ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :34.207.247.69
Latest Cases

(41) HARI AND ANOTHER Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 26-11-2021
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 201, 302, 323 and 324 - Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(3)(10) - Honour killing - Hostile witnesses - Criminal trial - Credible evidence even of a hostile witnesses can form the basis for conviction in a criminal trial

(42) L & T FINANCE LIMITED Vs. PRAMOD KUMAR RANA AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-11-2021
Consumer Complaint - Anybody has tried to pressurize the original complainant and pressurized him to enter into settlement and any threatening visits were made to the residence of the original complainant, further order can be passed by the National Commission

(43) STATE OF HARYANA Vs. HARNAM SINGH (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-11-2021
Succession Act, 1925 - Section 63 - Execution of unprivileged Wills - Formulating question of law - Opinion of the High Court was that the Will was proved in terms of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and while coming to such finding the High Court went deep into factual inquiry. It is evident from the judgment under appeal that the formulation of the question of law was on question of fact only

(44) AKKAMMA AND OTHERS Vs. VEMAVATHI AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 25-11-2021
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34 and 63 - Possession of the suit property was not established by the plaintiffs and hence injunctive relief could not be granted - Declaration of ownership of property - Discretion in granting declaratory decree on ownership cannot be exercised by the Court to deny such relief on the sole ground that the original plaintiff has failed to establish his case on further or consequential relief - Plaintiffs were not entitled to injunctive relief as prayed for an

(45) STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. BABLU @ OM PRAKASH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-11-2021
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 450, 452, 302 and 307 - Murder - Appeal against order of acquittal of 11 accused persons - Testimony of witness - Even the version of a single witness, if his testimony is found reliable by the Court, can be the foundation of the order of conviction

(46) AVNEESH CHANDAN GADGIL AND ANOTHER Vs. ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-11-2021
Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Section 30 - Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5 - Appeal against the order of Recovery Officer

(47) DEVENDER BHASKAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 24-11-2021
Service Law - Appointment - Arts and Crafts Teachers in State of Haryana - Whether the diploma in Art and Craft by Kurukshetra University through distance education is recognized by the Haryana Education Department as an equivalent qualification to the diploma in Art and Craft Examination conducted by the Haryana Industrial Training Department

(48) VIRAM @ VIRMA Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - 147, 149, 302, 325, 324 and 323 - Murder - Voluntarily causing hurt - Reduction of sentence - There is a contradiction between the oral testimony of the witnesses and the medical evidence

(49) ANIL KUMAR SOTI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH COLLECTOR BIJNORE (U.P.) [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4 and 18 - Land Acquisition - Determination of Market Value/Compensation - High Court has determined the compensation at Rs.7,100/- per acre - Appeal against - While determining the market value/compensation, previous instances of acquisition in proximity for location and potential of land acquisition along with cumulative increase is relevant consideration

(50) STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS Vs. SAKHI BEWA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 30.07.2009 passed by the High Court of Orissa in OJC No. 4048 of 1994 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred by the respondents herein - original writ petitioners

(51) STATE OF U.P. Vs. CHUNNI LAL AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Service Law - Appointment - Two persons cannot be directed to be appointed to a single post.

(52) UTTAR PRADESH FOREST CORPORATION LUCKNOW AND OTHERS Vs. VIJAY KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHER [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Service Law - Charge of causing loss - Recovery - Whether the High Court ought to have maintained the punishment order for recovery of Rs.2,46,922.56, which was also held to be proved by the Enquiry Officer

(53) HAMID ALI KHAN (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5A and 17(4) - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 106 - Special powers in cases of urgency - When a challenge is made to the invocation of power under Section 17 (4) the writ applicant cannot succeed on bare and bald assertions - Facts which are specifically within the exclusive knowledge of the state must be laid before the court on the basis of the principle in Section 106 of the Evidence Act

(54) STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANOTHER Vs. NATIONAL SOUTH INDIAN RIVER INTERLINKING AGRICULTURIST ASSOCIATION [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 - Tamil Nadu Government scheme - Loan waiver to small and marginal farmers - Scheme in issue was introduced in pursuance of an electoral promise made by the then party in power in Tamil Nadu

(55) AVNI PRAKASH Vs. NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY (NTA) AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Rights of Persons with Disability Act, 2016 - Sections 2(r) and 17(i) - Persons with Disabilities - Examinations - Relaxation - National Testing Agency (NTA), as an examining body, was bound to scrupulously enforce the Guidelines for Written Examinations which provides for specific relaxations - NTA must remember that all authority under the law is subject to responsibility, and above all, to a sense of accountability.

(56) TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED Vs. VISHAL GHISULAL JAIN, RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL, SK WHEELS PRIVATE LIMITED [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 60(5)(c) - Residuary jurisdiction of the NCLT cannot be invoked if the termination of a contract is based on grounds unrelated to the insolvency of the Corporate Debtor

(57) PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANOTHER Vs. BAL KRISHAN SHARMA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 23-11-2021
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Section 79 - Punjab State Electricity Board Service of Engineers (Civil) Recruitment Regulations, 1965 - Regulation 17 - Pay scale of next higher post

(58) GYAN PRAKASH ARYA Vs. M/S TITAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-11-2021
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 33, 34 and 37 - Modification of Original award - No arithmetical and/or clerical error in original award - Original award was passed considering the claim made by the claimant as per its original claim and as per the statement of the claim made and therefore subsequently allowing the application under Section 33 of the 1996 Act to modify the original award in exercise of powers under Section 33 of the 1996 Act is not sustainable - Only in a case

(59) STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS Vs. VIKASH KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-11-2021
Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Relaxation in Qualifying Service for Promotion Rules, 2006 - Rule 4 - Promotion - Relaxation in qualifying service - Relaxation cannot be prayed as a matter of right - High Court while quashing and setting aside the eligibility lists has issued the writ of mandamus commanding or directing the competent authority to grant relaxation in qualifying service, which as such was permissible under Rule 4 of the Relaxation Rules, 2006 - Word used in the Rule 4 of Relaxati

(60) STATE OF M.P. Vs. GHISILAL [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 22-11-2021
Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 10, 10(1) and 10(3) - Suit for declaration and permanent injunction - Jurisdiction of civil courts - Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 is a self-contained Code - Various provisions of the Act make it clear that if any orders are passed by the competent authority, there is provision for appeal, revision before the designated appellate and revisional authorities - In view of such remedies available for aggrieved parties, the juri

IP Address :34.207.247.69