India Law Library

ive

User not Logged..

India Law Library AI
Lex AI Legal Document Intelligence Assistant

Free Practice/Case Management Software

Latest Cases

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
»
Last

(81) MEENU SHARMA AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 482 — Compromise substantially acted upon — Complainant resiling from verification — Effect — Parties settled matrimonial dispute, divorce obtained by mutual consent, S. 125 CrPC petition withdrawn pursuant to compromise, but complainant repeatedly failed to appear for verification of compromise — Held, once a party has derived benefits under a compromise, he cannot resile and continue criminal proceedings merely to harass the other side; such conduct amou
India Law Library Docid # 2448112

(82) KULBHUSHAN AGGARWAL AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS[PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] 23-07-2026
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 125(a), 125(b) — Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 — Section 75 — Quashing on compromise, compensation paid — Compromise between parties verified by Magistrate as genuine, voluntary and free of coercion; compensation cheque encashed by victim, additional treatment expenses reimbursed — Held, following settled principles permitting compounding of non-compoundable offences to prevent abuse of process, continuation of proceedings a
India Law Library Docid # 2448113

(83) RAKESH THAKUR Vs. M/S DASHMESH STEEL CENTRE[UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT] 23-07-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 — Partnership firm as accused — Non-impleadment of all partners — Maintainability — Applicant, a partner in accused firm, sought quashing of cheque-dishonour complaint contending all partners were not impleaded and firm was not duly represented — Held, following Dhanasingh Prabhu v. Chandrasekar, partners being jointly and severally liable under S. 25, Indian Partnership Act, 1932, complaint impleading firm and even one partner is maintainable; non-
India Law Library Docid # 2448127

(84) GAJENDRA DAS AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 23-07-2026
Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 — Section 3 — Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 — Section 183 — Kotwar's service land — Whether convertible into Bhumiswami rights — Held, service land granted to a Kotwar for rendering services prior to abolition of proprietary rights cannot be recognized and converted into Bhumiswami rights in favour of such Kotwar or
India Law Library Docid # 2448294

(85) SAGAR SHRIVAS Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 23-07-2026
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Section 483 — Regular bail — Theft — No recovery from accused, implication based on co-accused's memorandum statement — Applicant arrested in connection with offence under Ss. 331(4), 305(a) & 3(5) BNS, no article seized from his possession, implication resting on memorandum statement of co-accused and suspicion — Applicant in custody since 16.02.2026, no criminal antecedents, trial likely to take time — Held, without commenting on merits, applicant ent
India Law Library Docid # 2448295

(86) STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Vs. JOGINDER KUMAR @ JINDI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 8 — Appeal against acquittal — Inconsistencies in prosecution evidence regarding date and time of incident and lodging of FIR — Trial court's appreciation of evidence not perverse or wholly unsustainable — Appeal dismissed.
India Law Library Docid # 2447909

(87) RASHMIKANT JYANTILAL PATEL RASHMIKANT @ R.K.PATEL JAYANTILAL GANDALAL PATEL Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of FIR — Applicant not named in FIR, implicated solely on co-accused's statement — No recovery or discovery from applicant, no evidence of aiding or abetting.
India Law Library Docid # 2447907

(88) BHARATBHAI BABUBHAI VACHHETA AND ANOTHER Vs. NAVINCHANDRA MOHANLAL SHAH AND ANOTHER[GUJARAT HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 — Quashing of FIR — Abuse of process of court — Where allegations in FIR do not prima facie constitute any offence, or disclose a cognizable offence, or are absurd and improbable, or there is a legal bar, or the proceeding is malicious, the court may quash the FIR to secure the ends of justice.
India Law Library Docid # 2447908

(89) HARSH RAJNIKANT KILACHAND Vs. AMRISH RAJNIKANT KILACHAND[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Succession Act, 1925 — Section 301 — Removal of Executor — Prolonged and unexplained failure to distribute estate — Court found that nearly ten years after probate was granted, the estate remained undistributed, which alone was sufficient ground for removal.
India Law Library Docid # 2448013

(90) THE GENERAL MANAGER, BOMBAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY AND TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING Vs. USHA INDRAJEET YADAV AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 22 — Limitation for filing cross-objection — Cross-objection filed after a significant delay of over 14 years from the date of admission of the appeal — No application for extension of time or condonation of delay filed — Cross-objection dismissed as time-barred.
India Law Library Docid # 2448014

(91) MADHUR NAINA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 — Section 18 — Bifurcation of Society — Revisional authority cannot routinely remand proceedings without detailed analysis of lower authorities' findings — Remand order must be supported by cogent reasons and a valid need for re-adjudication.
India Law Library Docid # 2448015

(92) RANJANA YOGESH JADHAV Vs. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 — Admission under RTE quota — Rejection of proposal due to non-production of father's caste certificate — Held, hyper-technical and arbitrary, infringing child's fundamental right to education.
India Law Library Docid # 2448016

(93) RAMAKRISHNAN KRISHNAN Vs. GLUHEND INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 9 — Interim Protection — Court must balance the need to preserve the effectiveness of arbitration with the impact on commercial operations, considering factors like delay, financial condition, and alleged dissipation of assets.
India Law Library Docid # 2448029

(94) TECPRO SYSTEMS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) Vs. RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 — Section 33(5) proviso — Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 21 — Liquidation proceedings — Initiation of legal proceedings by Liquidator — Prior approval of Adjudicating Authority mandatory — Notice invoking arbitration issued without prior approval is ineffective
India Law Library Docid # 2448030

(95) MEHTA IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Enemy Property Act, 1968 — Vesting of Property — The Custodian of Enemy Property cannot unilaterally declare property as enemy property and direct mutation entries without following due procedure, including issuing notice and providing an opportunity to be heard to the claimant — The amended rules of 2015 clearly outline the procedure for identification, declaration, and vesting of enemy property, which
India Law Library Docid # 2448031

(96) SUDHAKAR RAMRAO AHIRRAO Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (AURANGABAD BENCH)] 22-07-2026
Education Law — Shikshan Sevak — Discharge from service due to reduction in divisions and posts — Petitioner appointed as Shikshan Sevak and served for 26 months before discharge.
India Law Library Docid # 2448036

(97) RUSHIKESH PRAKASH JANGME Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (NAGPUR BENCH)] 22-07-2026
Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 — Section 34(2) — Reservation for disabled persons — Vacancy not filled due to non-availability of suitable candidate — Such vacancy must be carried forward to the succeeding recruitment year.
India Law Library Docid # 2448044

(98) HARPRASAD YADAV Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 — Cheating, Forgery of valuable security, Forgery for purpose of cheating, Using forged document as genuine — Appellant executed a second sale deed for land he had already sold, dishonestly inducing purchasers to pay money — Evidence, including expert opinion on thumb impressions, proved his active participation and fraudulent intent from the inception — The court
India Law Library Docid # 2448259

(99) S.K. MIHANI Vs. AJEEM UDDIN[MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Section 138 and 142 — Dishonour of cheque — Complaint filed by a company — Authorization of representative — A complaint filed by a company under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must be instituted by a person duly authorized by the company at the time of filing — A subsequent
India Law Library Docid # 2448260

(100) STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Vs. LEELAKRAM KURMI AND OTHERS[CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT] 22-07-2026
Penal Code, 1860 — Sections 342, 376 — Rape — Contradiction as to place of occurrence — Effect on credibility of prosecutrix — Victim's FIR and site map depicted place of occurrence as an open, accessible veranda, whereas her deposition stated she was taken into a closed room with a bed — Held, such material inconsistency regarding the very place of occurrence strikes at the core of the prosecution case and adversely affects
India Law Library Docid # 2448296

First
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
»
Last