(981) SRIRAM GANGAJAMUNA AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 We only clarify that the order of status quo dated 27.07.2022 will not stand in the way of applications made by respondent-State for approval of the revised DPR which involves consumption of three TMC per day being considered by the Godawari River Management Board or any other competent authority strictly in accordance with law. India Law Library Docid # 1602631
(982) REEPAK KANSAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 Pursuant to the order dated 09.12.2022, a detailed report has been submitted by the Registry in which it is stated that a Delhi Government Health Centre is in existence in the Low Security zone of the Main Campus of Supreme Court of India for extending medical facilities including emergency response mechanism to advocates, litigants and others. It is further stated that at present, 2 Doctors, 1 Sr. Pharmacy Officer, 1 Pharmacist, 1 ANM and 1 Nursing Orderly are available in the said Centre. It i India Law Library Docid # 1602632
(983) UNION OF INDIA Vs. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. India Law Library Docid # 1602633
(984) AMD INDUSTRIES LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S. ASHOKA METAL DÉCOR PRIVATE LIMITED) Vs. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, LUCKNOW AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Section 4-A(5) - Exemption - Product manufactured on use of modern and/or advanced technology cannot be said to be manufacturing the different goods for claiming the exemption from payment of trade tax. India Law Library Docid # 1602517
(985) STATE BANK OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. KAMAL KISHORE PRASAD [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 State Bank of India Officers Service Rules, 1992 - Rule 19(3) - Dismissal from Service - Order of Appointing Authority dismissing the respondent from service after granting opportunity of hearing to the respondent was in consonance with the direction given by this Court and could not be said to be arbitrary illegal or in violation of Rule 19(3) of the Rules - Impugned order of the High Court setting aside the order of dismissal being under misconception of facts and law deserves to be quashed an India Law Library Docid # 1602518
(986) THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has put up a proposal for changes in the 'manner and mode of advertisement’, exhibited on the buses of the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation. India Law Library Docid # 1602622
(987) ANOOP BARANWAL AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 The petitioners, who appear in-person, seek to challenge the constitution of the Committee on the Uniform Civil Code set up by the State of Uttarakhand. According to the petitioners, in view of the Directive Principles of State Policy (Article 44 of the Constitution) such a Committee can only be set up by the Union Government. India Law Library Docid # 1602623
(988) STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE Vs. M. MARIDOSS AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 14.12.2021 passed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court in Crl.O.P. No. 19872 of 2021, by which the High Court has allowed the said application filed by the accused under Section 482, CrPC and caused the criminal proceedings for the offences under Sections 124A, 153A, 504, 505(1)(b) and 505(2) of the IPC, the State has preferred the present appeal. India Law Library Docid # 1602626
(989) INDIAN EX SERVICEMEN MOVEMENT (AN ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF MILITARY VETERANS ORGANISATION REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY) AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF EXSERVICEMEN WELFARE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE SECRETARY AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 Mr N Venkataramani, Attorney General for India states that the tabulation for nearly 25 lakh defence pensioners has been completed by the Controller General of Defence Accounts (CGDA), Allahabad. The tabulation shall now be processed by the Controller of Defence Accounts (CDA) and will be considered by the Ministry of Defence. India Law Library Docid # 1602627
(990) THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL Vs. TAPAS GHOSH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-01-2023 We are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India as after recording reasons for maintainability, all that is happened is that only notice has been issued in the matter as yet and it is open for the petitioner-State to defend the case on merits. India Law Library Docid # 1602628
(991) THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION BENGALURU Vs. BARUN MITRA AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-01-2023 It is towards that objective that he submits that out of the 104 recommendations made by the Collegiums of the High Courts pending with the Government, 44 are likely to be processed and sent to the Supreme Court by the week end. India Law Library Docid # 1602542
(992) S. RAJASEEKARAN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-01-2023 Section 136A has made provisions for the electronic monitoring and enforcement of road safety on national highways, state highways, roads or in any urban city within a State. Pursuant to the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 136A, Rules have been framed by the Central Government. The rules have come into force on 11 August 2021. India Law Library Docid # 1602547
(993) SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY AND ANOTHER Vs. UNION OF INDIA [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-01-2023 Since several writ petitions are pending before diverse High Courts involving the same question, we are of the considered view that they should be transferred to and decided by this Court. India Law Library Docid # 1602638
(994) THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA Vs. R. HAMBERLY WAHLANG AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-01-2023 A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was entered into between the State of Assam and the State of Meghalaya on 29 March 2022 after a meeting of the Chief Ministers of the two States. The agreement has been signed by the Chief Ministers of Assam and Meghalaya in the presence of the Union Minister of Home Affairs. India Law Library Docid # 1602541
(995) M/S USS ALLIANCE Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 06-01-2023 This Court in SLP (C) No. 20195/2017 titled “M/S Ved Prakash Mithal and Sons Vs. Union of India” decided on 08.08.2018 has interpreted Section 34 (3) with reference to Section 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 India Law Library Docid # 1602624
(996) TATA SONS PVT LTD (FORMERLY TATA SONS LTD) Vs. SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDINGS LTD AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2023 The applicant Tata Sons Pvt Ltd is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act 1913. The first respondent, Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd is a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1956 with a registered office at Chennai. The second respondent, C Sivasankaran, who is the promoter of the first respondent is a resident of Seychelles. India Law Library Docid # 1867873
(997) RAJKUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2023 In these proceedings, the specific cause for the Miscellaneous Application is that despite the previous orders of this Court, the case for remission/pre-mature release of fifty convicts has not been considered by the competent authority in the State of Uttar Pradesh. India Law Library Docid # 1602546
(998) BASAVARAJ Vs. PADMAVATHI AND ANOTHERR [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2023 Suit for Specific Performance - Unless the plaintiff was called upon to produce the passbook either by the defendant or, the Court orders him to do so, no adverse inference can be drawn - High Court has materially erred in quashing and setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Trial Court by reversing the findings on the readiness and willingness of the plaintiff. India Law Library Docid # 1602485
(999) K. SREEDHAR Vs. M/S RAUS CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2023 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) - Section 31(i) - Possession and Auction - Only in a case where the secured property is actually put to use as agricultural land and solely on the basis of the revenue records / Pattadar and once the secured property is put as a security by way of mortgage etc. meaning thereby the same was not treated as agricultural land, such properties cannot be said to be exempted from the provisio India Law Library Docid # 1602482
(1000) M/S SIDHA NEELKANTH PAPER INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. PRUDENT ARC LIMITED AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 05-01-2023 Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI) - Section 18 - Pre-deposit - Whether, while calculating the amount to be deposited as pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 50% of which amount the borrower is required to deposit as pre-deposit? - Held, As per Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, any person aggrieved, by any order made by the DRT under section 17 India Law Library Docid # 1602483