ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
     Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(661) STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. FATEH LAL[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302 and 201 — Murder and Causing Evidence of Offence to Disappear — Appeal against acquittal — Held, prosecution failed to establish motive and "last seen" theory — Contradictory statements of prosecution witnesses and lack of corroboration for key prosecution theories rendered the case highly doubtful — Acquittal upheld.
India Law Library Docid # 2428022

(662) PRABH KIRAN SINGH ALIAS PRABHKIRAN SINGH Vs. GURMAIL SINGH KHINDA[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 311 — Additional Evidence — Trial Court's power to permit — Scope and principles discussed — Evidence essential for just decision — Can be allowed even after cross-examination foreclosed — Court can summon witnesses or allow further examination at instance of party or suo motu — Successive applications require higher circumspection — No straight jacket formula,
India Law Library Docid # 2428023

(663) MR. SATISH KUMAR @ BABAL Vs. STATE[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 326, 324, 325, 341, 34 — Applicability — Grievous hurt by dangerous weapon or means — Conviction under Section 326 RPC for an injury caused by a human bite — Held, human teeth are a natural part of the human body and cannot be equated with weapons specifically categorized as dangerous or
India Law Library Docid # 2428026

(664) PARVEZ AHMAD PADROO AND OTHERS Vs. J&K BANK LIMITED, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14, 16, 21 — Equality, Non-discrimination, Right to Life — Petitioners engaged as casual workers by Respondent-Bank, later services utilized through outsourcing agency — Bank formulated "Absorption Policy" for contractual engagement/regularization of casual workers — Petitioners figured in
India Law Library Docid # 2428027

(665) M.C. RAVIKUMAR Vs. D.S. VELMURUGAN AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Quashing of criminal proceedings — Second quashing petition — Maintainability — Not permissible to raise previously available grounds in a subsequent petition to effect a review of an earlier order, violating Section 362 CrPC — Exception is when there has been a
India Law Library Docid # 2428029

(666) KONDE NAGESHWAR RAO Vs. A. SRIRAMA CHANDRA MURTY AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Quashing of proceedings — High Court quashed proceedings under SC/ST Act, 1989, against respondents — Appellant contended High Court erred in exercising jurisdiction, overlooking evidence, and conducting roving inquiry — Court held High Court’s scope under Section 482 is limited to determining if allegations disclose a cognizable offence, and
India Law Library Docid # 2428030

(667) SUA Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 342 (Wrongful Confinement) and 376 (Rape) — Conviction and Sentence — Appeal against — Delay in FIR — Explained by the short duration of days in November, distance to police station, and victim narrating incident to mother in the evening.
India Law Library Docid # 2428031

(668) VISHNU VARDHAN @ VISHNU PRADHAN Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 6 Rule 4 — Particulars of fraud to be stated in pleadings — Fraud must be pleaded and proved. (Para 3)

B. Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 32 — Writ jurisdiction — Violation of Fundamental Rights — A writ petition under Article 32 requires a prima facie case of violation or imminent threat of violation of a Fundamental Right, with specific pleadings and prayers for
India Law Library Docid # 2428032

(669) THE STATE Vs. ASHOK[DELHI HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 378(1) — Appeal against acquittal — Grounds for appeal — Judgment based on conjecture and surmises, against facts and law — Victim’s statement narrated entire incident consistently, role of respondent specifically described — Trial court did not consider tender age of prosecutrix (nine years old) — Deviations due to passage of time natural — Children are receptive to
India Law Library Docid # 2428035

(670) AMRENDRA KUMAR YADAV AND OTHERS Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (NEW DELHI)[PATNA HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 223 — Joint trial of accused — Application for joint trial of three special cases was rejected by the Trial Court on the grounds that it would cause judicial delay and violate Supreme Court directions for expeditious disposal of one of the cases. Held, the application was filed at a belated stage, after the prosecution evidence was closed and the cases were at the stage of
India Law Library Docid # 2428037

(671) UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. R. SHANKARAPPA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-07-2025
Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Rule 13(2) and Rule 14, Appendix 3 — Disciplinary proceedings for major penalties — Initiation of by authority competent to impose minor penalties — Permissible — Rule 13(2) allows a disciplinary authority competent to impose minor penalties to institute
India Law Library Docid # 2428056

(672) HDFC BANK Vs. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK[DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II, DELHI] 23-07-2025
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 — Section 17 & 11 — Maintainability of Application — Dispute between two banks regarding recovery of dues and priority of charges — Honourable Supreme Court judgment clarifies that such disputes are not maintainable before Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under Section 17 — Instead, disputes are to be resolved
India Law Library Docid # 2428093

(673) PUNJAB & SIND BANK Vs. M/S. MADAN LAL KULDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS[DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, DELHI] 23-07-2025
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — Section 19 — Original Application (OA) filed by bank for recovery of substantial amount with interest — Several defendants including borrower and guarantors/mortgagors — Defendants raised objections regarding time-barring of claim, filing by unauthorized officer, incorrect statement of accounts, revocation of guarantees, and parallel
India Law Library Docid # 2428094

(674) THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. RANJOT SINGH[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-07-2025
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Section 19 — First Appeal against State Commission order — Delay condoned — Appeal allowed subject to facts and evidence.
India Law Library Docid # 2428101

(675) BHAGWATI PRASAD KANYA MAHAVIDYALAYA Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA[NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION] 23-07-2025
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Deficiency in Service — Failure to provide account details — Bank failed to provide details of a dormant account and made it difficult for the complainant to access their deposited funds, constituting a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act.
India Law Library Docid # 2428102

(676) DAULT RAM AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P.[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Sections 386, 374 — Hearing of Criminal Appeals — Absence of Appellant/Counsel — Amicus Curiae — Supreme Court judgments in Surya Baksh Singh, K.S. Panduranga, and Mohd. Sukur Ali — High Court's discretion to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution or decide on merits in absence of appellant/counsel — Appointment of Amicus Curiae is discretionary — Court can decide appeal after perusing record and trial court judgment, with or without Amicus Curiae if
India Law Library Docid # 2428017

(677) JITENDER Vs. KULDEEP (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 21 Rule 35 — Objections to execution — Maintainability of revision petition — Objections filed by judgment debtors themselves are not third-party objections under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, or 103 CPC — Consequently, the order disposing of such objections is not appealable and a revision petition is maintainable.
India Law Library Docid # 2428940

(678) CHANDER BHAN THROUGH SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY ASHWANI KINGER Vs. KAMAL KRISHAN[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 6 Rule 17 — Amendment of Written Statement — Application to introduce plea of damage to property by landlord — Alleged incident occurred before filing of written statement and injunction suit — Tenant failed to raise issue in written statement or injunction suit — Tenant also failed to demonstrate due diligence in not raising the issue earlier — Amendment sought to justify stand taken in
India Law Library Docid # 2428941

(679) JAGAN NATH (DECEASED) THROUGH LR Vs. SITA RAM (DECEASED) THROUGH LR[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Indian Easements Act, 1882 — Sections 52, 54, 56, 60 — License — Revocation — Permanent construction — Defendant denied being a licensee, therefore, cannot claim irrevocable license under Section 60(b) based on permanent construction.
India Law Library Docid # 2428942

(680) SURJIT KAUR AND OTHERS Vs. MALKIAT SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-07-2025
Limitation Act, 1963 — Article 61(a) — Redemption of mortgaged property — Applicability — Article 61(a) providing 30-year period for redemption applies only if a subsisting mortgage exists — Once a mortgage is redeemed and such redemption is judicially affirmed, the mortgage is extinguished and no further right to redeem can be
India Law Library Docid # 2428943