(861) RAGHU VAKKIYAL Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 18-04-2026 Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Section 59(1) — Prosecutions — Quashing of — Inherent powers of High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. — Applicable when proceedings are manifestly mala fide, maliciously instituted with ulterior motive, or to wreak vengeance India Law Library Docid # 2442720
(862) KAILASH CHAND AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF H.P AND ANOTHER[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 18-04-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of criminal proceedings — Abuse of process — Unnecessary continuation of criminal proceedings when no cognizable offense is made out, or when proceedings are maliciously instituted with ulterior motive, amounts to abuse of process of the court and securing the ends of India Law Library Docid # 2442747
(863) SHIVAKANT SHRIVASTAVA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 18-04-2026 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 18(2) Proviso 1 and Section 11(1) — Application for reference to court for determination of compensation — Rejection of application by Collector due to delay — Petitioners received compensation in 2011 after notices were issued in 2002 — Applications for reference were filed in 2011, beyond the India Law Library Docid # 2442895
(864) CHANCHAL DAWRE Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT (INDORE BENCH)] 18-04-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 203, 482 — Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 120-B, 420 — Challenge to validity of sanction for prosecution — Where sanction order exists but its legality and validity is questioned, such issue should be raised in the course India Law Library Docid # 2442896
(865) THE STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. GHANABHAI KHIMABHAI AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 18-04-2026 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 323, 337, 504, 114 and Mumbai Police Act, 1951 — Section 135 — Criminal Appeal against acquittal — The prosecution alleged offences including murder, voluntarily causing hurt, and endangering life or personal safety of others — The court examined the evidence of eye-witnesses and medical professionals. India Law Library Docid # 2443471
(866) DEEPAK SAHU AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Service Law — Seniority — Promotion — Rectification of administrative lapses — Notional seniority cannot be granted from a date prior to an employee's actual entry into the cadre, especially when it adversely affects others who were validly appointed earlier — The date of actual joining the post is the basis for seniority unless rules specifically India Law Library Docid # 2442332
(867) MUNNA LAL TOPPO Vs. CHHATTISGARH ELECTION COMMISSION AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Representation of the People Act, 1951 — Section 9A — Disqualification for Government Contracts — A person is disqualified if they have a subsisting contract with the appropriate Government for the supply of goods or execution of works undertaken by that government in the course of their trade or business — The election petitioner admitted to having subsisting contracts with the appropriate Government in their India Law Library Docid # 2442333
(868) THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Vs. SUNITA SINGH AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 166 — Claim petition for compensation — Proof of negligence — In proceedings under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the claimant has the burden to prove negligence on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle. However, the standard of proof required is preponderance of probabilities, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Reliance on FIR, charge sheet, and India Law Library Docid # 2442371
(869) AMRA AND ANOTHER Vs. AASAM KHAN AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 7 Rule 11 — Rejection of Plaint — Limitation — Fraud — When a plaint is challenged on the ground of limitation, it should not be rejected at the threshold unless it is clearly barred on the face of it — Limitation is generally a mixed question of law and fact, and requires evidence to determine — Allegations of fraud are serious and can vitiate all proceedings, and typically do not have India Law Library Docid # 2442374
(870) INDERJIT KAUR Vs. MANJIT SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 6 Rule 17 — Amendment of Plaint — Necessary for fair adjudication — Plaintiff sought to include additional land owned by her deceased mother in a suit claiming a share based on natural succession and challenging a will — Suit aimed at determining inheritance rights of property owned by the mother — Amendment was essential to include all relevant property for a complete India Law Library Docid # 2442375
(871) HARYANA STATE THROUGH SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HARYANA AND OTHERS Vs. AMRISH KUMAR AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Property Law — Allotment of Land — Valuation of Excess Land — The issue concerns the valuation of excess land allotted to displaced persons — The High Court affirmed the lower courts' decision that the valuation should be determined by the Rehabilitation Department's rates, not those of the Consolidation Authorities, following precedent in Lal Singh v — Deputy Secretary to Government Haryana Rehabilitation India Law Library Docid # 2442376
(872) SUNDER LAL @ SURENDER SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS. Vs. SHRI BHAGWAN AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Suit for permanent injunction — Determination of ownership and possession of property within 'Lal Dora' — No documentary evidence on title, reliance on oral evidence and circumstantial factors — Appeals Court to re-appreciate evidence when lower courts differ on findings of fact, especially possession which is determinant. India Law Library Docid # 2442377
(873) SONU SOOD Vs. MADALSA SOOD AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Appeal — First Appellate Court's duty — A first appeal is a continuation of original proceedings and involves a rehearing of facts and law — The appellate court must analyze all evidence, provide cogent reasons for reversing a trial court's judgment, and comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, which mandates stating points for determination, decisions, reasoning, and relief — Failure to India Law Library Docid # 2442378
(874) DHAN SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. Vs. LAJJAWATI AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27 — Additional evidence in Appellate Court — Application to lead additional evidence (Special Power of Attorney) was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide any reason for not producing the document before the lower courts, nor did they demonstrate due diligence, which are essential conditions for admitting additional evidence at the appellate stage. India Law Library Docid # 2442379
(875) PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRATARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, HARYANA, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS Vs. SI BAL KISHAN AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Limitation Act, 1963 — Suit barred by limitation — Court's duty to dismiss — Even if the defense of limitation is not specifically raised, a court is bound to dismiss a suit if it is found to be barred by limitation as per law laid down by the Supreme Court. India Law Library Docid # 2442380
(876) ISHWAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS AND OTHERS Vs. DILBAGH SINGH AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Family Settlements and Minors — A family settlement, even if it involves a minor receiving a share of immovable property, is valid and not void merely because of the minor's age — This is because the purpose of a family settlement is to maintain family harmony and avoid disputes, which is distinct from a purely contractual arrangement — A minor can be a transferee of immovable property. India Law Library Docid # 2442381
(877) AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEE, DEESA Vs. NATIONAL HORTICULTURE BOARD AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-04-2026 Subsidy for Cold Storage — Eligibility for subsidy depends on completion of the project and compliance with scheme guidelines, not just physical construction. The initial inspection found the facility to be at 'minimum capacity utilization', leading to pending subsidy. India Law Library Docid # 2442357
(878) NAGREEKA INDCON PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. Vs. CARGOCARE LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-04-2026 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Clause 25 of Bill of Lading — Interpretation of "can" — A clause stating that disputes "can be settled by arbitration" does not create a mandatory arbitration agreement — It implies a future possibility and requires further agreement between the parties to refer disputes to arbitration, as opposed to a definitive commitment. India Law Library Docid # 2442358
(879) “IN RE: ILLEGAL SAND MINING IN THE NATIONAL CHAMBAL SANCTUARY AND THREAT TO ENDANGERED AQUATIC WILDLIFE.”[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-04-2026 Environmental Law and Wildlife Protection — Illegal Sand Mining — Supreme Court's Suo Motu Cognizance — The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of rampant illegal sand mining in the National Chambal Gharial Sanctuary, recognizing its severe impact on wildlife habitats, including endangered Gharials. The Court issued notices to concerned states and authorities, highlighting that such destruction of India Law Library Docid # 2442359
(880) MODI PROJECTS LTD Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS[JHARKHAND HIGH COURT] 17-04-2026 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 11(6) — Appointment of Arbitrator — Limited Scope of Referral Court — The Court's role under Section 11(6) is primarily to examine the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and not to adjudicate on other related issues. India Law Library Docid # 2442365