(522) PIYUSH SHYAMDASANI Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-07-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 302, 364, 201, 203 and 120-B — Circumstantial evidence — Murder of wife by hired assailants — Conviction upheld — Prosecution established an unbroken chain of circumstances through call detail records, mobile tower locations, usage of fake SIM cards, CCTV footage and invoices proving purchase of the murder weapon, and recoveries under Section 27 of Evidence Act — Husband's highly unnatural conduct, including lodging a false abduction complaint, remaining unharme
India Law Library Docid # 2457614
(526) MANI @ SUBRAMANIYAM Vs. STATE REP BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 17-07-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 294(b) — Obscenity — Distinction between "obscene" and "abusive"/"vulgar" language — Test of — Held, to attract S. 294(b) IPC, prosecution must prove: (i) an obscene act done, or obscene word/song/ballad uttered, in or near a public place; and (ii) such act/utterance caused annoyance to others — Word "obscene" undefined under IPC but judicially construed, in the context of S. 292 IPC, to mean material which, taken as a whole, is lascivious, appeals to prurient in
India Law Library Docid # 2447722