syndicate to help illegal immigrants and anti-national elements — Serious
India Law Library Docid # 2438915

(662) NEETESH KUMAR PAL Vs. SMT. RAMENDREE PAL[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 498A — Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Cruelty — False implication in criminal case amounts to mental cruelty — Husband's arrest on false allegations by wife can cause apprehension of safety for him and his family to live with her.
India Law Library Docid # 2438916

(663) RAJENDRA Vs. STATE OF U.P.[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Appeal against conviction and sentence of life imprisonment — Factual matrix involves dispute over ancestral property and suspicion of illicit relationship as motive — Defense raises contradictions in eyewitness testimony, absence of motive, and lack of independent witnesses — Court
India Law Library Docid # 2438917

(664) IRFAN AHMAD Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 09-01-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ of Certiorari — Quashing of order — Petitioner seeks quashing of order removing him from post of President, Nagar Palika Parishad — Allegations of corruption and financial misuse of power — Held, inquiry conducted for removal of elected representative must be a full-fledged inquiry in accordance with law.
India Law Library Docid # 2438918

(665) SHRI GUNAJIT NATH AND OTHERS Vs. SHRI HITESH DAS AND OTHERS[GAUHATI HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Motor Accident Claims Tribunal — Compensation — Assessment of Income of Deceased Housewife — Court held that the notional income of a housewife cannot be equated to a paid employee, and can be assessed based on 1/3rd of the earning spouse's income, taking into account the
India Law Library Docid # 2438919

(666) G.HEMALATHA AND OTHERS Vs. S.NARSIMHA AND ANOTHER[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Motor Accident Claim Petition — Proceedings under beneficial legislation — Strict principles of evidence applicable in criminal cases not binding — Mere turning of a witness hostile in a criminal case does not automatically discredit their evidence in a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal proceeding.
India Law Library Docid # 2438938

(667) SRI RAM HANUMAN MUTT. Vs. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS.[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Telangana Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 — Sections 2(17), 2(18), 6(c)(ii), 6(d), 92, 93 — Charitable and Hindu Religious Institution — Temple vs. Mutt — Petitioner claimed the institution was a Mutt, but records and evidence, including Gazette notifications and rent control case filings, indicated it was a Temple — An Assistant Commissioner of Endowments lacked the
India Law Library Docid # 2438945

(668) SANTOSH KUMAR Vs. SMT. RAMAKANTA[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 09-01-2026
MP Accommodation Control Act, 1961 — Section 12(1)(e) — Eviction on grounds of bonafide need — Pleadings and evidence regarding alternate accommodation — Landlord claiming eviction for bonafide need must show they have no other reasonably suitable accommodation. Absence of specific pleading in the plaint is not fatal if sufficient oral evidence establishes this fact, and the tenant has not alleged or proven the
India Law Library Docid # 2439047

(669) THE T.S.COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY FEDERATION LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. GANTA SUDHEER KUMAR AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 09-01-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 151 and Order 18 Rule 17 — Reopening of evidence — Exceptional circumstances — While a convention exists against entertaining applications after evidence is concluded and judgment is reserved, this is not an absolute rule — Courts can permit production of new evidence in exceptional circumstances to meet the ends of justice or prevent abuse of process,
India Law Library Docid # 2439204

(670) DEEPAK BHANDARI AND OTHERS Vs. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 08-01-2026
Companies Act, 1956 — Winding Up — Claims of Creditor/Shareholder — Interest Rate on Deposits — Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, Rules 156 and 179 — Creditors challenged Official Liquidator's rejection of claim for 12% annual interest, awarded only 1.5% — Official Liquidator relied on Board Resolution (dated 28.04.1972 for accounting period 01.01.1971 to 31.12.1971) which fixed interest at 1.5% per annum — Rules 156
India Law Library Docid # 2437894

(671) SUMIT BANSAL Vs. M/S MGI DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of Cheque — Separate Causes of Action — Quashing of Complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C. — Where multiple cheques are issued in relation to the same underlying liability, but are distinct instruments (drawn on different accounts, presented on different dates, and dishonoured separately), each dishonour gives rise to a separate cause of action under
India Law Library Docid # 2437924

(672) C.S. PRASAD Vs. C. SATYAKUMAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Inherent power of High Court to quash criminal proceedings — Principles governing exercise of power — High Court must exercise power sparingly, cautiously, and avoid usurping function of trial court or conducting mini-trial — Only requirement is to examine whether uncontroverted allegations in FIR, taken at face value, disclose commission of any cognizable offence — Reliability, sufficiency, or acceptability of evidence is not for
India Law Library Docid # 2437925

(673) STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS Vs. BHAWANA MISHRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Service Law — Appointment — Ayurvedic Nursing Training Course — Right to Appointment — Candidates admitted to the course in a Government institution do not acquire an automatic right to appointment as Ayurvedic Staff Nurse upon completion of training, especially when there is a significant change in Government policy and the number of candidates available due to the grant of permission to private
India Law Library Docid # 2437926

(674) THE JOINT DIRECTOR (RAYALASEEMA), ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, A.P. AND ANOTHER ETC. Vs. DAYAM PEDA RANGA RAO ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 2(s) and 2(o) — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 — Sections 2(f), 100, 101, 102 — Quashing of FIRs — Jurisdiction of Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) Police Station post-bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh — High Court quashed Anti-Corruption Bureau FIRs on hyper-technical ground of lack of specific notification
India Law Library Docid # 2437927

(675) TEJ NARAIN SHARMA Vs. STATE OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) — Offence of illegal gratification/criminal misconduct — Mandatory requirement of proof of 'demand' — To establish guilt under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii), prosecution must prove both demand and acceptance/obtainment of illegal gratification by the public servant as a fact in issue (sine qua non) — Mere possession and recovery of
India Law Library Docid # 2437879

(676) RAMESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Service Law — Disciplinary Proceedings — Natural Justice — Disagreement with Inquiry Officer's Report — Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (as applicable to Haryana), Rule 16.24 — Where the Disciplinary Authority (DA) disagrees with the Inquiry Officer's report exonerating the delinquent employee, supplying the inquiry report along with the disagreement note-cum-show cause notice and affording an opportunity to file a reply and a personal hearing constitutes due compliance with principles of natural just
India Law Library Docid # 2437935

(677) TANCY BANSAL Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (or Section 528 of BNSS, 2023) — Quashing of FIR — Indian Penal Code (IPC) — Section 174-A (Non-appearance in response to proclamation) — Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) — Section 138 (Cheque Bounce) — Abuse of process of law — FIR under Section 174-A IPC (for being declared a Proclaimed Person/Offender) derived from original criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act — Original complaint settled and withdrawn
India Law Library Docid # 2437938

(678) RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. Vs. M/S KARAM BHOOMI ESTATES[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 08-01-2026
Promissory Estoppel — Administrative Law — Binding nature of promise by public bodies — Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO) invited bids for land allotment — Writ Petitioner (Respondent) was the highest bidder, paid entire consideration, and initiated litigation when allotment was delayed/cancelled — RIICO's Infrastructure Development Committee (IDC) decided to execute the lease deed upon the condition that the Writ Petitioner withdraw its pending
India Law Library Docid # 2437945

(679) MANOJ Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 — Section 29 — Consent — Victim below 12 years — Where the victim is a minor below 12 years of age, the question of consent does not arise — Statutory presumption under Section 29 operates against the accused once foundational facts are established and remains
India Law Library Docid # 2437949

(680) SHOBHA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 08-01-2026
Rajasthan Contractual Hiring to Civil Posts Rules, 2022 (Rules of 2022) — Rule 6 — Rajasthan Medical Health and Subordinate Service Rules, 1965 (Rules of 1965) — Rule 10 — Constitutional validity of minimum age requirement for contractual appointment — Minimum age for Auxiliary Nurse Midwife/Health Worker (Female) (ANM) — Rule 6 (Rules of 2022) prescribing minimum age of 21 years for contractual hiring declared
India Law Library Docid # 2437950

First
«
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
»
Last