ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
   Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

     AI Submission Generator [on behalf of Appellant/Respondent]  

Latest Cases

(201) PRADEEP BHARDWAJ Vs. PRIYA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(a) — Cruelty — Divorce — Allegations of cruelty by husband against wife for property grabbing, physical abuse, and extra-marital affair — Family Court and High Court found allegations unsubstantiated — Conviction of husband in criminal case for cruelty also resulted in acquittal
India Law Library Docid # 2427850

(202) G. KALAWATHI BAI (DIED), PER LRS. Vs. G. SHASHIKALA (DIED), PER LRS., AND OTHERS ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Registration Act, 1908 — Sections 32, 33, 34 and 35 — Power of Attorney Holder presenting document for registration — A power of attorney holder who signs on behalf of a principal does not become the ‘executant’ under Section 32(a) but remains an agent under Section 32(c), requiring compliance with Sections 33, 34, and 35 and related rules.
India Law Library Docid # 2427851

(203) KRISHAN GOPAL Vs. GURMEET KAUR (DEAD), THROUGH LRS., AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Contract Law — Specific Performance — Agreement to Sell — Readiness and Willingness of Purchaser — Purchaser need not produce money or have a concluded finance scheme to prove readiness and willingness; it is inferred from conduct.
India Law Library Docid # 2427852

(204) PNB HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED Vs. SH. MANOJ SAHA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) — Section 17(4A) and Section 18 — Tenancy rights — Amendments to SARFAESI Act in 2016 allowing tenants to approach DRT — Right of appeal against DRT orders — High Courts should generally refrain from
India Law Library Docid # 2427853

(205) VIJAY KUMAR Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Central Bank of India (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995 — Regulation 33 — Compulsory retirement pension — Interpretation of clauses (1) and (2) — Held, both clauses must be read conjointly. Reduction of pension requires prior consultation with the Board of Directors.
India Law Library Docid # 2427854

(206) G. MOHANDAS Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 — Quashing of FIR — Dismissal of petition by High Court — Appeal against dismissal — Appellant sought quashing of FIR alleging criminal conspiracy with Municipal Corporation officials for illegal construction. Appellant claimed the original building collapsed due to heavy rain and the new construction was for rebuilding, and that regularization of the structure erased
India Law Library Docid # 2427855

(207) NEETHU B. @ NEETHU BABY MATHEW Vs. RAJESH KUMAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 137 — Review of Judgments — Scope of review is limited and requires substantial and compelling reasons such as discovery of new and important evidence, a mistake apparent on the face of the record, or any other sufficient reason — Review is not maintainable for repetition of old arguments, minor mistakes, or as a disguised appeal.
India Law Library Docid # 2427856

(208) L. MURUGANANTHAM Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Articles 14 and 21 — Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 — Sections 40, 45 — UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 2006 — Article 15 — Prisoners with disabilities — Duty of State — Ensuring dignity, accessibility, and protection — Systemic neglect and lack of adequate infrastructure as constitutional and statutory violations — Mandatory to
India Law Library Docid # 2427857

(209) JAYKISHOR CHATURVEDI & ETC. Vs. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
SEBI Act, 1992 — Section 28A — Income Tax Act, 1961 — Section 220(2) — Recovery of Penalties — Interest Levy — Section 220 of the IT Act, incorporated by Section 28A of SEBI Act, mandates payment of interest at 1% per month for unpaid demand — Adjudication order itself constitutes a valid demand, and interest accrues from expiry of prescribed payment period, not from subsequent demand notices.
India Law Library Docid # 2427858

(210) M/S TORINO LABORATORIES PVT. LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIAAND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 — Section 2A, 7A, 7I — Clubbing of establishments — Tests for clubbing — Unity of ownership, management and control, functional integrality, unity of finance, geographical proximity, unity of purpose, unity of labour, transferability of employees — Cumulative consideration of factors is crucial, not reliance on a single test —
India Law Library Docid # 2427859

(211) KATTAVELLAI @ DEVAKAR Vs. STATE OF TAMILNADU[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 15-07-2025
Criminal Law — Circumstantial Evidence — Requirements for conviction based on circumstantial evidence discussed — The circumstances must be fully established, consistent only with the guilt of the accused, of a conclusive nature, exclude every other hypothesis except the guilt of the accused, and form a chain so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the
India Law Library Docid # 2427860

(212) SURESH JATAV Vs. SUKHENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 168 — Compensation — Assessment of Income — Skilled Mason — In 2002, a skilled mason’s daily income of Rs. 200 leading to a monthly income of Rs. 6000 can be accepted — Considering a Coolie’s income of Rs. 4500 in 2004 and an estimated Rs. 500 annual increase for an unskilled worker, a skilled mason’s higher income is plausible and justified. (Paras 3, 6,
India Law Library Docid # 2427826

(213) MEENA (DEAD) REPRESENTED THR. LRS. Vs. PRAYAGRAJ AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Claims — Legal representatives — Right to pursue claim after death of injured claimant — Property under the Act includes the estate left behind by the deceased, having a wider connotation than its conventional definition — If legal heirs can pursue claims in case of death, there is no reason to prohibit legal representatives from pursuing claims for loss of a property akin to the estate of the
India Law Library Docid # 2427827

(214) THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. NIRU @ NIHARIKA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Compensation — Multiplier — Remarriage of widow — Effect on minor children’s entitlement — Minor children of the deceased are entitled to the multiplier adopted by the Tribunal despite the remarriage of the deceased’s wife, as their loss of dependency is not extinguished by the mother’s remarriage.
India Law Library Docid # 2427828

(215) MADHUKAR AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Inherent Power of High Court — Quashing of FIR — Effect of Compromise — Cases under Section 376 IPC (Rape) — While generally grave offenses like rape are not quashed on compromise, the Court’s power under Section 482 CrPC is broad and must be exercised based on the specific facts of each case to secure the ends of justice.
India Law Library Docid # 2427829

(216) SANJU BAI PRAJAPATI AND OTHERS Vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Motor Accident Claims — Proof of Accident and Vehicle Involvement — Delay in FIR — Significance of Murg Report — High Court’s dismissal of claim based on perceived inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony and delay in FIR registration is improper when a ‘Murg report’ (medical-legal report) on the same day establishes the accident.
India Law Library Docid # 2427830

(217) VIKRAM BHALCHANDRA GHONGADE Vs. THE HEADMISTRESS GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL AND JUNIOR COLLEGE, ANJI (MOTHI), TAH. AND DISTT. WARDHA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — Section 4(5) — Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Gratuity to teachers in aided schools — Applicability of Act of 1972 vs. Rules of 1982 — Aided school teachers, though not strictly government employees, are akin to them for monetary benefits due to government sanction of posts and payment of salaries and benefits — Rules of 1982 are more beneficial than
India Law Library Docid # 2427831

(218) PANDURANGAN Vs. T. JAYARAMA CHETTIAR AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Order 7, Rule 11 (d) — Rejection of plaint — Bar by law (Res Judicata) — Scope of inquiry — A plea of res judicata cannot be decided in an application under Order VII, Rule 11(d) CPC, as it requires consideration of previous pleadings, issues, and decisions, which goes beyond merely examining the averments in the plaint. The defence of the defendant and documents relied upon by him cannot be considered for rejecting a plaint under this rule.
India Law Library Docid # 2427832

(219) ARUN KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 — Section 14 — Jurisdiction — Petroleum Rules, 2002 — Scope of Challenge — Environmental Concerns — The NGT’s jurisdiction under Section 14 is primarily for environmental protection. Challenges to No Objection Certificates (NOCs) for petrol pumps based on environmental impact and siting criteria fall within its purview. However, the NGT found that challenges primarily centered on Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002, or other non
India Law Library Docid # 2427833

(220) UMEDRAJ JAIN Vs. V. SUDARSANAN[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 14-07-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Section 2(2) & Order 20 Rule 6 — Final Decree — Satisfaction — Power of Court to determine full and final satisfaction of a decree — Supreme Court, in an appeal, can order a lump sum payment as full and final settlement of all dues arising from a final decree, even if it modifies prior orders of lower courts, to end prolonged litigation and avoid wastage of time and resources.
India Law Library Docid # 2427834