ive
User not Logged..
India's Biggest Headnotes Library over 53.69 Lakhs Headnotes
    Free Artificial Intelligence Drafting  

    Free Artificial Intelligence Case Analyzer  

   AI Submission Generator   

Latest Cases

(61) SABU TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. RAJKUMAR SABU AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Trade Marks Act, 1999 — Section 28(1) and 29 — Infringement — Prior use — Registration of a trade mark is prima facie evidence of its validity, and the onus to prove invalidity lies on the challenger — While registration grants rights, these are subject to the rights of prior users under Section 34.
India Law Library Docid # 2434217

(62) STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED Vs. BRITISH MARINE PLC[DELHI HIGH COURT] 13-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34 — Setting aside of arbitral award — Challenge to appointment of arbitrators — Issue conflict doctrine — Arbitrator having previously decided a similar issue involving one of the parties does not automatically disqualify them unless it's shown they cannot approach the issue with an open mind or were partial in the earlier arbitration — Mere presence-based
India Law Library Docid # 2434218

(63) BALAJI Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (AURANGABAD BENCH)] 13-10-2025
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 376(2)(i) and 376(3) — Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Sections 4, 6, and 42 — Rape of minor — Conviction under deleted section — Error in charge framing — Charge under Section 376(2)(i) of IPC was framed despite its deletion prior to the offense and charge framing. However, the evidence on record substantiated an offense under Section
India Law Library Docid # 2434382

(64) SHRI SAGAR @ MANISH SHAILESH BELAMKAR Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS[BOMBAY HIGH COURT (CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR)] 13-10-2025
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 — Section 3 — Detention Order — Challenge to — Grounds for detention — Awareness of custody, real possibility of release on bail, and likelihood of engaging in prejudicial activities upon release are essential conditions.
India Law Library Docid # 2434384

(65) ANIRUDH DAWAR AND OTHERS Vs. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — Section 528 — Quashing of FIR — Settlement between parties — Marriage dispute — FIR registered under Sections 498A/406/377/34 IPC — Parties amicably resolved their disputes, entered into a settlement agreement, and obtained a divorce — Respondent No. 2 (complainant) confirmed settlement and had no objection to quashing the FIR — State also had no objection — Held, in view of settlement and to secure ends of justice, FIR and
India Law Library Docid # 2433775

(66) M/S AMD ESTATES AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. Vs. M/S VSR INFRATECH PVT LTD[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 9 — Interim relief — Principles for grant — Prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury — Court's role is to preserve subject matter of dispute and ensure award is not infructuous, not to
India Law Library Docid # 2433779

(67) KOMAL GARG (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS. Vs. MOHIT ARORA AND OTHERS[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e) — Eviction petition — Bona fide need of landlord — Requirement for storing business equipment/tools due to space crunch — Landlord’s need is genuine and sincere, not whimsical or fanciful.
India Law Library Docid # 2433781

(68) HARISH Vs. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER[DELHI HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sections 483, 528 (Corresponding to CrPC Sections 439, 482) — Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376AB — POCSO Act, 2012 — Sections 6, 21 — Bail Application — Grant of bail is not solely based on gravity of accusation but on necessity of continued detention — Court must consider reasonable grounds for belief of guilt, nature of accusation, severity of punishment, likelihood of absconding, and possibility of repetition of offence.
India Law Library Docid # 2433783

(69) STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. AEHSAN[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20 — Recovery of Charas — Discrepancies in witness testimonies — Place of apprehension, steps taken after apprehension, and proceedings on the spot — Material contradictions leading to doubt — Case property preparation in CIA office and not on spot — Independent witnesses not supporting prosecution — Accused falsely implicated —
India Law Library Docid # 2434032

(70) HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED Vs. HCL INFOTECH LIMITED[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Section 34(3) — Condonation of delay — Application for setting aside an arbitral award must be filed within three months from the date of receipt of the award, with an additional grace period of thirty days if sufficient cause is shown.
India Law Library Docid # 2434033

(71) STATE OF H.P. Vs. HARNAM SINGH[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sections 7 and 13(2) — Appeal against acquittal — Appellate court’s power to interfere with acquittal — High Court can interfere if acquittal is perverse, based on misreading or omission of material evidence, and no reasonable view other than guilt is possible — Double presumption of innocence favours accused in acquittal cases.
India Law Library Docid # 2434081

(72) KASHMIR CHAND SHADYAL Vs. STATE OF H.P. AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Hindu Public Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1984 — Sections 22, 23 and 17 — Writ petition seeking directions for strict compliance of the Act — Court emphasized the historical and multifaceted role of temples in Indian society, including education, social welfare, arts, and even the freedom struggle — Highlighted the constitutional mandate under Article 25 for social reform and
India Law Library Docid # 2434090

(73) EX. HAV (CLK) SURJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS[HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT] 10-10-2025
Service Law — Ex-servicemen — Appointment Procedure — Government Instructions — Nomination by Ex-servicemen Cell — Requirement for Issuing Appointment Letters within 15 Days of Nomination — Departmental Violation of Instructions — Impact on Accrued Rights of Appointment — Denial of Regular Appointment Contrary to Statutory Rules and Requisition Conditions — Arbirtrary
India Law Library Docid # 2434091

(74) CH THORU DIN (DIED) THROUGH LRS AND OTHERS Vs. THE UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 9 Rule 4 — Restoration of suit dismissed for non-prosecution — Condonation of delay — Requirements — Plaintiff must apply within 30 days with satisfactory explanation for delay and demonstrate prima facie case — Restoration is an equitable remedy requiring bona fide intentions and reasonable diligence — Delay beyond 30 days can be condoned under Article 122 of Limitation Act for sufficient cause.
India Law Library Docid # 2434103

(75) SHEIKH MOHD. ASLAM AND ANOTHER Vs. MAHESH SINGH JAMWAL[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227 — Supervisory jurisdiction of High Court — High Court's power under Article 227 is to ensure subordinate courts and tribunals exercise powers within their authority and act in accordance with law — It is a supervisory and not an appellate power — High Court should not correct all errors of judgment or re-appreciate evidence unless there is grave dereliction of duty, flagrant abuse of fundamental principles of law or justice, or a miscarriage of justice.
India Law Library Docid # 2434104

(76) SAJJAD AHMED Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — Section 19 — Providing support to terrorists — Bail application — Petitioner seeking bail after custody for over a year and charges framed — Trial court had previously rejected bail on the grounds that challan had not been produced — Subsequent filing of challan and framing of charges constitute changed circumstances — Bail granted.
India Law Library Docid # 2434105

(77) TARUN SHARMA Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J & K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 174 — Death by a stranger — Inquest proceedings — Initial stage of investigation into a suspicious death — Inquest proceedings are a preliminary inquiry to ascertain if a death occurred and if it was due to foul play, not to identify the offender at this stage.
India Law Library Docid # 2434106

(78) BARKET ALI Vs. DIVISIONAL MANAGER SFC DIVISION BHADERWAH[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226 — Writ of Mandamus — Quashing of Judgment — Petition filed seeking quashment of a judgment allowing an appeal and setting aside an award under the Payment of Wages Act.
India Law Library Docid # 2434107

(79) GHULAM HAIDER AND ANOTHER Vs. KAMLESH SINGH AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 47, Section 50 and Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 — Execution of decree — Objections by legal heirs claiming independent rights — Executing court's duty to decide such claims — The executing court is bound to adjudicate the claim of an objector even if they were not a party to the original suit or the decree was not passed against them, provided the claim relates to the execution, discharge, or satisfaction of the decree. A claim for independent rights
India Law Library Docid # 2434108

(80) ZULAFKAR ALI AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF J&K AND OTHERS[JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH HIGH COURT (JAMMU BENCH)] 10-10-2025
J&K Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immoveable Property Act, 1968 — Section 7 — Withdrawal of acquisition notice — Land must be requisitioned before acquisition proceedings can be initiated — Acquisition proceedings cannot be initiated for land not requisitioned, especially if occupation is unauthorized and no compensation is paid — This violates the constitutional right to property.
India Law Library Docid # 2434109