ive
India Law Library (Website) is free for India Law Library Offline customers only, Please Don't Pay for this website.

User not Logged..
IP Address :44.192.52.167
Latest Cases

(101) ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) Vs. AHMEDABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 03-11-2022
Clarification of judgment - Revenue seeks a clarification of the judgment dated 19.10.2022, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority, Civil Appeal No. 21762 of 2017 - Reference to application of the law declared by this court's judgment, therefore, has to be understood in the context, which is that they apply for the assessment years in question, which were before this court and were decided; wherever the appeals were decided against the revenue
India Law Library Docid # 1602314

(102) IN RE: PERRY KANSAGRA - CONTEMNOR[SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 03-11-2022
Contempt of Court - Contemnor has deliberately and with a clear intention committed egregious acts of contempt - These acts constitute willful disobedience of the judgment, direction and order of this Court coupled with willful breach of the undertaking given by the Court which constitute civil contempt Contemnor has falsely represented before the foreign jurisdiction that Indian Courts have not sought the consent of son and that the decision of the Supreme Court of India is unenforceable - Thes
India Law Library Docid # 1602327

(103) MARINGMEI ACHAM Vs. M MARINGMEI KHURIPOU [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 03-11-2022
The impugned order is an order passed in a Civil Revision Petition. The High Court has found that in view of the fact that the suit, filed by the appellant’s late father(Maringmei Thaitoungam) who had died and as no steps had been taken to implead his legal representatives, had abated, the result of the abatement of the suit filed by the appellant’s father, it was held, was that the civil miscellaneous appeal filed under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of the Civil Procedure against an order refu
India Law Library Docid # 1602369

(104) SARADA VIDHYALAYA MATRICULATION HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL Vs. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND WATER SUPPLY DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 03-11-2022
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) states that he has misplaced the files. He requests for a photocopy of the matters so that he can clear the defects. The Registry is directed to immediately make him available photocopy of the matters so as to cure the defects.
India Law Library Docid # 1602370

(105) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Vs. DR. MAROTI S/O KASHINATH PIMPALKAR [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-11-2022
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Sections 161, 164, 173(2) and 482 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145 and 157 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 19(1) and 21 - Non-reporting of sexual assault against a minor child despite knowledge is a serious crime and more often than not, it is an attempt to shield the offenders of the crime of sexual assault
India Law Library Docid # 1602308

(106) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. KRISHAN LAL ARORA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-11-2022
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Under the provisions of Section 24(1)(a) in case the award is not made as on 1-1-2014, the date of commencement of the 2013 Act, there is no lapse of proceedings. Compensation has to be determined under the provisions of the 2013 Act - In case the award has been passed within the window period of five years excluding the period covered by
India Law Library Docid # 1602309

(107) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. BHAGWAT SINGH AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 02-11-2022
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 - Section 24(2) - Lapse of acquisition proceedings - Under the provisions of Section 24(1)(a) in case the award is not made as on 1-1-2014, the date of commencement of the 2013 Act, there is no lapse of proceedings. Compensation has to be determined under the provisions of the 2013 Act - In case the award has been passed within the window period of five years excluding the period covered by
India Law Library Docid # 1602310

(108) STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER Vs. PRAVINKUMAR R. PATEL [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
We refuse to condone the delay. Consequently, the instant Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of limitation.
India Law Library Docid # 1602345

(109) KORUKANTI KUMAR Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
The accused was found guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 376, 302 and 309 of the IPC. The conviction and sentence recorded by the Trial Court was affirmed by the High Court in appeal. The Special Leave Petition arising therefrom having been dismissed by this Court, the instant Review Petition is filed.
India Law Library Docid # 1602346

(110) D. LAXMAMMA Vs. S. HALAPPA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
There is delay of 975 days in filing the Review Petition. The explanation offered in the application seeking condonation of delay is not satisfactory at all.
India Law Library Docid # 1602347

(111) L. NARASIMHAIAH Vs. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MYSORE URBAN DIVISION [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
The Special Leave Petition was disposed of after considering rival submissions and facts on record. The grounds raised in the Review Petition do not make out any error apparent on record to justify interference.
India Law Library Docid # 1602348

(112) D. KRISHNA MOHAN Vs. HON’BLE SECRETARY, HON’BLE SUPREME COURT LEGAL SERVICE COMMITTEE AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
Application for listing Review Petition in open Court is rejected.
India Law Library Docid # 1602349

(113) RAGHUNATH BEHERA Vs. THE STATE OF ODISHA [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
These matters listed today were petitions filed before this Court from the year 2020 to 2022. As there were defects in the filing, the same files were returned to the respective Advocates- on-Record for curing the defects and for refiling. These matters have not come back to the Registry after rectification of defects inspite of reminders having been sent to the learned Counsel.
India Law Library Docid # 1602350

(114) NAVEEN Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 319 - Summoning of accused - Power under Section 319 CrPC is a discretionary and extraordinary power which should be exercised sparingly and only in those cases where the circumstances of the case so warrant and the crucial test as noticed above has to be applied is one which is more than prima facie case as exercised at the time of framing of charge, but short of satisfaction to an extent that the evidence, if goes unrebutted, would lead to convict
India Law Library Docid # 1602328

(115) M/S INTERNATIONAL MERCHANDISING COMPANY, APPELLANT LLC (EARLIER KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL MERCHANDISING CORPORATION) Vs. COMMISSIONER, SERVICE TAX, NEW DELHI [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
The appellant is engaged in providing diversified sports, entertainment and media services. It is registered with the jurisdictional service tax authorities under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 for taxable event categories such as management consultant services, event management services, business auxiliary services, business exhibition services, and TV or radio programme production services. The appellant organizes events such as the Chennai Open Tennis Tournament and Lakme Fashion Week. It
India Law Library Docid # 1602397

(116) MOHAMMED SADIQ Vs. DEEPAK MANGLANI [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 01-11-2022
Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Section 10 - Eviction - Bonafide requirement - Landlord was carrying on business and that he had children for whom he wanted to set-up a business - On the ground that son of landlord was still pursuing studies, the High Court held that the requirement of the landlord was not bona fide - There is no bar for someone who is pursuing higher studies, to start a business - High Court, for a moment did not realize that it was deali
India Law Library Docid # 1602364

(117) THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Vs. SHAILENDRA KUMAR RAI @ PANDAV RAI [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 31-10-2022
Rape - Two-finger test - While examining the victim, the Medical Board conducted what is known as the "two-finger test" to determine whether she was habituated to sexual intercourse - This Court has time and again deprecated the use of this regressive and invasive test in cases alleging rape and sexual assault - This so-called test has no scientific basis and neither proves nor disproves allegations of rape - It instead re-victimizes and re-traumatizes women who may have been sexually assaulted,
India Law Library Docid # 1602296

(118) DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Vs. PADMANABHAN KISHORE [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 31-10-2022
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 482 - Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 3 and 4 - Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 120B - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) - Money-laundering - Criminal proceedings quashed - Appeal against - Section 3 states, inter alia, that whoever knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with proceeds of crime including its conceal
India Law Library Docid # 1602297

(119) AROON PURIE Vs. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 31-10-2022
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 482 - Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 499 - Defamation complaint - Quashing of - A news item titled (Article) 'Mission Misconduct' was published in the news magazine INDIA TODAY (for the period of 23.04.2007 to 30.04.2007) stating that in a string of embarrassments for the foreign office, three Indian Officials posted in the Indian High Commission at UK had to be recalled in quick succession following serious allegations of sexual misconduct, corru
India Law Library Docid # 1602298

(120) UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. MUNSHI RAM [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] 31-10-2022
Service benefits - Railway employees - Employees working under the same employer - Railway Board working in different Zones/Divisions are required to be treated similarly and equally and are entitled to similar benefits and are entitled to the same treatment. As rightly submitted on behalf of the respondents, there cannot be any discrimination inter se. Under the circumstances, on the ground of parity, the Commission Vendors/bearers working in the Northern Railway are entitled to the same benefi
India Law Library Docid # 1602299

IP Address :44.192.52.167