ive
User not Logged..
  Quick Judgments/News
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(601) SWARGAM VENKATA SWAMY, DIED PER LRS Vs. ELIGETI PRABHAKAR[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 07-10-2025
Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Section 12 — Partial Specific Performance — Allowed when unperformed portion is minor, severable, and compensable — Trial court judiciously confined relief to the remaining portion of the property after part was alienated to a third party.
India Law Library Docid # 2434618

(602) PRAVEEN KUMAR GOEL Vs. MRS. BINA KUMARI PARIHAR[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 07-10-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Dishonour of cheque — Complaint for — Quashing of summoning order — Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. — High Court’s power is extraordinary and residuary, to prevent abuse of process or secure ends of justice, not a substitute for trial or appeal — Magistrate only required to be satisfied that complaint discloses a prima facie case — Court under
India Law Library Docid # 2434677

(603) SURESH CHAND Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 07-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Appeal against conviction — Prosecution case based on testimony of an alleged eyewitness — Court meticulously analyzed evidence, particularly the discrepancies in the timeline and the sequence of events as narrated by prosecution witnesses — Key issues included the delay in naming the accused in the initial police report, inconsistencies in the
India Law Library Docid # 2434678

(604) MAHENDRA PRATAP Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 07-10-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Motor Accident Claims Petition — Appeal against award — Appeal dismissed for lack of merit — Evidence including FIR, eyewitnesses, and post-mortem report established accident due to rash and negligent driving of offending vehicle — Driver's admission and owner's initial admission through power of attorney corroborated evidence — Retraction of
India Law Library Docid # 2434679

(605) SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. PANCHAYATI AKHADA NIRMALA[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 07-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 10 CPC — Withdrawal of Suit — Trial court permitting unilateral withdrawal of application to withdraw suit and decreeing it without reconsidering the application after affording hearing to both parties, as directed by revisional court, amounts to short-circuiting the process and vitiates the proceedings.
India Law Library Docid # 2434680

(606) GOPI CHAND AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 07-10-2025
Uttarakhand Subordinate Education (Trained Graduate Grade) Service Rules, 2014 — Rule 15(6) — Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 — Section 3(6) — Recruitment — Provisional recommendation list — Reservation policy — Vacancies — Selection process — Candidates belonging to reserved categories securing marks
India Law Library Docid # 2434681

(607) PREM AGGARWAL Vs. MOHAN SINGH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 2 Rule 2 — Bar to further suit — First suit for injunction based on potential dispossession was withdrawn without reservation, second suit for specific performance based on the same cause of action (advertisement for sale) was filed — Held, both suits were based on the same cause of action.
India Law Library Docid # 2434701

(608) T. KRISHNASAMY VANDAYAR Vs. M. BHUVANESWARI AND ANOTHER[MADRAS HIGH COURT] 07-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 — Temporary Injunction — Cardinal principles — Prima facie case, irreparable injury, and balance of convenience are essential for granting an injunction — An appellate court should not interfere with the discretion of the trial court unless it was exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or perversely.
India Law Library Docid # 2434786

(609) ARUMUGAM PILLAI Vs. P.CHAKKARAVARTHI[MADRAS HIGH COURT (MADURAI BENCH)] 07-10-2025
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Cheque dishonour — Compounding of offence — Parties entered into a Memorandum of Compromise after conviction and appeal — High Court has power to compound the offence and set aside conviction even at the revisional stage, to secure the ends of justice and prevent miscarriage.
India Law Library Docid # 2434836

(610) THE MANAGER PARUDUR HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL AND OTHERS Vs. SANTHAKUMARI K. AND OTHERS[KERALA HIGH COURT] 07-10-2025
Kerala Education Rules, Chapter XIVA, Rule 44A(1), second proviso — Appointment of Headmaster — Exemption from test qualification — Teachers above 50 years exempted from acquiring test qualification.
India Law Library Docid # 2434872

(611) SRI CHIKKEGOWDA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 149, 143, 147, 148, 324, 326, 354, 307 — Murder, Unlawful Assembly, Causing Hurt, Outraging Modesty, Attempt to Murder — Appeal against High Court judgment reversing Trial Court acquittal — Supreme Court found High Court's reasoning to be sound and not perverse — Appreciation of evidence by appellate court — High Court correctly
India Law Library Docid # 2434881

(612) NAZIM AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Sections 154, 11 — First Information Report (FIR) — Omission of names — Significant omission of names of accused in FIR, despite complainant's familiarity with them, raises serious doubt about subsequent implication and suggests possibility of false implication — In cases based solely on circumstantial evidence, every circumstance must withstand rigorous scrutiny.
India Law Library Docid # 2433540

(613) P. RADHAKRISHNAN AND ANOTHER Vs. COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Writ Petition — Scope of enquiry — High Court exceeding the scope of writ petition by issuing directions for fixing license fee and conducting an inquiry by the Chief Vigilance Officer, without putting the appellants on notice. Such directions rendered the appellants worse off in their own writ petition,
India Law Library Docid # 2433541

(614) VINISHMA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 14 and 19(1)(g) — Doctrine of Level Playing Field — Tender Conditions — Suppliers based outside the State excluded by a condition requiring past experience of supplying to Chhattisgarh government agencies — Supreme Court held this to be arbitrary and discriminatory, violating the right to equality and freedom of trade — The condition created an artificial barrier,
India Law Library Docid # 2433542

(615) VINISHMA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) — Tender Conditions — Past Performance Restriction — A tender condition restricting bidders to those who supplied goods to the specific State Government in the past three years is arbitrary and discriminatory, violating the principles of equality and freedom of trade. Such a restriction creates an artificial barrier, excludes competent bidders, and curtails fundamental rights without just cause.
India Law Library Docid # 2433557

(616) BHERU SINGH Vs. SMT. SEEMABAI[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 06-10-2025
M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 — Section 23-A and 23-J — Eviction application by widow landlord — Widow status and death of husband not challenged — Landlord falls under Section 23-J(iii) — Eviction for bona fide requirement is permissible.
India Law Library Docid # 2433846

(617) SMT. BABITA MOR Vs. CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 06-10-2025
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — Section 4(6)(b)(ii) — Forfeiture of gratuity for offence involving moral turpitude — Requires conviction by a competent court — Dismissal from service based on departmental proceedings alone is insufficient to forfeit gratuity under this section unless a criminal offence involving moral turpitude is proven in a court of law.
India Law Library Docid # 2433847

(618) RADHESHYAM Vs. DEVKUMAR[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 06-10-2025
Registration Act, 1908 — Section 49 and Section 17(2)(vi) — Effect of non-registration of documents — Requirement of registration of decree — Decree passed by court does not require compulsory registration as per Section 17(2)(vi) of the Registration Act, 1908, except in cases of compromise decrees involving property not subject matter of the suit or creating new rights — In the present case, an ex-parte
India Law Library Docid # 2433848

(619) DILESH RAJ BORANA Vs. M/S. UDHOG MANDIR[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 06-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of Plaint — Jurisdiction — Where essential ingredients for jurisdiction are not met, the plaint can be rejected. In trademark infringement cases, Section 134(2) of the Trademarks Act, 1999 allows suits to be filed where the plaintiff resides or carries on business, even if the cause of action did not arise there.
India Law Library Docid # 2433986

(620) M/S. ZONEX INDUSTRIES Vs. KUNAL CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 06-10-2025
Trademarks Act, 1999 — Section 124 — Stay of proceedings where validity of trademark registration is questioned — Where rectification proceedings for a trademark are pending before the competent forum, a suit for infringement of that trademark must be stayed until the rectification proceedings are finally decided — This includes ancillary issues like punitive damages and rendition of accounts.
India Law Library Docid # 2433987