(901) UTTAM KUMAR SHAW Vs. PARTHA SARATHI SEN AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-09-2022 Heard Mr. Jayanth Nath, learned senior counsel for the appellant. Neither the counsel for the High Court nor that of the contesting respondents would want to make their submissions. While the counsel for the High Court submitted that any decision of this Court would be duly implemented, it is the say of the counsel for the contesting respondents that they have no desire to pursue the matter further. Counsel for the State have stated that appropriate orders may be passed based on the position it India Law Library Docid # 1602082
(902) RAMDEV AGRAWAL AND OTHERS Vs. RAJKISHORE AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-09-2022 The appellant is before this Court seeking enhancement of the compensation as against the amount awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short "MACT") through the award dated 18.10.2004, which was marginally enhanced by the High Court through its judgment dated 14.03.2016. Keeping in view the fact that the issues relating to the accident having occurred on 08.9.1999 and the wife of the first claimant who is the mother of the claimants 2 and 3 had died in the said accident is not in di India Law Library Docid # 1854897
(903) SMT. YASHODAMMA S. Vs. REGIONAL MANAGER RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LIMITED AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-09-2022 Through the said judgment and order, the High Court has reduced the compensation to Rs. 19,74,000/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Seventy Four Thousand Only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum as against the sum of Rs. 33,65,000/- (Rupees Thirty Three Lakhs Sixty Five Thousand Only) with interest at the rate of 8% per annum awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal ('MACT' for short). India Law Library Docid # 1854898
(904) BAJAJ AUTO LIMITED Vs. AJANTA PRESS AND MECHANICAL WORKS AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-09-2022 Aggrieved by a common order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, in two writ petitions, one filed by the appellant herein and another filed by the 1st respondent herein, setting aside an order passed by the Facilitation Council under The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the 'MSMED Act') and remanding the matter back to the Facilitation Council for a fresh inquiry, the buyer has come up with the above appeal. India Law Library Docid # 1846110
(905) KALLOO Vs. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 13-09-2022 The appellants are the legal representatives of the original claimant who had filed a claim petition under Sec. 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation on account of the death of Sushil Kumar in a motor accident. The said Sushil Kumar (for short the deceased) was the son of the original claimant Kalloo. India Law Library Docid # 1846950
(906) VINOD KATARA Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2022 Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 136 - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 - Section 7A - Plea of juvenility could be raised in any court, at any stage even after the final disposal of the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution. India Law Library Docid # 1602061
(907) MOHAMMAD LATIEF MAGREY Vs. THE UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2022 Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21 - Hyderpora encounter - Right to dignity and fair treatment under Article 21 of the Constitution is not only available to a living man but also to his body after his death - Even a dead person has the right of treatment to his body with respect and dignity which he would have deserved had he been alive, subject to his tradition, culture and religion which he professed - These rights are not only for the deceased but, his family members also have a right t India Law Library Docid # 1602062
(908) YASHODA (ALIAS SODHAN) Vs. SUKHWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2022 The appeal challenges the judgment dated 28th January 2009 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Regular Second Appeal No. 3205 of 2007 (O&M), thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the present appellant. India Law Library Docid # 1602063
(909) LAXMI GUPTA AND ANOTHER Vs. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2022 The above-stated appeal was filed by respondent No.1 - Insurance Company against the Award dated 18.08.2005, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gorakhpur (for short, 'the Tribunal') whereby compensation of Rs.6,21,400/- along with 6% monthly interest was awarded to the appellants/claimants. India Law Library Docid # 1854899
(910) O. PANNEERSELVAM Vs. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER CUM SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2022 The notice under Section 145(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, South Division, Chennai dated 11 July 2022 relied upon an FIR in Crime No 190 of 2022 registered at E2 Royapettah Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 324, 326 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 read with Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act 1992. The notice states that: India Law Library Docid # 1846103
(911) KARSHAKA SHABDAM Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2022 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has accepted that this draft Notification was followed by subsequent draft Notification dated 06.07.2022. He further submits that his client has already raised objections to said draft Notification dated 06.07.2022 and the final Notification is yet to be issued. India Law Library Docid # 1846104
(912) SUNIL KUMAR VERMA Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2022 By the said writ petition, the appellant had challenged the letter No. 23842/Admn (Selection & Appointment Cell) PF (VIII). XIX-78-2016 dated 18th May 2020 and letter No. 24973/Admn (Selection & Appointment Cell) PF (VIII). XIX- 78-2016 dated 1st June 2020 issued by the High Court of Judicature at Patna, thereby calling upon the appellant to show cause as to why his services from the post of Additional District and Sessions Judge should not be terminated in view of the judgment of this Court in India Law Library Docid # 1846108
(913) M/S SHREE ENTERPRISE COAL SALES PVT LTD Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 12-09-2022 The appellant is a private limited company with a Head Office in Kolkata and branches in other States, including Uttar Pradesh. The branch in Uttar Pradesh is situated in the District of Bulandshahar and is registered since 18 July 2001. The appellant is involved in the trading of coal which it obtains from e-auctions conducted, inter alia, by the subsidiaries of Coal India Limited. The appellant has stated that after purchasing coal from the second respondent, Northern Coal Fields Limited, thro India Law Library Docid # 1846109
(914) JOSEPH JOHNSON N. MAITHKURI Vs. SUBRAHMANYA AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-09-2022 Criminal Law - Cancellation of bail - Grounds on which the said coaccused was released on bail and the grounds on which the present respondent is released on bail are same - Once the bail in favour of coaccused has been cancelled by this Court, the bail in the present case also requires to be cancelled - Bail cancelled. India Law Library Docid # 1602058
(915) CHANDIGARH NURSING HOME AND ANOTHER Vs. SUKHDEEP KAUR [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-09-2022 Medical negligence - Reduction of compensation - Wrong diagnosis and wrong treatment, which led to rashes on the body of the complainant-girl - National Commission has enhanced the amount of compensation from Rs. 1 lakh awarded by the District Forum to Rs. 10 lakhs - Amount of compensation varies from person to person, looking to the damages and/or disability suffered/sustained - Merely because in some cases, the amount of compensation has been enhanced, in other cases, the amount of compensatio India Law Library Docid # 1602059
(916) KETAN KANTILAL SETH Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-09-2022 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 406 - Transfer of 16 Criminal Cases Pending in Four Different States to one Court in Mumbai, where 3 cases are already pending - An approach taken by High Court is primafacie amounts to differential treatment, causing serious prejudice to the right of fair trial of other accused persons including the petitioner India Law Library Docid # 1602060
(917) STATE OF JHARKHAND Vs. SALAUDDIN KHAN [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-09-2022 The appellant - State of Jharkhand has challenged the order dated 08.02.2021 whereby the respondent was ordered to be released on bail. The appellant has also challenged order dated 26.03.2021 whereby on an application moved for modification of order dated 08.02.2021, the bail condition regarding grant of interim compensation has been clarified to the extent that the same was to be given to only one victim. India Law Library Docid # 1854659
(918) BHAGAT SINGH AND OTHERS Vs. INDER PAL SINGH AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-09-2022 The challenge in the present appeal is to an order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 26.03.2019 whereby an enhanced sum of Rs.6,98,992/- was awarded to the appellants as compared to Rs.4,15,000/- awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. India Law Library Docid # 1854881
(919) VISHWANATH PRATAP SINGH Vs. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-09-2022 The challenge in the present special leave petition is to an order passed by the High Court of Delhi on 10.06.2022 whereby a writ petition filed by the petitioner claiming a mandamus to decide the candidature of the petitioner to file his nomination for Rajya Sabha Elections 2022, was dismissed. India Law Library Docid # 1846105
(920) LINET NUNES Vs. GOA COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 09-09-2022 Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, learned senior Advocate for the appellant, has invited our attention to certain documents to submit that the structure in Survey No.42/10 was in existence prior to the year 1991. He has further submitted that his client stands by the statement recorded by the National Green Tribunal in paragraph 8 of its Order to the effect that only Survey No.42/10 belongs to the appellant and other structures do not belong to him. India Law Library Docid # 1846116