India Law Library

User not Logged..

Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Latest Cases

First
«
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
»
Last

(621) K SRINIVAS AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Service Law — Regularization of service — Termination of daily wage workers — Division Bench erred in upholding termination of daily wage workers who had worked for a long period, based on a technicality of improper advertisement — Supreme Court allowed appeal, set aside High Court's order, and restored Single Judge's order to reinstate workers, counting period for pensionary benefits but denying back wages for a specific period due to their absence from service following the Division Bench's ju
India Law Library Docid # 2441708

(622) THAKUR BHAGAT ETC. Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Valuation of acquired land — Sale deed dated 05.02.2007 accepted as a reliable benchmark for valuation — High Court's decision to reduce valuation from Rs.80,000/- per biswa to Rs.45,000/- per biswa, and apply a 25% deduction for development charges, was incorrect — Supreme Court fixed the compensation at Rs.80,000/- per biswa with a 25% deduction for development charges, accepting the sale deed’s valuation and the High Court's reasoning on statutory deduction — Prev
India Law Library Docid # 2441591

(623) THE MANAGEMENT, CARBORUNDUM UNIVERSAL Vs. K.P. KISHORE KUMAR AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Section 17-B — Wages paid under Section 17-B — Employee reinstated by Labour Court without back wages, modified by Single Bench to lump sum compensation of Rs. 3,00,000/-, then Division Bench directed reinstatement without back wages — Employee attained superannuation — Supreme Court directed payment of Rs. 10,00,000/- as lump sum compensation, in addition to wages already paid under Section 17-B, with adjustment if Rs. 3,00,000/- was already paid — Appeals dispos
India Law Library Docid # 2441598

(624) SREE SANKARACHARYA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT AND ANOTHER Vs. UNNIKRISHNA PILLAI J.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Contractual Employment — Guest Lecturers — Pay Parity — University appointed guest lecturers on contract basis and sought regularisation of services — High Court directed University to pay emoluments equal to gross salary of regularly appointed Assistant Professors — Supreme Court held that contractual appointees cannot claim pay parity with regularly appointed employees, as their duties and responsibilities may differ — Supreme Court also noted that guest lecture
India Law Library Docid # 2441609

(625) JATINDER KAUR @ ALIYA Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Anticipatory Bail — Grant of — Considerations — Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant, a lady, in a case involving cheating and obtaining a substantial amount of money by promising to send a person abroad, after considering the facts and circumstances and the amount involved — The order was set aside, and anticipatory bail was granted subject to terms and conditions imposed by the Trial Court — Additionally, the appellant was directed to deposit the amount of Rs — 12 Lakhs bef
India Law Library Docid # 2441750

(626) FARHANA Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Supreme Court Rules 2013, Order XLVII Rule 1 — Review petitions — Dismissal — Applications for open court hearing rejected — Delay condoned — Review petitions dismissed as no error apparent on the face of the record and no case for review established. [Paras 1, 3-4]
India Law Library Docid # 2441757

(627) PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 INDORE AND OTHERS Vs. AMIT SHARMA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 132A(1)(c) and 132B — Model Code of Conduct — Seizure of goods during elections — Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) — High Court directed release of seized articles and imposed costs — Revenue contended that release should be under Section 132B — Court held that seizure was in violation of SOP and no reason to believe goods were related to influencing elections — Proceedings against courier employee Amit Sharma were arbitrary — Seized articles ought to be returned
India Law Library Docid # 2441759

(628) SADAN KILLO Vs. UNION OF INDIA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8/29 — Bail — Petitioner arrested for offences under Sections 8/29, implicated based on a SIM card in his name but recovered from another person — Petitioner undergone about one year in custody — Supreme Court granted bail considering the facts and circumstances and period of custody, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case — Petitioner to furnish bail bonds and sureties, abide by trial court's terms and conditions,
India Law Library Docid # 2441760

(629) NEHA SINGH RATHORE @ NEHA KUMARI Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Anticipatory Bail — Protection from arrest — Petitioner apprehended arrest in connection with FIR for offences under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Information Technology Act, 2008 — Interim protection of no coercive steps granted subject to cooperation in investigation — Petitioner appeared and cooperated as directed — Supreme Court confirmed interim protection and released petitioner on anticipatory bail, directing her to furnish bail bonds and sureties, join investigation as and when requi
India Law Library Docid # 2441764

(630) THE CHENNAI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY Vs. DHARMALINGAM AND OTHERS ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 10-03-2026
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 48-B — Reconveyance of acquired land to original owner — State government's satisfaction that land is no longer required for acquisition purpose or any other public purpose is a prerequisite for reconveyance — This section does not create an enforceable right for the landowner to demand
India Law Library Docid # 2444276

(631) ABHISHEK SHARMA Vs. THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 — Section 3(b) — Exclusion of employees appointed on academic arrangement basis from regularization — Classification held unconstitutional — Section 3(b) lacks intelligible differentia and rational nexus to the object of the Act — Denial of regularization solely based on nomenclature is impermissible under Article 14 of the Constitution
India Law Library Docid # 2440575

(632) VEENA DEVI Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Anticipatory Bail — Appellant aggrieved by denial of anticipatory bail by High Court — Supreme Court granted protection from arrest subject to cooperation with investigation — State failed to file affidavit regarding cooperation — Offence allegedly committed 16 years prior to FIR registration — No grounds for custodial interrogation — Interim order made absolute, appellant to be released on bail if arrested — Appeal allowed. [Paras 2-9]
India Law Library Docid # 2441490

(633) DONIYAR VILDANOV Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Habeas Corpus Petition — Acquittal — Passport Renewal and Repatriation — Petitioner was incarcerated and subsequently acquitted — Through a writ petition, sought directions for his release, passport renewal, and regularization of stay or repatriation — The Supreme Court noted measures taken by authorities, including facilitating passport application with the Russian Embassy and transferring the petitioner to a Restriction Centre for repatriation — Held that
India Law Library Docid # 2441497

(634) NARESH KUMAR DAHAT Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 142 — Dissolution of marriage by mutual consent — Parties filed a joint application seeking directions for divorce via mutual consent based on a Memorandum of Settlement — All disputes amicably resolved and terms agreed upon — Court appreciated mediation efforts and counsel's assistance in reaching settlement — Specific sums of money paid and electronically transmitted as per settlement terms — Cases mentioned in settlement agreement to be closed — Court iss
India Law Library Docid # 2441617

(635) ANIL TUTEJA Vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Bail — Directions sought by an accused, including production of material and stay on further proceedings, were rightly declined by the High Court when multiple cases involving various scams were registered against him, some of which were investigated by the Enforcement Directorate — The Supreme Court held that the effective remedy for the petitioner was to seek a regular or anticipatory bail in the pending cases. [Paras 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]
India Law Library Docid # 2441620

(636) URVASHI J. VAYDA Vs. MEDICAL OFFICER OF HEALTH C WARD AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Municipal Corporations — Trade/Health License — Cancellation — Premises being run by legal heirs of deceased licensee — Petitioner expressing interest only in tenancy rights — Court directing Municipal Corporation to decide on cancellation of license and to hear all stakeholders. [Paras 3-12]
India Law Library Docid # 2441621

(637) ASHOK KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 438 — Pre-Arrest Bail — Considering that three out of five accused have been granted pre-arrest bail and the FIR was registered with a delay of eight days, the Court extended the interim protection granted earlier and made it absolute, with the condition that no coercive steps will be taken against the petitioners if they continue to participate and cooperate with the investigation — In the event of arrest, they shall be enlarged on bail under terms
India Law Library Docid # 2441695

(638) DR. SUSHIL KUMAR PURBEY AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of criminal proceedings — High Court quashed proceedings against sister-in-law on ground of general and omnibus allegations, but declined relief to father-in-law and mother-in-law (appellants) — Allegations against appellants were similarly general and omnibus, with no specific role or overt act attributed to them — Delay in lodging FIR,
India Law Library Docid # 2440506

(639) GOBIND SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 27 — Additional evidence in appeal — Appellate court can allow additional evidence only in exceptional circumstances as laid down in the rule, such as where the court needs it to pronounce judgment or for any other substantial cause — Parties do not have a right to produce additional evidence and it cannot be introduced at their convenience — The provision
India Law Library Docid # 2440507

(640) MD. AFSAR ALI @ AFSU KHAN AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Bail pending trial — Where trial is in progress, evidence of some witnesses has been recorded, co-accused have been enlarged on bail, the case is triable by a magistrate, and the trial is proceeding at a slow pace, the appellants need not be detained in custody any longer and can be admitted to bail.
India Law Library Docid # 2441394

First
«
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
»
Last