ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :34.207.247.69
Latest Cases

(61) KEWAL KRISHAN Vs. RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS ETC. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-11-2021
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 54 - Sale deed - Order of Joint possession - Appeal against - No evidence was adduced by respondents about the payment of the price mentioned in the sale deeds as well as the earning capacity at the relevant time of his wife and minor sons - Hence, the sale deeds will have to be held as void being executed without consideration - Hence, the sale deeds did not affect in any manner one half share of the appellant in the suit properties- In fact, such a tran

(62) ARVIND KUMAR @ NEMICHAND AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-11-2021
A. Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 96 to 102 - Private defence - A private defence need not be set up in a particular manner - Such a private defence need not be confined to the individual accused alone, to be applied to the others. Though the initial onus is on the accused to satisfy the court, the extent of evidence is that of preponderance of probabilities. Thereafter, the onus shifts. Once a private defence is accepted, there are two questions alone to the answered by the court, namely, th

(63) JYOTI JAISWAL Vs. NEERAJ KUMAR GUPTA [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-11-2021
This transfer petition has been filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of Divorce Petition No. 10/2017 titled as "Neeraj Kumar Gupta vs. Smt. Jyoti Jaiswal" filed by the respondent-husband in the Court of Ld. Additional District & Session Judge, Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan to the competent Court at Ghazipur, UP.

(64) MAMTA Vs. KAILASH CHAND AGRAWAL [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-11-2021
This petition has filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure ,1908 by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of Divorce case No. 94 of 2018 titled as "Shri Kailash Chand Agrawal Vs. Smt. Mamta" under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

(65) RACHNA Vs. ASHOK [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-11-2021
This petition has filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of HMA No. 67 of 2019 titled as "Ashok vs. Rachna Devi” under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in the Court of Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ambah, M.P. to the Learned Family Court, Saket, New Delhi.

(66) SAMI ULLAH AND OTHERS ETC. Vs. ZULFIKAR NASIR AND OTHERS ETC. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Grant of Bail - To attend marriage ceremony of daughter - Marriage of the daughter of the appellant is to be performed on 22.11.2021 and that he has no objection if appropriate directions are issued to enable the appellant to attend the marriage ceremony of his daughter

(67) UNION OF INDIA Vs. MANRAJ ENTERPRISES [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 37 - General Conditions of Contract - Clause 16(2) - Pendente lite and future interest - In view of clause 16(2) of the GCC, the arbitrator could not have awarded the interest, pendente lite or future interest on the amount due and payable to the contractor under the contract - Arbitrator in the instant case has erred in awarding pendente lite and future interest on the amount due and payable to the contractor under the contract in questio

(68) VEENA PANDEY Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948 - Section 3-E - Pensionary benefits - Coal Mines Pension Scheme, 1998 was framed as a measure of social security for ensuring socio-economic justice for the employees in the coal sector under the powers conferred by Section 3-E of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1948

(69) SMT. MEENA PAWAIA AND OTHERS Vs. ASHRAF ALI AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Section 168 - Motor Accident Death - Enhancement of compensation - Determination of future economic loss - In case deceased who was not serving at the time of death and had no income at the time of death, their legal heirs shall also be entitled to future prospects by adding future rise in income - Claimants shall be entitled to future economic loss at Rs.14,000/­ per month - The deceased at the time of accident was aged between 21­22 years

(70) RISHIPAL SINGH SOLANKI Vs. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 302 and 34 - Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 - Section 94 - Juvenile delinquent - Appeal against - Presumption and determination of age - Incident occurred on 05.05.2020 - Thus accused was only 15 years 7 months of age on the date of the incident which in any case is less than 16 years of age

(71) ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA AND ANOTHER Vs. SATISH AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 7 - Sexual assault - Skin-to-skin contact not essential for POCSO offence - Most important ingredient for constituting the offence of sexual assault under Section 7 of the Act is the "sexual intent" and not the "skin to skin" contact with the child:

(72) TEJINDER KUMAR JOLLY AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 - Environmental and pollution - Adherence to the environmental and pollution norms cannot be compromised for factual misunderstandings or due to cryptic determination:

(73) M/S. NARINDER SINGH AND SONS Vs. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER - II, NORTHERN RAILWAY, FEROZEPUR DIVISION, FEROZEPUR [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 18, 19, 24, 25, 29A, 34 and 37 - Appointment of arbitrator for adjudication of disputes - Contract for additional washing line to accommodate 26 coaches at Railway Station - Termination - Non-performance and repeated lapses

(74) STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED Vs. GOURI DEVI [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Service Law - Compassionate appointment - Delay and laches - Appointment on compassionate ground is an exception to general rule that appointment to public office should be made on the basis of competitive merits - Once it is proved that in spite of the death of the breadwinner, the family survived and substantial period is over, there is no need to make appointment on compassionate ground at the cost of the interests of several others ignoring the mandate of Article 14 of the Constitution - App

(75) STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS Vs. PANKAJ KUMAR [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Uttar Pradesh (Civil Police) Constable and Head Constable Rules, 2008 - Police Constables Recruitment - There is no bar in intimating the candidates through SMS, more particularly when large number of candidates had to appear in the subsequent process and majority of the candidates have appeared for document verification and physical fitness test pursuant to intimation by SMS.

(76) NATIONAL CONFEDERATION OF OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL PUBLIC SECTOR ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
A. Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32 - Summary dismissal of an earlier petition under Article 32 of the Constitution does not bar the present writ petition on grounds of res judicata as there has been no substantive decision on the merits of the issues.

(77) THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Vs. ASHISH AWASTHI [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Service Law - Compassionate appointment - Policy scheme - Deceased employee died on 08.10.2015. At the time of death, he was working as a work charge employee, who was paid the salary from the contingency fund - As per the policy/circular prevalent at the time of the death of the deceased employee, i.e., policy/circular No.C-3- 12/2013/1-3 dated 29.09.2014 in case of death of the employee working on work charge, his dependents/heirs were not entitled to the appointment on compassionate ground an

(78) SAGAR LOLIENKAR Vs. THE STATE OF GOA AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 279 and 304A - Rash and negligent driving on a public street and act unfortunately resulted in the loss of the precious human life - There was no allegation against the appellant that at the time of accident, he was under the influence of liquor or any other substance impairing his driving skills - It was a rash and negligent act simplicitor and not a case of driving in an inebriated condition which is, undoubtedly despicable aggravated offence warranting strict

(79) PREETI ALOK SINGH Vs. ALOK ANIL SINGH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 406 - Application seeking withdrawal of Transfer Petitions - Transfer Petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn.

(80) JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY Vs. CRESCENT EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 18-11-2021
Education - Affiliation and Admission - It is all the more necessary for the Universities to conduct the process of affiliation with scrupulous care in order to ensure that the interest of students is not imperilled.

IP Address :34.207.247.69