(1) ASHWINKUMAR GOVINDBHAI PRAJAPATI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-06-2025 Criminal Procedure — Investigation — Summoning of Lawyers — Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), Section 179 — Evidence Act, 1872 — Section 126 (Corresponding to Section 132 of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) — Confidentiality of Client Communications — Professional Duty of Advocates — Whether Investigating Agencies can directly summon a lawyer for questioning related India Law Library Docid # 2427141
(2) WAZAHAT KHAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-06-2025 Criminal Procedure — Multiple FIRs/Complaints — Consolidation and Transfer — Interim Protection — The Petitioner, facing multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) and complaints across various states due to social media posts, sought consolidation of all cases and transfer to a neutral state for investigation, or alternative reliefs including a blanket prohibition on further cognizance/registration, and interim protection from coercive steps. The Court acknowledged the presence of multiple India Law Library Docid # 2427142
(3) KUNDAN SINGH Vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-06-2025 Criminal Procedure — Bail — Anticipatory Bail — Regular Bail — Conditions for bail — Voluntary offers of deposit by accused — Practice of making voluntary offers of substantial deposits to secure bail and then challenging conditions as onerous or counsel lacking authority is strongly deprecated — Such conduct forecloses merits-based consideration of bail and amounts to playing “ducks and drakes” with the Court India Law Library Docid # 2427144
(4) RENAVVA @ LAKSHMI AND OTHERS Vs. SHANTILKUMARSWAMY R. SUBRAMANYA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-06-2025 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Special Leave Petition — Interference by Supreme Court — When not to interfere — Where High Court's judgment is based on an established legal principle and factual analysis, and the Supreme Court finds no error or infirmity, a special leave petition will be dismissed for lack of merit. India Law Library Docid # 2427145
(5) SHAMBHU YADAV Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-06-2025 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 4 — Section 376 (3) IPC — Rape — Conviction upheld — Evidence of victim’s mother and medical evidence — Reliability of victim’s mother’s testimony confirmed despite lengthy cross-examination, finding it natural and trustworthy and corroborated by other witnesses and medical evidence — Medical evidence, though partially presented India Law Library Docid # 2427143
(6) AMLESH KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-06-2025 Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 341, 342, 323, 363, 364, 498(A), 504, 506 and 34 — Domestic Violence — Missing Person — Husband and Family Accused of Fouls Play — FIR Registered — Wife Allegedly Ran Away — Complaint Filed — Missing Person Not Found — Co-Accused Granted Bail — Appellant’s Bail Rejected Based on FIR Allegations and Co-Accused Confessional Statements — Appellant Approached High Court for Bail. India Law Library Docid # 2426540
(7) DHANYAM Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-06-2025 Kerala Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007 — Section 3 — Preventive Detention — “Notorious Goonda” — Threat to society at large — Justification for preventive detention — Power to be used sparingly and only in rare cases, as an exception to Article 21 of the Constitution — Extraordinary nature requires strict observance of procedural safeguards and demonstration of conformity with procedure established by law — Burden on detaining authority to prove justification — Preventive detention India Law Library Docid # 2426438
(8) THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. VINAY RAJASHEKHARAPPA KULKARNI[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-06-2025 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973— Section 439(2) — Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483(3) — Cancellation of bail — Jurisdiction of Trial Court (Court of Sessions) — Bail granted by Supreme Court — Trial Court declined to entertain CBI application for cancellation of bail granted by Supreme Court on grounds of maintainability and propriety — Erroneous view — Court of Sessions is entitled to entertain an application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) CrPC / 483(3 India Law Library Docid # 2426441
(9) M/S. BALAJI TRADERS Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-06-2025 Penal Code, 1860 — Section 387 — Putting person in fear of death or of grievous hurt, in order to commit extortion — Distinction from Section 384 (Punishment for extortion) — Essential ingredients of Section 387 are putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt in order to commit extortion — This is a stage prior to actual commission of extortion under Section 383/384 — Delivery of property or valuable security, though essential for Section 383 India Law Library Docid # 2426436
(10) ABHISHEK SINGH Vs. AJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-06-2025 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Quashing of FIR — Scope of High Court’s power — Determination of prima facie case confined to averments in FIR/complaint — Appreciation of defence evidence or undertaking mini-trial impermissible at initial stage — High Court cannot embark upon appreciation of evidence while considering quashing application — Quashing permissible only when allegations in FIR/charge-sheet do not India Law Library Docid # 2426437
(11) UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S KAMAKHYA TRANSPORT PVT. LTD. ETC.ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-06-2025 Railways Act, 1989 — Sections 66, 73, 78 & 54(1) — Carriage of goods — Misdeclaration of goods vs. Overloading of wagons — Punitive charges — Stage of imposing charges — Section 66, dealing with misdeclaration of goods, imposes a charge for materially false statements regarding goods description to determine carriage rate — Section 66 does not specify whether the charge must be made before or after delivery, implying permissibility at either stage, unlike Section 73 which specifically mandates r India Law Library Docid # 2426434
(12) VAIBHAV Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-06-2025 Criminal Law — Circumstantial Evidence — Admitted Facts — Cause of death by gunshot from a specific weapon in appellant’s home undisputed — Appellant admitted removing the body and cleaning the scene — Discovery of articles linked to the incident from appellant’s disclosure relevant for Section 201 IPC. India Law Library Docid # 2426342
(13) HARINAGAR SUGAR MILLS LTD. (BISCUIT DIVISION) AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-06-2025 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Section 25-O — Procedure for closing down an undertaking — Right to close down business is integral to right to carry on business under Article 19(1)(g) but subject to reasonable restrictions — Section 25-O provides a detailed procedure for obtaining prior permission for closure — Appropriate India Law Library Docid # 2426343
(14) NAGARAJAN Vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-06-2025 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 386(b)(iii) & 401 — Appellate Court Powers — Exercise of Revisional Powers — Scope Of — Appeal from conviction filed by accused — Enhancement Of sentence — High Court in appeal filed by accused, cannot, while affirming the conviction, enhance the sentence (Paras 9, India Law Library Docid # 2426344
(15) GHANSHYAM SONI Vs. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-06-2025 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 468 — Limitation for taking Cognizance — Computation of Limitation Period — Relevant Date — It is settled law that for computing the limitation period under Section 468 CrPC, the relevant date is the date of filing of the complaint or the date of institution of prosecution, not the date on which the Magistrate takes cognizance. (Paras 15, 16 India Law Library Docid # 2426345
(16) GREATER MOHALI AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMADA) THROUGH ITS ESTATE OFFICER (H) Vs. ANUPAM GARG ETC.[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 04-06-2025 Consumer Protection Act, 1986 / Consumer Protection Law — Delay in delivery of possession — Allottee’s remedies — Developer’s liability — Refund of amount paid with interest and compensation — Where the developer has received full price but fails to deliver possession within the stipulated or reasonable time, or cancels/refuses possession without justifiable cause, the allottee is entitled India Law Library Docid # 2426439
(17) MACHHINDRANATH S/O KUNDLIK TARADE DECEASED THROUGH LRS Vs. RAMCHANDRA GANGADHAR DHAMNE AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-06-2025 Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Sections 47, 48(a), 48(c), 48(d), 48(e) & 48(g) — Charge on immovable property of members borrowing from societies — Restriction on alienation of charged property — Void transactions — Interpretation of ‘void’ under Section 48(e) — Member creating declaration of charge on land in favour of society for loan — Subsequent alienation of such charged land without repaying loan and obtaining necessary sanction/release from society — Such alienation declar India Law Library Docid # 2426254
(18) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERS Vs. PANKAJ BABULAL KOTECHA AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 30-05-2025 Environmental Law — Public Trust Doctrine — Sustainable Development — Balancing ecological preservation and development for public welfare — Recreational park developed on alleged historical water body — Whether park developed by MCGM on land allegedly incorporating a historical lake should be demolished and lake restored, or development preserved considering utility and time lapse — High Court’s reasoning in directing restoration based on public trust doctrine and retrospective sanction invalid India Law Library Docid # 2426199
(19) KAMLA NEHRU MEMORIAL TRUST AND ANOTHER Vs. U.P. STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 30-05-2025 Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC) — Allotment of Industrial Land — Cancellation of Allotment — Legality of — Public Trust Doctrine — Principles of transparency and accountability — Respondent Corporation initially allotted a substantial tract of industrial land (125 acres) to Appellant Trust in a swift manner for floriculture purposes — Allotment conditioned on timely payments and execution of lease deed — Appellant Trust defaulted on payments and failed to submit d India Law Library Docid # 2426200
(20) CHETAN Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 30-05-2025 Criminal Law — Circumstantial Evidence — Principles — Admissibility and Evaluation — Five golden principles for cases based on circumstantial evidence reiterated: (1) circumstances establishing conclusion of guilt must be fully established; (2) facts established consistent only with hypothesis of guilt; (3) circumstances conclusive in nature; (4) exclude every possible hypothesis except guilt; (5) complete chain of evidence leaving no reasonable ground for innocence — Each circumstance must be i India Law Library Docid # 2426201