ive
User not Logged..
Latest Cases

(681) JAI KRISHNA PRASAD YADAV AND OTHERS Vs. DEEPAK KUMAR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Petitions — Contempt Petitions related to non-compliance with a previous order — While it does not explicitly state a ratio decidendi, it does lay out a procedure for resolving the matter — The court directs the authorities to adjudicate the issues through a fact-finding enquiry conducted by the Registrar/Vice Chancellor of the University — This decision is based on the court's view that issues of actual working days, salary arrears, and pension cannot
India Law Library Docid # 2421496

(682) PREMSHILA KUER Vs. DR. AMRENDRA NARAYAN YADAV AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Petitions — Contempt Petitions related to non-compliance with a previous order — While it does not explicitly state a ratio decidendi, it does lay out a procedure for resolving the matter — The court directs the authorities to adjudicate the issues through a fact-finding enquiry conducted by the Registrar/Vice Chancellor of the University — This decision is based on the court's view that issues of actual working days, salary arrears, and pension cannot be decided in contempt proceedings
India Law Library Docid # 2421497

(683) SRI MUNSHI LAL MAHTO AND OTHERS Vs. SRI SUDHIR TRIPATHY AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Proceedings — The Supreme Court determined that the issues regarding the date of birth, pay fixation, and arrears of salary for petitioner No. 4, who was allegedly a minor at the time of his appointment, required adjudication through a fact-finding enquiry by the Registrar/Vice Chancellor of the University — The court stated that these matters could not be resolved in contempt proceedings — The court directed the petitioner to submit his claims along with relevant documents to the Unive
India Law Library Docid # 2421498

(684) DINESH KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. R. K. MAHAJAN AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Petition — The Supreme Court dismissed a contempt petition, stating that there was no willful non-compliance with its previous order — The court clarified that the prior order directed the University to consider qualified individuals for vacant positions based on their inter-se seniority, rather than mandating their absorption — The court determined that the J. Sinha Commission’s order did not include a positive direction for the petitioners’ absorption — The court noted that the State
India Law Library Docid # 2421499

(685) MS JAYANI ESTATES PVT LTD AND OTHERS Vs. MS VALLABHA FEEDS PVT. LTD AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Suit for Specific Performance — The petitioners filed a suit for specific performance of a contract to re-transfer land and other reliefs, including a request for an injunction to prevent respondents from transferring the land or creating third-party rights — The trial court declined to grant the injunction, and the High Court upheld this decision — The Supreme Court is now hearing a special leave petition against this decision — The petitioners argue they are entitled to an injunction to preven
India Law Library Docid # 2421601

(686) UNION OF INDIA Vs. MOHD JAVED AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Foreigners Act 1946 — Section 3 — The Supreme Court is reviewing a petition by the Union of India challenging a Delhi High Court decision that quashed a "Leave India Notice" against Nausheen Naz, who holds a valid but expired long-term visa and has applied for citizenship — The High Court found the notice arbitrary and violated natural justice, also protecting her family's right to unity under Article 21 — The Supreme Court is concerned about proceeding ex-parte and has requested the respondents
India Law Library Docid # 2421608

(687) GOPAL SHARAN SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. DEEPAK KUMAR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Petitions — Contempt Petitions related to non-compliance with a previous order — While it does not explicitly state a ratio decidendi, it does lay out a procedure for resolving the matter — The court directs the authorities to adjudicate the issues through a fact-finding enquiry conducted by the Registrar/Vice Chancellor of the University — This decision is based on the court's view that issues of actual working days, salary arrears, and pension cannot be decided in contempt proceedings
India Law Library Docid # 2421509

(688) PRASHANT BANDYOPADHYAY AND ANOTHER Vs. SUDHIR TRIPATHI AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Petitions — Contempt Petitions related to non-compliance with a previous order — While it does not explicitly state a ratio decidendi, it does lay out a procedure for resolving the matter — The court directs the authorities to adjudicate the issues through a fact-finding enquiry conducted by the Registrar/Vice Chancellor of the University — This decision is based on the court's view that issues of actual working days, salary arrears, and pension cannot be decided in contempt proceedings
India Law Library Docid # 2421510

(689) DR. YUGESHWAR YADAV Vs. SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Petitions — Contempt Petitions related to non-compliance with a previous order — While it does not explicitly state a ratio decidendi, it does lay out a procedure for resolving the matter — The court directs the authorities to adjudicate the issues through a fact-finding enquiry conducted by the Registrar/Vice Chancellor of the University — This decision is based on the court's view that issues of actual working days, salary arrears, and pension cannot be decided in contempt proceedings
India Law Library Docid # 2421511

(690) ANRAJ DEVI Vs. DEEPAK KUMAR AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Petitions — Contempt Petitions related to non-compliance with a previous order — While it does not explicitly state a ratio decidendi, it does lay out a procedure for resolving the matter — The court directs the authorities to adjudicate the issues through a fact-finding enquiry conducted by the Registrar/Vice Chancellor of the University — This decision is based on the court's view that issues of actual working days, salary arrears, and pension cannot be decided in contempt proceedings
India Law Library Docid # 2421512

(691) H.GURUSWAMY AND OTHERS Vs. A. KRISHNAIAH SINCE DECEASED BY LRS. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 9 Rule 13 — Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5 — Condonation of Delay — Reversal of High Court Decision — The Supreme Court reversed the High Court's decision to condone a 2200-day delay in filing an application for recall — The Supreme Court's decision emphasizes the importance of adhering to the rules of limitation and not allowing the concept of "substantial justice" to override these rules — This sets a precedent for cases involving significant delays i
India Law Library Docid # 2421513

(692) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA Vs. SUBRATA ROY SAHARA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Contempt Case — The Supreme Court is hearing a contempt case against Subrata Roy Sahara and others, with multiple interlocutory applications pending — Issues include financial irregularities, contempt of court, and enforcement of previous orders concerning Sahara companies — The court is considering settlement proposals and financial deposits, with SEBI tasked to scrutinize these — Parties are also allowed to explore mediation — The court has directed deposits and investigations while keeping fu
India Law Library Docid # 2421615

(693) J.H.V. SUGAR LIMITED Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Allocation of sugarcane to sugar mills — Petitioner-J.H.V. Sugar Limited petitioned over sugarcane allocation in Uttar Pradesh, following a High Court judgment — The court monitored compliance with sugarcane allocation orders, with J.H.V. allocated 54.62 lakhs quintals — Issues included mill capacity, further allocation, farmer payments, and purchase centers — The court directed proportional allocation of remaining sugarcane based on crushing capacity, ordered J.H.V. to provide an additional Rs.
India Law Library Docid # 2421616

(694) VINOD Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 394, 397, 120(B) and 506(B) — Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 — Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(2), 3(4) — Appellant was arrested in April 2023 for allegedly being part of an organized crime syndicate involved in a dacoity — His bail application was rejected by the Special Judge under MCOCA, and subsequently by the High Court — The main issue is whether appellant should be granted bail, considering he has been in jail for about twenty months, the trial has
India Law Library Docid # 2421622

(695) JYOTI TOBI JONES Vs. THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Information and Technology Act, 2000 — Sections 66D — Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 406, 420, 465 and 468 — Supreme Court addressed a case involving a Nigerian citizen who was arrested in India and then ordered to be confined to a Special Detention Camp after being granted bail — The petitioner had been arrested for offenses under the Information Technology Act and the Indian Penal Code — The petitioner challenged the detention order, but the High Court rejected his challenge — The Supreme C
India Law Library Docid # 2421633

(696) SHARMILA VELAMUR Vs. V. SANJAY AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Supreme Court is hearing a case concerning two specially abled children — The court has ordered that the two children, aged 21 and 19, should stay together in Bengaluru with their mother and other relatives — The elder son who was not previously in Bengaluru, was ordered to join his younger brother there — Both children are to undergo medical assessments at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS) in Bengaluru — The court expects both parents to accompany their childr
India Law Library Docid # 2421688

(697) A. VIJAY @ VIJAYA KUMAR Vs. STATE [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 08-01-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 417 and 376 — The court upheld the conviction of the appellant — However, the court modified the sentence of imprisonment to the period already served — The decision was significantly influenced by the fact that the appellant and the complainant had married, had a child, and were living together happily, with the complainant no longer wishing to pursue the case — The court noted that the appellant's second marriage was technically invalid under the Hindu Marriag
India Law Library Docid # 2422160

(698) M/S AIR SHAGOON (NETWORK) PVT LTD Vs. ABW INFRASTURTURE LTD AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-01-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 8 — Landlord filed a suit against their tenant for eviction and mesne profit — The tenant invoked Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, citing an arbitration clause in their contract and claiming the tenancy was not statutorily protected — The High Court initially dismissed the tenant's application but later allowed it, referring the matter to arbitration — The landlord challenged this decision in the Supreme Court — Meanwhile, a petition was filed be
India Law Library Docid # 2422314

(699) M/S VIDYAWATI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Vs. UNION OF INDIA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-01-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sections 16(2) and 34 — Section 16(2) — A party cannot raise a plea of lack of jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal after submitting their statement of defence — This bar does not apply if the party had not appointed or participated in appointing an arbitrator, but in cases where a party has submitted to the jurisdiction (e.g., by filing a statement of defence) and agreed to proceed with the arbitration, they are estopped
India Law Library Docid # 2422635

(700) PALAK AND ANOTHER Vs. YOGESH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 07-01-2025
Matrimonial Law — Divorce by Mutual Consent — Supreme Court addressed a case involving a couple, who married on June 26, 2023, but separated due to temperamental differences — After a failed mediation, they agreed to a settlement to end their marriage and dissolve their disputes — The Court granted a divorce by mutual consent, as per the settlement, and quashed all listed legal proceedings between them, which included a civil suit, police complaints, domestic violence proceedings, a CAW complain
India Law Library Docid # 2421652