(381) PAWAN KUMAR Vs. STATE NCT OF DELHI[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-01-2026 Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 302 — Murder — Conviction — Circumstantial evidence — Suspicion alone is insufficient for conviction. The principle of 'falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus' is not applicable in India. Courts must be careful when relying on evidence in such circumstances. India Law Library Docid # 2439545
(382) GLOSTER LIMITED Vs. GLOSTER CABLES LIMITED AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-01-2026 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 60(5)(c) — Jurisdiction of Adjudicating Authority — Declaration of title to trademark — NCLT exceeded its jurisdiction by declaring title to trademark "Gloster" in favour of the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA) while adjudicating an application under Section 60(5) of the IBC, as the issue of trademark title was a highly contentious dispute beyond the India Law Library Docid # 2438475
(383) HEMALATHA (D) BY LRS. Vs. TUKARAM (D) BY LRS. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-01-2026 Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — Section 58(c) — Mortgage by conditional sale — Proviso strictly requires that the condition for mortgage must be part of the sale document itself, not in a separate agreement. India Law Library Docid # 2438568
(384) M/S GOLDEN GATE PROJECTS AND ANOTHER Vs. SRI YOGESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-01-2026 Injunction Orders — Compliance — Supreme Court reiterates the importance of full compliance with court orders, even if parties later reach an agreement among themselves, unless a joint petition for recall or modification is filed. India Law Library Docid # 2439603
(385) VINOD GANDHI Vs. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MADURAI AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-01-2026 Limitation Act, 1963 — Condonation of delay — Court can take a pragmatic view in condoning delay based on facts and circumstances, considering the consequences on the litigation. India Law Library Docid # 2438882
(386) RAKESH JAIN Vs. STATE[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-01-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Bail — Conditions for granting bail — High Court rejected extension of interim bail on failure to deposit balance amount as undertaken — Supreme Court directed High Court to decide bail application on merits. India Law Library Docid # 2438884
(387) VIRAJ IMPEX PVT. LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-01-2026 Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 — Section 3 — Notification — Publication in Official Gazette — Essential requirement for enforceability — Delegated legislation requires publication for accessibility, notice, accountability and solemnity — Not an empty formality but transforms executive decision into law — Strict compliance with publication requirement is a condition precedent — Law must be promulgated or published in a recognisable way. (Paras 16, 17, 18, India Law Library Docid # 2438473
(388) INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. Vs. P.C. SATHIYADEVAN (D) BY LRS. AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-01-2026 Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1964 — Section 106 — Leases for commercial or industrial purposes — Protection from eviction — Conditions for protection — Lease must be for commercial or industrial purposes, and lessee must have constructed buildings for such purpose before the appointed date (20.05.1967) — Failure to prove India Law Library Docid # 2438756
(389) NEHA LAL Vs. ABHISHEK KUMAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2026 Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 142 — Dissolution of marriage — Irretrievable breakdown — Supreme Court can dissolve marriage in exercise of extraordinary powers under Article 142 when marriage has irretrievably broken down, even if one party opposes it, to do complete justice. Factors to consider include period of cohabitation, separation, nature of allegations, attempts at reconciliation, and economic/social status. India Law Library Docid # 2438390
(390) UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. HEAVY VEHICLES FACTORY EMPLOYEES’ UNION AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2026 Factories Act, 1948 — Section 59(2) — Overtime wages calculation — "Ordinary rate of wages" — Includes basic wages plus all allowances worker is entitled to, excluding only bonus and overtime wages — Compensatory allowances like House Rent Allowance (HRA), Transport Allowance (TA), Clothing and Washing Allowance (CWA), and Small Family Allowance (SFA) are includible. India Law Library Docid # 2438391
(391) RAJ SINGH GEHLOT AND OTHERS Vs. AMITABHA SEN AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2026 Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 — Section 3(3A) — Amendment Act, 2020 — Retrospective validation of actions — Power to grant license includes power to modify, suspend, revoke, or delicense — Delicensing of land for commercial purposes after it was initially licensed for residential use is permissible. India Law Library Docid # 2438392
(392) PRAKASH ATLANTA (JV) Vs. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2026 Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 — Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996 — Applicability — Cess could not be levied or collected before the constitution of Welfare Boards, as their constitution is a condition precedent for the implementation of these Acts. India Law Library Docid # 2438393
(393) BERI MANOJ Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 161 and 164 — Statement of prosecutrix — Contradiction in statement recorded under Section 161 CrPC and Section 164 CrPC — Improvement of version after a considerable delay — Vague allegations without clear intention to cause alarm — Insufficient evidence for prosecution under Section 506 IPC. India Law Library Docid # 2438877
(394) V.ANIMA MALAR Vs. S. AADHAVAN AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2026 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Abuse of Process — Filing of writ petition when civil suit on same subject matter is pending — Held, filing a writ petition to seek relief already sought in a pending civil suit, especially when parties are the same, amounts to an abuse of the process of law. India Law Library Docid # 2439648
(395) 42605-B CDR YOGESH MAHLA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2026 Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 (POSH Act) — Section 18 — Appeal — Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (AFT Act) — Section 14 — Jurisdiction — Where an appeal is filed challenging the report and recommendations of an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) under Section 18 of the POSH Act read with Section 14 of the AFT Act, the India Law Library Docid # 2439651
(396) ASIF ALI AND OTHERS Vs. RAJESAB AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-01-2026 Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Section 20 — Discretion to decree specific performance — The court's discretion to grant specific performance is not arbitrary but must be sound and reasonable, guided by judicial principles. Even if lawful, specific performance may not be granted if it is not judicious. India Law Library Docid # 2438883
(397) NAVEEN KUMAR SAH Vs. STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-01-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 173(2) — Charge-sheet — Quashing FIR — High Court quashed FIR without considering charge-sheet filed before passing order — Held, charge-sheet and supporting materials ought to have been brought to the notice of High Court — Impugned order unsustainable due to non-consideration of charge-sheet — Matter requires reconsideration by High Court. India Law Library Docid # 2438886
(398) PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS INC. (THR. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-01-2026 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 41A — Procedure for arrest — High Court should not direct compliance with Section 41A in a petition seeking quashing of FIR unless a prima facie case for quashing is made out, as this indirectly grants relief. India Law Library Docid # 2438889
(399) NAWAL KISHORE MEENA @ N.K MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-01-2026 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Jurisdiction of State Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) to investigate Central Government employees — The ACB of a State has the jurisdiction to register and investigate criminal cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act against employees of the Central Government, even if the CBI is the designated agency for such matters. India Law Library Docid # 2438893
(400) ANIL DAIMA ETC. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 19-01-2026 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 17-A — Inquiry or investigation into offences related to recommendations or decisions by public servants — Applicability — State Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) has jurisdiction to register cases against Central Government employees within its territorial limits, even without prior consent of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) — Prior approval India Law Library Docid # 2438894