(561) NEVA LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHER[RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH)] 05-11-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 166 — The case involves multiple petitions related to a land dispute in Bundi, Rajasthan, where allegations of forgery, cheating, and manipulation of revenue records were made against the accused-petitioners — The primary issues include the validity of the FIR, the delay in filing the complaint, and whether the dispute is of a civil or criminal nature — The petitioners argued that the FIR is void due to an existing civil suit, the delay in
India Law Library Docid # 2419828
(564) ABDUL KHALID SAIFI @ KHALID SAIFI Vs. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI[DELHI HIGH COURT] 05-11-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 147, 148, 149, 186, 188, 332, 353, 307, 109, 120B, 34 — Arms Act, 1959 — Sections 25, 27 — The main issue is whether the charges framed against the petitioner are legally sustainable, particularly under Sections 307 and 149 — The petitioner argues that the charges are based on insufficient evidence, including lack of CCTV footage and vague witness statements — They also claim custodial torture and procedural lapses — The State defends the charges, citing witness
India Law Library Docid # 2420007
(576) KHAJA HUSSAIN Vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA[KARNATAKA HIGH COURT (KALABURAGI BENCH)] 05-11-2024
Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Sections 447, 366(A), 376 and 506 — Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(2)(v) — Trespassing, kidnapping, rape, and criminal intimidation — The victim was a minor and belonged to a Scheduled Caste — The main issues were whether the trial court's judgment of conviction and sentence should be upheld, particularly regarding the victim's age, consent, and the application of the Atrocities Act — The appellant argued that the v
India Law Library Docid # 2420516