India Law Library

User not Logged..

Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Latest Cases

First
«
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
»
Last

(401) NEERAJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-03-2026
Indian Air Force — Short Service Commission Officers (SSCOs) — Reinstatement and consideration for Permanent Commission (PC) — Dismissal of appeal challenging AFT order — Delay in approaching legal forum.
India Law Library Docid # 2441215

(402) COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-03-2026
Supreme Court Rules, 2013 — Appointment of Amicus Curiae — Upon the demise of the appointed amicus curiae, the Court appointed a new senior counsel as amicus curiae and directed all parties to furnish relevant papers within two weeks.
India Law Library Docid # 2441391

(403) MV GOLDEN PRIDE Vs. GAC SHIPPING (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-03-2026
Admiralty Law — Vessel Arrested and Sold — Special Leave Petitions challenging an interim order related to a vessel's sale and auction procedure were dismissed as infructuous because the main Admiralty Suit had already been disposed of — The Court noted that the petitioner's counsel had previously stated they were not pressing the issue of the vessel being sold as scrap. [Paras 1, 2, 5]
India Law Library Docid # 2441592

(404) SHAGAF SHANAWAZ KAREL AND ANOTHER Vs. SAFWAN JAFAR HUSSAIN SAYYAD AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-03-2026
Municipal Law — Regularisation of unauthorized construction — Application for regularization of unauthorized construction filed, but not decided — High Court directed Municipal Corporation to take action for demolition — Supreme Court directed Appellate Authority to decide pending statutory appeal against rejection of regularization application within six months, continuing interim status quo order till disposal of appeal, and stating that the Appellate Authority would decide the appeal uninflue
India Law Library Docid # 2441712

(405) TINKU Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-03-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Offence compoundable with consent of parties at any stage, even after conviction — Parties entered into a settlement agreement during pendency of appeal, resolving the monetary dispute underlying the cheque dishonour case — Settlement was verified by the High Court — Supreme Court set aside the conviction order and allowed the appeal in terms of the settlement, citing precedent that Section 147 of the N.I — Act makes the offence compoundable. [Par
India Law Library Docid # 2441752

(406) MEENA AND ANOTHER Vs. CHAMAN AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Suspension of Sentence and Bail — High Court erroneously granted suspension of sentence and consequential bail to a murder convict based on an incorrect age and the pendency of numerous appeals, despite the convict having served a minimal period of incarceration — Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, emphasizing that such grounds are insufficient for granting relief in serious criminal matters and directed the convict to surrender. [Paras 1-4]
India Law Library Docid # 2441765

(407) S. SUBRAMANIAM Vs. MURUGESAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-03-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Cheque Dishonour — Appeal against High Court order reinstating conviction after acquittal by Sessions Court — Parties settling the matter through compromise — Accused paid settlement amount to complainant — Compounding of offence permissible under Section 147 of N.I — Act
India Law Library Docid # 2447361

(408) XYZ Vs. THE STATE OF UP AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-03-2026
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) & Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) — FIR registered under various sections (Sections 147, 376, 377, 354, 342, 323, 506 and 120-B of IPC; Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of BNSS) — Allegations of abduction, wrongful confinement, sexual assault, rape, unnatural offences, physical assault, and criminal intimidation — Appellant's claim of being
India Law Library Docid # 2447369

(409) DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER AND COLLECTOR, GWALIOR, M.P. Vs. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Sections 2(30), 173, 174 — Compensation — Liability for accident during requisition of vehicle — Bus owned by a school was requisitioned by the appellant (District Magistrate) for election purposes — Accident occurred while the bus was under the control of the appellant — Issue of shifting of liability from the insurance company to the requisitioning authority — Held, when a
India Law Library Docid # 2441129

(410) INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DEEPAK SHARMA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
National Green Tribunal (NGT) — Adjudicatory Function — NGT cannot abdicate its powers and entrust its adjudicatory functions to a committee, even an expert committee — The role of such a committee is only to assist the NGT, not to decide the case.
India Law Library Docid # 2441130

(411) CHAYA AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14, 15(1), 16, 309 — Relaxation in qualifying examination (TET) marks for reserved category candidates — The provision of relaxation in qualifying marks in TET enables reserved category candidates to enter the zone of consideration and does not affect their inter se merit in the main selection process (TAIT) — Migration to the open category is permissible if recruitment rules do not expressly prohibit it or are silent on the matter — Decisions
India Law Library Docid # 2441131

(412) STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS Vs. SANTHOSH KUMAR C[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Karnataka Recruitment of Gazetted Probationers (Appointment by Competitive Examinations) Rules, 1997 — Rule 11(1), 11(3) & Rule 4(3) — Selection process for Gazetted Probationers — Vacancy arising from non-joining candidate — Claims of next eligible candidate — Held, select list is not an open-ended reservoir of candidates but is prepared for notified vacancies & operates within statutory
India Law Library Docid # 2441132

(413) M/S.LAMBA EXPORTS PVT. LTD Vs. M/S.DHIR GLOBAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) — Section 12A — Withdrawal of CIRP — Order of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and Civil Suit — Supreme Court expresses no opinion on the merits of proceedings under IBC or the pending civil suit, leaving all rights and contentions open to be urged before the competent forum.
India Law Library Docid # 2441133

(414) M/S ABS MARINE SERVICES Vs. THE ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Contract Law — Interpretation of clauses — State as a party — Non-negotiable principles of Rule of Law apply — Clause providing that one party's decision is final and unchallengeable in any court or arbitration is unsustainable if it leads to a vacuum in legal remedies or violates the principle of natural justice that no one can be a judge in their own cause.
India Law Library Docid # 2441134

(415) ARVIND WALIA Vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) — Sections 3, 4, 44, 45, 50 — Bail — Appellant in custody for over 8 months, aged 65 years, appeared before ED on five occasions prior to arrest — Further detention not necessary — Section 45 conditions cannot override Article 21 rights — Bail granted subject to furnishing bonds and other conditions imposed by trial court — Observations in order not to be treated as findings on merits. [Paras 7–10, 15–16]
India Law Library Docid # 2441487

(416) ARUNKUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Suspension of Sentence — Bail — Applicants convicted by Sessions Court and affirmed by High Court, seeking suspension of sentence during pendency of criminal appeals before Supreme Court — Applicants are women who have undergone substantial period of sentence, including remission, and have good case on merits — Supreme Court considered the facts and granted suspension of sentence, directing release on bail subject to conditions imposed by trial court. [Para
India Law Library Docid # 2441495

(417) THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Vs. MOULASAB DILAWARSAB TALLUR AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Limitation Act, 1963 — Condonation of delay — Where reasons for delay in filing an appeal before the High Court are found to be satisfactory, such delay can be condoned.
India Law Library Docid # 2441498

(418) ASHISH RANJAN AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Supreme Court — Jurisdiction — Miscellaneous Application — Modification of time schedule for admission — National Medical Commission sought modification of time schedule for postgraduate medical course admissions for academic session 2025-2026 — Supreme Court allowed the application and extended the last date for admission to 28th February, 2026 for All India Quota, Deemed & Central Institutes, and State Counselling. [Paras 1-2]
India Law Library Docid # 2441500

(419) J. KRISHNAN Vs. STATE OF TAMILNADU[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Anticipatory Bail — Conditions for granting bail — High Courts and Trial Courts should decide bail pleas strictly on merits of the case and not based on any undertaking or statement regarding deposit of money by the accused — Imposing a condition of depositing a sum of money for granting anticipatory bail is impermissible and amounts to passing a conditional order of bail, which is contrary to law laid down by the Supreme Court — High Court’s order imposing
India Law Library Docid # 2441520

(420) THE CHIEF ENGINEER AND OTHERS Vs. T ARJUNAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-03-2026
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 142 — Compensation — Where re-appointment of a former employee, who had worked for 13 years as a Nominal Muster Roll employee but was disengaged much earlier and had attained superannuation age, was not feasible due to passage of time, the Supreme Court, exercising its powers under Article 142, directed payment of lump sum compensation to the employee, making it clear that the order was based on peculiar facts and not a precedent. [Paras 7-12]
India Law Library Docid # 2441619

First
«
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
»
Last