(901) SANJIV KUMAR SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023 Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel for the respondents and perused the petition papers. India Law Library Docid # 1602678
(902) COMMON CAUSE (A REGD. SOCIETY) Vs. UNION OF INDIA INDIAN SOCIETY OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE - APPLICANT[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023 Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21 - Passive Euthanasia - Right to die with dignity is a fundamental right - Procedure/guidelines for executing Living Will/Advance Directive/Advance Care Directive/Advance Medical Directive in the judgement of Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. Union of India and Another (2018) 5 SCC 1 is require to be modified or deleted - Modifications/Deletion : India Law Library Docid # 1602657
(903) HITESH @ BAVKO SHIVSHANKAR DAVE Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023 On 16 July 2002, the petitioner was convicted, with the co-accused, of an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life. India Law Library Docid # 1602696
(904) ARJUN (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER Vs. CONSORTIUM OF NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITIES AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023 The petitioner, a young boy of 17 years, belonging to the OBC category (non-creamy layer) obtained an All India Rank (general) 481 and All India Rank (OBC) of 30 in CLAT 2023 UG examination. However, he made a crucial mistake while filling the form- he informed that he belonged to the creamy layer even though he uploaded his certificate of OBC where it was stipulated that he was not a part of the creamy layer. This mistake has caused the candidate heavily as despite his merit, if he is treated a India Law Library Docid # 1602697
(905) SHRI DILIP K. BASU Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-01-2023 Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned amicus curiae, in response to the queries of the Court, has submitted that he would be filing a comprehensive chart/note with reference to the directions hitherto issued by this Court and in regard to the directions as being further sought in this matter. India Law Library Docid # 1602700
(906) E. JEEVANANDAM Vs. N. KOTESWARA RAO AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-01-2023 The petitioner was the Chairperson of the erstwhile Maduravoyal Town Panchayat. On 28 November 2001, during his tenure as Chairperson, a resolution was passed by the local body to provide sewerage facilities to the area enclosing a list of streets in which ward No 147 of Rukmani Nagar Road, Chennai was included. A scheme was prepared in terms of the request made by the local body. India Law Library Docid # 1862513
(907) CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Vs. ANIL VASANTRAO DESHMUKH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-01-2023 Since the observations in the impugned order of the High Court are confined to the question as to whether the respondent was entitled to the grant of bail, we clarify that these observations shall be construed only for that purpose. In other words, the observations shall not affect the merits of the trial or be pressed in any other collateral proceedings. India Law Library Docid # 1602680
(908) ANADI DIXIT Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-01-2023 The present petition has been brought by the father of a girl student who was enrolled in an educational institution pursuing MBBS course. She died an unnatural death on 5th September 2017. The writ petitioner had lodged the First Information Report with jurisdictional police station in the same district on 11th September 2017. charge-sheet was submitted in connection with the said complaint. In the charge-sheet, two persons were arraigned as accused for commission of offences under Section 306/ India Law Library Docid # 1602675
(909) ADVOCATE UNION FOR DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE Vs. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-01-2023 We are not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution. India Law Library Docid # 1602693
(910) PRATAP BABURAO PANDIT Vs. UNION OF INDIA [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-01-2023 We are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India as what is being sought is the quashing of the appointment and functioning of the new Commission vide Gazette Notification dated 06.10.2022. India Law Library Docid # 1602694
(911) M.R. AJAYAN Vs. M/S COCHIN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-01-2023 Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having perused the material placed on record, we do not find any reason to entertain this petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. India Law Library Docid # 1602695
(912) THE ESI CORPORATION Vs. M/S. RADHIKA THEATRE [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 - Section 1(6) - Demand notice - Sub-section (6) of Section 1 therefore, shall be applicable even with respect to those establishments, established prior to 31.03.1989/20.10.1989 and the ESI Act shall be applicable irrespective of the number of persons employed or notwithstanding that the number of persons employed at any time falls below the limit specified by or under the ESI Act. India Law Library Docid # 1602604
(913) MANUBHAI SENDHABHAI BHARWAD AND ANOTHER Vs. OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 300A - Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 35 - Temporary acquisition - If the land is continued to be under temporary acquisition for number of years, meaning and purpose of temporary acquisition would lose its significance India Law Library Docid # 1602605
(914) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER Vs. RATI RAM AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - Relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Pune Municipal Corporation and Anr. Vs. Harakchand Misirimal Solanki and Ors., (2014) 3 SCC 183, the High Court has allowed the writ petition and has declared that the acquisition with respect to the land in question is deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the India Law Library Docid # 1602609
(915) GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER Vs. MANJEET SINGH ANAND AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Subsequent purchaser has no locus to challenge the acquisition / lapse of acquisition - High Court has committed a very serious error in entertaining the writ petition - Impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is unsustainable and the same deserves to be quashed and set aside and is accordingly quashed and set aside. India Law Library Docid # 1602596
(916) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SHAKUNTLA DEVI AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 31(1) - Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - In case a person has been tendered the compensation as provided under Section 31(1) of the 1894 Act, it is not open to him to claim that acquisition has lapsed under Section 24(2) due to non-payment or non-deposit of compensation in court. India Law Library Docid # 1602597
(917) MAHANADI COALFIELDS LIMITED Vs. STATE OF ODISHA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 - Section 2(d), 11, 13 and 18(a) - Payment to State Governments in lieu of royalty - State being person interested in the land shall be entitled to the compensation/rental over and the amount of royalty leviable/payable under Section 18(a) of the Act, 1957 - Section 13 provides for compensation for prospecting licences ceasing to have effect, rights under mining leases being acquired. India Law Library Docid # 1602598
(918) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. RAJESH DUA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - Compensation with respect to the land in question was deposited in the Reference Court in the year 1967 and that between 1967 and 2017, nothing is on record to show that the writ petitioners were praying and/or a grievance was made by the original landowners with respect to nonpayment of compensation and that the possessi India Law Library Docid # 1602599
(919) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. ASHA PRAKASH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - Subsequent purchaser has no locus to challenge the acquisition / lapse of acquisition - High Court has committed a grave error in entertaining the writ petition preferred by the respondent, who is a subsequent purchaser praying for deemed lapse of acquisition - Impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is unsus India Law Library Docid # 1602600
(920) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SHYAMO AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 20-01-2023 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Appeal against - When the possession of the land in question was taken over by drawing the panchnama and preparing the possession proceedings and the same was handed over to the DDA and that the original writ petitioner was not the recorded owner and therefore there was no question of tendering any compensation to him at the relevant time India Law Library Docid # 1602601