(105) ROSHAN LAL MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B — Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992 — Sections 3, 4, 6 — Prolonged detention — Appellant remained in custody for over two years — Charge-sheet was filed and prosecution cited seventeen witnesses, yet charges were not framed and trial would take time to conclude — High Court had rejected second bail application — Held, further detention of the appellant is unnecessary — Impugned order set aside and a
India Law Library Docid # 2451805
(106) NARAYAN Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-08-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Regular Bail — Parity — Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, Sections 3 and 4 — Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 408, 409, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 201 — Misappropriation in credit society — Appellant worked as a Senior Clerk, alleged to have processed bogus loan transactions using his user ID — Primary accused with higher accountability, including Chairman, Secretary, and Directors, were alrea
India Law Library Docid # 2451814
(113) ROHIT Vs. STATE OF HARYANA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-08-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 482 — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 3(5), 121(1), 132, 191(2), 191(3), 221, 305(c) — Anticipatory bail — Rejection by High Court — Appellants were implicated based on co-accused's disclosure during investigation — Pursuant to interim protection granted by Supreme Court, appellants joined investigation and cooperated, as affirmed by State's status report — Held, appellants made out a case for anticipatory bail — Impugned orders set asi
India Law Library Docid # 2451749
(114) BHOLA KUMAR @VIKASH Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 21-08-2026
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 310(4), 310(5), 111 — Arms Act, 1959 — Sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 35 — Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Sections 8(c), 21(b), 29 — Regular Bail — Parity — Brown sugar and firearms recovered from co-accused who were subsequently enlarged on bail by the High Court — No contraband or weapon recovered from the appellant except two mobile phones — Held, the appellant stood on a better footing than the co-accused and was entitled to grant of r
India Law Library Docid # 2451758