India Law Library

User not Logged..

India Law Library AI
Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Latest Cases

First
«
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
»
Last

(921) SHOBHA DEVI Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS[TELANGANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Grant of Parole — Inconsistent Stand by State Authorities — Life convict lodged in prison applied for 30 days parole to attend to his ailing wife — Rejection of parole on ground that District Probation Officer noted wife had no serious disease — Record revealed that Probation Officer and Police authorities had issued favorable report and no-objection for release — State authorities took shifting stands contrary to earlier round of litigation — Rejectio
India Law Library Docid # 2450106

(922) RAM PRATAP SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 494 — Bigamy — Liability of family members — Test for summoning co-accused — To attract criminal liability under Section 494 IPC against the husband's relatives, the complainant must prima facie prove specific overt acts or active involvement in facilitating, encouraging, or solemnizing the second marriage — Mere knowledge of second marriage or vague, generalised statements without attributing specific roles are insufficient to summon family members — Summoning o
India Law Library Docid # 2450826

(923) SANJEEV AGARWAL Vs. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 11-08-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 524 and 506 — Quashing of complaint proceedings and summoning order — Allegations of forgery of signatures on trading forms, unauthorized share transfers, and criminal intimidation — Police submitted closure reports twice, but Magistrate proceeded on protest application treated as complaint — Applicant sought quashing based on police closure reports and alleged malice — Held, sta
India Law Library Docid # 2450827

(924) GAUTAM KUMAR ALIAS GAUTAM KUMAR BOSE Vs. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 11-08-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 199(2) — Defamation — Maintainability of private complaint — Public servants acting in discharge of official duties — Applicants conducted inquiry and lodged FIR against school managers for scholarship embezzlement — Upon acquittal by appellate court, private complaint under Section 500 IPC was filed against applicants — Cognizance taken by Magistrate — Section 199(2) CrPC mandates that offences of defamation concerning public servants acting in dis
India Law Library Docid # 2450828

(925) ARVIND KUMAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Rules, 1995 — Rules 12(4) and 12(7) — Financial relief to victims — Scope of judicial scrutiny — Special Judge rejected applications for balance financial assistance holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to determine relief — Held, Rule 12(7) explicitly empowers the Special Court to monitor the adequacy and timeliness of relief disbursed — Special Court is not a passive recipient of administrative reports and possesses sta
India Law Library Docid # 2450829

(926) MANISH BANSAL Vs. JAGDISH PRASAD MITTAL AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 1 Rule 10 — Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 — Impleadment of third party — Landlord-tenant dispute — Claim of independent title — Revisionist sought impleadment in a Small Causes suit based on an unregistered Will — Held, a third person asserting an independent title or right adverse to the landlord does not become a necessary or proper party to proceedings concerning a landlord-tenant relationship — Scope of a rent suit cannot be enlarged by intr
India Law Library Docid # 2450830

(927) MAHENDRA KUMAR YADAV Vs. STATE OF U.P. THR. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION U.P. CIVIL SECTT. AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 11-08-2026
U.P. Recognized Basic Schools (Junior High Schools) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Ministerial Staff and Group D Employees) Rules, 1984 — Rule 13, 14 and 15(5)(ii) — Selection Process — Absence of DBEO's Nominee — Vacancy of Class-IV employee duly notified and advertised — Management repeatedly requested District Basic Education Officer (DBEO) to send a nominee for selection committee, but no nominee was sent — Selection committee proceeded with selection and recommended petitioner —
India Law Library Docid # 2450831

(928) SHRI THAKUR RAM JANKI SUGRIVJI VIRAJMAN MANDIR, THRU. SARVARAHKAR SWAMI VISHVESH PRAPANNACHARYA Vs. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 11-08-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 54 — State action and non-payment of consideration — State executed registered sale deed for temple land, took immediate possession promising payment within 15 days, but subsequently withheld payment claiming land was Nazul property and sought cancellation of sale deed — High Court deprecated State's conduct as arbitrary — Held, title disputes requiring evidence cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction, relega
India Law Library Docid # 2450833

(929) M/S D.K.AUTOMOBILES AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (LUCKNOW BENCH)] 11-08-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Locus Standi — Writ petition by business rival — Petitioner, an existing petrol pump operator, challenged approval and No Objection Certificate (NOC) granted for establishing a new petrol pump nearby — Held, an existing trader or business competitor has no fundamental or statutory right to prevent a competitor from setting up business — A business rival is not an "aggrieved person" to maintain a writ of certiorari — Extraordinary writ jurisdiction unde
India Law Library Docid # 2450834

(930) WINSTROL PETROCHEMICALS PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER, STATE GST AND OTHERS[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — Section 169 — Mode of service — Cancellation of registration — Notice served exclusively via GST portal — Assessee whose registration stands cancelled is not required or expected to continuously monitor the GST portal — Service of notice solely through portal post-cancellation does not constitute valid service under Section 169 — Department must effect service through alternative permissible modes such as registered post, speed post, or direct communica
India Law Library Docid # 2450710

(931) PATEL ANILKUMAR KANTILAL Vs. THAKOR NATVARJI GABHAJI AND OTHERS[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 166 and 173 — Enhancement of compensation — Assessment of income — Injured claimant aged 30 engaged in agricultural labour and animal husbandry — Tribunal fixed monthly income at Rs.5,000/- without adding prospective income — High Court enhanced monthly income to Rs.7,500/- based on prevailing minimum wages and evidence — Applying principles in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi, addition of 40% towards prospective income allowed, fixing monthly prosp
India Law Library Docid # 2450474

(932) PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD. Vs. RAJESHBHAI MULJIBHAI CHAVDA[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 226 and 227 — Labour Law — Domestic Inquiry — Opportunity to adduce evidence — Labour Court held departmental inquiry against respondent-workman illegal for violation of natural justice and directly ordered reinstatement — Management challenged the order alleging denial of opportunity to prove charges — Held, when a Labour Court finds a domestic inquiry vitiated or defective, it cannot straightaway order reinstatement; it must afford the management an oppor
India Law Library Docid # 2450485

(933) SUBODH CH. KARMAKAR Vs. CHANU MAITY AND ANOTHER[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 — Section 17(3) — Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Res Judicata — Striking off defence — Interlocutory order — Eviction suit — Trial Court allowed application under Section 17(3) striking off tenant's defence — Order was not challenged in higher forum and attained finality — Principle of res judicata applies between two stages of the same litigation — A court deciding a matter at an earlier stage will not allow parties to re-agitate it at a subsequent sta
India Law Library Docid # 2450659

(934) SMT. SANTI ROY AND OTHERS Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND OTHERS[CALCUTTA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Motor accident claim — Quantum of compensation — Enhancement — Calculation of monthly income, future prospects, and general damages — Deceased victim died in a road accident involving two colliding offending trucks — High Court recalculated monthly income after deducting profession tax at Rs. 10,714/-, added 30% towards future prospects, deducted 1/3rd for personal expenses, and applied multiplier of 13 — Adding Rs. 70,000/- towards general damages, total
India Law Library Docid # 2450666

(935) GAGAN CHOPRA Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Execution — Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 53 — Fraudulent transfer — Bona fide purchaser — Property under attachment sold during execution of consumer decree — SIT inquiry confirmed petitioner knew about pending execution proceedings and existing attachment orders — Petitioner failed to initiate legal action against seller and colluded to shield property from execution — Held, petitioner was not a bona fide purchaser — Transaction was a fraudulent trans
India Law Library Docid # 2450244

(936) BINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 279, 337 and 338 — Rash and negligent driving — Conviction affirmed — Accused drove a vehicle at high speed in a rash and negligent manner, hitting a motorcycle and causing simple and grievous injuries — Testimony of eye-witnesses established identity of driver and rashness — Medical evidence and mechanical reports corroborated the collision and injuries — Prosecution proved charges beyond reasonable doubt — Conviction under Sections 279, 337 and 338 IPC maintai
India Law Library Docid # 2450245

(937) VAISHNAVI PROMOTERS AND BUILDING Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Determination of market value — Potential value of land — Revenue classification vs actual potentiality — Acquired land recorded as agricultural in revenue records, but falling within residential Sector-2 under Master Development Plan of Narnaul — Landowner had applied for license to develop a plotted colony and deposited fee prior to Section 4 notification — Held, land could not be assessed purely as agricultural land due to its potential and locational advantages —
India Law Library Docid # 2450246

(938) MONIKA AND OTHERS Vs. ANGREJ SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Condonation of delay — Delay of 455 days in filing appeal against Tribunal's award — Explanation rested solely on assertion that counsel advised filing appeal late without detailing timeline or specific circumstances — Held: Discretion to condone delay requires satisfactory and bona fide explanation — Parties cannot claim condonation merely by attributing delay to omission of counsel without demonstrating bona fide and unavoidable cau
India Law Library Docid # 2450247

(939) NARINDER KUMAR @ NARINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 482 — Grant of Anticipatory Bail — Principles governing extraordinary power — Power to grant anticipatory bail is an extraordinary and exceptional remedy to be exercised sparingly with caution — It cannot be claimed as a matter of right or routine in grave offences — Judicial discretion must be exercised considering the facts of the case, severity of the offence, and the potential impact on the investigation.
India Law Library Docid # 2450248

(940) ROHIT DAHAYAT Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 11-08-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Delay and Laches — Limitation — Absence of prescribed limitation period under Article 226 does not confer an unrestricted right to approach the High Court at any time. Writ jurisdiction is discretionary and subject to principles of delay, laches, and reasonable diligence. The three-year period prescribed for civil remedies under Articles 113 and 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 ordinarily furnishes a reasonable standard for evaluating delay under Articl
India Law Library Docid # 2450524

First
«
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
»
Last